RESUMO
BACKGROUND: For studying the effectiveness of treatment, it is important to check whether a new treatment is performed as originally described in the study-protocol. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an interdisciplinary graded exposure program, for adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain reporting pain-related fear, was performed according to protocol, and whether it is feasible to implement the program in rehabilitation care. METHODS: A process evaluation where quantitative and qualitative data on participant characteristics (adolescents, parents and therapists), attendance and participants' opinion on the program were collected, by means of registration forms, questionnaires and group interviews. To evaluate treatment fidelity, audio and video recordings of program sessions were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty adolescents were offered the program, of which 23 started the program. Adolescents attended on average 90% of the sessions. At least one parent per adolescent participated in the program. Analysis of 20 randomly selected recordings of treatment sessions revealed that treatment fidelity was high, since 81% of essential treatment elements were offered to the adolescents. The program was considered client-centered by adolescents and family-centered by parents. Treatment teams wished to continue offering the program in their center. CONCLUSION: The interdisciplinary graded exposure program was performed largely according to protocol, and therapists, adolescents and their parents had a favorable opinion on the program. Implementation of the program in rehabilitation care is considered feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02181725 (7 February 2014).
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/psicologia , Dor Crônica/reabilitação , Medo , Dor Musculoesquelética/psicologia , Dor Musculoesquelética/reabilitação , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Walking ability is a priority for many children with cerebral palsy (CP) and their parents when considering domains of importance regarding treatment interventions. Partial body-weight supported treadmill training has become an established therapeutic treatment approach to address this demand. Further, new robotic rehabilitation technologies have increasingly been implemented in the clinical setting to allow for longer training sessions with increased step repetitions while maintaining a consistent movement pattern. But the current evidence about its clinical effectiveness in pediatric rehabilitation is weak. The aim of this research project is therefore to investigate the effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training on improvements of functional gait parameters in children with cerebral palsy. METHODS/DESIGN: Children aged 6 to 18 years with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy who are able to walk at least 14 m with or without walking aids will be recruited in two pediatric therapy centers in Switzerland. Within a pragmatic cross-over design with randomized treatment sequences, they perform 5 weeks of robot-assisted gait training (three times per week with a maximum of 45 min walking time each) or a 5-week period of standard treatment, which is individually customized to the needs of the child and usually consists of 1-2 sessions of physiotherapy per week and additional hippotherapy, circuit training as well as occupational therapy as necessary. Both interventions take place in an outpatient setting. The percentage score of the dimension E of the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) as primary outcome as well as the dimension D of the GMFM-88, 6-minute and 10-meter walking tests as secondary outcomes are assessed before and at the end of each intervention period. Additionally, a 5-week follow-up assessment is scheduled for the children who are assigned to the standard treatment first. Treatment effects, period effects as well as follow-up effects are analyzed with paired analyses and independent test statistics are used to assess carry-over effects. DISCUSSION: Although robot-assisted gait training has become an established treatment option to address gait impairments, evidence for its effectiveness is vague. This pragmatic trial will provide important information on its effects under clinical outpatient conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00887848 . Registered 23 April 2009.
Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/reabilitação , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Marcha , Robótica , Adolescente , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Criança , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento , CaminhadaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The standard aftercare treatment (according to the AO guideline) for surgically treated trauma patients with fractures of the tibial plateau is non-weight bearing or partial weight bearing for 10-12 weeks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current state of practice among orthopaedic surgeons and trauma surgeons in choosing the criteria and the time period of restricted weight bearing after surgically treated tibial plateau fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed among members of the Dutch Trauma Society and Dutch Orthopaedic Society to identify the most commonly applied protocols in terms of the post-operative initiation and level of weight bearing in patients with tibial plateau fractures. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven surgeons responded to the survey. 72.1% of the respondents recommended starting weight bearing earlier than the 12 weeks recommended by the AO guideline; 11.7% recommended starting weight bearing immediately, 4.5% after 2 weeks and 55.9% after 6 weeks. Moreover, 88.7% of the respondents reported deviating from their own local protocol. There is little consensus about the definition of 100% weight bearing and how to build up weight bearing over time. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that consensus about the weight bearing aftercare for tibial plateau fractures are limited. A large majority of surgeons do not follow the AO guideline or their own local protocol. More transparent criteria and predictors are needed to design optimal weight-bearing regimes for the aftercare of tibial plateau fractures.
Assuntos
Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas da Tíbia , Humanos , Países Baixos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fraturas da Tíbia/reabilitação , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Suporte de CargaRESUMO
Rett syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder in which scoliosis is a common orthopedic complication. This explorative study aims to identify predictors for rapid progression of scoliosis in Rett syndrome to enable variable selection for future prediction model development. A univariable logistic regression model was used to identify variables that discriminate between individuals with and without rapid progression of scoliosis (>10 ∘Cobb angle/6 months) based on multi-center data. Predictors were identified using univariable logistic regression with OR (95% CI) and AUC (95% CI). Age at inclusion, Cobb angle at baseline and epilepsy have the highest discriminative ability for rapid progression of scoliosis in Rett syndrome.
Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Síndrome de Rett , Escoliose , Humanos , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome de Rett/complicações , Síndrome de Rett/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Choosing measurement tools for diagnostic, prognostic, or evaluative purposes in a chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) population is challenging for rehabilitation practice. Implementation of measurement tools for clinical practice is impaired by gaps in knowledge about measurement properties. OBJECTIVE: Identifying evidence about the measurement properties of tools frequently used in Dutch pain rehabilitation practice. METHODS: A mapping review was conducted of eligible studies that investigated reliability, validity, or responsiveness, and interpretability, as defined by the COSMIN taxonomy, of original versions or Dutch translations of predefined Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a CMP population. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched in March 2021. Results were visually mapped. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included. The results show many knowledge gaps in both original and translated versions. In general, aspects of validity were most frequently reported. The Pain Disability Index, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey were the most studied measurement tools. No results were found for the Checklist Individual Strength, Illness Perception Questionnaire, and Utrecht Coping List. CONCLUSION: Little evidence of the measurement properties of PROMs used in rehabilitation of patients with CMP in the Netherlands was found. PROMs need to be used and interpreted with caution in daily practice.