Resident Training and the Assessment of Orthopaedic Surgical Skills.

Medical knowledge and technical skills are foundations of surgical competency. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) and the Resident Review Committee for Orthopaedic Surgery recently mandated simulation training to improve surgical skills, listing 17 surgical skills modules to improve residents' technical skills. However, there is no established tool to measure the effectiveness of these modules. The Global Index for Technical Skills (GRITS) tool has been previously validated for evaluating general surgery residents. The aim of this study was to determine whether the GRITS tool is valid, practical, and reliable in evaluating the skills of orthopaedic residents in a simulation setting, whether the outcomes correlate to performance in the operating room, and to what extent these simulation modules are valued by residents. METHODS: Simulation performance was assessed longitudinally on 5 residents using the GRITS assessment through postgraduate years (PGY) 1 to 5 (n = 25 evaluations) in a simulated volar forearm approach using cadaveric specimens. An additional 20 PGY-1 residents were evaluated cross-sectionally in this same time frame. Written, open-ended feedback on the simulation experience was sought and analyzed via a thematic analysis. For correlative data, evaluations (n = 65 evaluations) of a variety of authentic surgical procedures were compiled on PGY-2 through PGY-5 orthopaedic residents and compared with the simulated experiences. RESULTS: GRITS scores were averaged for each group of residents, and validity and reliability were assessed using R-software. PGY-1 residents' mean GRITS evaluation score (expressed as a value from 1 to 5) was 3.4. Longitudinally, this mean score increased over the PGY years 2-5 to 4.4, 4.7, 4.9, and 4.8, respectively. Of the parameters measured by GRITS, the lowest average scores were "flow of operation" and "time and motion" across all levels, although these did improve over PGY years 2 to 5. Findings were consistent between simulation and "real-world" procedures. Open-ended responses evaluating the module were positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the GRITS tool shows promise as an effective and reliable method for assessing orthopaedic resident's technical skills based on an ABOS module system.

Optimal Prosthesis Sizing for Radial Head Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Evidence and Guidelines.

¼: Radial head arthroplasty is a viable surgical option when a radial head fracture cannot be reconstructed. Radial head arthroplasty provides a load-bearing articular structure against the capitellum in unstable fractured elbows. ¼: Studies have emphasized the importance of choosing the correct implant size to replicate the native radial head anatomy, citing various consequences of improperly sized radial head prostheses. Overstuffing of the radiocapitellar joint, or lengthening of the radius, has been extensively studied because of its detrimental effects on elbow biomechanics, but other types of improper sizing also have negative consequences. ¼: In the setting of severe fracture-dislocation or revision surgery, anatomic landmarks that are useful for prosthesis sizing often are missing. Various methods have been described to provide guidance for the accurate sizing of a prosthetic radial head; a retrieved radial head, the proximal edge of the lesser sigmoid notch, the radiocapitellar synovial fold, and the ulnohumeral joint space all represent useful references. ¼: Intraoperative radiographic examination is an important step while assessing implant size, including the height of the prosthetic radial head. ¼: Since no single method is perfect on its own, the surgeon should combine as many reference measures as possible, both before and during the procedure, for accurate prosthesis sizing in order to achieve successful outcomes.