Fluid Balance in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Prescribing, Delivering, and Review.

BACKGROUND: Historically IV and enteral fluids given during acute kidney injury (AKI) were restricted before the introduction of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) when more liberal fluids improved nutrition for the critically ill. However, fluid accumulation can occur when higher volumes each day are not considered in the fluid balance prescribing and the NET ultrafiltration (NUF) volume target. KEY MESSAGES: The delivered hours of CRRT each day are vital for achievement of fluid balance and time off therapy makes the task more challenging. Clinicians inexperienced with CRRT make this aspect of AKI management a focus of rounding with senior oversight, clear communication, and "precision" a clinical target. Sepsis-associated AKI can be a complex patient where resuscitation and admission days are with a positive fluid load and replacement mind set. Subsequent days in ICU requires fluid regulation, removal, with a comprehensive multilayered assessment before prescribing the daily fluid balance target and the required hourly NET plasma water removal rate (NUF rate). Future machines may include advanced software, new alarms - display metrics, messages and association with machine learning and "AKI models" for setting, monitoring, and guaranteeing fluid removal. This could also link to current hardware such as on-line blood volume assessment with continuous haematocrit measurement. SUMMARY: Fluid balance in the acutely ill is a challenge where forecasting and prediction are necessary. NUF rate and volume each hour should be tracked and adjusted to achieve the daily target. This requires human and machine connections.

Vancomycin and Gentamicin Removal with the HA380 Cartridge during Experimental Hemoadsorption.

INTRODUCTION: Hemoadsorption has emerged as an adjunctive therapy for sepsis, but its impact on antibiotic levels remains poorly defined. We conducted an in vivo experimental study to investigate the removal of vancomycin and gentamicin during hemoadsorption using the HA380 cartridge, a novel styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer cartridge. METHODS: Six surgically prepared sheep were administered 2 g of vancomycin and 400 mg of gentamicin over 30 min, followed by a continuous infusion of vancomycin (20 mg/h). Hemoadsorption was implemented with a styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer HA380 cartridge at a blood flow of 120 mL/min. The removal ratio, sorbent-based clearance, and the mass removal rate were calculated for each time point. RESULTS: The mean 10-min vancomycin removal ratio exceeded 90% and declined to 68.0% at 30 min; 52.8% at 60 min, and 28.0% by 4 h. Due to constant plasma flow, clearance varied proportionally with the removal ratio. Over 4 hours, the total mass removal was 556 mg (SD 106.3). For gentamicin, the mean 10-min removal ratio was 96.9% and the final ratio at 4 h remained 53.0%, with clearances changing proportionately. The total mass removal of gentamicin was 138 mg (SD 26.6) over 4 h. The sorbent-based clearance of vancomycin was significantly lower than that of gentamicin (Pgroup < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The novel HA380 sorbent cartridge appears safe and achieves significant vancomycin and gentamicin removal over a four-hour period. This information can be used by clinicians to guide their prescription and consider the additional dosing of at least an extra 25-35% amount in patients receiving HA380 hemoadsorption therapy during sepsis.