Pulmonary artery to aorta ratio for the detection of pulmonary hypertension: cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive hemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Previous work indicates that dilatation of the pulmonary artery (PA) itself or in relation to the ascending aorta (PA:Ao ratio) predicts pulmonary hypertension (PH). Whether these results also apply for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unknown. In the present study we evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic power of PA diameter and PA:Ao ratio on top of right ventricular (RV) size, function, and septomarginal trabeculation (SMT) thickness by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: 159 consecutive HFpEF patients were prospectively enrolled. Of these, 111 underwent CMR and invasive hemodynamic evaluation. By invasive assessment 64 % of patients suffered from moderate/severe PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥30 mmHg). Significant differences between groups with and without moderate/severe PH were observed with respect to PA diameter (30.9 ± 5.1 mm versus 26 ± 5.1 mm, p < 0.001), PA:Ao ratio (0.93 ± 0.16 versus 0.78 ± 0.14, p < 0.001), and SMT diameter (4.6 ± 1.5 mm versus 3.8 ± 1.2 mm; p = 0.008). The strongest correlation with mPAP was found for PA:Ao ratio (r = 0.421, p < 0.001). By ROC analysis the best cut-off for the detection of moderate/severe PH was found for a PA:Ao ratio of 0.83. Patients were followed for 22.0 ± 14.9 months. By Kaplan Meier analysis event-free survival was significantly worse in patients with a PA:Ao ratio ≥0.83 (log rank, p = 0.004). By multivariable Cox-regression analysis PA:Ao ratio was independently associated with event-free survival (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: PA:Ao ratio is an easily measureable noninvasive indicator for the presence and severity of PH in HFpEF, and it is related with outcome.

9-year clinical follow-up of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with Genous or TAXUS Liberté stents.

OBJECTIVES: This matched-cohort retrospective study investigated the long-term (9-year) safety and efficacy outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with Genous (n = 102) versus TAXUS Liberté (n = 101) stents in 2006-2008. BACKGROUND: In the era of off-label use of drug-eluting stents for pPCI in patients with STEMI, the use of first-generation Genous stents (endothelial progenitor cell capture stents that have a passive coating and accelerate re-endothelialization) was proposed. METHODS: The primary endpoint was 9-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, re-infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke. The secondary endpoints were the separate primary endpoint events at pre-defined time-points (in-hospital, 6 months, and yearly) and stent thrombosis. Time-dependent 9-year composite MACCE, all-cause death, and TVR were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Propensity score analysis confirmed the comparability of the groups. Patients in the Genous and TAXUS groups had 7 and 1 acute definitive stent thrombosis events, respectively (p<0.001). There was a trend towards higher in-hospital MACCE in the Genous group (10.8%) versus the TAXUS group (4.0%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 9-year MACCE was significantly worse in the Genous than in the TAXUS group. The in-hospital, 6-month, 1-year, and 9-year mortality rates were 7.8%, 8.8%, 9.8%, and 23.5% in the Genous group and 2.0%, 3.0%, 4.0%, and 16.8% in the TAXUS group. CONCLUSIONS: Higher peri-procedural, in-hospital, and short-term mortality led to worse outcomes for first-generation Genous stents versus TAXUS Liberté stents for pPCI in STEMI. TAXUS Liberté stents had more favorable 9-year clinical outcomes.

Size matters! Impact of age, sex, height, and weight on the normal heart size.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic decisions in cardiology are determined frequently by cardiac chamber size. To decide whether cardiac dimensions are still in the normal range, reliable reference values are needed. However, published reference values mostly refer to historical cohorts using motion-mode measurements and have not been adjusted for sex or age. The impact of body size was only vaguely addressed. The importance of such adjustments is illustrated by studies, which show that smaller individuals and women are at risk of delayed treatment and impaired outcome when currently used reference values are applied. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of body size, sex, and age on the normal heart size. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 622 individuals (52.7% women; 17-91 years; 143-200 cm; 32-240 kg) without cardiac disease by standard transthoracic echocardiography. Multivariable linear regression analyses of the impact of sex, age, height, and weight on cardiac chamber size were performed. By multivariable regression analysis (n=500), all 4 variables independently influenced cardiac chamber size. The validity of cardiac dimensions predicted by the regression model was tested prospectively in a validation cohort (n=122). A calculator is proposed that estimates cardiac dimensions on the basis of the regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Sex, height, weight, and age significantly affect the normal heart size. These parameters need to be considered when cutoff values indicating the need for treatment or even surgery are established.