The challenge of the definition of early symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a proposal of criteria and red flags from an international initiative promoted by the Italian Society for Rheumatology.

The aim of this study was to establish consensus for potential early symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (ESKOA) clinical definition and referral criteria from primary care to rheumatologists, based on available data from literature and a qualitative approach, in order to perform studies on patients fulfilling such criteria and to validate the obtained ESKOA definition. A complex methodological approach was followed including: (1) three focus groups (FG), including expert clinicians, researchers and patients; (2) a systematic literature review (SLR); (3) two discussion groups followed by a Delphi survey. FG and SLR were performed in parallel to inform discussion groups in order to identify relevant constructs to be included in the modified Delphi survey. ESKOA is defined in the presence of: (a) two mandatory symptoms (knee pain in the absence of any recent trauma or injury and very short joint stiffness, lasting for less than 10 min, when starting movement) even in the absence of risk factors, or (b) knee pain, and 1 or 2 risk factors or (c) three or more risk factors in the presence of at least one mandatory symptom, with symptoms lasting less than 6 months. These criteria are applicable in the absence of active inflammatory arthritis, generalized pain, Kellgren-Lawrence grade >0, any recent knee trauma or injury, and age lower than 40 years. Knee pain in the absence of any recent trauma lasting for less than 6 months was considered as the referral criterion to the rheumatologist for the suspicion of ESKOA. This consensus process has identified provisional clinical definition of ESKOA and defined potential referral criterion to rheumatologist, in order to test ESKOA obtained definition in prospective validation studies.

Persistence of weekly alendronate: a real-world study in Croatia.

Long-term treatment of osteoporosis is required for optimal efficacy, but adherence to therapy is suboptimal with daily and weekly oral bisphosphonates. The aim of this study was to assess real-world persistence (long-term adherence) with weekly alendronate. Persistence data were collected according to World Health Organization criteria for the prior month and year for 102 consecutive patients with osteoporosis at three outpatient clinics in Croatia. Persistence was assessed using medication possession ratios (MPR). Adequate persistence was defined as sufficient medication supply to ensure antifracture efficacy (MPR >or=80%). Self-reported persistence data were compared with resupply prescription data from primary care physicians (PCPs). The effect of patient age, co-therapy, co-morbidity, and time since osteoporosis was diagnosed were evaluated. A diagnosis of osteoporosis was established 3.21+/-1.83 years prior for the 96 women and six men enrolled (mean age 66.92+/-8.05 years). During the previous year, 86.3% patients reported not missing any tablets. Age correlated with the number of missed tablets, with older patients missing more tablets (p=0.038). Patients with co-therapy (p=0.042) missed more tablets. PCPs reported that 65.7% of the patients were issued prescriptions for 52 tablets. A total of 68.7% had MPR >80%. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis did not impact MPR (p=0.936). Previous fractures or number of fractures were not associated with persistence (p>0.05). In Croatia, persistence was superior with weekly-administered alendronate than has been reported elsewhere, perhaps due to socio-cultural factors. Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these results.

Coexistence of ochronosis and B 27 positive ankylosing spondylitis.

We describe a 49-year-old man with coexistence of ochronosis and B27 positive ankylosing spondylitis. This is the first report documenting the simultaneous occurrence of ochronosis and B27 positive ankylosing spondylitis, with no positive familiar history for seronegative spondylarthropathies. The relations of these rheumatic diseases are discussed.

Proximal tibial stress fracture associated with mild osteoarthritis of the knee: case report.

Stress fractures are considered as multifactorial overuse injuries occurring in 0.3%-0.8% of patients suffering from rheumatic diseases, with rheumatoid arthritis being the most common underlying condition. Stress fractures can be classified according to the condition of the bone affected as: 1) fatigue stress fractures occurring when normal bone is exposed to repeated abnormal stresses; and 2) insufficiency stress fractures that occur when normal stress is applied to bone weakened by an underlying condition. Stress fractures are rarely associated with severe forms of knee osteoarthritis, accompanied with malalignment and obesity. We present a patient with a proximal tibial stress fracture associated with mild knee osteoarthritis without associated malalignment or obesity. Stress fracture should be considered when a patient with osteoarthritis presents with sudden deterioration, severe localized tenderness to palpation and localized swelling or periosteal thickening at the pain site and elevated local temperature. The diagnosis of stress fractures in patients with rheumatic diseases may often be delayed because plain film radiographs may not reveal a stress fracture soon after the symptom onset; moreover, evidence of a fracture may never appear on plain radiographs. Triple phase nuclear bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging are more sensitive in the early clinical course than plain films for initial diagnosis.