Impact of the medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy on foot biomechanics: a systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), formally known as "adult-acquired flatfoot deformity" (AAFFD), is a complex foot deformity consisting of multiple components. If surgery is required, joint-preserving procedures, such as a medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO), are frequently performed. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a summary of the evidence on the impact of MDCO on foot biomechanics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search across two major sources (PubMed and Scopus) without time limitation was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Only original research studies reporting on biomechanical changes following a MDCO were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of review articles, case studies, and studies not written in English. 27 studies were included and the methodologic quality graded according to the QUACS scale and the modified Coleman score. RESULTS: The 27 included studies consisted of 18 cadaveric, 7 studies based on biomechanical models, and 2 clinical studies. The impact of MDCO on the following five major parameters were assessed: plantar fascia (n = 6), medial longitudinal arch (n = 9), hind- and midfoot joint pressures (n = 10), Achilles tendon (n = 5), and gait pattern parameters (n = 3). The quality of the studies was moderate to good with a pooled mean QUACS score of 65% (range 46-92%) for in-vitro and a pooled mean Coleman score of 58 (range 56-65) points for clinical studies. CONCLUSION: A thorough knowledge of how MDCO impacts foot function is key in properly understanding the postoperative effects of this commonly performed procedure. According to the evidence, MDCO impacts the function of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon, the integrity of the medial longitudinal arch, hind- and midfoot joint pressures, and consequently specific gait pattern parameters.

Surgical outcome of avulsion fractures of the distal fibula: a systematic literature review.

PURPOSE: To provide a systematic overview of clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent surgical treatment of a painful avulsion fragment of the distal fibula also known as posttraumatic os subfibulare. METHODS: A systematic literature search across two major sources (PubMed and Scopus) was performed. Twenty-seven studies were included and analyzed using the modified Coleman score to assess the methodologic quality. RESULTS: The surgical treatment of symptomatic os subfibulare, with or without concomitant ankle instability, generally results in substantial improvement in clinical and radiographic outcomes with relative low complication rates. Clinical outcome measures may not be affected by the presence of ankle instability or by the fragment size. The methodological quality of analyzed studies was satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Posttraumatic os subfibulare may result in chronic pain and ankle instability. If surgery is indicated, ankle instability should be concomitantly addressed when present. Based on available literature, satisfactory postoperative outcomes can be reliably expected following surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review of Level III and Level IV Studies, Level IV.

Does the COVID-19 personal protective equipment impair the surgeon's performance?

INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing vaccination rates, new viral variants of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) are advancing the COVID 19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic and continue to challenge the entire world. Surgical care of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients requires special protective measures. We hypothesized that "COVID-19" personal protective equipment (PPE) during surgery of SARS-CoV-2 positive or potentially positive patients would negatively affect the surgeon and thus the surgical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten experienced trauma surgeons participated in the study. Each surgeon performed two simulated surgeries of a distal tibial fracture on a Sawbone® under standardized conditions either wearing regular PPE or special COVID-19 PPE. Baseline values at rest were acquired for heart rate, blood pressure, saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2), respiratory rate and capillary blood gas (CBG) analysis including capillary partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) and carbon dioxide (pCO2), followed by four different standardized tests of attentional performance (TAP). Subsequently, the surgeon performed the first surgery according to a randomly determined order, with regular or COVID-19 PPE conditions in an operation theatre. After each surgery vital signs were acquired and CBG and TAP were performed again. RESULTS: In our simulated surgical procedure heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure did not show relevant differences. Percutaneously measured SpO2 decreased with additional layers of PPE, while CBG parameters were not affected. TAP tests showed a significant impairment of attention if PPEs were compared to the baseline, but both PPEs had similar results and no meaningful differences could be measured. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, for surgical procedures additional PPE required during COVID-19 pandemic does not relevant affect the surgeon's mental and physical performance. Surgeries under COVID-19 PPE conditions appear safe and do not increase patient risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Multiplanar instability of the first tarsometatarsal joint in hallux valgus and hallux rigidus patients: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Hypermobility of the first ray has been considered associated with various forefoot diseases including hallux valgus (HV) and hallux rigidus (HR). Weightbearing CT scan can be a reliable method for analysis of the first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Our objective was to comparatively investigate signs of instability of the first TMT joint on weightbearing CT between three groups (control, HV, and HR). METHODS: In this single-centre, retrospective, case-control study, 27 HV patients (30 feet; mean age 54.2 years), 26 HR patients (30 feet; mean age 56.6 years), and 30 controls (30 feet; mean age; 43 years) were enrolled. Measurements of signs of instability were performed in multiplanes including first TMT angle, dorsal translation of the first metatarsal (M1) at the first TMT joint, plantar distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and M1 in sagittal plane, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) in axial plane, rotational profiles of C1 and M1 in coronal plane. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and chi-square test were performed to compare each parameter between the three groups. Interobserver reliabilities were assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The HV group had significantly increased first TMT angle (0.23° in controls, 1.15° in HV, 0.19° in HR, p < 0.001), HVA (7.52°, 33.50°, 11.21°, p < 0.001), IMA (9.46°, 16.98°, 11.87°, p < 0.001), C1-M1 angle (22.44°, 29.46°, 23.74°, p < 0.001), and rotational profile of the distal M1 (7.06°, 17.88°, 9.85°, p < 0.001) compared with the control and HR groups. Dorsal translation of M1 (23% in controls, 63% in HV, 70% in HR, p < 0.001) was frequently found in the HV and HR groups with significantly increased plantar distance (0.37 mm, 1.14 mm, 1.46 mm, p < 0.001) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplanar instability of the first TMT joint was confirmed using weightbearing CT in HV and HR groups compared with controls. HV group demonstrated instability mainly in sagittal and axial planes; HR group had sagittal instability predominantly. Our measurement of rotational instability at the first TMT joint was not able to detect differences between groups. A surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint can be an option to address HV and HR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: First ray hypermobility at the first TMT joint is an important consideration when addressing HV and HR, a surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint should be taken in consideration as an option.

Use of intramedullary locking nail for displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus: what is the evidence?

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary locking devices (ILDs) have recently been advocated as a minimally invasive approach to manage displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), to minimise complications and improve outcomes. We reviewed clinical and biomechanical studies dealing with commercially available devices to identify their characteristics, efficacy and safety. METHODS: Following a PRISMA checklist, Medline, Scopus and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies reporting the use of ILDs for treating DIACFs. Biomechanical studies were first evaluated. Cohort studies were then reviewed for demographics, surgical technique, postoperative protocol, clinical and radiographic scores, complications and reoperations. The modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was used to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS: Eleven studies were identified which investigated two devices (Calcanail®, C-Nail®). Three biomechanical studies proved they offered adequate primary stability, stiffness, interfragmentary motion and load to failure. Eight clinical studies (321 feet, 308 patients) demonstrated a positive clinical and radiographic outcome at 16-months average follow-up. Metalware irritation (up to 20%) and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms (up to 30%) were the most common complications, while soft tissue issues (wound necrosis, delayed healing, infection) were reported in 3-5% of cases. Conversion to subtalar fusion was necessary in up to 6% of cases. Four (50%) out of 8 studies were authored by implant designers and in 5 (62%) relevant conflicts of interest were disclosed. Mean (± standard deviation) CMS was 59 ± 9.8, indicating moderate quality. CONCLUSIONS: Treating DIAFCs with ILDs leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up, enabling restoration of calcaneal height and improved subtalar joint congruency. Metalware irritation and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms are common complications although wound complications are less frequent than after open lateral approaches. The quality of evidence provided so far is moderate and potentially biased by the conflict of interest, raising concerns about the generalisability of results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V - Review of Level III to V studies.

Conservative Trio-Therapy for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Case-Study.

Background and Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent cause of pain, functional limitations, and a common reason for surgical treatment, such as joint replacement. Conservative therapies can reduce pain and improve function; thus, delaying or even preventing surgical intervention. Various individual conservative therapies show benefits, but combination therapies remain underexplored. The aim of this prospective case-study was to assess the effect of a conservative combination therapy in patients with painful varus knee OA. Materials and Methods: With strong inclusion and exclusion criteria, nine patients with painful varus knee OA (mean age 56 years (range 51−63 years) were selected and monitored over six months, using the following clinical outcome scores: pain visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC score), short-form−36 items (SF-36) quality of life score, and the sports frequency score. All patients received a standardized conservative trio-therapy with varus-reducing hindfoot shoe-insoles with a lateral hindfoot wedge, oral viscosupplementation, and physiotherapy for six months. Results: The pain was reduced significantly from initial VAS values of 5.4 points (range, 3−10) to values of 0.6 points (range, 0−3; p < 0.01), at the end of treatment. After six months, seven out of nine patients reported no pain at all (VAS 0). The WOMAC score improved significantly, from initial values of 35 (range, 10−56) to values of 2 (range, 0−9; p < 0.01). The SF-36 score showed significant improvement after six months in all four domains of physical health (p < 0.01) and in two of the four domains of mental health (p < 0.05). The sports frequency score increased by at least one level in six out of nine patients after six months. Conclusions: The conservative trio-therapy in patients with varus knee OA showed positive initial clinical results: less pain, higher function, better quality of life, and higher sport activity. Further studies are required to evaluate the long-term effect.

Diagnostic accuracy of measurements in progressive collapsing foot deformity using weight bearing computed tomography: A matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of known two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) in weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). We hypothesized that 3D biometrics would have better specificity and sensitivity for PCFD diagnosis than 2D measurements. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study, including 28 PCFD feet and 28 controls matched for age, sex and Body Mass Index. Two-dimensional measurements included: axial and sagittal talus-first metatarsal angles (TM1A and TM1S), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), forefoot arch angle (FFAA), middle facet incongruence angle (MF°) and uncoverage percentage (MF%). The 3D Foot Ankle Offset (FAO) was obtained using dedicated semi-automatic software. Intra and interobserver reliabilities were assessed. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the Curve (AUC)), sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: In PCFD, mean MF% and MF° were respectively 47.2% ± 15.4 and 13.3° ± 5.3 compared with 13.5% ± 8.7 and 5.6° ± 2.9 in controls (p < 0.001). The FAO was 8.1% ± 3.8 in PCFD and 1.4% ± 1.7 in controls (p < 0.001). AUCs were 0.99 (95%CI, 0.98-1) for MF%, 0.96 (95%CI, 0.9-1) for FAO, 0.90 (95%CI, 0.81-0.98) for MF°. For MF%, a threshold value equal or greater than 28.7% had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 92.8%. Conversely, a FAO value equal or greater than 4.6% had a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 89.2%. All other 2D measurements were significantly different in PCFD and controls (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MF% and FAO were both accurate measurements for PCFD. MF% demonstrated slightly better specificity. FAO better sensitivity. A combination of threshold values of 28.7% for MF% and 4.6% for FAO yielded 100% sensitivity and specificity.

What Are the Indications for Implant Revision in Three-component Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Given the increasing usage of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), a better understanding of the reasons leading to implant revision and the factors that might influence those indications is necessary to identify at-risk patients. QUESTION/PURPOSES: Using a single-design three-component ankle prosthesis, we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of implant revision at 5 and 10 years? (2) What are the indications for implant revision in our population? (3) What factors are associated with an increased likelihood of implant revision during the time frame in question? METHODS: Between 2003 and 2017, primary TAA using a single-design three-component ankle implant was performed by or under the supervision of the implant designer in 1006 patients (1074 ankles) aged between 17 and 88 years to treat end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. No other TAA systems were used during the study period at the investigators' institution. In 68 patients with bilateral surgery, only the first TAA was considered. Of the patients treated with the study implant, 2% (16 of 1006) were lost to follow-up 5 to 14 years after TAA and were not known to have died or undergone revision, and 5% (55 of 1006) were deceased due to reasons unrelated to the procedure, leaving 935 patients for evaluation in this retrospective study. The mean (range) follow-up for the included patients was 8.8 ± 4.2 (0.2 to 16.8) years. Implant revision was performed 0.5 to 13.2 years after TAA in 12% (121 of 1006) of our patients. Survivorship free from revision was calculated using cumulative incidence (competing risks) survivorship, with death as a competing risk. The reason for each revision was classified into one of six categories according to a modified version of a previously published protocol: aseptic loosening, cyst formation, instability, deep infection, technical error, and pain without another cause. Two foot and ankle surgeons reviewed the records of all patients who underwent implant revision and assigned each patient's reason for revision to one of the six categories. The decision for assigning each patient to one of the six categories was made based on a consensus agreement. A subgroup classification of preoperative ankle alignment (neutral, mild, and major deformity) and variables of age, sex, BMI, etiology of ankle osteoarthritis, and number of preoperative and intraoperative hindfoot or midfoot procedures were used in a multinomial logistic regression and Cox regression analysis to estimate their association with reason for revision and implant survival until revision. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of implant revision at the mean (range) follow-up time of 8.8 ± 4.2 years (0.2 to 16.8) was 9.8% (95% confidence interval 7.7% to 11.8%). Five and 10 years after TAA, cumulative incidence was 4.8% (95% CI 3.4 to 6.1) and 12.1% (95% CI 9.7% to 14.5%), respectively. The most common reason for revision was instability (34% [41 of 121]), followed by aseptic loosening of one or more metallic components (28% [34 of 121]), pain without another cause (12% [14 of 121]), cyst formation (10% [12 of 121]), deep infection (9% [11 of 121]), and technical error (7% [9 of 121]). Ankles with a major hindfoot deformity before TAA were more likely to undergo revision than ankles with a minor deformity (hazard ratio 1.9 [95% CI 1.2 to 3.0]; p = 0.007) or neutral alignment (HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.5 to 4.4]; p = 0.001). A preoperative hindfoot valgus deformity increased revision probability compared with a varus deformity (HR 2.1 [95% CI 1.4 to 3.4]; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Instability was a more common reason for implant revision after TAA with this three-component design than previously reported. All causes inducing either a varus or valgus hindfoot deformity must be meticulously addressed during TAA to prevent revision of this implant. Future studies from surgeons/institutions not involved in this implant design are needed to confirm these findings and to further investigate why a substantial number of patients had pain of unknown cause prompting revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Limitations of accessibility of the talar dome with different open surgical approaches.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to systematically review the current, relevant literature and provide a thorough understanding of the various open surgical approaches utilized to gain access to the talar dome for treatment of osteochondral lesions. Realizing the limits of access from soft tissue exposures and osteotomies, with and without external distraction, will help surgeons to select the appropriate approach for each individual clinical situation. METHODS: A literature search was performed using three major medical databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Embase. The Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of each included study. RESULTS: Of 3108 reviewed articles, nine cadaveric studies (113 limbs from 83 cadavers) evaluating the accessibility of the talar dome were included in the final analysis. Most of these (7/9 studies) investigated talar dome access in the context of treating osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) requiring perpendicular visualization of the involved region. Five surgical approaches (anteromedial; AM, anterolateral; AL, posteromedial; PM, posterolateral; PL, and direct posterior via an Achilles tendon splitting; DP), four types of osteotomy (anterolateral tibial, medial malleolar, distal fibular, and plafondplasty), and two methods of distraction (Hintermann retractor and external fixator) were used among the included studies. The most commonly used methods quantified talar access in the sagittal plane (6/9 studies, 66.7%). The greatest exposure of the talar dome can be achieved perpendicularly by performing an additional malleolar osteotomy (90.9% for lateral, and 100% for medial). The methodological quality of all included studies was determined to be satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Gaining perpendicular access to the central portion of the talar dome, measured in the sagittal plane, has clear limitations via soft tissue approaches either medially or laterally from the anterior or posterior aspects of the ankle. It is possible to access a greater talar dome area in a non-perpendicular fashion, especially from the posterior soft tissue approach. Various types of osteotomies can provide greater accessibility to the talar dome. This systematic review can help surgeons to select the appropriate approach for treatment of OLTs in each individual patient preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. Although of questionable accuracy, bilateral weightbearing radiographs are considered the current gold standard to assess these injuries. However, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), which provides clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be used for evaluation. This study aims to design a protocol that reliably measures the distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsal (M2) to assess the Lisfranc joint using WBCT imaging. METHODS: Two unique methods of measuring the C1-M2 distance were designed that localize the center of the interosseous Lisfranc ligament (ILL, reference point). This reference point was located by (I) measuring a specific distance at the M2 base, or (II) approximating from nearby bony landmarks, on both axial (Ax) and coronal (Cor) WBCT images. Four parameters (I-Ax, I-Cor, II-Ax, and II-Cor) were evaluated for each of 96 specimens. Measurements were recorded by three independent observers and repeated for inter- and intra-observer agreement. RESULTS: In total, 96 patient image series were included and assessed in our study with an average age of 46 (19-66, SD 16.1) and average BMI of 25.8 (17.8-30.5, SD 4.3). I-Ax showed excellent agreement for intra-observer evaluation (R = 0.802) and good agreement for inter-observer evaluation (R = 0.727). I-Cor demonstrated excellent inter- (R = 0.814) and intra-observer (R = 0.840) agreement. Good agreement was found for both II-Ax and II-Cor for both intra- (R = 0.730, R = 0.708) and inter-observer (R = 0.705, R = 0.645) evaluation. CONCLUSION: Measuring the C1-M2 joint space with coronal WBCT imaging through a protocol that localizes the ILL is reproducible, simple, and can potentially be utilized clinically to evaluate the Lisfranc joint.

Can a fibular malunion be corrected by a Z-shaped fibular osteotomy?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent realigning Z­shaped fibular osteotomy. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2014, 28 patients with a painful fibular malunion underwent a Z-shaped realignment fibular osteotomy. The mean age was 42.2 ± 14.1 years (range 19.1-67.8 years) and the mean follow-up was 7.0 ± 1.7 years (range 4.0-9.7 years), with no loss to follow-up. Weight-bearing radiographs were used to determine the distal fibula alignment based on Weber's criteria. Degenerative changes of the tibiotalar joint were assessed using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. Clinical assessment included pain evaluation, measurement of ankle range of motion (ROM), sports activities, and quality of life outcomes. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative or perioperative complications. No delayed unions or nonunions were observed. One patient had radiographic progression of degenerative changes in the tibiotalar joint. Postoperative complications included removal of hardware (n = 15) and arthroscopic tibiotalar joint debridement (n = 2). At the last follow-up the mean visual analog scale (VAS) decreased from 6.5 ± 1.1 to 2.1 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001),the ROM improved from 39ºâ€¯± 6º to 45ºâ€¯± 4.5º (p < 0.001), the short form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) physical and mental outcome scores improved from 49 ± 8 to 84 ± 7 (p < 0.001) and from 61 ± 4 to 83 ± 5 (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Z­shaped realignment osteotomy of the distal fibula can provide pain relief and functional improvement in the treatment of fibular malunion. Further studies are needed to address long-term outcomes in this patient cohort.

[Unstable injuries of the deltoid ligament complex in ankle fractures : How to diagnose, how to treat?] / Instabile Verletzungen des Deltabandkomplexes bei Sprunggelenkfrakturen : Wie erkennen, wie behandeln?

Unstable injuries of the deltoid ligament complex can have a substantial negative effect on the prognosis and treatment of ankle injuries. Lesions of the deltoid ligament are often overlooked at the initial presentation, both as isolated ruptures and in combination with more complex injuries of the ankle. Neglected unstable injuries of medial ankle ligaments may result in chronic instability, especially following correct treatment of fractures and lateral ligament injuries. These are accompanied by reduced ankle mobility, persisting pain, reduced load bearing and osteoarthritis. Despite the possible subsequent damage, the need for surgical repair of the deltoid ligament in patients with ankle fractures is controversially discussed. Although in most cases of ligament injuries of the upper ankle joint conservative treatment leads to very good results, there is increased interest in acute surgical treatment particularly for unstable injuries in order to avoid secondary instability and the associated sequelae. When surgical treatment should be given priority over conservative treatment has not yet been sufficiently clarified. This article gives an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of injuries of the deltoid ligament complex in patients with ankle fractures based on the current literature.

Combined weightbearing CT and MRI assessment of flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between Weightbearing CT (WBCT) markers of pronounced peritalar subluxation (PTS) and MRI findings of soft tissue insufficiency in patients with flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). We hypothesized that significant correlation would be found. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study with 54 flexible PCFD patients. WBCT and MRI variables deformity severity were evaluated, including markers of pronounced PTS, as well as soft tissue degeneration. A multiple regression analysis and partition prediction models were used to evaluate the relationship between bone alignment and soft tissue injury. P-values of less than .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Degeneration of the posterior tibial tendon was significantly associated with sinus tarsi impingement (p = .04). Spring ligament degeneration correlated to subtalar joint subluxation (p = .04). Talocalcaneal interosseous ligament involvement was the only one to significantly correlate to the presence of subfibular impingement (p = .02). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that WBCT markers of pronounced deformity and PTS were significantly correlated to MRI involvement of the PTT and other important restraints such as the spring and talocalcaneal interosseus ligaments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

Is Lower-limb Alignment Associated with Hindfoot Deformity in the Coronal Plane? A Weightbearing CT Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The goals of lower limb reconstruction are to restore alignment, to improve function, and to reduce pain. However, it remains unclear whether alignment of the lower limb and hindfoot are associated because an accurate assessment of hindfoot deformities has been limited by superposition on plain radiography. Consequently, surgeons often overlook hindfoot deformity when planning orthopaedic procedures of the lower limb. Therefore, we used weight-bearing CT to quantify hindfoot deformity related to lower limb alignment in the coronal plane. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is lower-limb alignment different in varus than in valgus hindfoot deformities for patients with and without tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis? (2) Does a hindfoot deformity correlate with lower-limb alignment in patients with and without tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis? (3) Is joint line orientation different in varus than in valgus hindfoot deformities for patients with tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis? (4) Does a hindfoot deformity correlate with joint line orientation in patients with tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis? METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2017, one foot and ankle surgeon obtained weightbearing CT scans as second-line imaging for 184 patients with ankle and hindfoot disorders. In 69% (127 of 184 patients) of this cohort, a combined weightbearing CT and full-leg radiograph was performed when symptomatic hindfoot deformities were present. Of those, 85% (109 of 127 patients) with a median (range) age of 53 years (23 to 75) were confirmed eligible based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this retrospective comparative study. The Takakura classification was used to divide the cohort into patients with (n = 74) and without (n = 35) osteoarthritis of the tibiotalar joint. Lower-limb measurements, obtained from the full-leg radiographs, consisted of the mechanical tibiofemoral angle, mechanical tibia angle, and proximal tibial joint line angle. Weightbearing CT images were used to determine the hindfoot's alignment (mechanical hindfoot angle), the tibiotalar joint alignment (distal tibial joint line angle and talar tilt angle) and the subtalar joint alignment (subtalar vertical angle). These values were statistically assessed with an ANOVA and a pairwise comparison was subsequently performed with Tukey's adjustment. A linear regression analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). A reliability analysis was performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Lower limb alignment differed among patients with hindfoot deformity and among patients with or without tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis. In patients with tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis, we found knee valgus in presence of hindfoot varus deformity and knee varus in presence of hindfoot valgus deformity (mechanical tibiofemoral angle 0.3 ± 2.6° versus -1.8 ± 2.1°; p < 0.001; mechanical tibia angle -1.4 ± 2.2° versus -4.3 ± 1.9°; p < 0.001). Patients without tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis demonstrated knee varus in the presence of hindfoot varus deformity compared with knee valgus in presence of hindfoot valgus deformity (mechanical tibiofemoral angle -2.2 ± 2.2° versus 0.9 ± 2.4°; p < 0.001; mechanical tibia angle -1.8 ± 2.1° versus -4.3 ± 1.9°; p < 0.001). Patients with more valgus deformity in the hindfoot tended to have more tibiofemoral varus (r = -0.38) and tibial varus (r = -0.53), when tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis was present (p < 0.001). Conversely, patients with more valgus deformity in the hindfoot tended to have more tibiofemoral valgus (r = 0.4) and tibial valgus (r = 0.46), when tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis was absent (p < 0.001). The proximal joint line of the tibia had greater varus orientation in patients with a hindfoot valgus deformity compared with greater valgus orientation in patients with a hindfoot varus deformity (proximal tibial joint line angle 88.5 ± 2.0° versus 90.6 ± 2.2°; p < 0.05). Patients with more valgus deformity in the hindfoot tended to have more varus angulation of the proximal tibial joint line angle (r = 0.31; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with osteoarthritis of the tibiotalar joint, varus angulation of the knee was associated with hindfoot valgus deformity and valgus angulation of the knee was associated with hindfoot varus deformity. Patients without tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis exhibited the same deviation at the level of the knee and hindfoot. These distinct radiographic findings were most pronounced in the alignment of the tibia relative to the hindfoot deformity. This suggests a detailed examination of hindfoot alignment before knee deformity correction at the level of the proximal tibia, to avoid postoperative increase of pre-existing hindfoot deformity. Other differences detected between the radiographic parameters were less pronounced and varied within the subgroups. Future research could identify prospectively which of these parameters contain clinical relevance by progressing osteoarthritis or deformity and how they can be altered by corrective treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Asymmetric lambda sign of the second tarsometatarsal joint on axial weight-bearing cone-beam CT scans of the foot: preliminary investigation for diagnosis of subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in a cadaveric model.

BACKGROUND: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose. Although of questionable accuracy, the current gold standard to assess these injuries is through bilateral weight-bearing radiography. However, weight-bearing cone beam-computed tomography (CBCT), providing clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be utilized for evaluation. This study aims to establish the hypothesis that a specific weight-bearing CBCT finding (asymmetric lambda sign) can serve as an independent indicator of a subtle Lisfranc injury. METHODS: Weight-bearing CBCT images of 24 match-paired cadaveric legs were acquired, initially intact, and then following sequential dissection of each aspect (dorsal, interosseous, and plantar ligaments, respectively) of the Lisfranc ligamentous complex (LLC). All scans were taken in non- (NWB, 0 kg), partial- (PWB, 40 kg), and full-weight-bearing (FWB, 80 kg) manners. The lambda sign was then inspected axially for asymmetry (positive sign) by identifying three symmetrical joint spaces created between the medial cuneiform and the second metatarsal base (C1-M2), the medial and middle cuneiform (C1-C2), and the second metatarsal base and middle cuneiform (M2-C2). RESULTS: A positive sign was observed in 25.6% (221/864) of all studies. Most notably, the fully dissected specimens demonstrated an asymmetric lambda sign in 33.3%, 72.2%, and 83.3% in NWB, PWB, and FWB conditions, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability kappa value was calculated to be 0.843 and 0.912. CONCLUSION: An asymmetric lambda sign is a simple and useful indicator for a complete LLC injury in PWB and FWB conditions using a cadaver model.

Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the Lisfranc joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and ScienceDirect were systematically searched. Thirty articles were subdivided by imaging modality: conventional radiography (17 articles), ultrasonography (six articles), computed tomography (CT) (four articles), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (11 articles). Some articles discussed multiple modalities. The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement methods, participant number, sensitivity, specificity, and measurement technique accuracy. Methodological quality was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: Conventional radiography commonly assesses Lisfranc injuries by evaluating the distance between either the first and second metatarsal base (M1-M2) or the medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base (C1-M2) and the congruence between each metatarsal base and its connecting tarsal bone. For ultrasonography, C1-M2 distance and dorsal Lisfranc ligament (DLL) length and thickness are evaluated. CT clarifies tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint alignment and occult fractures obscured on radiographs. Most MRI studies assessed Lisfranc ligament integrity. Overall, included studies show low bias for all domains except patient selection and are applicable to daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: While conventional radiography can demonstrate frank diastasis at the TMT joints; applying weightbearing can improve the viewer's capacity to detect subtle Lisfranc injury by radiography. Although ultrasonography can evaluate the DLL, its accuracy for diagnosing Lisfranc instability remains unproven. CT is more beneficial than radiography for detecting non-displaced fractures and minimal osseous subluxation. MRI is clearly the best for detecting ligament abnormalities; however, its utility for detecting subtle Lisfranc instability needs further investigation. Overall, the available studies' methodological quality was satisfactory.

Supramalleolar osteotomy in post-traumatic valgus ankle osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: To assess how the level of the deformity, the stage of the osteoarthritic process, and the role of additional surgeries impact radiographic and clinical outcomes following an extra-articular medial closing supramalleolar osteotomy for treatment of post-traumatic valgus ankle osteoarthritis. METHODS: About 56 consecutive patients who underwent an extra-articular medial closing wedge osteotomy for post-traumatic valgus ankle osteoarthritis were retrospectively analyzed. Subgroups were formed according to the pre-operative level of deformity and preoperative stage of ankle osteoarthritis. Additional surgical steps required to achieve a properly balanced hindfoot were also noted. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of each subgroup were compared with each other, and the role of additional surgical steps required to achieve a balanced hindfoot was investigated. RESULTS: Radiographic and clinical outcomes improved significantly between pre-operative assessment and the last follow-up. Patients with a pre-operative supramalleolar deformity showed superior radiographic outcomes compared to patients with an intra-articular deformity. Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between these two subgroups. The pre-operative stage of ankle osteoarthritis significantly impacted radiographic outcomes but did not influence clinical outcome measures. An additional fibula or calcaneus osteotomy was necessary for 55% and 23% of all patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Extra-articular medial closing supramalleolar osteotomies show satisfactory mid- to long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with post-traumatic valgus ankle osteoarthritis.

Hindfoot balancing in total ankle replacement: the role of supramalleolar osteotomies.

PURPOSE: To compare the obtained deformity correction and clinical/functional outcomes between patients who underwent total ankle replacement (TAR) with or without a concurrent supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) to address a varus and/or recurvatum deformity of the distal tibia. METHODS: Data of 23 patients treated with an additional SMO to correct a varus and/or recurvatum deformity of the distal tibia at the time of TAR were prospectively collected. Twenty-three matched patients who underwent TAR only served as controls. RESULTS: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)-hindfoot scale and pain assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) did not significantly differ between the two groups at the final follow-up (AOFAS-hindfoot scale SMO/TAR group = 82 ± 10; TAR group = 82 ± 12; VAS pain SMO/TAR group = 1 (range, 0-4); TAR group = 1 (range, 0-5)). Ankle range of motion (ROM) did not improve in the SMO/TAR group (pre-operative = 27 ± 13 degrees, last follow-up = 30 ± 9 degrees; P = .294), but did improve in the TAR group (pre-operative = 31 ± 14 degrees, last follow-up = 39 ± 14 degrees; P = .049). Two patients who underwent SMO/TAR showed non-union of the tibial osteotomy, and two patients who underwent TAR only suffered from an intra-operative medial malleolar fracture. CONCLUSION: An additional SMO during TAR in patients with a varus and/or recurvatum deformity of the distal tibia is not beneficial in most cases and should only be considered in pronounced multiplanar deformities.

Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time.

BACKGROUND: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to more precisely measure bone position than conventional weightbearing radiographic series (R) and conventional CT (CT). The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT as the standard imaging modality, evaluating image acquisition time, radiation dose, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: All patients who obtained a WBCT as part of standard of care from July 1, 2013 until March 15, 2019 were included in the study. Image acquisition time (T), radiation dose (RD) per patient, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed and compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) and the parameters from 2012, i.e. before the availability of WBCT (RCT group). RESULTS: 11,009 WBCT scans were obtained from 4987 patients (4,987 scans (45%) before treatment; 6,022 scans (55%) at follow-up). On a yearly average, 1,957 WBCTs (bilateral scans) and an additional 10.6 CTs (bilateral feet and ankles) were obtained (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 Rs (bilateral feet, dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view) and 254 CTs were obtained from 885 patients (RCT group). The mean yearly RD was 4.3/4.8uSv for the WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of .5uSv; a decrease of 10% for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly mean T was 114/493h in total (3.3/16.0min per patient) for WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of 379h; a 77% decrease for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly cost-effectiveness was a mean profit of 43,959/-723 Euros for WBCT/RCT groups. CONCLUSIONS: 11,009 WBCT scans from 4,987 patients over a period of 5.6 years at a foot and ankle department resulted in 10% decreased RD, 77% decreased T, and increased financial profit (51 Euros per patient) for the institution.

Impact of the rotational position of the hindfoot on measurements assessing the integrity of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients with ankle fractures demonstrate evidence of syndesmotic injuries. As intra-operative measurements have high specifity but low sensitivity for identifying injuries to the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis, numerous measurements have been developed to assess pre-operative syndesmosis integrity. Several factors affecting measurements on conventional radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images have been identified. The influence of the rotational position of the hindfoot during imaging, however, remains unclear. METHODS: Twenty (20) healthy volunteers (mean age 49, standard deviation [SD] 7.5, range 40-66 years) underwent a weightbearing cone beam CT scan. From this dataset, digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and axial CT images of the hindfoot were reconstructed. For each image, an antero-posterior view (defined as a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the second metatarsal) was reconstructed. Then, internal and external rotation of the hindfoot was simulated in 10° increments (maximum rotation of 30°). The tibio-fibular clear space (TFCS), tibio-fibular overlap (TFO), and medial clear space (MCS) were measured on each reconstructed DRR and axial CT image. RESULTS: Internal rotation of the hindfoot substantially impacted inter-observer agreement for TFCS measurements on DRRs. Intra- und inter-observer agreement of measurements (MCS, TFCS, TFO) on axial CT images was minimally affected by hindfoot rotation. Hindfoot rotation highly impacted on absolute values of each measurement. As little as 10° of internal or external rotation significantly (P<0.05) impacted MCS and TFO measurements (DRRs and axial CT images). External rotation increased, while internal rotation decreased, MCS and TFO measurements. TFCS measurements performed on DRRs did not significantly differ for 10° (P=0.0931) and 20° (P=0.486) of external rotation or for 10° of internal (P=0.33) rotation. DISCUSSION: The rotational position of the hindfoot during imaging has a major impact on MCS, TFCS, and TFO measurements when using DRRs and axial CT images. To avoid misinterpretation of measurements, the position of the hindfoot during imaging must be standardized. CONCLUSIONS: DRRs and axial CT images require reliable reconstructions to allow accurate assessment of the TFCS, TFO, and MCS.