Peripheral-to-central ratio of Guttae: validity and reliability of an objective method to characterize severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

PURPOSE: Common methods of measuring severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) are limited in objectivity, reliability, or start with a variable baseline that prevents distinguishing healthy from affected eyes. The aim of this study was to describe a method of grading FECD that overcomes these limitations. METHODS: Fifteen patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy were included in the study. Guttae were imaged with a slit lamp beam 8 mm tall; the bottom 4 mm half of each image was divided into two equally-sized sections. Guttae were counted by four independent graders blinded to disease severity scores. The peripheral:central guttae ratio was compared to modified Krachmer clinical severity scores. The peripheral:central guttae ratio was compared between mild (severity 0.5-3) versus moderate-to-severe (severity 4-5) disease. Receiver operating characteristics defined optimal ratio cutoffs for mild versus moderate-to-severe disease. RESULTS: Increased peripheral guttae and peripheral:central guttae ratio correlated with Krachmer severity (p = 0.021 and p = 0.009, respectively). The difference between mild and moderate-to-severe cases for the peripheral:central guttae ratio was significant (p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability of total guttae count was high (coefficient = 0.82, p < 0.001). A peripheral:central guttae ratio of 0.16 was the ideal cut-off point (area under the curve = 0.79, sensitivity = 0.78, and specificity = 0.80). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, the peripheral:central ratio of guttae correlates with subjective clinical severity of Fuchs dystrophy. It starts at a common baseline, has good inter-rater reliability, does not require dilation, and can be conducted with a smartphone and slit-lamp.

Outcomes of a Modified Trabeculectomy Closure Technique.

PRECIS: A modified closure for trabeculectomy in which the conjunctiva is incised posterior to the limbus and reapproximated using 2 nylon sutures, provided similar surgical outcomes to the standard trabeculectomy closure technique. PURPOSE: To examine the surgical outcomes of a modified trabeculectomy closure technique in which the conjunctiva is incised posterior to the limbus and reapproximated using 2 sutures, burying the posterior conjunctiva under an anterior lip of conjunctiva. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 73 eyes that underwent trabeculectomies between 2015 and 2017 at Johns Hopkins Hospital by a single surgeon. We analyzed traditional closures used from January 2015 to May 2016, and modified closures used from July 2016 to March 2017. The main outcome measures were a reduction in intraocular pressure at 3, 6, and 12 months, reduction in the number of medications at 12 months, and total number of postoperative complications. RESULTS: There was no difference in reduction of intraocular pressure at 3 months (9.9±8.2 vs. 10.5±8.7 mm Hg), 6 months (10.8±9.6 vs. 10.6±8.3 mm Hg), or 12 months (12.2±8.9 vs. 10.0±9.3 mm Hg) in the standard (n=44) and modified groups (n=29), respectively. There was a similar reduction in the use of glaucoma medications in the standard group (1.2±1.5 vs. 1.0±1.1) compared with the modified group and no difference in the number of postoperative complications (25.0% vs. 17.2%, respectively) (P>0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The modified closure provided similar results to the standard closure for trabeculectomy. Further studies are needed to determine whether the 2 techniques differ in surgical outcomes over a longer follow-up or other surgical parameters (eg, ease, surgical time, learning curve).