RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) continues to be an invariably fatal condition. While historically, de-novo metastatic PCa was primarily treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and systemic therapy, there is a growing trend toward incorporating local treatments in the early management of the disease. This is particularly applicable to men with oligometastatic PCa (OMPC), which represents an 'intermediate phase' between localized and disseminated metastatic disease. Local treatment offers an opportunity for disease control before it progresses to a more advanced stage. This review discussed the current evidence for local treatment options for OMPC. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, it has been suggested that men with OMPC may have a more indolent course and, therefore, favorable outcomes may be observed with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). This review will not address the role of MDT to patients with OMPC but will focus on local treatments of the primary disease. The three main forms of local therapy employed for OMPC are cryotherapy, radiation therapy, and cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP). Whole gland cryotherapy, either with ADT or with ADT and systemic chemotherapy, has shown some limited promising results. Radiation therapy combined with ADT has also demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival in clinical trials (primarily STAMPEDE Arm G and HORRAD). CRP often combined with ADT has emerged as a potential strategy for managing OMPC, with promising findings primarily from retrospective studies. Currently, several randomized controlled trials are underway to further investigate the role of CRP in the oligometastatic setting. SUMMARY: OMPC has become a unique category of disease with specific therapeutic implications. Lack of robust clinical data renders treatment selection controversial. Further studies with long follow up are necessary to identify men with oligometastatic disease who will benefit from local treatment.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Prostatectomia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Differences in DNA alterations in prostate cancer among White, Black, and Asian men have been widely described. This is the first description of the frequency of DNA alterations in primary and metastatic prostate cancer samples of self-reported Hispanic men. METHODS: We utilized targeted next-generation sequencing tumor genomic profiles from prostate cancer tissues that underwent clinical sequencing at academic centers (GENIE 11th). We decided to restrict our analysis to the samples from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center as it was by far the main contributor of Hispanic samples. The numbers of men by self-reported ethnicity and racial categories were analyzed via Fisher's exact test between Hispanic-White versus non-Hispanic White. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Our cohort consisted of 1412 primary and 818 metastatic adenocarcinomas. In primary adenocarcinomas, TMPRSS2 and ERG gene alterations were less common in non-Hispanic White men than Hispanic White (31.86% vs. 51.28%, p = 0.0007, odds ratio [OR] = 0.44 [0.27-0.72] and 25.34% vs. 42.31%, p = 0.002, OR = 0.46 [0.28-0.76]). In metastatic tumors, KRAS and CCNE1 alterations were less prevalent in non-Hispanic White men (1.03% vs. 7.50%, p = 0.014, OR = 0.13 [0.03, 0.78] and 1.29% vs. 10.00%, p = 0.003, OR = 0.12 [0.03, 0.54]). No significant differences were found in actionable alterations and androgen receptor mutations between the groups. Due to the lack of clinical characteristics and genetic ancestry in this dataset, correlation with these could not be explored. CONCLUSION: DNA alteration frequencies in primary and metastatic prostate cancer tumors differ among Hispanic-White and non-Hispanic White men. Notably, we found no significant differences in the prevalence of actionable genetic alterations between the groups, suggesting that a significant number of Hispanic men could benefit from the development of targeted therapies.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Adenocarcinoma/genética , DNA , Mutação , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Hispânico ou Latino , BrancosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Historically, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is accompanied by an inpatient hospital admission. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a transition to same-day discharge robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in some centers to free up critically needed inpatient beds. This study aims to compare complications, total health care costs, and patient satisfaction for same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 392 consecutive robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies performed as same-day discharge (n = 206) vs inpatient (n = 186) from February 2020 to November 2022 at 2 academic medical centers. We utilized propensity score analysis to assess the impact of same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy on 30-day complications (primary outcome). Time-driven activity-based costing analysis was applied to compare total costs of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy care, and we administered a validated Patient Satisfaction Outcome Questionnaire to compare satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy patients were more likely to be older, self-reported Black race or Hispanic ethnicity, and have higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Complication rates were nonsignificantly lower for same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.21; P = .8). Same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy demonstrated a $2106 (19%) overall cost reduction. Median satisfaction survey scores were similar, and a clinically significant difference can be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is cost-effective and should be the preferred approach in appropriately selected patients.
Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Alta do Paciente , Pandemias , Resultado do Tratamento , Prostatectomia , Custos de Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
PURPOSE: Left-digit bias is a phenomenon in which the leftmost digit of a number disproportionately influences decision making. We measured the effect of left-digit age bias on treatment recommendations for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included men with clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results from 2004 to 2018 and the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Primary outcomes were recommendations for radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy. Regression discontinuity was used to assess whether age increase from 69 to 70 years was associated with disproportionate changes in treatment recommendations. RESULTS: In Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, discontinuities were found in the proportion of patients recommended for radiation among the entire cohort (effect size 2.2%, P < .01) and among patients with Gleason 6 (1.6%, P < .01), Gleason 7 (2.5%, P < .01), and Gleason ≥8 (2.1%, P < .01) cancer, while the proportion recommended for prostatectomy decreased in the entire cohort (-1.4%, P < .01) and in patients with Gleason 7 cancer (-2.4%, P < .01). In the National Cancer Database, discontinuity from age 69 to 70 was found in recommendations for radiation in the entire cohort (effect size: 3.1%, P < .01) and in patients with Gleason 6 (2.2%, P < .01), Gleason 7 (4.0%, P < .01), and Gleason ≥8 (2.3%, P < .02) cancer, while the proportion recommended for prostatectomy decreased at this cutoff in the entire cohort (effect size: -2.7%, P < .01) and patients with Gleason 6 (-2.2%, P < .01) and Gleason 7 (-3.7%, P < .01) cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with localized prostate cancer, left-digit age change from 69 to 70 was associated with disproportionately increased recommendations for radiation and decreased recommendations for prostatectomy.
Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Próstata/patologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The incidence of kidney stones in the United States is currently unknown. Here, we assessed the incidence of kidney stones using recent, nationally representative data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2015 to 2018. During this time participants were asked, "Have you ever had a kidney stone?" and "In the past 12 months, have you passed a kidney stone?" Demographics analyzed include age, race, gender, body mass index, history of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and gout. Multivariable models were used to assess the independent impact of subject characteristics on kidney stone prevalence and incidence. RESULTS: Data were available on 10,521 participants older than age 20. The prevalence of kidney stones was 11.0% (95% CI 10.1-12.0). The 12-month incidence of kidney stones was 2.1% (95% CI 1.5-2.7), or 2,054 stones per 100,000 adults. We identified significant relationships between stone incidence and subject age, body mass index, race and history of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Here we find a substantially higher 12-month incidence of kidney stones than previous reports. We also validate known risk factors for stone prevalence as associated with incidence. The remarkable incidence and prevalence of stones is concerning and has implications for disease prevention and allocation of medical resources.
Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Distribuição de Poisson , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sociodemográficos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostate biopsy is a very commonly performed office procedure leading to the diagnosis of the most prevalent solid-organ malignancy in American men. Although the transrectal technique for prostate biopsy remains the gold standard, there is increasing interest in the transperineal approach as it offers a clean, percutaneous approach that significantly decreases the risk for infection. In this review, we discuss emerging developments in transperineal prostate biopsy that may optimize the way biopsies are performed in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Similarly, to transrectal biopsy, the transperineal approach also allows for the performance of systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy cores. As transperineal biopsy obviates the translocation of rectal bacteria to the prostate or bloodstream, in contrast to transrectal biopsy, it is feasible to forgo peri-procedural antibiotics in accordance with professional guidelines. This may attenuate antimicrobial resistance that may be associated with augmented prophylaxis. In addition, although transperineal biopsy may be traditionally performed under general anesthesia using a template grid, it may also be performed freehand under local anesthesia or sedation. Avoiding prophylactic antibiotics and general anesthesia as well as reducing infections/hospitalizations for transperineal biopsy scaled nationally will likely result in significant healthcare savings. SUMMARY: Transperineal biopsy with combined systematic and MRI-targeted cores, offers several advantages over conventional transrectal biopsy. Transperineal biopsy under local anesthesia and without periprocedural antibiotic is emerging as a promising method for prostate cancer diagnosis and surveillance.
Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Biópsia/métodos , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Masculino , Períneo/patologia , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Novel minimally invasive therapies like the prostatic urethral lift are among the many endoscopic options for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement and lower urinary tract symptoms (BPE/LUTS). To further understand the relative uptake, complications and retreatment rates of contemporary endoscopic procedures for BPE/LUTS across diverse practice types, we performed a retrospective study of inpatient and ambulatory surgery encounters in the Premier Healthcare database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included men who underwent endoscopic procedures for BPE/LUTS between 2000 and 2018. We determined the utilization of endoscopic therapies for BPE/LUTS, 30-day and 90-day readmission rates, and retreatment rate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of procedure type with outcomes for the 3 most commonly performed procedures. RESULTS: We identified 175,150 men treated with endoscopic surgery for BPE/LUTS. The annual percent utilization of the prostatic urethral lift increased from <1% in 2014 to 10.4% in 2018. Compared to transurethral resection of the prostate and prostate photovaporization, prostatic urethral lift was associated with a lower odds of readmission at 30 (OR 0.58, p <0.01) and 90 (OR 0.55, p <0.01) days and a higher odds of retreatment within 2 years of followup (OR 1.78, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Providers have rapidly adopted prostatic urethral lift which accounted for more than 1 in 10 endoscopic procedures captured for BPE/LUTS in 2018. Men treated with prostatic urethral lift are readmitted less within 30 and 90 days but are more likely to be retreated within 2 years of their index procedure as compared to men treated with transurethral resection of the prostate or prostate photovaporization.
Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Slings Suburetrais , Idoso , Endoscopia , Humanos , Terapia a Laser , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ressecção Transuretral da PróstataRESUMO
We aimed to characterise diverse practice patterns for vasal reconstruction and to determine whether surgeon volume is associated with vasoepididymostomy performance at the time of reconstruction. We identified adult men who underwent vasal reconstruction from 2000 to 2020 in Premier Healthcare Database and determined patient, surgeon, cost and hospital characteristics for each procedure. We identified 3,494 men who underwent either vasovasostomy-alone (N = 2,595, 74.3%) or any-vasoepididymostomy (N = 899, 25.7%). The majority of providers (N = 487, 88.1%) performed only-vasovasostomy, 10 (1.8%) providers performed only-vasoepididymostomy and 56 (10.1%) providers performed both. Median total hospital charge of vasoepididymostomy was significantly higher than vasovasostomy ($39,163, interquartile range [IQR]$11,854-53,614 and $17,201, IQR$10,904-29,986, respectively). On multivariable regression, men who underwent procedures at nonacademic centres (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.12-3.49) with higher volume surgeons (OR 11.60, 95% CI 8.65-16.00) were more likely to undergo vasoepididymostomy. Furthermore, men who underwent vasoepididymostomy were more likely to self-pay (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.83-3.04, p < .001) and more likely had procedures in the Midwest or West region (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.66-2.96 and OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.61-2.76, respectively; p < .001). High-volume providers have increased odds of performing vasoepididymostomy at the time of reconstruction but at a significantly higher cost. These data suggest possibly centralising reconstructive procedures among high-volume providers.
Assuntos
Vasovasostomia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirurgia , PapaverinaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Small renal masses (≤ cT1a, less than 4 cm) are a subset of renal tumors with low malignant and metastatic potential but increasing incidence given increased use of cross-sectional imaging. Here, we review the diagnostic and treatment options available for the lesions. RECENT FINDINGS: While the low metastatic potential of SRMs has been known, recent studies show that 30% of SRMs removed surgically are benign. Renal biopsy is a tool that can be implemented to help with diagnosis before treatment (options of which include active surveillance, ablation, and surgery). Active surveillance might be associated with worse cancer-specific survival but all interventional methods appear to fare similarly. Advancements have also been made in percutaneous ablation techniques, and they now are included on multiple guideline statements. Active surveillance, surgery (PN and RN), and thermal ablation are all treatment options for SRMs with similar outcomes but varying side effects.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Técnicas de Ablação , Biópsia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologiaRESUMO
Urachal anomalies are rare in the adult population and when diagnosed, are typically malignant. Herein, we report a case of a 61-year-old male who underwent an excision of a urachal mass for a presumed malignancy. Pathologic evaluation demonstrated a neurofibroma. Neurofibromas are benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors that mostly appear as localized skin tumors and rarely involve the genitourinary system. Neoplastic transformation of neurofibromas is rare but not unheard. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a neurofibroma originating from the urachus.
Assuntos
Neurofibroma , Úraco , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurofibroma/diagnóstico , Neurofibroma/cirurgiaRESUMO
Adrenal-renal fusion is an anomaly misclassified as a renal tumor due to the absence of pathognomonic radiographic features. Herein, we report a case of a 61-year-old male who underwent a right radical nephrectomy for a presumed renal malignancy. Pathologic evaluation demonstrated a pheochromocytoma in the context of adrenal-renal fusion. Neoplastic transformation of fused adrenal tissue is rare but not unheard of and is typically adrenal cortical in origin. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a pheochromocytoma originating from an adrenal-renal fusion. The clinical presentation did not raise a high index of suspicion for the ultimate diagnosis rendered.
Assuntos
Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico , Glândulas Suprarrenais/anormalidades , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim/anormalidades , Feocromocitoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/patologia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Adrenalectomia , Erros de Diagnóstico , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia , Feocromocitoma/patologia , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
Previous studies have shown that increased levels of chemokine receptor CXCR7 are associated with the increased invasiveness of prostate cancer cells. We now show that CXCR7 expression is upregulated in VCaP and C4-2B cells after enzalutamide (ENZ) treatment. ENZ treatment induced apoptosis (sub-G1) in VCaP and C4-2B cells, and this effect was further increased after combination treatment with ENZ and CCX771, a specific CXCR7 inhibitor. The levels of p-EGFR (Y1068), p-AKT (T308) and VEGFR2 were reduced after ENZ and CCX771 combination treatment compared to single agent treatment. In addition, significantly greater reductions in migration were shown after combination treatment compared to those of single agents or vehicle controls, and importantly, similar reductions in the levels of secreted VEGF were also demonstrated. Orthotopic VCaP xenograft growth and subcutaneous MDA133-4 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumor growth was reduced by single agent treatment, but significantly greater suppression was observed in the combination treatment group. Although overall microvessel densities in the tumor tissues were not different among the different treatment groups, a significant reduction in large blood vessels (>100 µm2 ) was observed in tumors following combination treatment. Apoptotic indices in tumor tissues were significantly increased following combination treatment compared with vehicle control-treated tumor tissues. Our results demonstrate that significant tumor suppression mediated by ENZ and CXCR7 combination treatment may be due, in part, to reductions in proangiogenic signaling and in the formation of large blood vessels in prostate cancer tumors.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores CXCR/antagonistas & inibidores , Animais , Benzamidas , Processos de Crescimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Movimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Nus , Neovascularização Patológica/tratamento farmacológico , Neovascularização Patológica/metabolismo , Neovascularização Patológica/patologia , Nitrilas , Feniltioidantoína/administração & dosagem , Feniltioidantoína/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/metabolismo , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Receptores CXCR/biossíntese , Regulação para Cima , Ensaios Antitumorais Modelo de XenoenxertoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of caveolin-1 (Cav-1) as a predictor of disease reclassification (DR) in men with early prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed archived plasma samples prospectively collected from patients with early prostate cancer in a single-institution AS study. Of 825 patients enrolled, 542 had ≥1 year of follow-up. Baseline and longitudinal plasma Cav-1 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Tumour volume or Gleason grade increases were criteria for DR. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between clinicopathological characteristics and reclassification risk. RESULTS: In 542 patients, 480 (88.6%) had stage cT1c disease, 542 (100.0%) had a median prostate-specific antigen level of 4.1 ng/mL, and 531 (98.0%) had a median Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score of 1. In all, 473 (87.3%) had a Gleason score of 3+3. After a median of 3.1 years of follow-up, disease was reclassified in 163 patients (30.1%). The mean baseline Cav-1 level was 2.2 ± 8.5 ng/mL and the median 0.2 ng/mL (range, 0-85.5 ng/mL). In univariate analysis, baseline Cav-1 was a significant predictor for risk of DR (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.65; P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, with adjustments for age, tumour length, group risk stratification and number of positive cores, reclassification risk associated with Cav-1 remained significant (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.28-2.84; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Baseline plasma Cav-1 level was an independent predictor of disease classification. New methods for refining AS and intervention may result.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Caveolina 1/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Gradação de Tumores , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The use of active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer is increasing, and racial disparities have been identified in its implementation. We investigated differences by race and ethnicity in the utilization and intensity of AS by race and ethnicity among older men with low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with particular focus on the integration of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) into AS protocols. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare fee-for-service linked database, we identified a cohort of men diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 with low- or favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The odds of receiving AS were compared by patient race and ethnicity using multivariable logistic regression models, while the rates of usage of PSA tests, biopsy, and mpMRI within 2 years of diagnosis among men on AS were assessed using multivariable Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Our cohort included 33,542 men. The proportion of men with low-risk disease who underwent AS increased from 29.5% in 2010 to 51.7% in 2017, while the proportion among men with favorable intermediate disease grew from 11.4% to 17.2%. Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.79) and non-Hispanic Black men (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89) were less likely to receive AS than non-Hispanic White men for low-risk disease, while non-Hispanic Black men were more likely to receive AS for favorable intermediate disease (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.39). Non-Hispanic Black men receiving AS underwent prostate MRI at a lower rate compared to non-Hispanic White men, regardless of whether they had low-risk (incidence rate ratio = 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97) or favorable intermediate-risk (incidence rate ratio = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.83) disease, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adoption of AS for low-risk prostate cancer increased among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. However, a significant disparity exists for non-Hispanic Black men, as they exhibit lower rates of AS utilization. Moreover, non-Hispanic Black men are less likely to have access to novel technologies, such as mpMRI, as part of their AS protocols.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Conduta Expectante , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Medicare , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos , Hispânico ou LatinoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Renal sarcomas are exceedingly rare and lack a prognostic stage classification. We thus aimed to investigate the contemporary clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of renal sarcomas at a national level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to extract data on patients with renal sarcoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. We estimated median, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) probabilities via Kaplan-Meier curves and used multivariable regression to compare OS between different patient groups. RESULTS: We identified 365 patients; at diagnosis, 104 patients (28.5%) had stage I disease (T1N0M0), 133 patients (36.4%) patients had stage II disease (T2-4N0M0), and 117 patients (32.1%) patients had stage III disease (any T, N1, or M1). Median survival was 105 months (interquartile range [IQR], 29 - not reached) for stage I disease, 46 months (IQR 14-118 months) for stage II disease, 8 months (IQR 3-28 months) for stage III disease, and 32 months (IQR, 8-116 months) for the entire cohort. Patient age (hazard ratio [HR] for death [per year] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.00-1.04), stage (II vs. I: HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.00-2.92; III vs. I: HR 4.93, 95% CI 2.68-9.05), grade (grade 3 vs. grade 1: 3.07, 95% CI 1.18-8.00; grade 4 vs. grade 1: HR 3.66, 95% CI 1.41-9.49), and possessing medical insurance (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.94) were independently and significantly associated with OS. Performance of nephrectomy also trended towards independently improving OS (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.09). CONCLUSION: A novel staging classification for renal sarcomas into a 3-stage system based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) criteria produces distinct survival curves, although further studies are needed to robustly assess its validity.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Sarcoma , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Sarcoma/epidemiologia , Sarcoma/terapia , Programa de SEERRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite many available treatments for Peyronie's disease (PD), practice patterns of available therapeutics are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a national survey of urologists to characterize real-world practice patterns of PD management and to characterize the use of therapies discouraged by the American Urological Association guidelines on PD management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 34-item survey was distributed via RedCap to urologists who treat patients with PD in all American Urological Association sections. Questions elicited demographic information as well as practices in the diagnosis and treatment of PD. Comparisons were made with Pearson's chi-squared test. The primary outcome was reported use of therapies discouraged by the American Urological Association guidelines on PD. RESULTS: A total of 145 respondents completed the survey, of whom 19% were fellowship trained in andrology/sexual medicine, 36% practiced in an academic setting, and 50% had at least 20 years in practice. Only 60% of respondents reporting performing in-office curvature assessment prior to commencing intralesional injection or surgical treatment, with higher prevalence in andrology/sexual medicine fellowship-trained versus non-fellowship-trained urologists (85% vs. 54%, p = 0.003). The most popular treatment modalities were collagenase clostridium histolyticum (61% of respondents), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (54%), and penile traction (53%). Twenty-one percent of respondents reported currently using a treatment that is explicitly discouraged by the American Urological Association guidelines (extracorporeal shockwave therapy for curvature, L-carnitine, omega-3 fatty acids, or vitamin E). DISCUSSION: Patients seeking PD treatment may be offered different therapies, some of which are not evidence-based, depending on the treating urologist. This study is limited by self-selection and response bias. Its strength is that it represents a cross-sectional overview of real-world practice patterns in PD management, which has not been previously described. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of urologists reported PD management practices that are not evidence-based and not guideline-supported.
Assuntos
Induração Peniana , Urologistas , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Induração Peniana/terapia , Induração Peniana/tratamento farmacológico , Colagenase Microbiana/uso terapêutico , Pênis/cirurgia , Injeções Intralesionais , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The national usage and cost trends associated with hemostatic agents in major urologic procedures remain unknown. This study aims to describe the trends, costs, and predictors of local hemostatic use in major urologic surgeries. METHODS: We utilized the Premier Healthcare Database to analyze 385,261 patient encounters between 2000 and 2020. Our primary objective was to describe the usage patterns of topical hemostatic agents in open and laparoscopic/robotic major urological surgeries. The data from the last 5 years (2015-2020) were used to characterize specific cost trends, and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of hemostatic agent use in relation to surgical approach, patient, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: By 2020, at least 1 topical hemostatic agent was used in 37.3% (95% CI: 35.5-39.1) of laparoscopic/robotic prostatectomies and 30.7% (95% CI: 24.2-37.1) of open prostatectomies; 60.8% (95% CI: 57.6-64.1) of laparoscopic/robotic partial nephrectomies and 55.9% (95% CI: 47.3-64.5) of open partial nephrectomies; 40.7% (95% CI: 36.9-44.3) of laparoscopic/robotic radical nephrectomies and 43.2% (95% CI: 38.8-47.6) of open radical nephrectomies; and 40.52% (95% CI: 35.02-46.02) of open radical cystectomies. For the 2015-2020 cohort, predictors for hemostatic agent use varied by surgery type and included gender, race, surgical approach, insurance coverage, geographical location, urbanicity, and attending volume. The cost of the hemostatic agent accounted for less than 1.6% of the total cost of hospitalization for each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The use of hemostatic agents in major urologic surgeries has grown over the past 2 decades. For all procedures, the specific cost of using a hemostatic agent constitutes a small fraction of the total hospitalization cost and does not vary significantly between open and laparoscopic/robotic approaches. Some patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics are highly correlated with their use.