Phase I study of etoposide phosphate (etopophos) as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 3, and 5.

Etoposide phophate is a phosphate ester prodrug of etoposide designed to improve the pharmaceutical characteristics of the parent compound. A Phase I dose-escalating study of etoposide phosphate was conducted concurrently at two institutions to determine its toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose. Etoposide phosphate was administered i.v. for 30 min on days 1, 3, and 5 every 21 days or on recovery from toxicity. Cohorts of at least three patients received etoposide phosphate at dose levels from 50 mg/m2 to 150 mg/m2 expressed as molar equivalents of etoposide. Blood and urine samples were obtained from all patients during the first cycle of treatment and the concentrations of etoposide phosphate and etoposide were measured. Thirty-nine patients with documented cancers received a total of 75 cycles of etoposide phosphate. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression which occurred at the 150-mg/m2 etoposide equivalent dose. Etoposide phosphate was rapidly and extensively converted to etoposide. No measurable etoposide phosphate was detectable in the plasma by 15-60 min after the end of the infusion. The mean half-life of etoposide at the different dose levels ranged from 5.5 to 9.3 h. The pharmacokinetics of etoposide, generated from etoposide phosphate, was linear over the dose range studied and was comparable to results reported in the literature for i.v. etoposide. In summary, i.v. etoposide phosphate is rapidly and extensively converted to etoposide. The maximum tolerated dose of etoposide phosphate when given on days 1, 3, and 5 is 150 mg/m2/day. The dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression. The maximum tolerated dose and adverse event profile are consistent with those of etoposide.

Multiple-dose phase I study of transnasal butorphanol.

The safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of transnasal butorphanol were evaluated in a double-blind, multiple-dose phase I study. A total of 18 subjects received either placebo (n = 6) or a single transnasal dose of 2 mg butorphanol tartrate on the first day and 1, 2, and 4 mg doses of butorphanol tartrate every 6 hours on days 2 through 6, 7 through 11, and 12 through 16, respectively. Safety assessment was performed on days 7, 12, and 17. Serial blood samples were collected on days 1, 6, 11, and 16, and the plasma was analyzed for unchanged butorphanol by a validated and specific radioimmunoassay. Butorphanol was rapidly absorbed and peak levels in plasma were generally attained within 1 hour after the nasal administration. The values of maximum concentration, minimum concentration, and area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the dosing interval [AUC(0-tau)] increased as the administered dose increased in a dose-proportional manner. The values of AUC from time zero to infinity after a single dose of 2 mg butorphanol tartrate, 10.9 ng.hr/ml, were identical to the values of AUC(0-tau) after a multiple administration of 2 mg dose, 10.4 ng.hr/ml. Mean elimination half-life value was 5.45 hours. Steady state was reached in fewer than eight doses when given every 6 hours. Transnasal butorphanol was well tolerated by all subjects. After repeated administration of transnasal butorphanol, no significant changes were observed in the nasal examination, which included evaluation of color, wetness, and thickness of nostril membrane, air flow, airway patency, and general nasal conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Food-induced reduction in bioavailability of didanosine.

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of didanosine was evaluated in an open two-way crossover study in eight male subjects who tested seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus. Each subject received a single 375 mg oral dose of didanosine in a chewable tablet form with or without food. Serial blood samples and the total urinary output during 12 hours were collected and assayed for intact didanosine by validated HPLC methods. The mean (SD) values for the peak concentration (Cmax) of didanosine in plasma were 2789 (1032) ng/ml and 1291 (536) ng/ml and for the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC0-infinity) were 3902 (1316) and 2083 (922) hr.ng/ml, and the urinary excretion (%UR) accounted for 21% and 11% of dose as intact didanosine when didanosine was given under fasting conditions and with food, respectively. The values of Cmax, AUC0-infinity, and %UR were significantly lower for subjects who received didanosine with food compared with those observed for the fasted subjects. The time to reach Cmax, mean residence time, elimination half-life, and renal clearance remained essentially the same between the two treatments. The results from this study indicated that the rates of absorption and elimination were not affected by the presence of food; however, the extent of absorption, as indicated by AUC0-infinity and %UR, was reduced significantly in the presence of food. It is recommended that didanosine be administered under fasting conditions.

A pharmacokinetic interaction study of avitriptan and propranolol.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a clinically significant change in the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan and propranolol is observed in healthy subjects after coadministration of the two drugs. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of avitriptan and propranolol were investigated when the two drugs administered separately and when two 150 mg doses of avitriptan 2 hours apart were added to a steady-state regimen (80 mg twice a day) of propranolol. The pharmacokinetics of metabolites of avitriptan (N-desmethylavitriptan, methoxypyrimidinyl piperazine, and O-desmethylavitriptan) and the pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxypropranolol were also assessed. RESULTS: Administration of avitriptan alone and together with propranolol resulted in small increases in mean blood pressure and small decreases in heart rate. Administration of propranolol resulted in lowering of blood pressure and heart rate consistent with the beta-blocking actions of propranolol. There were no changes in the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan after coadministration with propranolol. However, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of propranolol showed a 20% increase after coadministration with avitriptan, whereas the AUC of 4-hydroxypropranolol significantly decreased. Avitriptan therefore appeared to affect the metabolism of propranolol to 4-hydroxypropranolol. The peak plasma concentration and AUC for N-desmethylavitriptan and the AUC for methoxypyrimidinyl piperazine also showed statistically significant increases (about 25%) when avitriptan was coadministered with propranolol. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the wide safety margin of propranolol, the increase in the exposure is not clinically significant. The increase in the exposure to the metabolites of avitriptan is also not considered to be clinically significant because the metabolite contribution to the pharmacologic activity or side effects is expected to be minimal. Based on these findings, avitriptan may be added to a steady-state regimen of propranolol as an abortive antimigraine therapy.

The absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of butorphanol nasal spray in patients with hepatic impairment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of hepatic impairment on the absolute transnasal bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of butorphanol. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve (eight men and four women) healthy subjects and 12 (eight men and four women) patients with hepatic impairment received a 1 mg dose of butorphanol by intravenous or transnasal administration on two separate occasions. Hepatic function was assessed by antipyrine and indocyanine green clearance tests. Serial blood and urine samples were collected after each dose. Plasma samples were analyzed for butorphanol, and urine samples were analyzed for butorphanol and its metabolites. RESULTS: No statistical difference in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for butorphanol was observed between the two groups of volunteers after transnasal administration. However, total plasma clearance (CL), steady-state volume of distribution, area under the concentration-time curve [AUC(0-infinity)], and elimination half-life of butorphanol in patients with hepatic impairment were significantly altered (approximately twofold to threefold). The absolute transnasal bioavailability of butorphanol was significantly higher (approximately 20%) in patients with hepatic impairment. A greater fraction of the administered dose was recovered from the urine in hepatically impaired patients compared to that in healthy subjects (23% to 31% versus 10% to 11%). There was a significant reduction in CL of indocyanine green and antipyrine in hepatically impaired patients. The percentage of reduction in butorphanol CL was highly correlated to the estimated degree of portosystemic shunts in the patients with hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION: Based on the comparable Cmax but the increased AUC in patients with liver dysfunction, the initial dose of butorphanol nasal spray may not need to be adjusted. However, the subsequent dosing intervals for butorphanol should be prolonged.

Effects of age, gender, and diurnal variation on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of BMS-181101, an antidepressant, in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of age, gender, and diurnal variation on the safety, tolerability, and steady-state pharmacokinetics of BMS-181101, an antidepressant, in humans. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose parallel-design study in 51 healthy subjects (12 young and 12 elderly men and 12 young and 15 elderly women). Each subject received a 15 mg oral dose of BMS-181101 every 12 hours on days 1 through 6 and one dose on day 7. After the evening dose on day 6 and morning dose on day 7, serial blood samples were collected at specified times after administration. Plasma was analyzed for BMS-181101 with use of an HPLC method. RESULTS: Male subjects tolerated BMS-181101 better than female subjects. The mean values for area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval tau (AUC tau; 58.8 to 102.4 ng.hr/ml) and elimination half-life t1/2; 5.7 to 10.4 hours) for the elderly subjects were significantly greater than those for the young subjects (39.0 to 64.3 ng.hr/ml and 3.2 to 4.5 hours). The mean values for peak plasma concentration (Cmax; 14.7 to 25.2 ng/ml) and AUC tau (52.4 to 102.4 ng.hr/ml) for the women were significantly greater than those for the men (9.08 to 15.3 ng/ml and 39.0 to 73.6 ng.hr/ml). The mean values for Cmax (14.7 to 25.2 ng/ml) and AUC tau (54.8 to 102.4 ng.hr/ml) on the morning of day 7 were significantly greater than those after the evening dose on day 6 (9.08 to 17.3 ng/ml; 39.0 to 83.4 ng.hr/ml). CONCLUSIONS: An initial lower dose or appropriate titration of daily doses of BMS-181101 may be necessary for the treatment of elderly and female subjects, and the pharmacokinetics of BMS-181101 exhibited significant diurnal effects.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in subjects with renal insufficiency.

The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefepime (1000 mg over 30 minutes) were studied in 5 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with various degrees of renal impairment. Cefepime concentrations in plasma, urine, and hemodialysate were assayed using reverse-phase HPLC with ultraviolet detection. Mean peak plasma concentrations of cefepime at the end of 30-minute infusion ranges from 63.5 to 73.9 micrograms/ml and were not affected by the degree of renal impairment. The half-life of cefepime was approximately 2.3 hours in subjects with normal kidney function; it increased proportionately as renal function decreased. Significant linear relationships between total body clearance and creatinine clearance, as well as renal clearance and creatinine clearance, were observed. The mean volume of distribution at steady state in healthy volunteers was 20.5 liters and was not significantly altered in subjects with renal insufficiency. The mean cumulative urinary recovery of cefepime in healthy volunteers was 82.9% of the administered dose and significantly decreased in subjects with creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min. Hemodialysis significantly shortened the elimination half-life from 13.5 hours during the predialysis period to 2.3 hours during the dialysis period. Cefepime dosage should be reduced in proportion to the decline in creatinine clearance.

Pharmacokinetics of didanosine in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related complex.

The pharmacokinetics of didanosine (2',3'-dideoxyinosine) after intravenous and oral administration were evaluated in an open, escalating-dose phase I study in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or severe AIDS-related complex. Didanosine was administered twice a day for 2 weeks as an intravenous infusion of 60 minutes duration at doses ranging from 0.4 to 16.5 mg/kg, followed by 4 weeks of oral treatment at twice the intravenous dose. Serial blood and urine samples were obtained on the first and final day of intravenous administration and after the first oral dose, as well as at steady state. Didanosine demonstrated linear pharmacokinetic behavior over the dose ranges of 0.4 to 16.5 mg/kg intravenously and 0.8 to 10.2 mg/kg orally. There was no indication of significant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters with repeated administration. The apparent elimination half-life after oral administration was approximately 1.4 hour. Renal clearance values exceeded the glomerular filtration rate, indicating that active tubular secretion of didanosine occurs. Bioavailability of didanosine when administered as a solution with an antacid was approximately 43% for doses from 0.8 to 10.2 mg/kg in patients with AIDS and advanced AIDS-related complex. Bioavailability of didanosine from the citrate-phosphate-buffered solution, the formulation currently used in phase II and expanded access studies, was comparable to the formulation used in the phase I trials.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of nefazodone in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of nefazodone and its three pharmacologically active metabolites, hydroxynefazodone, m-chlorophenylpiperazine, and triazoledione, in patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis and age-, sex-, and weight-matched healthy volunteers. METHODS: Subjects received a single 100 mg dose of nefazodone on day 1 followed by 100 mg nefazodone every 12 hours on days 3 through 10. Serial blood samples were collected on days 1 and 10; blood samples for trough levels were also collected just before the morning doses on days 7, 8, and 9. Plasma samples were assayed for nefazodone and its metabolites by validated chromatographic methods. RESULTS: The blood samples for trough levels indicated that, regardless of hepatic function, steady state for nefazodone and its metabolites was achieved by the fourth day of every-12-hour dosing. Subjects with liver cirrhosis had about a two-fold greater systemic exposure to nefazodone and hydroxynefazodone compared with normal subjects after a single dose of nefazodone, the difference decreasing to approximately 25% at steady state. Exposure to m-chlorophenylpiperazine was twofold to threefold greater and exposure to triazoledione was similar in patients with cirrhosis after a single dose of nefazodone and at steady state. There were no serious or unexpected adverse events observed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that, although no untoward accumulation is anticipated compared with patients with normal hepatic function, patients with hepatic impairment may be exposed to higher concentrations of nefazodone and its metabolites than would subjects with normal hepatic function. Consequently, a lower daily dose of nefazodone should be considered when treating patients with impairment of hepatic function.

Disposition of didanosine in HIV-seropositive patients with normal renal function or chronic renal failure: influence of hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of didanosine in patients with normal kidney function or chronic kidney failure. METHODS: Three groups of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were studied: group I, six men with normal kidney function (creatinine clearance > 90 ml/min/1.73 m2); group II, six men with chronic renal failure maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD); and group III, four men and two women with chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis three times a week. A 300 mg dose of didanosine was administered orally and intravenously according to a two-period randomized crossover design. Patients in group III were studied between hemodialysis sessions during the crossover periods. In addition, patients in group III were studied in a third period after administration of a 300 mg oral dose of didanosine 4 hours before hemodialysis. RESULTS: After intravenous administration in group I, the mean (+/-SD) total clearance (CLT) was 13.0 +/- 1.6 ml/min/kg and the elimination half-life (t 1/2) was 1.56 +/- 0.43 hour. In groups II and III, the CLT decreased significantly to 3.4 +/- 1.2 and 3.2 +/- 1.2 ml/min/kg, respectively, whereas the t1/2 increased to 3.60 +/- 0.82 hours and 3.11 +/- 0.88 hours, respectively. The absolute bioavailability of didanosine in groups I, II, and III was 42% +/- 12%, 52% +/- 6%, and 38% +/- 11%, respectively, and did not differ significantly. CAPD had little effect on the removal of didanosine, whereas approximately 30% of the drug present in the body at the start of dialysis was eliminated by an average 3-hour dialysis session. CONCLUSION: The clearance of didanosine is impaired in patients with chronic renal failure. To compensate, the dose and schedule of administration should be adjusted. It is recommended that one-fourth of the total daily dose of didanosine be administered once a day in this patient population.

A phase I study of etoposide phosphate administered as a daily 30-minute infusion for 5 days.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, kinetics, and disposition of etoposide phosphate when administered as a daily 30-minute infusion for 5 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in this phase I dose-escalation trial. Cohorts of patients received etoposide phosphate in etoposide equivalent doses of 50, 75, 100 and 125 mg/m2 intravenously for 30 minutes each day for 5 days. Pharmacokinetic sampling of both blood and urine was performed and concentrations of etoposide and etoposide phosphate were determined on day 1 of study for each patient and on day 4 of study for three patients receiving the 100 mg/m2 dose. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity was reversible myelosuppression as evidenced by leukopenia and neutropenia. Toxicities seen were comparable to those expected from etoposide administration. With this schedule, the 100 mg/m2 dose was the maximum tolerated dose. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Two patients had major responses and three others had minor responses. Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed rapid (< 15 minutes) extensive conversion of etoposide phosphate to etoposide. Peak plasma etoposide concentrations and etoposide areas under the curve were proportional to the dose of etoposide phosphate administered. Etoposide kinetics were similar to those expected after a comparable dose of etoposide. CONCLUSIONS: Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble pro-drug of etoposide that is rapidly converted to etoposide in vivo with a toxicity profile similar to etoposide. Etoposide generated from etoposide phosphate exhibits linear kinetics over a dose range of 50 to 125 mg/m2. When administered as a daily 30-minute infusion for 5 days, the dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression and 100 mg/m2 daily is the maximum tolerated dose.

A pharmacodynamic evaluation of hematologic toxicity observed with etoposide phosphate in the treatment of cancer patients.

The pharmacodynamics of etoposide phosphate (Etopophos; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide, was evaluated in 39 patients with solid tumors after a 30-minute intravenous infusion of escalating doses (equivalent to 50 to 175 mg/m2 of etoposide) on a day 1, 3, and 5 schedule of treatment. Serial blood samples were collected at predose and throughout the 32 hours following day 1 of treatment to determine the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of etoposide phosphate and etoposide. Hematology profiles and serum chemistries were determined at predose and twice weekly for approximately 3 weeks after each treatment cycle. Both linear and nonlinear pharmacodynamic models were used to evaluate the relationship between hematologic toxicity and etoposide AUC and patient factors (age, gender, performance status, prior radiation therapy, prior chemotherapy, baseline albumin, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, leukocyte count, granulocyte count). Etoposide phosphate was converted rapidly to etoposide in vivo. The ratio of the etoposide phosphate AUC to that of etoposide was < or = 1.2% indicating that etoposide was the main species in the systemic circulation. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, and significant decreases in white blood cell and granulocyte counts were noted. Hematologic toxicity was best described by a stepwise linear regression model consisting of etoposide AUC, serum albumin, and bilirubin. In summary, hematologic toxicity produced by the intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate correlates significantly with etoposide AUC and patient factors (baseline serum albumin and bilirubin) in cancer patients.

Effects of gender, age, and race on the pharmacokinetics of etoposide after intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate in cancer patients.

The influence of gender, age, and race on the pharmacokinetics of etoposide and on the extent of conversion of etoposide phosphate (Etopophos; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to etoposide are summarized. Included in the integrated statistical analyses were 192 patients from six phase I/II studies (102 men and 90 women, 128 aged < or = 65 years and 64 aged > 65 years; 134 were white, 18 were other races, and race was not recorded for 40). The dose of etoposide phosphate ranged from 25 to 200 mg/m2 of etoposide equivalents and was administered as 5-(bolus) to 210-minute intravenous infusions. Total body clearance of etoposide was comparable between men and women. However, significantly lower steady-state volumes of distribution and shorter half-lives were observed in women relative to men. Patients who were older than 65 years had significantly lower etoposide total body clearance and longer half-lives than younger patients. The gender- and age-related differences observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide were significant but generally of a small magnitude (< or = 13%), indicating no need for dose adjustment in these patient populations. There were no significant race-related differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide. All patients showed rapid conversion of etoposide phosphate to etoposide. The individual area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio of etoposide phosphate/etoposide was < or = 0.0324, indicating that etoposide was the major circulating moiety after infusion of etoposide phosphate. Significant gender-, age-, or race-related differences in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios were not observed. An evaluation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios with respect to infusion time suggested that the conversion of etoposide phosphate to etoposide was independent of infusion time.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nefazodone.

Nefazodone is a new antidepressant drug, chemically unrelated to the tricyclic, tetracyclic or selective serotonin uptake inhibitors. Nefazodone blocks the serotonin 5-HT2 receptors and reversibly inhibits serotonin reuptake in vivo. Nefazodone is completely and rapidly absorbed after oral administration with a peak plasma concentration observed within 2 hours of administration. Nefazodone undergoes significant first-pass metabolism resulting in an oral bioavailability of approximately 20%. Although there is an 18% increase in nefazodone bioavailability with food, this increase is not clinically significant and nefazodone can be administered without regard to meals. Three pharmacologically active nefazodone metabolites have been identified: hydroxy-nefazodone, triazoledione and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP). The pharmacokinetics of nefazodone are nonlinear. The increase in plasma concentrations of nefazodone are greater than would be expected if they were proportional to increases in dose. Steady-state plasma concentrations of nefazodone are attained within 4 days of the commencement of administration. The pharmacokinetics of nefazodone are not appreciably altered in patients with renal or mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment. However, nefazodone plasma concentrations are increased in severe hepatic impairment and in the elderly, especially in elderly females. Lower doses of nefazodone may be necessary in these groups. Nefazodone is a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and does not inhibit CYP1A2. It is not anticipated that nefazodone will interact with drugs cleared by these isozymes. Indeed, nefazodone did not affect the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, a compound cleared by CYP1A2. Nefazodone is metabolised by and inhibits CYP3A4. Clinically significant interactions have been observed between nefazodone and the benzodiazepines triazolam and alprazolam, cyclosporin and carbamazepine. The potential for a clinically significant interaction between nefazodone and other drugs cleared by CYP3A4 (e.g. terfenadine) should be considered before the coadministration of these compounds. There was an increase in haloperidol plasma concentrations when coadministered with nefazodone; nefazodone pharmacokinetics were not affected after coadministration. No clinically significant interaction was observed when nefazodone was administered with lorazepam, lithium, alcohol, cimetidine, warfarin, theophylline or propranolol.

Effects of time of administration and posture on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.

The effects of time of administration, sleep and posture on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil were evaluated in a single-dose 3-way crossover study. After a 6-hour fast, 12 healthy male volunteers received oral cefprozil 250mg at 1200h (treatment A), 1200h (treatment B) and 2400h (treatment C) with a 7-day washout interval between each treatment. During the study period, volunteers receiving treatment A remained in a sitting/standing position or were ambulatory, those receiving treatment B were in the supine position, and those receiving treatment C were sleeping. Blood samples were taken over an 8-hour period and the plasma samples were analysed for the concentrations of cefprozil by a high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method. Plasma concentration vs time data were analysed using noncompartmental analysis methods. Mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 4.51, 5.02 and 4.91 mg/L for treatments A, B and C, respectively. Corresponding mean values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) were 12.6, 12.6 and 14.2 mg/L.h, respectively. The mean half-life (t1/2) values were 1.30, 1.23 and 1.50 hours for treatments A, B and C, respectively. Mean AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and t1/2 values following treatment B were not significantly different from those of treatment A. However, the mean AUC(0-infinity) and t1/2 values of cefprozil following treatment C were significantly greater than those of either treatment A or B. The mean Cmax value following treatment C was not significantly different than that of either treatments A or B. From these results, it was concluded that posture has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of time of food administration on the bioavailability of didanosine from a chewable tablet formulation.

The effect of the time of food administration on the bioavailability of didanosine, administered as a 300-mg dose of a chewable tablet formulation, was evaluated in 10 men seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but free of any symptoms of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Using an open, randomized, balanced, incomplete block crossover study design, each patient received the dose of didanosine under four of the five following conditions: (1) after an overnight fast, (2) 30 minutes before a meal, (3) 1 hour before a meal, (4) 1 hour after a meal, or (5) 2 hours after a meal. The meal consisted of a standard high-fat, high-calorie breakfast, consumed over a 15-minute period. Serial blood samples and the total urinary output were collected over a 12-hour interval after each dose for analysis using validated high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)/ultraviolet (UV) methods. Concentration data were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters using noncompartmental methods. There were no significant differences among the fasting, 30-minute before, and 1-hour before the meal treatments with respect to maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)), or urinary recovery (%UR). Values for Cmax, AUC(0-infinity), and %UR observed for the 1 and 2 hours after the meal treatments were significantly less than those obtained under either fasting conditions or before the meal. There were no significant differences among any of the treatments with respect to time to reach peak concentration (tmax), half-life (t1/2), or renal clearance (CLR).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of nefazodone after escalating single and multiple oral doses.

The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of nefazodone and its metabolites, hydroxynefazodone, p-hydroxynefazodone, and m-chlorophenylpiperazine were investigated in two groups of 18 healthy male volunteers, employing three-period complete crossover designs. In one group, single 50-mg, 100-mg, and 200-mg oral doses of nefazodone hydrochloride were administered with a 1-week washout between treatments. In the other group, doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg were administered twice a day (every 12 hours) for 7.5 days (15 doses) with a 1-week washout between treatments. Serial plasma samples were obtained in both groups and assayed for nefazodone, hydroxynefazodone, m-chlorophenylpiperazine, and p-hydroxynefazodone. Cmax plasma levels of nefazodone and hydroxynefazodone were attained within 2 hours of administration of nefazodone; tmax for m-chlorophenylpiperazine was more delayed, and p-hydroxynefazodone levels were generally below the assay limit. On repeated twice-daily dosing of nefazodone, steady-state levels of the drug and its metabolites were reached within 3 days. Mean single-dose plasma half-life (t1/2) values for nefazodone increased from approximately 1 hour at a 50-mg dose to approximately 2 hours at a 200-mg dose; at steady state, t1/2 values increased from approximately 2 hours at 50 mg twice daily to approximately 3.7 hours at 200 mg twice daily. Whereas dose increased in the proportion of 1:2:4, mean single-dose AUC0-infinity for nefazodone increased in the proportion of 1:3.3:8.9 and mean steady-state AUC0-tau for nefazodone increased in the proportion of 1:4.2:16.8. Plasma levels of hydroxynefazodone paralleled those of nefazodone and were approximately 33% of nefazodone levels at each dose level. Plasma levels of m-chlorophenylpiperazine were only approximately 10% those of nefazodone. Within the dosage range of 50-200 mg of nefazodone hydrochloride, nefazodone and hydroxynefazodone exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics; m-chlorophenylpiperazine, a minor metabolite, appeared to exhibit linear pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetics of didanosine and ketoconazole after coadministration to patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus.

The steady-state pharmacokinetics of didanosine (DDI) and ketoconazole (KET) were evaluated when the agents were administered alone or concurrently to patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus. Using a randomized, three-way crossover design, multiple oral doses of DDI (375 mg twice daily for 4 days), KET (200 mg daily for 4 days) or the combination were administered under fasting conditions. When DDI and KET were coadministered, KET was given 2 hours before the morning dose of didanosine. Serial blood samples and total urine output were a collected after the administration of a final single dose on day 5 of each treatment session. Samples were analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)/ultraviolet (UV) or fluorescence methods specific for unchanged DDI (plasma and urine) or KET (plasma only). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. The average DDI maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax) value at steady state was significantly less when DDI was administered with KET (1836 ng/mL) than when DDI was administered alone (2094 ng/mL), although the magnitude of the decrease was only 12%. Didanosine area under the curve (AUC(0-tau)) for the combination (2872 hr.ng/mL) was 8% less than when DDI was given alone (3107 hr.ng/mL); the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences among the other evaluated parameters (time to reach peak concentration [tmax], half-life [t1/2], renal clearance [CLR], or urinary recovery [UR]) between the two DDI treatments. There were no significant differences among any of the pharmacokinetic parameters between the two KET treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetic interactions of cefprozil with food, propantheline, metoclopramide, and probenecid in healthy volunteers.

Cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin antibiotic, is composed of cis and trans isomers in an approximate 90:10 ratio. The objectives of this study were: (1) to assess the effects of alterations in gastrointestinal motility by metoclopramide and propantheline on the pharmacokinetics of cis and trans isomers of cefprozil, and to compare them with the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil; (2) to assess the effects of inhibition of renal tubular secretion by probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil isomers. In this four-way crossover study, 15 healthy male volunteers received a 1000-mg dose of cefprozil after fasting, pretreatment with metoclopramide or propantheline, after breakfast, or after probenecid in an incomplete, balanced block design. There was a 1-week washout period between each treatment. Blood and urine samples collected over a 24-hour period were assayed for the cis and trans isomers. The concentrations of the trans isomers were generally 1/10 of the cis isomer. The means and variances of the pharmacokinetic parameters of the cis and trans isomers of cefprozil were similar in fasting subjects and were affected in a parallel manner by food, metoclopramide, propantheline, and probenecid. The pharmacokinetics of the cis isomer under the fasting condition were as follows: maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax), 14.0 +/- 2.7 micrograms/mL; median time to reach Cmax (tmax), 1.5 (range, 1.0-3.5) hours; half-life (t1/2), 1.24 +/- 0.27 hours; area under the concentration (AUC0-infinity), 47.3 +/- 7.7 micrograms.hour/mL; mean residence time after oral administration (MRTpo), 2.9 +/- 0.4 hours; CLR, 219 +/- 60 mL/minute; and Xu% (percent cumulative urinary excretion in 0-24 hours), 68.1 +/- 12.5.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions between nefazodone and digoxin in healthy male volunteers.

The effect of nefazodone on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of digoxin were evaluated in an open, randomized, multiple-dose, three-way crossover study of 18 healthy male volunteers. The volunteers received nefazodone alone (200 mg twice daily), digoxin alone (0.2 mg daily), or nefazodone combined with digoxin during three 8-day treatment periods, with a single dose on the ninth day. There was a 10-day washout period between treatment periods. Coadministration of nefazodone with digoxin had no effect on the frequency and severity of adverse events compared with those observed with either drug alone. Steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of digoxin were significantly higher (15%, 29%, and 27%, respectively) after coadministration of nefazodone/digoxin than after administration of digoxin. Despite these increases, no clinically significant changes in vital signs, heart rate, or PR, QRS, and QT intervals on the electrocardiogram occurred after coadministration from those measured after digoxin monotherapy. Coadministration did not affect the pharmacokinetics of nefazodone or its metabolites (hydroxynefazodone, m-chlorophenylpiperazine, triazole dione). Because digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index, monitoring of plasma digoxin levels and appropriate adjustment of dosage are recommended when nefazodone and digoxin are administered concurrently.