Assessment of core and lower limb muscles for static/dynamic balance in the older people: An ultrasonographic study.

BACKGROUND: sufficient research has not been conducted to determine the role of core and lower limb muscles in providing balance in older people. OBJECTIVE: to investigate the relationships between the thickness of core/lower limb muscles and static/dynamic balance in older people. METHODS: the study included a total of 68 older people (≥ 65 years) and 68 gender-matched young subjects, aged 20-40 years. Balance, knee proprioception sense, regional and total muscle measurements and grip strength were assessed using a force platform system, isokinetic dynamometer, ultrasound imaging, bioelectrical impedance analysis and Jamar dynamometer, respectively. RESULTS: all the static (postural sway) parameters were higher and all the dynamic (limits of stability) parameters were lower in the older adults compared to the young adults (all P<0.05). The diaphragm was thicker and all the other muscles (except for multifidus and tibialis anterior) were thinner in the older group (all P<0.05). A higher error of knee proprioception sense was determined at 45 and 70 degrees in the older subjects (both P<0.001). According to the multivariate analyses, significant predictors for balance were age, gender, height, and rectus femoris, vastus intermedius and diaphragm muscle thicknesses in the older group, and age, gender, height, grip strength, and rectus abdominis, internal oblique, longissimus, tibialis anterior and soleus muscle thicknesses in the young group (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: the thickness of core/lower limb muscles are important determinants of balance in both older and young adults. These findings could provide a strong rationale for strengthening specific (abdominal and quadriceps) muscles to prevent falls and regional sarcopenia, and to improve posture/balance in the older population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03791047. ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL: Hacettepe University Non-interventional Clinical Research Ethics Board. Decision number:GO 18/506-39.

STAR-Sonographic Thigh Adjustment Ratio: A Golden Formula for the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore an individualized sonographic muscle thickness ratio and its cutoff values in the diagnosis of sarcopenia. DESIGN: A total of 326 community-dwelling adults were included in this cross-sectional study. Total skeletal muscle mass was evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and nine-site muscle thickness measurements using ultrasound. Isometric handgrip and knee extension strengths were assessed. Physical performance was evaluated by usual Gait Speed, Chair Stand Test, and Timed Up and Go Test. RESULTS: Because the anterior thigh muscle thickness was the most significantly decreasing measurement with aging and the most significantly related value with body mass and height; sonographic thigh adjustment ratio was calculated by dividing it with body mass index. Using the two standard deviation values of our healthy young adults, sonographic thigh adjustment ratio cutoff values were found as 1.4 and 1.0 for male and female subjects, respectively. Sonographic thigh adjustment ratio values were negatively correlated with Chair Stand Test and Timed Up and Go Test in both sexes (all P < 0.05) and positively correlated with gait speed in female subjects and knee extension strength in male subjects (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that regional (rather than total) muscle mass measurements should be taken into consideration for the diagnosis of sarcopenia.

Functional results in periacetabular osteotomy: is it possible to obtain a normal gait after the surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Gait analysis is one of the poorly understood dimensions of the functional results obtained after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) due to dysplasia of the hip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spatiotemporal parameters as well as coronal and sagittal plane kinematics and moments were compared among three demographically similar groups of subjects: (i) 23 patients with excellent results according to the Harris Hip Score (HHS) (mean 6.6 years of follow-up); (ii) 12 patients with good and fair results according to the HHS (mean 9.3 years of follow-up); and (iii) 35 asymptomatic controls. RESULTS: 50% of the analysed sagittal plane kinematic parameters were significantly better (p<0.05) in the control group not only for the hip joint but also for the ipsilateral knee and ipsilateral ankle. A vast majority of the other evaluated gait parameters resulted similar among the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, most of the gait parameters after PAO are close to those observed in control subjects; however, the obtained pattern cannot be classified as a completely normal gait. The excellence in terms of functional results seems not to be determined by the achievement of this theoretical goal.

Effects of severity of osteoarthritis on the temporospatial gait parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in temporospatial parameters in according to severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: The study included a total of 110 subjects with no orthopedic or neurologic disease that might affect gait were divided into three study and one control groups. Eighty subjects (mean age: 53.13 ± 6.78 years) were diagnosed with bilateral knee OA and divided into groups according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiologic scale: the Phase 1 group included 29 subjects, Phase 2, 28 subjects, and Phase 3, 23 subjects. The control group was composed of 30 healthy subjects (25 females, 5 males; mean age: 41.50 ± 5.79 years). Temporospatial gait data were evaluated using a gait analysis system. METHODS: There were no significant differences in all temporospatial parameters between the control group and the Phase 1 and 2 OA groups (p>0.05). There was a significant decrease in cadence, gait velocity, stride length and step length (p<0.008) and a significant increase in stride time, double support time, step time, single support time and stance phase length in patients with Phase 3 knee OA compared to the other groups (p<0.008). CONCLUSION: Changes in temporospatial parameters of patients with Phase 3 knee OA may be correlated with loss of gait stabilization and increase in risk of falling. In subjects with knee OA, gait stabilization and balance loss must be examined and evaluated in terms of risk of falling and necessary precautions must be taken.