A study of erosive phenotypes in lupus arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging and anti-citrullinated protein antibody, anti-RA33 and RF autoantibody status.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate the extent of MRI-determined joint disease (erosion and synovitis) in SLE and to link this to autoantibody profiles known to be relevant to SLE, including ACPA, RF and anti-RA33 antibodies. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the hand and wrist was performed in 34 symptomatic SLE patients and in 15 RA patients with similar disease duration. Images were scored by two observers using the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI scoring (RAMRIS) system. Findings were correlated with clinical examination and autoantibody status. RESULTS: Erosions were present at the wrist in 93% of SLE patients and at the MCP joints in 61% of SLE patients. Despite the high prevalence of MRI-determined erosion, only 8.8% of SLE patients were ACPA positive, although these patients had a higher burden of erosive disease. There was no positive correlation with anti-RA33 titres and erosion scores in the SLE patients, but there was a negative correlation with anti-RA33 titres and total bone oedema scores in the SLE patients. Ninety-three per cent of SLE patients had at least grade 1 synovitis at one or more MCP joints, and wrist joint synovitis was present in all the SLE patients. CONCLUSION: An MRI-determined joint erosive phenotype is common in SLE, even in ACPA-negative cases. The conventional radiographic observation that anti-RA33 is not positively associated with erosion in patients with RA was also found to be the case in SLE patients.

Steroid injection for inferior heel pain: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain. The aim of this study was twofold: to compare steroid injection with placebo injection and to compare ultrasound guided with unguided steroid injection in the management of this condition. METHODS: 65 patients with inferior heel pain were recruited between November 2008 and June 2011. Heel pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and follow-up 6 and 12 weeks after injection. RESULTS: 22 patients were randomised to ultrasound guided steroid injection, 21 patients to palpation guided steroid injection and 22 to ultrasound guided placebo injection. There was a significant difference in VAS scores between the groups at 6 and 12 weeks (p=0.018 and p=0.004, respectively). There was a 19.7 (95% CI 2.5 to 37.0) difference in mean VAS scores at 6 weeks between the ultrasound guided steroid group and the placebo group and a 24.0 (95% CI 6.6 to 41.3) difference between the unguided steroid group and the placebo group at 6 weeks. At 12 weeks, the mean difference was 25.1 (95% CI 6.5 to 43.6) and 28.4 (95% CI 11.1 to 45.7) respectively between both steroid injection groups and the placebo group. There was no difference in VAS scores following steroid injection between the ultrasound guided and the unguided groups at either time point. Plantar fascia thickness was significantly reduced after injection in both active treatment groups (p=0.00). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, steroid injection showed a clear benefit over placebo at 6 weeks and this difference was maintained at 12 weeks. Trial Registration No ISRCTN79628180 (www.controlled-trials.com).

Lupus arthritis--do we have a clinically useful classification?

Joint disease in SLE is common and has a significant impact on patients in terms of their burden of disease and quality of life. Despite this it remains largely understudied in comparison with the other inflammatory arthropathies. Newer imaging techniques are challenging the traditional concepts of a non-erosive arthropathy that is outlined in the ACR diagnostic criteria for SLE. MRI and musculoskeletal US techniques have been applied extensively in RA to detail the underlying joint pathology, to monitor response to treatment and to guide prognosis. The advent of biological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of RA and has again been borne out of an abundance of research that exists surrounding the underlying pathobiological inflammatory pathways. Unfortunately, no such unified body of evidence exists for lupus arthritis, which has made the development of an appropriate classification system somewhat difficult as our understanding remains incomplete.