Preventing varus collapse in proximal humerus fracture fixation: 90-90 dual plating versus endosteal fibular allograft strut.

INTRODUCTION: Screw cut out and varus collapse are the most common complication of locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare dual plating and endosteal fibular allograft struts as augmentation strategies to prevent varus collapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A trapezoidal osteotomy was created at the metaphysis to create a 2-part proximal humerus model in 18 paired shoulder specimens. Each specimen was assigned to group A, B, or C and was fixed with either a lateral locking plate, a lateral locking plate and anterior one-third tubular plate in an orthogonal 90/90 configuration, or a lateral locking plate with intramedullary fibular strut, respectively. The specimens were stressed in axial compression to failure. Displacement, elastic limit, ultimate load, and stiffness were recorded and calculated. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean cyclic displacement between the three groups (0.71 mm vs 0.89 mm vs 0.61 mm for Group A, B, C, respectively). Lateral plating demonstrated the greatest absolute and relative displacement at the elastic limit (5.3 mm ± 1.5 and 4.4 mm ± 1.3) without significance. The elastic limit or yield point was greatest for fibular allograft, Group C (1223 N ± 501 vs 1048 N ± 367 for Group B and 951 N ± 249 for Group A) without significance. CONCLUSIONS: Dual plating of proximal humerus fractures in a 90-90 configuration demonstrates similar biomechanical properties as endosteal fibular strut allograft. Both strategies demonstrate superior stiffness to isolated lateral locked plating.

The relationship between fluid biomarkers and clinical outcomes in sports-related concussions: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The literature on fluid biomarkers for concussion has primarily focused on comparing athletes with and without a diagnosis of concussion and on examining the relationship between fluid biomarkers and exposure to head trauma. This systematic literature review aims to examine the strength of evidence for fluid biomarkers to be associated with clinically relevant outcomes in sports-related concussion. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using EmBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL. English-language articles that included athletes participating in organized sports and reported the relationship between at least one fluid biomarker and at least one clinical outcome measure, or provided data that could be used to analyze this relationship, were included. RESULTS: Studies of the relationship between fluid biomarkers and clinical outcomes of concussion have yielded small or variable effects. There were significant inconsistencies in methodology including duration of time post-injury of biomarker collection, use of control groups, the number of time points post-injury that biomarkers were collected, and what clinical outcomes were utilized. CONCLUSION: There is currently insufficient evidence to support a relationship between any of the included fluid biomarkers and clinical outcome measures of concussion. Future research including clinical outcome measures and using standardized study design and methodology is necessary.

Effects of Lateral Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy on Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Biomechanical Evaluation.

Background: Lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment increases the rate of lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT) with a concomitant varus-producing opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is an option yet to be evaluated biomechanically. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to clarify the biomechanical effects of the realignment procedure in the setting of LMAT. We hypothesized that (1) given the dependence of the lateral compartment on the lateral meniscus, a DFO and increasing degrees of varus would be insufficient to restore lateral compartment pressures to normal from a lateral meniscus-deficient state, and that (2) LMAT would restore lateral compartment pressures to the intact state while DFO would decrease lateral compartment pressures for any given state of the meniscus. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knees underwent opening-wedge varus-producing DFO secured by an external fixator. Anatomic alignment was standardized to 6° of mechanical valgus, and each joint was tested in full extension. Submeniscal placement of thin film pressure sensors allowed for the recording of contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and contact area. The specimens were loaded on a biaxial dynamic testing machine with loading angles between 9° valgus and 6° varus of mechanical alignment. Conditions tested included intact meniscus, meniscal deficiency, and meniscal transplantation. Results: Isolated varus-producing DFO to 6° in the meniscus-deficient state failed to restore joint pressures and contact areas to the intact state, with significant changes in mean contact pressure (175%), mean peak contact pressure (135%), and contact area (-41%) (all P < .05 vs intact), while LMAT restored all outcome measures (all P > .05 compared with intact). After LMAT, every additional 1° of DFO correction contributed to a decrease in the mean contact pressure, peak pressure, and contact area of 5.6% (-0.0479 N/mm2), 5.9% (-0.154 N/mm2), and 1.4% (-6.99 mm2) for the lateral compartment and 7.3% (+0.034 N/mm2), 12.6% (+0.160 N/mm2), and 4.3% (+20.53 mm2) for the medial compartment, respectively. Conclusion: Isolated DFO was inadequate to restore load distribution in meniscus-deficient knees, while concomitant LMAT restored near normal forces and improved the lateral compartment biomechanical profile. Clinical Relevance: Our findings support the concomitant use of LMAT and varus-producing DFO in the setting of lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment. This study provides tools for the orthopaedic surgeon to individualize the correction for each patient.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Shoulder Instability With a Clinically Relevant Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss Model.

BACKGROUND: Existing biomechanical studies of posterior glenoid bone loss and labral pathology are limited by their use of anterior instability models, which differ in both orientation and morphology and have been performed in only a single, neutral arm position. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical effectiveness of a posterior labral repair in the setting of a clinically relevant posterior bone loss model in various at-risk arm positions. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested in 7 consecutive states using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm: (1) native, (2) posterior labral tear (6-9 o'clock), (3) posterior labral repair, (4) mean posterior glenoid bone loss (7%) with labral tear, (5) mean posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair, (6) large posterior glenoid bone loss (28%) with labral tear, and (7) large posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair. Bone loss was created using 3-dimensional printed computed tomography model templates. Biomechanical testing consisted of 75 N of posterior-inferior force and 75 N of compression at 60° and 90° of flexion and scaption. Posterior-inferior translation, lateral translation, and peak dislocation force were measured for each condition. RESULTS: Labral repair significantly increased dislocation force independent of bone loss state between 10.1 and 14.8 N depending on arm position. Dislocation force significantly decreased between no bone loss and small bone loss (11.9-13.5 N), small bone loss and large bone loss (9.4-14.3 N), and no bone loss and large bone loss (21.2-26.5 N). Labral repair significantly decreased posterior-inferior translation compared with labral tear states by a range of 1.0 to 2.3 mm. In the native state, the shoulder was most unstable in 60° of scaption, with 29.9 ± 6.1-mm posterior-inferior translation. CONCLUSION: Posterior labral repair improved stability of the glenohumeral joint, and even in smaller to medium amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss the glenohumeral stability was maintained with labral repair in this cadaveric model. However, a labral repair with large bone loss could not improve stability to the native state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study shows that larger amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss (>25%) may require bony augmentation for adequate stability.