Bimekizumab versus Adalimumab in Plaque Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F. The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab as compared with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been extensively examined. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous bimekizumab at a dose of 320 mg every 4 weeks for 56 weeks; bimekizumab at a dose of 320 mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks, then every 8 weeks for weeks 16 to 56; or subcutaneous adalimumab at a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, followed by bimekizumab at a dose of 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 56. The primary end points were a 90% or greater reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 90 response; PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating worse disease) and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1, signifying clear or almost clear skin (scores range from 0 [clear skin] to 4 [severe disease]), at week 16. The analysis of the primary end points tested noninferiority at a margin of -10 percentage points and then tested for superiority. RESULTS: A total of 614 patients were screened, and 478 were enrolled; 158 patients were assigned to receive bimekizumab every 4 weeks, 161 to receive bimekizumab every 4 weeks and then every 8 weeks, and 159 to receive adalimumab. The mean age of the patients was 44.9 years; the mean PASI score at baseline was 19.8. At week 16, a total of 275 of 319 patients (86.2%) who received bimekizumab (both dose groups combined) and 75 of 159 (47.2%) who received adalimumab had a PASI 90 response (adjusted risk difference, 39.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30.9 to 47.7; P<0.001 for noninferiority and superiority). A total of 272 of 319 patients (85.3%) who received bimekizumab and 91 of 159 (57.2%) who received adalimumab had an IGA score of 0 or 1 (adjusted risk difference, 28.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 19.7 to 36.7; P<0.001 for noninferiority and superiority). The most common adverse events with bimekizumab were upper respiratory tract infections, oral candidiasis (predominantly mild or moderate as recorded by the investigator), hypertension, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: In this 56-week trial, bimekizumab was noninferior and superior to adalimumab through 16 weeks in reducing symptoms and signs of plaque psoriasis but was associated with a higher frequency of oral candidiasis and diarrhea. Longer and larger trials are required to determine the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab as compared with other agents in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. (Funded by UCB Pharma; BE SURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03412747.).

Phase 3 Trials of Tapinarof Cream for Plaque Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Tapinarof cream is a topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor-modulating agent under investigation for the treatment of psoriasis. Tapinarof modulates the expression of interleukin-17 and the skin-barrier proteins filaggrin and loricrin. METHODS: We conducted two identical phase 3 randomized trials of tapinarof in patients with mild-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Adults with a baseline Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score of 2 (mild) to 4 (severe) (on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe psoriasis) and a percent of total body-surface area affected of 3 to 20% were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to use tapinarof 1% cream or vehicle cream once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point, PGA response, was a PGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points at week 12. Secondary efficacy end points at week 12 were a reduction of at least 75% in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, a PGA score of 0 or 1, the mean change from baseline in the percent of body-surface area affected, and a reduction of at least 90% in the PASI score. Patient-reported outcomes were the mean changes from baseline to week 12 in the proportion of patients who had a decrease of at least 4 points in the Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score (range, 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst imaginable itch]), the PP-NRS total score, the Dermatology Life Quality Index total score, and the Psoriasis Symptom Diary score. RESULTS: In trials 1 and 2, a total of 692 and 674 patients, respectively, were screened, with 510 and 515 patients being enrolled. A PGA response occurred in 35.4% of the patients in the tapinarof group and in 6.0% of those in the vehicle group in trial 1 and in 40.2% and 6.3%, respectively, in trial 2 (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Results for secondary end points and patient-reported outcomes were generally in the same direction as those for the primary end point. Adverse events with tapinarof cream included folliculitis, nasopharyngitis, contact dermatitis, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, and pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: Tapinarof 1% cream once daily was superior to vehicle control in reducing the severity of plaque psoriasis over a period of 12 weeks but was associated with local adverse events and headache. Larger and longer trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tapinarof cream as compared with existing treatments for psoriasis. (Funded by Dermavant Sciences; PSOARING 1 and 2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03956355 and NCT03983980, respectively.).

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3b study.

BACKGROUND: Scalp psoriasis is common and difficult to treat. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of scalp psoriasis. METHODS: In this Phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study (NCT03897088), patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis affecting the scalp (Investigator Global Assessment modified [IGA mod] 2011 [scalp] ≥3, Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index [PSSI] ≥12, ≥30% scalp surface area affected) received tildrakizumab 100 mg or PBO at W0 and W4. The primary endpoint was IGA mod 2011 (scalp) score of "clear" or "almost clear" with ≥2-point reduction from baseline at W16 (IGA mod 2011 [scalp] response). Key secondary endpoints were PSSI 90 response at W12 and W16 and IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W12. Safety was assessed from adverse events. RESULTS: Of patients treated with tildrakizumab (n = 89) vs PBO (n = 82), 49.4% vs 7.3% achieved IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W16 (primary endpoint) and 46.1% vs 4.9% at W12; 60.7% vs 4.9% achieved PSSI 90 response at W16 and 48.3% vs 2.4% at W12 (all P < .00001). No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred. LIMITATIONS: Only short-term data are presented. CONCLUSION: Tildrakizumab was efficacious for the treatment of scalp psoriasis with no new safety signals.

Comparison of risankizumab and apremilast for the treatment of adults with moderate plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic therapy: results from a randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded phase IV study (IMMpulse).

BACKGROUND: Treatment of psoriasis with risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy to other treatments, such as adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy and safety of risankizumab and apremilast in adults with moderate plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic therapy. It also evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching to risankizumab vs. continuing apremilast in patients who did not achieve ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75 nonresponders) after 16 weeks of treatment with apremilast. METHODS: This 52-week, phase IV, multicentre, randomized, open-label, efficacy assessor-blinded study (NCT04908475) enrolled patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of moderate chronic plaque psoriasis (≥ 6 months) and who were candidates for systemic therapy. The enrolled patients (randomized 1 : 2) received subcutaneous risankizumab (150 mg at weeks 0 and 4) or oral apremilast (30 mg twice daily). At week 16, all patients treated with apremilast were re-randomized (1 : 1) to risankizumab or apremilast, stratified by week-16 PASI 75 response. The co-primary outcomes in period A at week 16 were the achievement of ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1 with a two-grade or better improvement from baseline. At week 52, the primary endpoint in period B was the achievement of PASI 90 in PASI 75 nonresponders with apremilast at week 16. Safety was monitored throughout the study. All patients who received one dose of treatment were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, 118 and 234 patients were assigned to receive risankizumab and apremilast, respectively. At week 16, PASI 90 was achieved by 55.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.0-64.9] and 5.1% (95% CI 2.3-8.0), and sPGA 0/1 by 75.4% (95% CI 67.7-83.2) and 18.4% (95% CI 13.4-23.3), respectively. In period B, among PASI 75 nonresponders with apremilast at week 16, 83 switched to risankizumab and 78 continued apremilast. At week 52, 72.3% (95% CI 62.7-81.9) who switched to risankizumab achieved PASI 90 vs. 2.6% (95% CI 0.0-6.1) who continued apremilast. The most frequent adverse events (reported in ≥ 5%) in risankizumab-treated patients were COVID-19 infection and nasopharyngitis. Diarrhoea, nausea and headache were most frequent among apremilast-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with moderate psoriasis, treatment with risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy to those treated with apremilast, including those who did not benefit from prior treatment with apremilast. The safety profile of risankizumab was similar to prior studies, and no new safety signals were identified. These results show that, compared with apremilast, risankizumab treatment can significantly improve clinical outcomes in systemic-eligible patients with moderate psoriasis.

Tapinarof cream 1% once daily for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: Patient-reported outcomes from the PSOARING 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tapinarof cream 1% once daily demonstrated significant efficacy versus vehicle and was well tolerated in two 12-week, phase 3 pivotal trials in adults with mild-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term, health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction with tapinarof. METHODS: Patients completing the 12-week trials were eligible for 40 weeks of open-label tapinarof based on Physician Global Assessment score in PSOARING 3, with a 4-week follow-up. Dermatology Life Quality Index was assessed at every visit; Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire responses were assessed at week 40 or early termination. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-three (91.6%) eligible patients enrolled; 78.5% completed the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. DLQI scores improved and were maintained. By week 40, 68.0% of patients had a DLQI of 0 or 1, indicating no impact of psoriasis on health-related quality of life. Most patients strongly agreed or agreed with all Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire questions assessing confidence in tapinarof and satisfaction with efficacy (62.9%-85.8%), application ease and cosmetic elegance (79.9%-96.3%), and preference for tapinarof versus prior psoriasis therapies (55.3%-81.7%). LIMITATIONS: Open-label; no control; may not be generalizable to all forms of psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: Continued and durable improvements in health-related quality of life, high rates of patient satisfaction, and positive perceptions of tapinarof cream were demonstrated.

Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 Program fOr Evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor psoriasis second trial.

BACKGROUND: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, inhibits cytokine signaling in psoriasis pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate deucravacitinib superiority versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis based on ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline at week 16. METHODS: POETYK psoriasis second trial (NCT03611751), a 52-week, double-blinded, phase 3 trial, randomized patients 2:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg every day (n = 511), placebo (n = 255), or apremilast 30 mg twice a day (n = 254). RESULTS: At week 16, significantly more deucravacitinib-treated patients versus placebo and apremilast patients achieved ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (53.0% vs 9.4% and 39.8%; P < .0001 vs placebo; P = .0004 vs apremilast) and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (49.5% vs 8.6% and 33.9%; P < .0001 for both). Efficacy was maintained until week 52 with continuous deucravacitinib. The most frequent adverse event with deucravacitinib was nasopharyngitis. Serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events were infrequent. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in laboratory parameters. LIMITATIONS: The study duration was 1 year. CONCLUSION: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superiority versus placebo and apremilast and was well tolerated in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Tildrakizumab in Combination With Topical Halcinonide 0.1% Ointment for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, open-label study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab plus topical halcinonide ointment in psoriasis patients. METHODS: Adults (age greater than or equal to 18 years) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (body surface area [BSA] greater than or equal to 10%, physician's global assessment [PGA] greater than or equal to 3, psoriasis area severity index [PASI] greater than or equal to 12) received tildrakizumab (100 mg; s.c.) at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Patients with BSA >3% at week 16 received additional halcinonide 0.1% twice daily for 4 weeks (week 20) and were followed for another 4 weeks (week 24); those with BSA less than or equal to 3% were followed to week 24. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled (mean age 52.6 years; 68% male). The proportion of all patients achieving BSA less than or equal to 3% was 52.2% at week 16, 73.7% at week 20 (after 4 weeks of adjunctive halcinonide in patients with BSA >3% at week 16), and 84.2% at week 24 (4 weeks after halcinonide discontinuation). PASI 75 was attained in 60.9% of all patients at week 16, and 73.7% at weeks 20 and 24. In patients adding halcinonide, improvements from baseline in mean BSA, PGA, and PGA x BSA increased from week 16 (55%, 29%, and 64%, respectively) to week 20 (78%, 51%, and 88%, respectively), and were maintained through week 24. Quality of life improved with tildrakizumab monotherapy and further with adjunctive halcinonide. Adverse events (AEs) were infrequent. No serious AEs or discontinuations due to AEs were noted. CONCLUSION: Tildrakizumab plus topical halcinonide ointment is safe and effective in controlling psoriasis for patients inadequately responding to tildrakizumab monotherapy.Bagel J, Novak K, Nelson E. Tildrakizumab in combination with topical halcinonide 0.1% ointment for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(8):766-772. doi:10.36849/JDD.6830.

Secukinumab dosing every 2 weeks demonstrated superior efficacy compared with dosing every 4 weeks in patients with psoriasis weighing 90 kg or more: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a common comorbidity of psoriasis and can attenuate response to biologic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) vs. secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients with a higher bodyweight. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 331 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis weighing ≥ 90 kg were randomized to receive secukinumab 300 mg Q2W or secukinumab 300 mg Q4W. Patients who did not achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at week 16 on the Q4W regimen were reallocated to remain on the Q4W regimen or uptitrate to Q2W. RESULTS: At week 16, Q2W dosing (n = 165) led to significantly higher PASI 90 responses vs. Q4W [n = 166; 73.2% vs. 55.5%, one-sided P-value = 0.0003, odds ratio estimate (95% confidence intervals): 2.3 (1.4-3.8)]. At week 52, higher efficacy responses were maintained in the Q2W arm (n = 165) vs. Q4W (n = 83); PASI 75: 88.9% vs. 74.8%; PASI 90: 76.4% vs. 52.4%; PASI 100: 46.7% vs. 27.3%; Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1: 75.9% vs. 55.6% and Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1: 66.1% vs. 48.8%. PASI 90 nonresponders at week 16 who uptitrated to Q2W (n = 31) showed higher efficacy responses at week 32 (16 weeks post-uptitration, PASI 90: 38.7% vs. 16.5%) vs. those who remained on Q4W (n = 40). Safety results were comparable across treatment arms and consistent with the established secukinumab safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab 300 mg Q2W demonstrated superior and sustained efficacy compared with Q4W in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis weighing ≥ 90 kg. PASI 90 nonresponders derived additional benefits from uptitration to a Q2W regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504852). What is already known about this topic? Obesity is a common comorbidity of psoriasis and can attenuate response to biologic treatment. Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin-17A in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Subgroup analyses of previous study results and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling data suggest that heavier patients may benefit from higher exposure to secukinumab through an increased dosing frequency [300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) vs. every 4 weeks (Q4W)]. What does this study add? Over 52 weeks, secukinumab 300 mg Q2W demonstrated superior efficacy compared with secukinumab 300 mg Q4W in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis weighing ≥90 kg, with comparable safety results, consistent with the established secukinumab safety profile. In patients who did not achieve PASI 90 at week 16 on the Q4W regimen, uptitration to the Q2W regimen at week 16 resulted in improved efficacy responses through week 52 after switching.

Adjunctive Use of Calcipotriene 0.005%/Betamethasone Dipropionate 0.064% Foam in Patients With Psoriasis Treated With Ixekizumab.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive treatment with calcipotriene 0.005%/betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% (Cal/BD) foam in adult patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who have localized residual plaques after ≥24 weeks of treatment with ixekizumab biologic therapy. METHODS: This study was a prospective, open-label, single-arm study of adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis who had suboptimal response after ≥24 weeks of treatment with ixekizumab (residual 3–8% body surface area [BSA] involvement). All patients continued treatment with ixekizumab and received once-daily Cal/BD foam for 4 weeks, followed by every other day for weeks 8 to 12. The primary endpoint was treat-to-target BSA ≤1% at week 4. Additional endpoints included the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) score, PGA×BSA, and the patient-reported Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Safety evaluations included assessments of adverse events (AEs) and local skin reactions. RESULTS: Among 25 enrolled patients, 36% were female, and the mean age was 50 years. After 4 weeks of daily Cal/BD foam, 56% of patients achieved the treat-to-target goal of ≤1% BSA. Mean % BSA involvement, mean PGA score, and composite PGA×BSA score decreased 4 weeks after the addition of Cal/BD foam. Improvements in disease severity outcomes were maintained after reducing Cal/BD dosing frequency. Cal/BD was generally safe and well-tolerated, with no serious AEs reported. CONCLUSION: In real-world clinical practice, for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had residual plaques following ≥24 weeks of ixekizumab monotherapy, adjunctive treatment with Cal/BD foam was associated with notable and sustained improvements in disease control. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(3): 235-240. doi:10.36849/JDD.6396.

Bimekizumab Self-Injection Devices: Two Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Studies on Self-Administration by Patients With Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A. OBJECTIVES: To assess patients' ability to self-inject bimekizumab subcutaneously using a 1 mL safety syringe or auto-injector. METHODS: DV0002 and DV0006 were sub-studies of BE BRIGHT, a multicenter, phase 3 open-label extension study. Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received bimekizumab 320 mg (2x160 mg injections) every 4 or 8 weeks and were randomized 1:1 to the safety syringe or the auto-injector. The ability of patients to safely and effectively self-inject bimekizumab was assessed at 8 weeks (primary endpoint) and immediately after self-injection training at Baseline (secondary endpoint). Patient experience was evaluated using the pain visual analog scale (VAS; 0–100 mm; 100 being worst pain), and the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ; 0–10; 10 being most positive experience). RESULTS: All evaluable patients in DV0002 (n=125) and DV0006 (n=86) safely and effectively self-injected bimekizumab at Week 8. All evaluable patients in DV0002 who used the safety syringe (n=64) and 97.1% (n=66/68) who used the auto-injector, as well as all evaluable DV0006 patients (n=88) also self-injected bimekizumab safely and effectively at Baseline. Median VAS scores were low (range: 7.0–20.0), and median pre-injection and post-injection SIAQ scores were high (range: 5.8–10.0 and 7.1–10.0, respectively) across both devices, sub-studies, and timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices provide a safe and effective option for patients to self-administer bimekizumab. Furthermore, patients reported a positive self-injection experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03766685 J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(2):162-171. doi:10.36849/JDD.6274THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

Effect of Roflumilast Cream vs Vehicle Cream on Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: The DERMIS-1 and DERMIS-2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: Once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.3%, a potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in a phase 2b trial of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of roflumilast cream, 0.3%, applied once daily for 8 weeks in 2 trials of patients with plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trials (DERMIS-1 [trial 1; n = 439] and DERMIS-2 [trial 2; n = 442]) were conducted at 40 centers (trial 1) and 39 centers (trial 2) in the US and Canada between December 9, 2019, and November 16, 2020, and between December 9, 2019, and November 23, 2020, respectively. Patients aged 2 years or older with plaque psoriasis involving 2% to 20% of body surface area were enrolled. The dates of final follow-up were November 20, 2020, and November 23, 2020, for trial 1 and trial 2, respectively. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive roflumilast cream, 0.3% (trial 1: n = 286; trial 2: n = 290), or vehicle cream (trial 1: n = 153; trial 2: n = 152) once daily for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success (clear or almost clear status plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline [score range, 0-4]) at week 8, analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by site, baseline IGA score, and intertriginous involvement. There were 9 secondary outcomes, including intertriginous IGA success, 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale score of 4 or higher at baseline achieving 4-point reduction (WI-NRS success) at week 8 (scale: 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst imaginable itch]; minimum clinically important difference, 4 points). Results: Among 881 participants (mean age, 47.5 years; 320 [36.3%] female), mean IGA scores in trial 1 were 2.9 [SD, 0.52] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.45] for vehicle and in trial 2 were 2.9 [SD, 0.48] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.47]) for vehicle. Statistically significantly greater percentages of roflumilast-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients had IGA success at week 8 (trial 1: 42.4% vs 6.1%; difference, 39.6% [95% CI, 32.3%-46.9%]; trial 2: 37.5% vs 6.9%; difference, 28.9% [95% CI, 20.8%-36.9%]; P < .001 for both). Of 9 secondary end points, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast vs vehicle were observed for 8 in trial 1 and 9 in trial 2, including intertriginous IGA success (71.2% vs 13.8%; difference, 66.5% [95% CI, 47.1%-85.8%] and 68.1% vs 18.5%; difference, 51.6% [95% CI, 29.3%-73.8%]; P < .001 for both), 75% reduction in PASI score (41.6% vs 7.6%; difference, 36.1% [95% CI, 28.5%-43.8%] and 39.0% vs 5.3%; difference, 32.4% [95% CI, 24.9%-39.8%]; P < .001 for both), WI-NRS success (67.5% vs 26.8%; difference, 42.6% [95% CI, 31.3%-53.8%] and 69.4% vs 35.6%; difference, 30.2% [95% CI, 18.2%-42.2%]; P < .001 for both). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 25.2% with roflumilast vs 23.5% with vehicle in trial 1 and 25.9% with roflumilast vs 18.4% with vehicle in trial 2. The incidence of serious adverse events was 0.7% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 1 and 0% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 2. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, treatment with roflumilast cream, 0.3%, compared with vehicle cream resulted in better clinical status at 8 weeks. Further research is needed to assess efficacy compared with other active treatments and to assess longer-term efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04211363, NCT04211389.

Tralokinumab does not impact vaccine-induced immune responses: Results from a 30-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Interleukin (IL) 13 is a type 2 cytokine that is key to the inflammation underlying AD. Tralokinumab is a first-in-class, fully human, monoclonal antibody that specifically binds with high affinity to IL-13, neutralizing it in AD. Immunomodulatory treatments may impair vaccine-induced immune responses. OBJECTIVE: Assess the immune responses to standard vaccines in adults with moderate-to-severe AD who are undergoing treatment with tralokinumab. METHODS: ECZema TRAlokinumab Trial No. 5 (ECZTRA 5; NCT03562377) was a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial taking place over 30 weeks. Eligible adults were randomized 1:1, with 107 patients receiving tralokinumab 300 mg and 108 patients receiving a placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks. All patients received Tdap (tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis) and meningococcal vaccines at week 12. The primary end points were positive antitetanus and antimeningococcal responses between weeks 12 and 16 (noninferiority margin, -25%; responder, >3-fold increase in IgG). RESULTS: The noninferiority of tralokinumab versus placebo for immune response to Tdap (91.9% vs 96.1%) and meningococcal (86.0% vs 84.2%) vaccines was demonstrated at week 16. During treatment, the rates of adverse events were lower for tralokinumab than for the placebo, with most events being mild or moderate. LIMITATIONS: Responses to other vaccines (including influenza) were not examined. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tralokinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks did not affect immune responses to Tdap and meningococcal vaccines. Treatment was well tolerated when administered concomitantly with the vaccines and demonstrated a safety profile comparable to phase 3 trials.

A Retrospective Review of Patients' Response to Biologic Therapy for Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Biologic treatments have taken the forefront in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Although numerous randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents, there is limited data suggesting that clinical trial outcomes are reproducible in real-world patients. OBJECTIVE: Obtain real-world evidence for the use of biologics that target different segments of the immune system in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 100 patients who initiated biologic therapy and had a follow-up visit within a 4- to 12-month period. Efficacy assessments included body surface area (BSA), Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) scores, composite BSA×PGA scores, and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) Treat to Target (TTT) goal of ≤1% BSA. RESULTS: Biologic treatment led to notable reductions in BSA, PGA, and BSA×PGA relative to baseline, with the majority (67.0%) of the population achieving NPF TTT goals at follow-up. Disease improvements were observed in all patients, regardless of baseline body weight, prior experience with biologics, or the specific immune target of the prescribed biologic. CONCLUSION: Long-term biologic therapy demonstrated effectiveness in treating patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 20(4):442-449. doi:10.36849/JDD.2021.5823Visit the Psoriasis Resource Center for more.

Serious Gastrointestinal-Related Adverse Events Among Psoriasis Patients Treated With Guselkumab in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2.

BACKGROUND: Anti-interleukin (IL)-17 biologic agents used to treat psoriasis are associated with onset/exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of IBD or serious gastrointestinal-related adverse events (GI SAEs) in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab, an IL-23p19 inhibitor that indirectly inhibits IL-17, through 4 years in the phase 3 VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials. METHODS: Patients were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg every-8-weeks or placebo→guselkumab (week 16), or adalimumab. In VOYAGE 1, all patients received open-label guselkumab starting at week 52. In VOYAGE 2, eligible patients were treated with guselkumab or placebo based on clinical response starting at week 28 and received open-label guselkumab starting at week 76. Cumulative incidence rates of IBD and other GI SAEs were calculated as events per 100 patient-years (PY) through week 204. IBD was defined as AEs of Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. Data were summarized for all guselkumab-treated patients for years 1-4. RESULTS: Of 1721 guselkumab-treated patients, 1612 were exposed for ≥1 year, 1545 for ≥2 years, 1454 for ≥3 years, and 661 for ≥4 years. For all patients through week 204, the cumulative rate of GI SAEs was 0.45/100PY. Event rates remained stable with longer duration of exposure, ranging from 0.36 to 0.57/100PY. No new or exacerbated cases of IBD were reported. CONCLUSIONS: No cases of IBD were observed and rates of GI SAEs were low through 4 years of treatment with guselkumab in two large trials of patients with psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(8):855-860. doi:10.36849/JDD.6216 THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

Immunogenicity and skin clearance recapture in clinical studies of brodalumab.

BACKGROUND: Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) may change pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic profiles of biologic therapies, potentially decreasing efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential effects of brodalumab immunogenicity on safety, efficacy, and retreatment. METHODS: Data from 1 phase 2 and 3 phase 3 studies of brodalumab in psoriasis were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 2.7% of patients had positive test results for binding ADAs after receiving brodalumab; ADAs were transient in 1.4% of patients, and there were no neutralizing ADAs. Among ADA-positive patients, 60.0% (3/5) achieved a static physician's global assessment score of 0 or 1 at week 12 in the group receiving the brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks, compared with 79.1% (1131/1429) of ADA-negative patients. All patients (100%) who experienced return of disease and were retreated with brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks (none were ADA positive) achieved at least a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area And Severity Index, ≥90% of whom regained response by week 8 of retreatment. Hypersensitivity reactions were less frequent with brodalumab than with placebo. Injection site reactions occurred in 1.8% of patients treated with brodalumab versus 2% of patients treated with ustekinumab. LIMITATIONS: Retreatment could be assessed in only 1 phase 3 brodalumab study. CONCLUSION: Brodalumab compares favorably with other biologics in terms of immunogenicity and high rates of efficacy recapture upon retreatment.

Serlopitant for psoriatic pruritus: A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus, a common symptom of psoriasis, negatively affects quality of life; however, treatment of lesional skin does not consistently alleviate psoriatic itch. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of serlopitant, an oral, once-daily neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist, for treatment of psoriatic pruritus in a phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NCT03343639). METHODS: Patients (n = 204) were randomized to receive serlopitant, 5 mg, or placebo daily for 8 weeks. Eligible adult patients had plaque psoriasis for ≥6 months, plaques covering ≤10% of body surface area, pruritus for ≥4 weeks, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score ≥7 at the initial screening. RESULTS: Participants (54.2% women) had a mean age of 47.5 years and 85.2% were white. Mean baseline WI-NRS scores were 8.3 for serlopitant and 8.1 for placebo. The WI-NRS 4-point response rate at 8 weeks (primary end point) was 33.3% for serlopitant vs 21.1% for placebo (P = .028); at 4 weeks the rates were 20.8% for serlopitant vs 11.5% for placebo (P = .039). Treatment-related adverse events were reported for 4.9% of serlopitant-treated and 4.0% of placebo-treated patients. LIMITATIONS: This was a phase 2 study with a small study population. Patients with severe psoriasis were excluded. CONCLUSION: Serlopitant significantly reduced pruritus associated with mild to moderate psoriasis, supporting continued development of serlopitant for this patient population.

Apremilast with Add-On Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: About 20% of patients taking apremilast alone obtain PASI 75 by week 8. This single-center, pilot study aimed to determine whether add-on topical therapy with calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate (C/BD) could improve responses of partial apremilast responders by week 12. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years of age) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (baseline PGA ≥3, BSA affected ≥10%, PASI ≥12) took oral apremilast (30 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks. Patients who achieved between PASI 25–74 at week 8 used add-on, daily topical C/BD (.005%/.064%) foam up to week 12; those with <PASI 25 at week 8 were discontinued. RESULTS: Of 50 patients enrolled, 26 achieved PASI 25−74 and 8 PASI 75 at week 8. At week 12, 29 achieved PASI 75, and 24 at week 16. Of the week-8 partial responders, 21/26 achieved PASI 75 at week 12 on combination therapy and 15 maintained PASI 75 through week 16 on apremilast alone (4 did not maintain; 2 lost to follow up). In partial responders, mean PGA and BSA affected improved by 30% and 33% on apremilast, respectively, and by 67% and 86% at week 12 on the combination therapy, respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs; >5% occurrence) were headache (14%), diarrhea (10%), and nausea (8%); majority were mild. No related serious AEs occurred. CONCLUSION: We show that most week-8 partial apremilast responders can achieve PASI 75 at week 12 with combination C/BD topical therapy, and maintain PASI 75 through week 16 with apremilast monotherapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5435.

Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes With Etanercept in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Patients After Therapy With Apremilast.

Background: Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis can have symptoms resulting in significant impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The effect of etanercept (ETN) in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients who previously received apremilast (APR) was studied, including impact on PRO endpoints. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 4 estimation study, patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who did not have adequate response to APR in the opinion of the investigator received ETN 50mg subcutaneous (SC) twice weekly for 12 weeks, followed by ETN 50mg SC once weekly for an additional 12 weeks. Analysis was conducted for PROs directly and by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) achievement thresholds. Results: Of the 80 patients enrolled, the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI; total and individual items) had substantial improvement at weeks 12 and 24. Improvement in PSI total score (percent; mean [SD]) in patients who achieved PASI 50, -75, and -90 at week 12 was 57% (30), 67% (24), and 83% (18), respectively and at week 24 was 56% (40), 68% (29), and 80% (25). DLQI responders by PASI 50, -75, and 90 achievements were 69%, 68%, and 90%, respectively, at week 12 and 68%, 77%, and 82% at week 24. The percent of patients reported being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with treatment at week 12 was 79%, 81%, and 100%, respectively, and at week 24 was 77%, 86%, and 88%. Conclusion: Patient-reported symptoms are important outcomes to consider in psoriasis management. ETN provided benefits in patients who did not have adequate response with APR, with improvements seen in both psoriasis symptoms and patient impact. Clinical Trial Number: NCT02749370 J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(4):378-383. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4910.

Phase 3 Studies Comparing Brodalumab with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Early clinical studies suggested that the anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody brodalumab has efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: In two phase 3 studies (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3), patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive brodalumab (210 mg or 140 mg every 2 weeks), ustekinumab (45 mg for patients with a body weight ≤100 kg and 90 mg for patients >100 kg), or placebo. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab were randomly assigned again to receive a brodalumab maintenance dose of 210 mg every 2 weeks or 140 mg every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks, or every 8 weeks; patients receiving ustekinumab continued to receive ustekinumab every 12 weeks, and patients receiving placebo received 210 mg of brodalumab every 2 weeks. The primary aims were to evaluate the superiority of brodalumab over placebo at week 12 with respect to at least a 75% reduction in the psoriasis area-and-severity index score (PASI 75) and a static physician's global assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin), as well as the superiority of brodalumab over ustekinumab at week 12 with respect to a 100% reduction in PASI score (PASI 100). RESULTS: At week 12, the PASI 75 response rates were higher with brodalumab at the 210-mg and 140-mg doses than with placebo (86% and 67%, respectively, vs. 8% [AMAGINE-2] and 85% and 69%, respectively, vs. 6% [AMAGINE-3]; P<0.001); the rates of sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were also higher with brodalumab (P<0.001). The week 12 PASI 100 response rates were significantly higher with 210 mg of brodalumab than with ustekinumab (44% vs. 22% [AMAGINE-2] and 37% vs. 19% [AMAGINE-3], P<0.001). The PASI 100 response rates with 140 mg of brodalumab were 26% in AMAGINE-2 (P=0.08 for the comparison with ustekinumab) and 27% in AMAGINE-3 (P=0.007). Rates of neutropenia were higher with brodalumab and with ustekinumab than with placebo. Mild or moderate candida infections were more frequent with brodalumab than with ustekinumab or placebo. Through week 52, the rates of serious infectious episodes were 1.0 (AMAGINE-2) and 1.3 (AMAGINE-3) per 100 patient-years of exposure to brodalumab. CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab treatment resulted in significant clinical improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. (Funded by Amgen; AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01708603 and NCT01708629.).