RESUMO
Background: Traumatic injury is a leading cause of death for those under the age of 45, with 40% occurring due to hemorrhage. Severe tissue injury and hypoperfusion lead to marked changes in coagulation, thereby preventing formation of a stable blood clot and increasing hemorrhage associated mortality. Objectives: We aimed to quantify changes in clot formation and mechanics occurring after traumatic injury and the relationship to coagulation kinetics, and fibrinolysis. Methods: Plasma was isolated from injured patients upon arrival to the emergency department. Coagulation kinetics and mechanics of healthy donors and patient plasma were compared with rheological, turbidimetric and thrombin generation assays. ELISA's were performed to determine tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and D-dimer concentration, as fibrinolytic markers. Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the study. The median injury severity score (ISS) was 17, median age was 37.5 years old, and mortality rate was 30%. Rheological, turbidimetric and thrombin generation assays indicated that trauma patients on average, and especially deceased patients, exhibited reduced clot stiffness, increased fibrinolysis and reduced thrombin generation compared to healthy donors. Fibrinogen concentration, clot stiffness, D-dimer and tPA all demonstrated significant direct correlation to increasing ISS. Machine learning algorithms identified and highlighted the importance of clinical factors on determining patient outcomes. Conclusions: Viscoelastic and biochemical assays indicate significant contributors and predictors of mortality for improved patient treatment and therapeutic target detection. ESSENTIALS: Traumatic injury may lead to alterations in a patient's ability to form stable blood clotsA study was performed to assess how trauma severity affects coagulation kineticsKey alterations were observed in trauma patients, who exhibit weaker and slower forming clotsPaired with machine learning methods, the results indicate key aspects contributing to mortality.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Leak following surgical repair of traumatic duodenal injuries results in prolonged hospitalization and oftentimes nil per os(NPO) treatment. Parenteral nutrition(PN) has known morbidity; however, duodenal leak(DL) patients often have complex injuries and hospital courses resulting in barriers to enteral nutrition(EN). We hypothesized EN alone would be associated with 1)shorter duration until leak closure and 2)less infectious complications and shorter hospital length of stay(HLOS) compared to PN. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a retrospective, multicenter study from 35 Level-1 trauma centers, including patients >14 years-old who underwent surgery for duodenal injuries(1/2010-12/2020) and endured post-operative DL. The study compared nutrition strategies: EN vs PN vs EN + PN using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests; if significance was found pairwise comparison or Dunn's test were performed. RESULTS: There were 113 patients with DL: 43 EN, 22 PN, and 48 EN + PN. Patients were young(median age 28 years-old) males(83.2%) with penetrating injuries(81.4%). There was no difference in injury severity or critical illness among the groups, however there were more pancreatic injuries among PN groups. EN patients had less days NPO compared to both PN groups(12 days[IQR23] vs 40[54] vs 33[32],p = <0.001). Time until leak closure was less in EN patients when comparing the three groups(7 days[IQR14.5] vs 15[20.5] vs 25.5[55.8],p = 0.008). EN patients had less intra-abdominal abscesses, bacteremia, and days with drains than the PN groups(all p < 0.05). HLOS was shorter among EN patients vs both PN groups(27 days[24] vs 44[62] vs 45[31],p = 0.001). When controlling for predictors of leak, regression analysis demonstrated EN was associated with shorter HLOS(ß -24.9, 95%CI -39.0 to -10.7,p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: EN was associated with a shorter duration until leak closure, less infectious complications, and shorter length of stay. Contrary to some conventional thought, PN was not associated with decreased time until leak closure. We therefore suggest EN should be the preferred choice of nutrition in patients with duodenal leaks whenever feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.