Toll-like receptor expression and functional behavior in platelets from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Multiple blood cell abnormalities participate in the development of inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although platelets have been suggested as one of these contributors through the release of their content during activation, there are limited specific data about their role as immune players in SLE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen SLE patients were included. Flow cytometry was used to measure Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2, 4, and 9 in resting platelets, platelet-activation markers (PAC-1 binding, P-selectin, CD63, and CD40 ligand -L) and platelet-leukocyte aggregates before and after specific TLR stimulation. Soluble CD40L and von Willebrand factor (vWf) release from stimulated platelets was measured using ELISA. RESULTS: In resting conditions, SLE platelets showed normal expression levels of TLR 2, 4 and 9. Platelet surface activation markers, soluble CD40L, and vWf release were normal at baseline and after TLR stimulation. Platelet-monocyte aggregates were elevated in resting conditions in SLE samples and showed only a marginal increase after TLR stimulation, while baseline and stimulated platelet-neutrophil and platelet-lymphocyte aggregates were normal. C-reactive protein levels positively correlated with platelet-monocyte aggregates both at baseline and after stimulation with the TLR-2 agonist PAM3CSK4, suggesting these complexes could reflect the inflammatory activity in SLE. In our cohort, 12 of 13 patients received treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a known inhibitor of endosomal activity and a potential inhibitor of platelet activation. The fact that SLE platelets showed an adequate response to TLR agonists suggests that, despite this treatment, they retain the ability to respond to the increased levels of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which represent known TLR ligands, present in the circulation of SLE patients. Interestingly, elevated plasma levels of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a classical DAMP, correlated with vWf release from TLR-stimulated platelets, suggesting that HMGB1 may also be released by platelets, thereby creating a positive feedback loop for platelet activation that contributes to inflammation. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates normal platelet TLR expression and function together with increased circulating platelet-monocyte aggregates. In addition, a direct correlation was observed between plasma HMGB1 levels and platelet vWf release following TLR2 stimulation. This platelet behavior in a group of patients undergoing HCQ treatment suggests that platelets could play a role in the inflammatory state of SLE.

Platelet Toll-Like Receptors Mediate Thromboinflammatory Responses in Patients With Essential Thrombocythemia.

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is comprised among chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and is caused by driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL, which lead to megakaryocyte proliferation and prominent thrombocytosis. Thrombosis remains the main cause of morbidity in ET and is driven by the interplay between blood cells, the endothelium, the clotting cascade, and host-derived inflammatory mediators. Platelet activation plays a key role in the thrombotic predisposition, although the underlying mechanisms remain poorly defined. In addition to their role in hemostasis, platelets participate in innate immunity and inflammation owing to the expression of toll-like receptors (TLR), which recognize inflammatory signals, triggering platelet functional responses. Considering the impact of inflammation on ET procoagulant state, we assessed the contribution of TLR2 and TLR4 to platelet hemostatic and inflammatory properties in ET patients, by using Pam3CSK4 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as specific TLR2 and TLR4 ligands, respectively. TLR2 ligation induced increased surface translocation of α-granule-derived P-selectin and CD40L, which mediate platelet interaction with leukocytes and endothelial cells, respectively, and higher levels of dense granule-derived CD63 in patients, whereas PAC-1 binding was not increased and LPS had no effect on these platelet responses. Platelet-neutrophil aggregate formation was elevated in ET at baseline and after stimulation of both TLR2 and TLR4. In addition, ET patients displayed higher TLR2- and TLR4-triggered platelet secretion of the chemokine RANTES (CCL5), whereas von Willebrand factor release was not enhanced, revealing a differential releasate pattern for α-granule-stored inflammatory molecules. TLR-mediated hyperresponsiveness contrasted with impaired or preserved responses to classic platelet hemostatic agonists, such as TRAP-6 and thrombin. TLR2 and TLR4 expression on the platelet surface was normal, whereas phosphorylation of downstream effector ERK1/2 was higher in patients at baseline and after incubation with Pam3CSK4, which may partly explain the enhanced TLR2 response. In conclusion, exacerbated response to TLR stimulation may promote platelet activation in ET, boosting platelet/leukocyte/endothelial interactions and secretion of inflammatory mediators, overall reinforcing the thromboinflammatory state. These findings highlight the role of platelets as inflammatory sentinels in MPN prothrombotic scenario and provide additional evidence for the close intertwining between thrombosis and inflammation in this setting.