Safe Spaces 4 Sexual Health: A Status-Neutral, Mobile Van, HIV/STI Testing Intervention Using Online Outreach to Reach MSM at High Risk for HIV Acquisition or Transmission.

BACKGROUND: Black men who have sex with men (MSM) carry the greatest burden of new HIV diagnoses in the United States. Ending the HIV epidemic requires strategic, culturally specific approaches to target factors contributing to persistent HIV disparities. SETTING: Safe Spaces 4 Sexual Health (SS4SH), a community-informed HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing strategy combining mobile van testing with online outreach, was implemented over a 14-month period from 2018 to 2019 in Baltimore, MD. METHODS: We evaluated the reach of MSM at high risk with high acquisition or transmission risk by SS4SH mobile van combined with online outreach as compared with the Baltimore City Health Department's venue-based mobile van (with no online outreach) operating during the same period based on the following HIV/STI testing outcome measures: (1) number of MSM HIV or STI tested, (2) new HIV diagnosis rate, (3) percent with new syphilis diagnosis, (4) percent at high risk for HIV acquisition, and (5) percent people living with HIV at high risk for transmission. RESULTS: Over a 14-month period, SS4SH HIV/STI tested 151 MSM. Of these, 74% were Black and the mean age was 34 (SD = 10, range = 19-68). Seven percent (10/148) were new HIV diagnoses, and 10% (13/130) were diagnosed with syphilis. The Baltimore City Health Department's venue-based mobile van strategy yielded 53% (231) more MSM (71% Black, mean age 38, SD = 14, range = 15-74), but the HIV/syphilis positivity rate was significantly lower: 0.5% new HIV diagnosis rate (P < 0.001) and 0.5% with syphilis diagnosis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest SS4SH combing online outreach with mobile van testing may be more effective at reaching high-risk Black MSM than venue-based mobile testing.

Rebuilding human resources for health: a case study from Liberia.

INTRODUCTION: Following twenty years of economic and social growth, Liberia's fourteen-year civil war destroyed its health system, with most of the health workforce leaving the country. Following the inauguration of the Sirleaf administration in 2006, the Ministry of Health & Social Welfare (MOHSW) has focused on rebuilding, with an emphasis on increasing the size and capacity of its human resources for health (HRH). Given resource constraints and the high maternal and neonatal mortality rates, MOHSW concentrated on its largest cadre of health workers: nurses. CASE DESCRIPTION: Based on results from a post-war rapid assessment of health workers, facilities and community access, MOHSW developed the Emergency Human Resources (HR) Plan for 2007-2011. MOHSW established a central HR Unit and county-level HR officers and prioritized nursing cadres in order to quickly increase workforce numbers, improve equitable distribution of workers and enhance performance. Strategies included increasing and standardizing salaries to attract workers and prevent outflow to the private sector; mobilizing donor funds to improve management capacity and fund incentive packages in order to retain staff in hard to reach areas; reopening training institutions and providing scholarships to increase the pool of available workers. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: MOHSW has increased the total number of clinical health workers from 1396 in 1998 to 4653 in 2010, 3394 of which are nurses and midwives. From 2006 to 2010, the number of nurses has more than doubled. Certified midwives and nurse aides also increased by 28% and 31% respectively. In 2010, the percentage of the clinical workforce made up by nurses and nurse aides increased to 73%. While the nursing cadre numbers are strong and demonstrate significant improvement since the creation of the Emergency HR Plan, equitable distribution, retention and performance management continue to be challenges. CONCLUSION: This paper illustrates the process, successes, ongoing challenges and current strategies Liberia has used to increase and improve HRH since 2006, particularly the nursing workforce. The methods used here and lessons learned might be applied in other similar settings.

Pulse pressure and adverse outcomes in women: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that brachial pulse pressure (PP) may be a better predictor of outcome than systolic or diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP). We sought to investigate the relative contributions of these indices to risk for adverse outcomes in women with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. METHODS: Among 857 women referred for angiography for suspected myocardial ischemia, baseline evaluations were performed, and the women were followed for clinical outcome. Relationships between baseline characteristics, blood pressure components, and outcomes were evaluated. Separate multivariate stepwise Cox regression models for PP and SBP (expressed in 10 mm Hg increments) were constructed and included covariates significantly associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: After 5.2 years (mean), univariate testing identified higher PP associated with higher risk for cardiovascular (CV) mortality and adverse CV outcomes than SBP, DBP, or mean arterial pressure (MAP). Multivariate modeling identified both PP and SBP associated with adverse CV outcomes, but only PP was significantly associated with higher CV mortality. When both PP and SBP were included in the model, only PP remained an independent predictor of adverse outcomes for CV events. CONCLUSIONS: In women with suspected CAD and myocardial ischemia, PP is a stronger predictor of adverse outcomes than SBP, DBP, or MAP with an 18% excess mortality risk for every 10 mm Hg increase in PP. Further investigations into pathophysiologic mechanisms and specific pharmacologic approaches to modifying this novel target are warranted.