Self-reported Sleep Quality Before and After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep quality is highly prevalent in atrial fibrillation (AF) with reported links between worse sleep quality and higher AF severity. Little research has examined whether sleep quality changes after AF ablation despite it being a routinely performed procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate self-reported sleep quality before and after AF ablation and to examine whether sleep quality differs by AF severity or sex. METHODS: This longitudinal pilot study assessed sleep using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at preablation and at 1, 3, and 6 months after ablation. Atrial fibrillation disease severity was assessed by the Canadian Cardiology Society Severity of AF scale. Outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman ρ correlations, and multilevel longitudinal models. RESULTS: The sample (N = 20) was 55% female with a mean age of 65 (±7) years. Poor sleep quality (mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores > 5) was evident at all time points. Improvement was noted at 3 months (moderate effect size d = 0.49); and negligible further improvement, from 3 to 6 months post ablation. Improvement was seen primarily in male subjects (large effect size d = 0.89 at 3 months), with smaller improvements for female subjects. Although Severity of AF scale scores were not correlated with sleep quality, Severity of AF scale severity scores did significantly improve over time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF have poor sleep quality that improves for the first 3 months after AF ablation, with men showing more improvement than women. A more accurate understanding of the sleep challenges after AF ablation could lead to development of more realistic patient education and improve patient self-management.

Trajectories of Recovery after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Ablation procedures are common for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), yet evidence is limited about patient perceptions of their recovery following ablation. We sought to expand understanding of this recovery process. Twenty participants undergoing their first AF ablation completed semi-structured interviews prior to ablation (baseline) and at one, three, and six months post AF ablation. Pre-procedure education is modeled after education used for other ablation procedures, preparing patients to expect a single recovery trajectory. We identified two recovery trajectories that varied in speed of symptom resolution: sustained improvement and pseudo improvement. Recovery was slower than expected in both trajectories. Moreover, returning to desired activity levels consistently lagged behind other symptom resolution by approximately two months. A more accurate understanding of what patients experience post-ablation, as illustrated in these findings, serves as a beginning step to alter patient education prior to AF ablation to better prepare individuals for the recovery process.

Variations in follow-up after atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary patient-centered approach using evidence-based care is recommended in recent atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines to achieve quality patient outcomes. Professional society guidelines are conflicting and vague in recommendations on timing of follow-up after AF ablation. PURPOSE: The aim of this secondary analysis was to examine whether the type and timing of follow-up care after AF ablation affected patient outcomes. METHODS: A 2-year, longitudinal, pilot study to explore patient experiences during the first 6 months following an AF ablation was conducted. Patients completed surveys and phone interviews before ablation, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the ablation. Pearson correlations and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used for comparison of outcomes over time. RESULTS: The sample (N = 20) had a mean age of 65 (± 7) years, was 55% female, 35% paroxysmal AF, and 65% persistent AF pre-ablation. Timing of follow-up visits following AF ablation varied widely. Patients reported many concerns and difficulties reflecting the lack of knowledge and unrealistic expectations of post-ablation recovery. Better outcomes were noted in those who were seen at 1-week post-ablation by a nurse practitioner (NP) compared with those who were not seen until 1 or 3 months after ablation by a physician. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Atrial fibrillation ablation is routinely performed in the United States, yet there seems to be a lack of standardization concerning the type and timing of follow-up care after AF ablation. These preliminary findings support a standardized approach to include an NP visit at one week after AF ablation to achieve quality AF patient outcomes.

Symptom challenges after atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear what symptom challenges occur during the recovery phase after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. OBJECTIVES: This longitudinal pilot study explored the patient perspective of the first six months following an AF ablation. METHODS: Telephone interviews and questionnaires were used with 20 patients at baseline, at 1, 3, and 6 months after AF ablation. Telephone interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Mean age was 65 ± 7 years and the sample was 55% female. The severity and duration of fatigue was the most concerning symptom. Patient expectations differed from providers' expectations. Recovery was a much slower process than patients expected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients struggled to manage symptoms after AF ablation. A more accurate understanding of the symptom challenges following AF ablation could lead to development of more realistic education to improve patient self-management.

Effect of environmental changes on noise in the NICU.

PURPOSE: To evaluate die effect of changes in die NICU environment on sound levels. DESIGN: A prospective quasi-experimental design evaluated sound levels in a 43-bed NICU. Decibel levels were monitored utilizing a data-logging dosimeter for 24 hours weekly over 12 months. Sound levels were also measured inside four different incubator models. SAMPLE: Forty-four 24-hour decibel recordings were obtained in one of eight randomly selected four-bed pods. In addition, a single 1-hour recording was obtained in four different models of vacant incubators. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: Ambient sound levels. RESULTS: Decibel levels were analyzed to identify changes in noise levels following alterations in the NICU environment. Installation of motion-sensing motorized paper towel holders significantly increased levels at beds closest to the towel dispensers, as did the trial of a new communication system. Decibel levels in four different incubators revealed varying noise levels. This study suggests that all environmental changes must be monitored to ensure that they reduce rather than increase noise levels.

Effect of environmental changes on noise in the NICU.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of changes in the NICU environment on sound levels. DESIGN: A prospective quasi-experimental design evaluated sound levels in a 43-bed NICU. Decibel levels were monitored utilizing a data-logging dosimeter for 24 hours weekly over 12 months. Sound levels were also measured inside four different incubator models. SAMPLE: Forty-four 24-hour decibel recordings were obtained in one of eight randomly selected four-bed pods. In addition, a single 1-hour recording was obtained in four different models of vacant incubators. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: Ambient sound levels. RESULTS: Decibel levels were analyzed to identify changes in noise levels following alterations in the NICU environment. Installation of motion-sensing motorized paper towel holders significantly increased levels at beds closest to the towel dispensers, as did thetrial of a new communication system. Decibel levels in four different incubators revealed varying noise levels. This study suggests that all environmental changes must be monitored to ensure that they reduce rather than increase noise levels.