Root resorption of maxillary incisors retracted with and without skeletal anchorage.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to compare root resorption degree of the maxillary central incisors retracted with and without skeletal anchorage. METHODS: This nonrandomized historical control study included 37 patients requiring maximum anterior retraction and treated with extraction of 2 maxillary premolars. Group 1 consisted of 22 patients (11 male, 11 female) in whom anterior retraction was performed without skeletal anchorage, and group 2 included 15 patients (3 male, 12 female) treated with skeletally anchored anterior retraction. Periapical radiographs were used to evaluate root resorption degree by a scoring system. The groups were compared regarding the resorption score and resorption degree distribution with the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Z test on proportions. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant intergroup difference regarding root resorption, but the number of patients with severe and extreme root resorption degrees was significantly greater in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Although the root resorption degree of the skeletal anchorage group was not significantly different from the group without skeletal anchorage, the number of patients with severe to extreme resorption in the first group was significantly greater. Therefore, careful clinical monitoring of skeletally anchored anterior retraction is needed, especially when there are known root resorption predisposing factors.

Efficiency of Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we compared the efficiency of Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with symmetric and asymmetric extractions. METHODS: A sample of 71 patients with complete Class II subdivision malocclusion was selected: group 1 consisted of 40 patients treated with 4 premolar extractions with an initial mean age of 13.37 years, and group 2 had 31 patients treated with 3 premolar extractions (2 maxillary premolars and 1 mandibular premolar on the Class I side) with an initial mean age of 14.44 years. To compare the efficiency of each treatment protocol, the initial and final occlusal results were evaluated on dental casts with the Peer Assessment Rating occlusal index, and time spent in treatment was calculated from the clinical charts. The amounts of initial and final midline deviation and improvement of midline deviation correction were also evaluated. Efficiency was calculated as the rate between occlusal improvement by the treatment time. The groups were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: The results showed that group 2 had a significantly smaller final amount of midline deviation and a greater correction of midline deviation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment efficiency of type 1 Class II subdivision malocclusions with 3 or 4 premolar extractions is similar. However, treatment with 3 premolar extractions provides a better occlusal success rate.

Complications of misdiagnosis of maxillary canine ectopic eruption.

Ectopic eruption of maxillary canines can be associated with root resorption of adjacent teeth. This case report describes and discusses an interesting case of a 15-year-old girl with a Class III malocclusion and an impacted maxillary canine. Because of the unfavorable position of the ectopic canine and the severe root resorption of the maxillary left central and lateral incisors, the treatment options included extraction of the maxillary permanent canines. The mandibular first premolars were extracted to compensate for the Class III malocclusion. A panoramic radiograph taken earlier in the mixed dentition already indicated a possible eruption disturbance of the maxillary left permanent canine. The importance of early diagnosis of maxillary canine ectopic eruption is highlighted in this case report. The early identification of radiographic signs of an ectopic pathway of eruption should be followed by deciduous canine extraction to prevent canine retention and maxillary incisor root resorption.

Validity and reliability of a trigonometry-based method for the measurement of tooth movement on digital models.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the present study were to develop a method for longitudinally measuring tooth rotation, inclination and angulation on digital models, and to test the method validity and reliability. METHODS: The initial and final planned models of 14 patients treated with Invisalign® (386 teeth) were exported from ClinCheck®. The rotation, inclination and angulation values were assessed for the incisors, canines, premolars and molars, in both models, using trigonometry. An application was developed in Python 2.7 to automate the measurements. The ∆planned (variation in the position between the initial and final planned models) was obtained for each tooth and each type of movement. To test the validity, the degree of agreement between the ∆planned and the values available in the Invisalign® Table of Movements was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. For intra and inter-rater reliabilities, the ∆planned was obtained again. RESULTS: Excellent ICCs (> 0.9) and limits of agreement with narrow and clinically acceptable discrepancies were obtained for the rotation of all teeth (except maxillary canines, which had broader limits: -3.47 - 5.43) and for the inclination of premolars and molars. The inclination of anterior teeth and angulation of all teeth had ICCs and limits that were not indicative of great agreement. The reliability was high for the three movements (discrepancy <2°). CONCLUSIONS: The method developed is reliable and suitable for longitudinally measuring inclination (posterior teeth) and rotation (except maxillary canines). It has limited value for the other movements measurements.

Validity and reliability of a trigonometry-based method for the measurement of tooth movement on digital models

ABSTRACT Objective: The objectives of the present study were to develop a method for longitudinally measuring tooth rotation, inclination and angulation on digital models, and to test the method validity and reliability. Methods: The initial and final planned models of 14 patients treated with Invisalign® (386 teeth) were exported from ClinCheck®. The rotation, inclination and angulation values were assessed for the incisors, canines, premolars and molars, in both models, using trigonometry. An application was developed in Python 2.7 to automate the measurements. The ∆planned (variation in the position between the initial and final planned models) was obtained for each tooth and each type of movement. To test the validity, the degree of agreement between the ∆planned and the values available in the Invisalign® Table of Movements was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. For intra and inter-rater reliabilities, the ∆planned was obtained again. Results: Excellent ICCs (> 0.9) and limits of agreement with narrow and clinically acceptable discrepancies were obtained for the rotation of all teeth (except maxillary canines, which had broader limits: -3.47 - 5.43) and for the inclination of premolars and molars. The inclination of anterior teeth and angulation of all teeth had ICCs and limits that were not indicative of great agreement. The reliability was high for the three movements (discrepancy <2°). Conclusions: The method developed is reliable and suitable for longitudinally measuring inclination (posterior teeth) and rotation (except maxillary canines). It has limited value for the other movements measurements.

RESUMO Objetivo: Os objetivos do presente estudo foram desenvolver um método para medir longitudinalmente a rotação, inclinação e angulação dentárias em modelos digitais, e testar sua validade e reprodutibilidade. Material e Métodos: Os modelos inicial e final planejado de 14 pacientes tratados com Invisalign® (386 dentes) foram exportados do ClinCheck®. Os valores de rotação, inclinação e angulação foram calculados para incisivos, caninos, pré-molares e molares, em ambos os modelos, por meio de trigonometria. Um aplicativo desenvolvido em Python 2.7 foi utilizado para automatização das medidas. O ∆planejado (variação na posição entre os modelos inicial e final planejado) foi obtido para os movimentos descritos, nos diferentes grupos de dentes. A validade do método foi verificada pelo grau de concordância entre o ∆planejado e os valores disponíveis na Tabela de Movimentos do Invisalign®, utilizando-se o Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse (ICC) e a análise de Bland-Altman. O ∆planejado foi novamente calculado para análise da reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminadores. Resultados: Excelentes ICCs (> 0,9) e limites de concordância com discrepâncias reduzidas e clinicamente aceitáveis foram obtidos para a rotação de todos os dentes (exceto os caninos superiores, que expressaram limites mais amplos: -3,47 - 5,43) e para a inclinação de pré-molares e molares. A inclinação dos dentes anteriores e a angulação de todos os dentes apresentaram ICCs e limites não representativos de boa concordância. A reprodutibilidade foi alta para os três movimentos (discrepância < 2°). Conclusões: O método desenvolvido é reprodutível e se mostrou adequado para mensuração longitudinal da inclinação de dentes posteriores e rotação de todos os dentes, exceto caninos superiores. Apresenta valor limitado para as demais mensurações.

Orthodontic movement of a maxillary incisor through the midpalatal suture: a case report.

Orthodontic space closure is a treatment alternative when a maxillary central incisor is missing. The objective of this report was to present an unusual treatment in which a right maxillary central incisor was moved through the midpalatal suture to replace the absent contralateral tooth. The biologic aspects and clinical appearance of the recontoured lateral and central incisors were analyzed. The position of the examined teeth and the appearance of the surrounding soft tissues were satisfactory; however, the upper midline frenulum deviated to the left. The incisor was successfully moved with no obvious detrimental effects as observed on the final radiographs. In the radiographic and tomographic examinations, the midline suture seemed to have followed the tooth movement. The patient expressed satisfaction with the results. It was concluded that orthodontic movement of the central incisor to replace a missing contralateral tooth is a valid treatment option, and the achievement of an esthetic result requires an interdisciplinary approach, including restorative dentistry and periodontics.