ProtecT-2-D trial protocol: cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes and established heart and/or vascular disease at a cardio-metabolic clinic-a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of morbidity and mortality despite advancements in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. Effective diabetes management extends beyond blood glucose control and includes cardiovascular prevention and treatment. However, the conventional healthcare model often emphasizes single-disease-specific management, leading to fragmented care. We aim to establish an affordable Cardio-Metabolic Clinic (CMC) that can provide comprehensive assessment and specialized care with a focus on cardiovascular protection. METHODS: The ProtecT-2-D study is a prospective, randomized control trial at the Cardiovascular Research Unit, Odense University Hospital Svendborg, Denmark. In this study, 1500 participants with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the intervention: treatment in the CMC, or the control: standard of care. The Cardio-Metabolic Clinic applies a decision-making algorithm coded with the latest guidelines to evaluate lifestyle factors and manage medical treatment. Health examinations are conducted at baseline and after three years, and clinical events will be assessed through registry and journal audits after five and ten years. The primary outcome is the time to the first occurrence of a composite of cardiovascular deaths, non-fatal acute myocardial infarctions, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization due to heart failure at a time frame of five years. DISCUSSION: The Cardio-Metabolic Clinic represents a pioneering approach to diabetes management that aims to improve patient outcomes by reducing the cardiovascular disease burden. This study could transform diabetes care and offer a multidisciplinary, cost-effective, and specialized treatment. We need to establish the efficacy and feasibility of a CMC to integrate comparable clinics into broader healthcare systems, and potentially enhance cardiovascular health in patients with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06203860.

Effects of Vitamin K2 and D Supplementation on Coronary Artery Disease in Men: A RCT.

Background: Extent and progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) are strong predictors of myocardial infarction and mortality. Objectives: This study aims to investigate if vitamin K2 and D supplementation can reduce CAC progression. Methods: A total of 389 participants were randomized to supplementation with vitamin K2 (720 µg/day) and D (25 µg/day) vs placebo in a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint (progression of aortic valve calcification) has been reported. This study reports CAC progression in participants with no ischemic heart disease. CT scans were performed at baseline, 12, and 24 months. ΔCAC and coronary plaque volume were evaluated in the entire group and in 2 subgroups. A safety endpoint was the composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality. Results: In total, 304 participants (male, mean age 71 years) were identified. The intervention and placebo group both increased in mean CAC scores from baseline to 24-month follow-up (Δ203 vs Δ254 AU, P = 0.089). In patients with CAC scores ≥400 AU, CAC progression was lower by intervention (Δ288 vs Δ380 AU, P = 0.047). Plaque analyses showed no significant difference in progression of noncalcified plaque volume (Δ-6 vs Δ46 mm3, P = 0.172). Safety events were fewer in participants receiving supplementation (1.9% vs 6.7%, P = 0.048). Conclusions: Patients with no prior ischemic heart disease randomized to vitamin K2 and D supplementation had no significant reduction in mean CAC progression over a 2-year follow-up compared to placebo. Although the primary endpoint is neutral, differential responses to supplementation in those with CAC scores ≥400 AU and in safety endpoints are hypothesis-generating for future studies.

Insulin resistance is associated with high-risk coronary artery plaque composition in asymptomatic men between 65 and 75 years and no diabetes: A DANCAVAS cross-sectional sub-study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Insulin resistance (IR) and pre-diabetes are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to investigate vulnerable plaque composition in relation to IR and pre-diabetes in asymptomatic non-diabetic men. METHODS: All participants underwent a contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to evaluate coronary artery plaque burden and plaque composition (necrotic core, dense calcium, fibrotic and fibrous-fatty volume). Homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) was used, and participants were stratified into tertiles. Participants underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and were categorized into 2 groups (normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or pre-diabetes). A multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between vulnerable plaque composition and IR or glycemic group. RESULTS: Four-hundred-and-fifty non-diabetic men without known CAD were included. The mean age was 70 ± 3 years. Participants in the higher HOMA-IR tertile (H-IR) had higher median necrotic plaque volume compared to the lower HOMA-IR tertile (L-IR) (18.2 vs. 11.0 mm3, p = 0.02). H-IR tertile (ß 0.37 [95% CI 0.10-0.65], p = 0.008), pack-years (ß 0.07 [95% CI 0.007-0.14], p = 0.03) and total atheroma volume (TAV) (ß 0.47 [95% CI 0.36-0.57], p < 0.001) remained associated with necrotic plaque volume in the multivariable linear regression model. CONCLUSIONS: IR was associated with necrotic plaque volume in asymptomatic men without diabetes. Thus, even in asymptomatic men without diabetes, IR seems to have an incremental effect on necrotic plaque volume and vulnerable plaque composition.