Repeat Gamma Knife radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis: a single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as an effective treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, the outcomes of repeat GKRS for patients with TN and MS with recurrent pain have been investigated in a few patients. This study aims to report the outcomes and predictive factors of pain reduction for MS patients undergoing repeat GKRS for recurrent TN. METHODS: Eighteen patients with MS underwent repeat GKRS for recurrent TN. A retrospective chart review and telephone interviews were conducted to determine background medical history, dosimetric data, and outcomes of the procedure. Facial pain and sensory function were evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scales. RESULTS: Fifteen patients achieved a BNI pain score of IIIa or better, indicating pain reduction, within a median period of 21 days after repeat GKRS. The maximum dose for repeat GKRS ranged from 70 to 85 Gy. Pain recurred in 5 patients after a median period of 12 months after GKRS. Percentages of patients with pain reduction at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 years were 60%, 60%, 50%, 50%, and 50%, respectively. Older age at repeat GKRS predicted sustained pain reduction (P = 0.01). Seven patients developed facial sensory disturbances, which were bothersome in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat GKRS may be used as an effective treatment modality for prolonging the duration of pain reduction time in patients with MS and TN. After repeat GKRS, facial sensory disturbances are common; however, they are often not bothersome.

Supramaximal resection: retrospective study on IDH-wildtype Glioblastomas based on the new RANO-Resect classification.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the extent of resection in the management of Glioblastoma is a long-debated topic, recently widened by the 2022 RANO-Resect Classification, which advocates for the resection of the non-enhancing disease surrounding the main core of tumors (supramaximal resection, SUPR) to achieve additional survival benefits. We conducted a retrospective analysis to corroborate the role of SUPR by the RANO-Resect Classification in a single center, homogenous cohort of patients. METHODS: Records of patients operated for WHO-2021 Glioblastomas at our institution between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed; volumetric data of resected lesions were computed and classified by RANO-Resect criteria. Survival and correlation analyses were conducted excluding patients below near-total resection. RESULTS: 117 patients met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 45 near-total resections (NTR), 31 complete resections (CR), and 41 SUPR. Median progression-free and overall survival were 11 and 15 months for NTR, 13 and 17 months or CR, 20 and 24 months for SUPR, respectively (p < 0.001), with inverse correlation observed between survival and FLAIR residual volume (r -0.28). SUPR was not significantly associated with larger preoperative volumes or higher rates of postoperative deficits, although it was less associated with preoperative neurological deficits (OR 3.37, p = 0.003). The impact of SUPR on OS varied between MGMT unmethylated (HR 0.606, p = 0.044) and methylated (HR 0.273, p = 0.002) patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present study support the validity of supramaximal resection by the new RANO-Resect classification, also highlighting a possible surgical difference between tumors with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter.

A randomized prospective comparative study on sinonasal morbidity and quality of life of transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenomas: endonasal versus trans-septal approach.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (Endonasal approach) is commonly used to treat pituitary adenomas. The extent of dissection possibly changes the anatomy and the physiology of the nasal cavities and could give rise to post-operative morbidity and the quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to investigate sinonasal morbidity and general QoL in patients who underwent surgery for treatment of pituitary adenoma, comparing Endonasal and endoscopic trans-septal transsphenoidal approach (Trans-septal approach). METHODS: A prospective observational study, recruiting 40 patients undergoing surgery for pituitary adenoma, 20 via Endonasal approach and 20 via Trans-septal approach at our institution. Surveys with Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS), and Short Form Health Survey 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) were obtained to collect QoL data pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: All the 40 patients completed the questionnaires. At 6 months postoperatively, the SNOT-22 and CSS score shows significant improvements both in Endonasal approach (p = 0.01) and in Trans-septal approach (p = 0.02). No significant difference in sinonasal morbidity is observed between the two groups for SNOT-22 (p = 0.13) and CSS scores, except for sinus headache (p = 0.49), with a better score in Endonasal approach. The mean SF-36v2 scores remain the same in pre- and post-operative periods, but an improvement in time is seen in general health (p = 0.027), and general health compared to one year ago (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has negligible morbidity and does not negatively affect the nasal function in the long term. Endonasal approach and Trans-septal approach are comparable in terms of morbidity outcomes and general QoL, leaving the choice of the approach to the surgeon preference.

Inferolateral Transorbital Endoscopic Approach for Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas.

ABSTRACT: Spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOM) are slow growing tumors that often cause proptosis and visual deficits, due to direct compression of adjacent structures or hyperostosis of surrounding bones.Traditionally, these lesions are approached via a lateral transcranial route. Recent interest in mini-invasive surgery and endoscopy brought many authors to study different trans-nasal or transorbital approaches.The authors report a surgical case series with 3 patients with proptosis due to SOM who underwent surgery in our institution via an inferolateral trans-orbital endoscopic approach. The authors described our surgical technique and the authorsretrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients.All 3 patients had an effective orbital decompression with improvement of the proptosis and pain relief. Histological examination was possible and no intraoperative nor postoperative complications were observed.Therefore, the authors consider inferolateral trans-orbital endoscopic approach as a feasible approach for lesions involving the lateral orbit compartment arising from middle cranial fossa or from orbit itself.

A rare case of giant calcified thoracic disc herniation, OPLL and OLF: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic myelopathy can have different aetiologies. Based on the location and on the nature of spinal cord compression, different surgical approaches may be indicated. METHOD: We present a rare case of thoracic myelopathy caused by the coexistence of a giant disc herniation, OPLL and OLF, and we describe the surgical approach, with a focus on technical nuances and strategies to avoid complications. CONCLUSION: Careful presurgical planning and microsurgery are fundamental in achieving a satisfactory spinal cord decompression. IONM, endoscopy-assisted microsurgery and intraoperative navigation can enhance the safety of surgery and the extent of safe surgical decompression.

Predictive Factors of Long-Term Neurologic Outcome and Progression-Free Survival in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: A 10-year Single-Center Cohort Study and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) are a rare subgroup of neoplasms, encompassing both benign, slow-growing masses, and malignant lesions; radical surgical excision represents the cornerstone of treatment for such pathologies regardless of histopathology, which, on the other hand, is a known predictor of survival and neurologic outcome postsurgery. The present study aims to investigate the relevance of other factors in predicting survival and long-term functional outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a review of current literature on functional outcomes of IMSCTs, as well as a 10-years prospective analysis of a wide cohort of patients with diagnosis of IMSCTs who underwent surgical resection at our institution. RESULTS: Our series encompasses 60 patients with IMSCTS, among which 36 ependymomas, 6 cavernous angiomas, 5 hemangioblastomas, 6 WHO Grade I-IV astrocytomas, 3 intramedullary spinal metastases and 4 miscellaneous tumors. GTR was achieved in 76,67% of patients, with high preoperative McCormick grade, syringomyelia and changes at neurophysiologic monitoring being the strongest predictors at multivariate analysis (P = 0.0027, P = 0.0017 and P = 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Consistently with literature, preoperative neurologic function is the most important factor predicting long-term functional outcome (0.17, CI 0.069-0.57 with P = 0.0018), advocating for early surgery in the management of IMSCTs, whereas late complications such as myelopathy and neuropathic pain were present regardless of preoperative function.

Intracranial Hypotension Syndrome after Lumbar Drainage in Skull Base Surgery: Diagnosis and Correct Management.

Lumbar drainage is commonly used in skull base surgery; however, very few cases of intracranial hypotension syndrome are reported to be caused by this procedure. We present a clinical case of lumbar drainage-assisted orbital and optic canal decompression surgery for a recurrent voluminous spheno-orbital meningioma, together with a literature review. A 49-year-old woman became confused and drowsy on postoperative day 3, after initially experiencing neurologic stability. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the head showed extradural frontotemporal fluid collection with moderate right to left midline shift. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed signs of intracranial hypotension, such as brain sagging and diffuse dural contrast enhancement. Conservative treatment with bed rest, aggressive hydration, steroids, and aminophylline led to progressive neurologic improvement. A systematic literature review was also performed, and previous reported cases were analyzed. Overall, neurosurgeons must be aware of the lumbar drainage-induced hypotension syndrome in skull base surgeries, because immediate diagnosis is essential for therapeutic decision-making. In this setting, conservative management is the first-line treatment as surgery may lead to severe complications.

Relationship between lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, PI-LL mismatch and outcome after short fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. Literature review, rational and presentation of public study protocol: RELApSE study (registry for evaluation of lumbar artrodesis sagittal alignEment).

Background: Vertebral arthrodesis for degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine still remains burdened by clinical problems with significant negative results. The introduction of the sagittal balance assessment with the evaluation of the meaning of pelvic parameters and spinopelvic (PI-LL) mismatch offered new evaluation criteria for this widespread pathology, but there is a lack of consistent evidence on long-term outcome. Methods: The authors performed an extensive systematic review of literature, with the aim to identify all potentially relevant studies about the role and usefulness of the restoration or the assessment of Sagittal balance in lumbar degenerative disease. They present the study protocol RELApSE (NCT05448092 ID) and discuss the rationale through a comprehensive literature review. Results: From the 237 papers on this topic, a total of 176 articles were selected in this review. The analysis of these literature data shows sparse and variable evidence. There are no observations or guidelines about the value of lordosis restoration or PI-LL mismatch. Most of the works in the literature are retrospective, monocentric, based on small populations, and often address the topic evaluation partially. Conclusions: The RELApSE study is based on the possibility of comparing a heterogeneous population by pathology and different surgical technical options on some homogeneous clinical and anatomic-radiological measures aiming to understanding the value that global lumbar and segmental lordosis, distribution of lordosis, pelvic tilt, and PI-LL mismatch may have on clinical outcome in lumbar degenerative pathology and on the occurrence of adjacent segment disease.