Effect of Jardiance on glucose uptake into astrocytomas.

PURPOSE: SGLT2, the sodium glucose cotransporter two, is expressed in human pancreatic, prostate and brain tumors, and in a mouse cancer model SGLT2 inhibitors reduce tumor glucose uptake and growth. In this study we have measured the effect of a specific SGLT2 inhibitor, Jardiance® (Empagliflozin), on glucose uptake into astrocytomas in patients. METHODS: We have used a specific SGLT glucose tracer, α-methyl-4-[18F]fluoro-4-deoxy-α-D-glucopyranoside (Me4FDG), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) to measure glucose uptake. Four of five patients enrolled had WHO grade IV glioblastomas, and one had a low grade WHO Grade II astrocytoma. Two dynamic brain PET scans were conducted on each patient, one before and one after treatment with a single oral dose of Jardiance, a specific SGLT2 inhibitor. As a control, we also determined the effect of oral Jardiance on renal SGLT2 activity. RESULTS: In all five patients an oral dose (25 or 100 mg) of Jardiance reduced Me4FDG tumor accumulation, highly significant inhibition in four, and inhibited SGLT2 activity in the kidney. CONCLUSIONS: These initial experiments show that SGLT2 is a functional glucose transporter in astocytomas, and Jardiance inhibited glucose uptake, a drug approved by the FDA to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), heart failure, and renal failure. We suggest that clinical trials be initiated to determine whether Jardiance reduces astrocytoma growth in patients.

Alzheimer's Amyloid Hypothesis and Antibody Therapy: Melting Glaciers?

The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer's disease is still alive, although heavily challenged. Effective anti-amyloid immunotherapy would confirm the hypothesis' claim that the protein amyloid-beta is the cause of the disease. Two antibodies, aducanumab and lecanemab, have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, while a third, donanemab, is under review. The main argument for the FDA approvals is a presumed therapy-induced removal of cerebral amyloid deposits. Lecanemab and donanemab are also thought to cause some statistical delay in the determination of cognitive decline. However, clinical efficacy that is less than with conventional treatment, selection of amyloid-positive trial patients with non-specific amyloid-PET imaging, and uncertain therapy-induced removal of cerebral amyloids in clinical trials cast doubt on this anti-Alzheimer's antibody therapy and hence on the amyloid hypothesis, calling for a more thorough investigation of the negative impact of this type of therapy on the brain.

Revision of Alzheimer's diagnostic criteria or relocation of the Potemkin village.

The recently announced revision of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostic ATN classification adds to an already existing disregard for clinical assessment the rejection of image-based in vivo assessment of the brain's condition. The revision suggests that the diagnosis of AD should be based solely on the presence of cerebral amyloid-beta and tau, indicated by the "A" and "T". The "N", which stands for neurodegeneration - detected by imaging - should no longer be given importance, except that A+ ± T + = AD with amyloid PET being the main method for demonstrating A+ . We believe this is an artificial and misleading suggestion. It is artificial because it relies on biomarkers whose significance remains obscure and where the detection of "A" is based on a never-validated PET method using a tracer that marks much more than amyloid-beta. It is misleading because many patients without dementia will be falsely classified as having AD, but nonetheless candidates for passive immunotherapy, which may be more harmful than beneficial, and sometimes fatal.

Donanemab, another anti-Alzheimer's drug with risk and uncertain benefit.

Based on "reducing amyloid plaques in the brain", the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted accelerated and full approval for two monoclonal anti-Alzheimer's antibodies, aducanumab and lecanemab, respectively. Approval of a third antibody, donanemab, is pending. Moreover, lecanemab and donanemab are claimed to cause delay in the cognitive decline that characterizes the disease. We believe that these findings are subject to misinterpretation and statistical bias. Donanemab is claimed to cause removal of up to 86 % of cerebral amyloid and 36 % delay in cognitive decline compared to placebo. In reality, these are very small changes on an absolute scale and arguably less than what can be achieved with cholinesterase inhibitor/memantine therapy. Moreover, the "removal" of amyloid, based on the reduced accumulation of amyloid-PET tracer, most likely also reflects therapy-related tissue damage. This would also correlate with the minimal clinical effect, the increased frequency of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, and the accelerated loss of brain volume in treated compared to placebo patients observed with these antibodies. We recommend halting approvals of anti-AD antibodies until these issues are fully understood to ensure that antibody treatment does not cause more harm than benefit to patients.