RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective is to evaluate the outcome of early emergency intubation and early dialysis in formic acid (FA) poisoning and to determine the clinical features associated with its mortality. METHODS: It is a retrospective cohort study of 78 patients who presented to the emergency medicine department from July 2008 to June 2015 with alleged history and clinical features of FA poisoning. The outcome of early intubation and early dialysis was studied in terms of 7-day and 30-day mortality. The outcome was compared in severe and not severe groups separately. Severity was graded according to Med-Tu chart used for corrosive poisoning. RESULTS: In the severe group (n = 53), early dialysis was done in 15 patients. There was 53% (n = 8) 30-day mortality. In the group where early dialysis was not done there was a significant increase in mortality 92.1% (n = 35). This was statistically significant with a P = 0.003. In a similar fashion 7-day mortality was analyzed in the severe group where mortality was higher when early dialysis was not done. In not severe group early dialysis has minimally decreased the mortality. Early intubation in severe group did not demonstrate any mortality benefit. Patients who were intubated early and not intubated early had equally high mortality. In not severe group, intubation could not make any significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we observed that early dialysis in the severe group has a better outcome in terms of 7-day and 30-day mortality.
RESUMO
Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position with supine sniffing position (SSP) in patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation (RSI) using direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This single-center randomized controlled superiority trial was carried out from September 2021 to December 2022 in an academic emergency medicine department. The patients undergoing RSI in ED were grouped into two arms, namely BUHE position and SSP. The primary outcome was the time taken for endotracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes were the first-pass success rates and postintubation complications. Results: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study. Time for intubation in the BUHE group was no different from SSP (32.09 s [interquartile range (IQR): 23.30-42.68] vs. 33.40 [IQR: 27.53-45.90], P = 0.17). There was a modest reduction in intubation time when performed by trained experts (22.5 s [IQR: 17.7-25.3] versus 30.3 s [IQR: 21.3-33.2], P = 0.04). The first-attempt success rate in the BUHE position was also similar to the SSP position ([91.18% vs. 90.91%] P = 0.958). Postintubation complications were lesser in BUHE compared to the SSP group ([7.4% vs. 19.7%] P = 0.04). Conclusions: In our study, BUHE position did not improve time to intubation and first-pass success rate in ED patients compared to SSP. A modest decrease in intubation time was noted while experts used the BUHE position. The postintubation complications were slightly lesser in the BUHE group.