Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone use in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis - study site experience based on the therapy of 104 patients.

Mitoxantrone (MX) is used in patients with primary and secondary progressive as well as relapsing-remitting type of multiple sclerosis (PPMS, SPMS, RRMS). The objective of our project was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MX use in patients with PPMS and SPMS. METHODS: The retrospective study included 104 patients (mean age 54.2 ± 9.0), with PPMS (13.46%) and SPMS (86.54%) treated with MX. During single cycle of the MX therapy a dose of 12 mg/m2 of body surface area was administered and next cycles every three months up to a total dose of 140 mg/m2 were realized. RESULTS: The course of the therapy was completed by 95 patients (91.34%) including 73 patients who received a scheduled whole dose. The average cumulative dose per patient was 75.2 mg/m2. Thirty-two patients reported nausea after MX administration, 20 revealed increase in the incidence of infection and 19 patients hair loss. Twenty-two patients discontinued therapy (seven patients because of the progress of disability). Independent risk factors for deterioration were: age and the form of PPMS (RR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.17-2.07] and RR 2.8 [95% CI: 1.08-7.21], respectively). Five patients revealed a asymptomatic decrease in EF value <50% or 10% in relation to the previous test. CONCLUSIONS: MX therapy enables us to stabilize the disease without causing any significant side effects in most patients with progressive disease as compared to patients with primary progressive disease with a comparable safety profile. Larger benefits of MX therapy are associated with the patients with secondary progressive disease.

Effect of comorbidities on the course of multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical condition of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients depends not only on the course of MS but also on their lifestyle and comorbidities. This study aimed to assess the effect of selected comorbidities, lifestyle-related factors and clinical data available at the time of MS diagnosis, on the disease activity and the disability progression in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on clinical relapses over a period of 12 months of observation and the results of MRI scans, 138 patients with RRMS were qualified into two groups: 'active' or 'stable' course of the disease. Patients from both groups were compared regarding the clinical data determined at diagnosis, comorbidities and lifestyle-related factors. Similar comparisons were carried out between patients with EDSS < 3 vs, patients with EDSS ≥ 3. RESULTS: No significant differences in comorbidities and lifestyle-related data between the stable and active group were detected. Arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, higher BMI values, older age and a lower education level, were found more frequently in patients with EDSS ≥ 3. Oligoclonal bands, multifocal clinical manifestation as the first relapse, higher EDSS score and many T2 MRI lesions at the diagnosis were detected significantly more often in the active group. Motor or brainstem/cerebellum damage symptoms as the first relapse were observed more frequently in patients with EDSS ≥ 3. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular diseases may exacerbate disability progression in MS patients. Relapses and radiological activity do not depend on chronic comorbidities. Clinical data available at the diagnosis may be useful in forecasting a distant course of MS.

Diagnostic methods used in searching for markers of atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis.

The results of available studies on assessment of neurodegenerative lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using different approaches have not been conclusive. Currently, clinical assessment is the most commonly used (involving primarily mobility assessment), along with magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological testing. In this review we describe available clinical, neuroimaging, electrophysiological and laboratory tests used to assess the neurodegeneration in MS. Laboratory markers to determine the risk of disease, its conversion and prognosis in MS patients are being constantly sought. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample collection is invasive and constitutes a burden to a patient, so serum biomarkers are being investigated. Optimistic preliminary results of studies assessing neurofilament light chains (NFL) in serum of MS patients, encourage further research. The possibility to use such marker (or a group of markers) would significantly facilitate clinical decisions at the stage of diagnosis and treatment. Currently used treatments have limited efficacy and are associated with numerous adverse effects. Additional information from available clinical, imaging, electrophysiological or laboratory biomarker or a group of biomarkers, which predict the course and prognosis, will facilitate choosing optimal treatment and its escalation at the relevant stage. CONCLUSION: Using the diagnostic panel consisting of imaging, neurophysiology and serology testing along with clinical and neuropsychological assessment may improve the reliability of diagnostic instruments evaluating cerebral atrophy in MS patients.