Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 33(4): 872-879, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37689103

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current methods available for assessment of radiolucency and in-between fin (IBF) growth of a glenoid component have not undergone interobserver reliability testing for an all-polyethylene fluted central peg (FCP) glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anteroposterior radiographs of an FCP glenoid component at ≥48 months comparing commonly used scales to a new method adapted to the FCP. Our hypothesis was that the new method would result in acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement and a more accurate description of radiographic findings. METHODS: We reviewed ≥48-month follow-up radiographs of patients treated with a primary aTSA using an FCP glenoid. Eighty-three patients were included in the review. Radiographs were evaluated by 5 reviewers using novel IBF radiodensity and radiolucency assessments and the Wirth and Lazarus methods. To assess intraobserver reliability, a subset of 40 images was reviewed. Kappa statistics were calculated to determine intra- and interobserver reliability; correlations were assessed using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (κ score) was as follows: IBF 0.71, radiolucency 0.68, Wirth 0.48, and Lazarus 0.22. Intraobserver agreement ranges were as follows: IBF radiodensity 0.36-0.67, radiolucency 0.55-0.62, Wirth 0.11-0.73, and Lazarus 0.04-0.46. Correlation analysis revealed the following: IBF to Wirth r = 0.93, radiolucency to Lazarus r = 0.92 (P value <.001 for all). CONCLUSION: This study introduces a radiographic assessment method developed specifically for an FCP glenoid component. Results show high interobserver and acceptable intraobserver reliability for the method presented in this study. The new scales provide a more accurate description of radiographic findings, helping to identify glenoid components that may be at risk for loosening.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Ombro , Artroplastia de Substituição , Cavidade Glenoide , Prótese Articular , Articulação do Ombro , Humanos , Polietileno , Articulação do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Artroplastia de Substituição/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Desenho de Prótese , Cavidade Glenoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Cavidade Glenoide/cirurgia
2.
JBJS Case Connect ; 8(4): e92, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30489376

RESUMO

CASE: A 49-year-old right-hand-dominant man sustained an auger-related injury that resulted in open dislocation at the left wrist and palm, with complete amputation of the distal aspect of the forearm and the hand. The injury at the elbow included instability with an ulnar coronoid fracture, posterior dislocation of the ulna, and posterolateral dislocation of the radius. To restore stability of the forearm stump and elbow, we performed a complete resection of the radius, open reduction and internal fixation of the coronoid tip, a repair of the lateral collateral ligament, and transfer of the distal biceps tendon to the coronoid. CONCLUSION: The procedure stabilized the elbow, allowing for early mobilization. The patient was eventually fitted with a prosthesis that allowed him to return to full-time manual labor in a rural setting.


Assuntos
Amputação Traumática/complicações , Traumatismos do Braço/cirurgia , Artroplastia/métodos , Lesões no Cotovelo , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA