Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment: SRP and Innovative Therapeutic Approaches.

Periodontitis is a major public health problem, that can have local and systemic consequences ranging from tooth loss to the aggravation of other chronic diseases. The consequences of which have an impact on patient's overall general health and quality of life. Periodontal treatments include a large range of techniques and concepts from plaque control to periodontal debridement, surgery and regeneration. Regardless of the treatment proposed, it always begins with the same first essential simple step that is etiological therapy which includes oral hygiene management and the control of periodontal risk factors. The aim of this first step, presented in this chapter, consists mainly in reducing oral bacterial load and inflammation by the means of daily oral hygiene methods and sub-gingival biofilm disruption. Although understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in periodontitis has increased, treatment wise, non-surgical debridement remains the keystone of every periodontal treatment and supportive periodontal therapy. Once risk factors are monitored and plaque control mastered by the patient, root instrumentation can be performed with hand or power-driven instruments. However effective, sub-gingival biofilm disruption has some limits and can be improved with adjunctive therapies such as antiseptics, antibiotics, air polishing or other emerging devices and therapies. Unfortunately, the lack of clear clinical guidelines, concerning these adjunctive therapies, still remains, thus pointing out the necessity of more standardized clinical studies. Also, if some patients can return to a healthy periodontal state, most periodontal patients will remain at periodontal risk for life. Proper assessment of the patient's periodontal risk will help establish correct monitoring of patients successfully treated for their periodontal disease.

Obesity Drives an Oral Microbiota Signature of Female Patients with Periodontitis: A Pilot Study.

The aim of this study was to analyze the link between oral microbiota and obesity in humans. We conducted a pilot study including 19 subjects with periodontitis divided into two groups: normo-weighted subjects (NWS) with a body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 25 (n = 9) and obese subjects (OS) with a BMI > 30 (n = 10). Obesity was associated with a poor oral health status characterized by an increased number of missing teeth and a higher score of periodontal-support loss associated with dysbiotic oral microbiota (39.45 ± 3.74 vs. 26.41 ± 11.21, p = 0.03 for the Chao 1 index). Oral microbiota taxonomic analysis showed that the abundance of the Capnocytophaga genus was higher (2.47% ± 3.02 vs. 0.27% ± 0.29, p = 0.04) in OS compared to NWS. Obese females (OF) were characterized by an increase in the Streptococcus genus (34.12% ± 14.29 vs. 10.55% ± 10.42, p = 0.05) compared to obese males (OM), where the Neisseria genus was increased (5.75% ± 5.03 vs. 58.05% ± 30.64, p = 0.008). These first data suggest that sex/gender is determinant in the link between oral dysbiotic microbiota and obesity in patients with periodontitis. Our results could lead to recommendations concerning therapeutic strategies for obese patients with periodontitis following the sex/gender.

Concentrations and in vivo antibacterial activity of spiramycin and metronidazole in patients with periodontitis treated with high-dose metronidazole and the spiramycin/metronidazole combination.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown that metronidazole, alone or in combination with spiramycin (250 mg/1 500 000 units, three times/day), is an effective treatment for active periodontitis, although the dose of metronidazole currently used (750 mg/day) could provide concentrations in gingival crevice fluid that are too low for the MICs of the involved pathogens. This study tested the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of the currently used metronidazole dose (as contained in the fixed spiramycin/metronidazole combination) in patients with an active periodontitis, and of a high dose (1500 mg/day) of metronidazole alone. METHODS: We measured the MICs of spiramycin and metronidazole for the recovered pathogens and the gingival crevice fluid antibiotic concentrations of both antibiotics, and attempted to correlate them with bacterial eradication. RESULTS: The concentrations of metronidazole consistently exceeded the MICs for the pathogens isolated in the corresponding sites, even at the usual metronidazole (250 mg three times/day) dose. All the bacterial species were eradicated during treatment and at follow-up, although Fusobacterium spp. eradicated during treatment reappeared in a majority of the cases at follow-up, 30 days after treatment, in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of antibiotic therapy with metronidazole or the spiramycin/metronidazole combination are consistent with their in vitro antibacterial activity and with the local antibiotic concentrations; they suggest that the currently used metronidazole dose (250 mg, three times/day) alone or as part of the spiramycin/metronidazole combination, could be sufficient for the treatment of active periodontitis.