The Treatment of Burkitt Lymphoma With the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Protocol With Rituximab and Consolidative Autologous Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive treatment approaches are required for adult patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL), although an univocal standard of care still does not exist. The use of frontline autologous stem cells transplantation (ASCT) is debated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2020, 50 patients with BL were treated with the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM). Treatment plan consisted of 3 blocks, A (ifosfamide, vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, and cytarabine), B (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and doxorubicin), and C (vindesine, methotrexate, etoposide, and cytarabine), each repeated twice, every 28 days. Rituximab was given at day 1 each block. Intrathecal prophylaxis was given once per each block. ASCT was scheduled at the end of the 6 blocks after conditioning. RESULTS: Median age at onset was 38 years (range 16-72); stages III-IV disease was observed in 82% of cases; bulky disease occurred in 44% of the patients, with B-symptoms in 38%. Stem cell harvest was performed in 72% of patients, who all received a subsequent ASCT. The full 6 blocks treatment was completed in 70% of the patients. The overall response rate was 74%, with a complete response rate of 60%. Ten-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 83.7% and 76.0%, respectively, without reaching the median. Ten-year disease-free survival was 80.3%. Grades 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and mucositis were seen in 96%, 60%, 32%, and 24% of patients. Infections occurred in 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: Intensive treatment according to BFM protocol, with rituximab and ASCT, appears feasible, safe, and highly effective in adult patients with BL, as confirmed by long-term survival rates reflecting response maintenance.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma characteristics and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in two tertiary centers - an Israeli/ Italian study.

The COVID-19 pandemic posed a major challenge in cancer care worldwide which might have an impact on the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a retrospective study comparing characteristics, management, and outcomes of DLBCL patients diagnosed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (1/3/2020-28/2/2021) to those diagnosed in the previous year (1/3/2019-28/2/2020) in two tertiary centers in Italy and Israel. 182 patients were diagnosed with DLBCL during the study period. More patients were diagnosed during the pandemic compared to the year before: 60 vs. 29 and 54 vs. 39 in Italy and in Israel, respectively. Trends towards older age and higher transformation rates were shown during the pandemic. The interval between the initiation of symptoms and diagnosis was longer during the pandemic. Five and four patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during treatment in Italy and in Israel, respectively. there was no difference in dose density and intensity of treatment, before and during the pandemic. The median follow-up during and before the pandemic was 15.2 and 25.5 months, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was slightly shorter during the pandemic compared to the year before (64.9% vs. 70.6%; p = 0.0499). In multivariate analysis, older age and transformed disease were independently related to PFS, while diagnosis of DLBCL during the pandemic was not. Despite the challenges caused by COVID-19 pandemic, the management of DLBCL patients remained unchanged including dose density and intensity. Nevertheless, a shorter PFS during the outbreak might be attributed to differences in patients' characteristics.

Genomic Profiling of Primary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System Suggests Novel Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the primary central nervous system (CNS-DLBCL) is an aggressive disease, with dismal prognosis despite the use of high-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy. Our study aimed to expand the biologic profiles of CNS-DLBCL and to correlate them with clinical/imaging findings to gain diagnostic insight and possibly identify new therapeutic targets. We selected 61 CNS-DLBCL whose formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were available at first diagnosis. These were investigated by immunohistochemistry, cMYC rearrangements were explored by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and CNS-DLBCL mutated genes were evaluated by next-generation sequencing. CD10, BCL6, and IRF4 were observed in 16%, 83.6%, and 93% of cases, respectively. As typical of CNS lymphoma, 10 (16.4%) of 61 cases were classified as germinal center (GCB) type and 51 (83.6%) of 61 as non-germinal center (non-GCB) type according to the Hans algorithm. Double-expression status for BCL2 and cMYC was detected in 36 (59%) of 61 cases whereas 25 (41%) of 61 were non-DE. Rearrangement of the cMYC gene was detected in 2 cases, associated with BCL6 translocation only in 1 case MYD88, PIM1, CD79B, and TP53 were mutated in 54.5%, 53.5%, 30.2%, and 18.4% cases, respectively. Novel mutations not previously reported in CNS-DLBCL were found: AIP in 23.1%, PI3KCA in 15%, NOTCH1 in 11.4%, GNAS in 8.1%, CASP8 in 7.9%, EGFR in 6.4%, PTEN in 5.1, and KRAS in 2.6% of cases. Survival was significantly longer for patients with mutated MYD88 (8.7 months vs 1.7 months; log-rank test = 5.43; P = .020) and for patients with mutated CD79B (10.8 months vs 2.5 months; log-rank test = 4.64; P = .031). MYD88 and CD79B predicted a longer survival in patients affected by CNS-DLBCL. Notably, we identified novel mutations that enrich the mutational landscape of CNS-DLBCL, suggest a role of PTEN-PI3K-AKT and receptor tyrosine kinase-RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in a subset of CNS-DLBCL, and provide new potential therapeutic targets.

Successful Bridging to Allogeneic Transplantation With Valemetostat in Two Refractory/relapsed Peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients.

We report the case of 2 patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with valemetostat tosylate, a selective dual inhibitor of histone-lysine N-methyltransferases enhancer of zest homolog 1 and 2, and subsequently bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Valemetostat led to a quick response and was well tolerated, offering a promising bridge therapy to transplantation for patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, which is still an unmet medical need.

Prolonged responses to brentuximab vedotin as last therapy in Hodgkin lymphoma failing autologous transplantation: A case series.

The follow-up of the pivotal trial and large case series reports of a proportion of patients, between 5% and 9%, with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma failing autologous stem cell transplantation and treated with brentuximab vedotin, achieving and maintaining long lasting complete responses with no further treatment. Very long-term data on the outcomes of such patients are indeed underreported. Our institutional experience with patients meeting these characteristics and in continuous complete response for more than 5 years after brentuximab vedotin was reviewed. Five patients achieved a median duration of complete response of 7.4 (range 5.1-8.1) years, and none of them encountered disease relapse or received any subsequent consolidation, including allogeneic transplantation. A proportion of patients failing autologous transplantation and receiving subsequent brentuximab vedotin may reach a long-lasting complete response with no need of further treatment. These patients are therefore considered cured. The role of allogeneic transplantation in such patients is matter of debate.

The safety profile of FLT3 inhibitors in the treatment of newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: FLT3 inhibitors are important drugs in the therapy of FLT3 positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Midostaurin was registered in combination with chemotherapy to treat newly diagnosed AML. Gilteritinib and quizartinib demonstrate effectiveness in a randomized trial in relapsed/refractory AML. Several promising FLT3 inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical research. AREAS COVERED: This review will report the safety of FLT3 inhibitors that are registered for acute myeloid leukemia induction and rescue therapy. EXPERT OPINION: In the near future, it is possible that all the FLT3 positive non M3-AML patients will receive a FLT3 inhibitor. Therapy adherence and strategies to mitigate adverse events must be pursued. The treatment with FLT3 inhibitors may be optimized in terms of toxicities with a rational evaluation of antifungal prophylaxis and concomitant therapy, cardiology monitoring, and keeping in mind rare adverse events. Future studies on unfit patients, special populations, and maintenance settings are warranted, together with post-market studies and real-life experiences. Whenever new FLT3 inhibitors will come to the clinic, we could face a scenario in which profound knowledge of effectiveness, toxicities, and off-target effects will be relevant to choose the best drug for each patient.