Comparison of hearing performance in patients with borderline indication for active middle ear or cochlear implants: clinical outcomes to guide preoperative counseling and decision making.

PURPOSE: The aim of the presented study was to compare the audiological benefit achieved in cochlear implant (CI) patients who, in principle, could still have been treated with an active middle ear implant (AMEI) with a group of AMEI users. METHODS: Results of 20 CI patients with a pure-tone average (PTA) of 70 dB HL prior to surgery were compared with a group of 12 subjects treated with a Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB). Pre-surgical comparison included PTA for air conduction and bone conduction, maximum speech recognition score for monosyllabic words (WRSmax), and aided monosyllabic word recognition at 65 dB SPL. One year after surgery, aided monosyllabic speech recognition score at 65 dB SPL was compared. RESULTS: Mean PTA for air conduction in the VSB group was significantly lower than in the CI group (4.8 dB, Z = - 2.011, p < 0.05). Mean PTA for bone conduction in the VSB group was also significantly lower than in the CI group (23.4 dB, Z = - 4.673, p < 0.001). WRSmax in the VSB group was significantly better than in the CI group (40.7%, Z = - 3.705, p < 0.001). One year after treatment, there was no significant difference in aided speech perception in quiet between both subject groups. CONCLUSION: Comparison of the two methods showed equivalent results for both treatments in subjects with a borderline indication. Not only pure-tone audiometry results but, particularly, speech perception scores pre-surgery should be taken into account in preoperative counseling.

Cochlear implant therapy improves the quality of life and social participation in the elderly: a prospective long-term evaluation.

PURPOSE: In recent years, the number of elderly cochlear implant (CI) candidates is continuously rising. In addition to the audiological improvement, other positive effects of CI treatment can also be observed in clinical routine. The "quality of life" as a parameter of success directly experienced by the patient is increasingly becoming the focus of clinical research. Although there are already clear indications of a rapid and significant improvement in quality of life, there is still a lack of systematic, prospectively collected longitudinal long-term data in patients over the age of 65. METHODS: This prospective longitudinal observational study included 31 patients between the age of 71 and 92 years who had first been treated unilaterally with a CI 6 years ago. In addition to free-field monosyllable recognition, quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-old (WHOQL-OLD). The results were compared with the data from our previous study, in which we focused on the short- and medium-term effects on quality of life. In both studies, the same patient population was examined. In addition, these study data were compared with an age-matched average population. RESULTS: In speech recognition, there was no significant change from the control 6 months postoperatively compared with the results 6 years postoperatively. No significant changes occurred in the total quality of life score or any of the other six facets of quality of life when comparing the results 6 months postoperatively with the results 6 years postoperatively. In "Social participation", the CI patients even exceed the values of the age-matched average population 6 years after treatment. CONCLUSION: Improvement in the quality of life and especially in social participation appears stable over many years in elderly patients after hearing rehabilitation with a CI.

Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users.

BACKGROUND: Although good speech perception in quiet is achievable with cochlear implants (CIs), speech perception in noise is severely impaired compared to normal hearing (NH). In the case of a bimodal CI fitting with a hearing aid (HA) in the opposite ear, the amount of residual acoustic hearing influences speech perception in noise. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to investigate speech perception in noise in a group of bimodal CI users and compare the results to age-matched HA users and people without subjective hearing loss, as well as with a young NH group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants comprised 19 bimodal CI users, 39 HA users, and 40 subjectively NH subjects in the age group 60-90 years and 14 young NH subjects. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in noise were adaptively measured using the Oldenburg Sentence Test for the two spatial test conditions S0N0 (speech and noise from the front) and multisource-noise field (MSNF; speech from the front, four spatially distributed noise sources) in continuous noise of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Ol-noise) and amplitude-modulated Fastl noise (Fastl-noise). RESULTS: With increasing hearing loss, the median SRT worsened significantly in all conditions. In test condition S0N0, the SRT of the CI group was 5.6 dB worse in Ol-noise than in the young NH group (mean age 26.4 years) and 22.5 dB worse in Fastl-noise; in MSNF, the differences were 6.6 dB (Ol-noise) and 17.3 dB (Fastl-noise), respectively. In the young NH group, median SRT in condition S0N0 improved by 11 dB due to gap listening; in the older NH group, SRTs improved by only 3.1 dB. In the HA and bimodal CI groups there was no gap listening effect and SRTs in Fastl-noise were even worse than in Ol-noise. CONCLUSION: With increasing hearing loss, speech perception in modulated noise is even more impaired than in continuous noise.

Frankfurt concept of early inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implant treatment : Feasibility for aftercare.

BACKGROUND: The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline on cochlear implant (CI) treatment, which was updated in 2020, defined the entire process of CI care for the first time. In the present study, the feasibility and results of very early rehabilitation were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intervention group (IG) comprised 54 patients in whom rehabilitation was initiated within 14 (maximally 28) days after implantation. Patients with a significantly longer waiting time were included in the control group (CG, n = 21). In addition to the start and duration of rehabilitation, the speech intelligibility achieved with CI was recorded at different timepoints within a 12-month period. In addition, questionnaires were used to assess the effort of fitting the CI processor and the patients' satisfaction with the outcome as well as the timing of the start of rehabilitation. RESULTS: Median waiting time between implantation and start of rehabilitation was 14 days in the IG and 106 days in the CG; 92.6% of IG patients were able to start rehabilitation within 14 days. The effect of rehabilitation in the IG was 35 and in the CG 25 percentage points (Freiburg monosyllabic test). After 6 and 12 months of CI use, both groups showed comparable results in the test condition in quiet (IG/CG 6 months: 70%/70%; 12 months: 70%/60%, Freiburg monosyllabic test) and in noise (IG/CG 6 months: -1.1 dB SNR/-0.85 dB SNR; 12 months: -0.65 dB SNR/+0.3 dB SNR, Oldenburg sentence test). Hearing quality assessment scores collected by SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) questionnaire showed better scores in the IG at 6 months, which converged to CG scores at 12 months. The IG was significantly more satisfied with the timing of the start of rehab than the CG. All other data obtained from questionnaires showed no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A very early start of inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implantation was successfully implemented. The rehabilitation was completed within 7 weeks of CI surgery. Comparison of speech recognition test results before and after rehabilitation showed a significant improvement. A clear rehabilitation effect can therefore be demonstrated. Inclusion of CI rehabilitation in the German catalog of follow-up treatments is thus scientifically justified and therefore strongly recommended.

[Frankfurt concept of early inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implant treatment : Feasibility for aftercare. German version]. / Frankfurter Konzept einer stationären Cochleaimplantat-Frührehabilitation : Untersuchung zur Durchführbarkeit als Anschlussheilbehandlung.

BACKGROUND: The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline on cochlear implant (CI) treatment, which was updated in 2020, defined the entire process of CI care for the first time. In the present study, the feasibility and results of very early rehabilitation were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intervention group (IG) comprised 54 patients in whom rehabilitation was initiated within 14 (maximally 28) days after implantation. Patients with a significantly longer waiting time were included in the control group (CG, n = 21). In addition to the start and duration of rehabilitation, the speech intelligibility achieved with CI was recorded at different timepoints within a 12-month period. In addition, questionnaires were used to assess the effort of fitting the CI processor and the patients' satisfaction with the outcome as well as the timing of the start of rehabilitation. RESULTS: Median waiting time between implantation and start of rehabilitation was 14 days in the IG and 106 days in the CG; 92.6% of IG patients were able to start rehabilitation within 14 days. The effect of rehabilitation in the IG was 35 and in the CG 25 percentage points (Freiburg monosyllabic test). After 6 and 12 months of CI use, both groups showed comparable results in the test condition in quiet (IG/CG 6 months: 70%/70%; 12 months: 70%/60%, Freiburg monosyllabic test) and in noise (IG/CG 6 months: -1.1-0.85 dB SNR; 12 months: -0.65 dB SNR/0.3 dB SNR, Oldenburg sentence test). Hearing quality assessment scores collected by SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) questionnaire showed better scores in the IG at 6 months, which converged to CG scores at 12 months. The IG was significantly more satisfied with the timing of the start of rehab than the CG. All other data obtained from questionnaires showed no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A very early start of inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implantation was successfully implemented. The rehabilitation was completed within 7 weeks of CI surgery. Comparison of speech recognition test results before and after rehabilitation showed a significant improvement. A clear rehabilitation effect can therefore be demonstrated. Inclusion of CI rehabilitation in the German catalog of follow-up treatments is thus scientifically justified and therefore strongly recommended.

[Cochlear implants reduce tinnitus in older patients in the long term]. / Eine Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung reduziert langfristig die Tinnitusbelastung bei älteren Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is one of the most common otologic comorbidities, particularly in older patients with severe hearing loss or deafness. Cochlear implants (CI) have been used for hearing rehabilitation more and more successfully in elderly patients and CI treatment is performed in Germany without an age limit. The aim of this follow-up study was to assess the tinnitus burden in the long-term follow-up of elderly patients with hearing rehabilitation using CI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study included 15 patients between 72 and 92 years of age with preoperative tinnitus who had been treated unilaterally with a CI for the first time about six years ago. Monosyllabic speech understanding and tinnitus burden were assessed using the Mini-Tinnitus Questionnaire. The results were compared with our previous study 24, focusing on the first six months. RESULTS: Six years postoperatively, there was a nonsignificant increase in monosyllabic understanding to 61.7 ± 26.3%, compared with the results six months postoperatively (p = 0.069). The burden of tinnitus showed a stable low mean of 3.9 ± 3.6 points six years postoperatively, compared with the six-month control (p = 0.689) and significantly reduced compared to the preoperative status with 6.9 ± 6.5 points (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Hearing rehabilitation by using CI leads to a stable improvement of monosyllabic discrimination in elderly people as well as to a stable reduction of tinnitus burden over years.

Residual low-frequency hearing after early device activation in cochlear implantation.

PURPOSE: The cochlear implant (CI) is a standard treatment for patients with severe to profound hearing loss. In recent years, early device activation of the sound processor after 2-3 days following surgery has been established. The aim of this study is to evaluate the residual hearing of CI patients with substantial preoperative low-frequency hearing after early device activation over a period of 12 months. METHODS: Results were compared between an early fitted group (EF) with device activation to less than 15 days after CI surgery and a control group (CG) with device activation after 3-6 weeks. In total, 57 patients were divided into EF group (n = 32), and CG (n = 25). Low-frequency residual hearing and speech recognition in quiet and in noise were compared over an observation period of 12 months. RESULTS: No significant difference (p > 0.05) in the residual low-frequency hearing PTAlow between EF and CG was found, neither preoperatively (EF 33.2 dB HL/CG 35.0 dB HL), nor postoperatively (EF 46.8 dB HL/CG 46.2 dB HL). In both groups, postoperative residual hearing decreased compared to preoperative and remained stable within the first year after CI surgery. Furthermore, both groups showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in speech recognition in quiet and in noise within the first year. CONCLUSION: Early device activation is feasible in CI patients with preoperative low-frequency residual hearing, without an additional effect on postoperative hearing preservation.

Impact of processing-latency induced interaural delay and level discrepancy on sensitivity to interaural level differences in cochlear implant users.

PURPOSE: This study investigated whether an interaural delay, e.g. caused by the processing latency of a hearing device, can affect sensitivity to interaural level differences (ILDs) in normal hearing subjects or cochlear implant (CI) users with contralateral normal hearing (SSD-CI). METHODS: Sensitivity to ILD was measured in 10 SSD-CI subjects and in 24 normal hearing subjects. The stimulus was a noise burst presented via headphones and via a direct cable connection (CI). ILD sensitivity was measured for different interaural delays in the range induced by hearing devices. ILD sensitivity was correlated with results obtained in a sound localization task using seven loudspeakers in the frontal horizontal plane. RESULTS: In the normal hearing subjects the sensitivity to interaural level differences deteriorated significantly with increasing interaural delays. In the CI group, no significant effect of interaural delays on ILD sensitivity was found. The NH subjects were significantly more sensitive to ILDs. The mean localization error in the CI group was 10.8° higher than in the normal hearing group. No correlation between sound localization ability and ILD sensitivity was found. CONCLUSION: Interaural delays influence the perception of ILDs. For normal hearing subjects a significant decrement in sensitivity to ILD was measured. The effect could not be confirmed in the tested SSD-CI group, probably due to a small subject group with large variations. The temporal matching of the two sides may be beneficial for ILD processing and thus sound localization for CI patients. However, further studies are needed for verification.

[Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users-German version]. / Sprachverstehen im modulierten Störgeräusch bei bimodal versorgten CI-Tragenden.

BACKGROUND: Although good speech perception in quiet is achievable with cochlear implants (CIs), speech perception in noise is severely impaired compared to normal hearing (NH). In the case of a bimodal CI fitting with a hearing aid (HA) in the opposite ear, the amount of residual acoustic hearing influences speech perception in noise. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to investigate speech perception in noise in a group of bimodal CI users and compare the results to age-matched HA users and people without subjective hearing loss, as well as with a young NH group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants comprised 19 bimodal CI users, 39 HA users, and 40 subjectively NH subjects in the age group 60-90 years and 14 young NH subjects. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in noise were adaptively measured using the Oldenburg Sentence Test for the two spatial test conditions S0N0 (speech and noise from the front) and multisource-noise field (MSNF; speech from the front, four spatially distributed noise sources) in continuous noise of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Ol-noise) and amplitude-modulated Fastl noise (Fastl-noise). RESULTS: With increasing hearing loss, the median SRT worsened significantly in all conditions. In test condition S0N0, the SRT of the CI group was 5.6 dB worse in Ol-noise than in the young NH group (mean age 26.4 years) and 22.5 dB worse in Fastl-noise; in MSNF, the differences were 6.6 dB (Ol-noise) and 17.3 dB (Fastl-noise), respectively. In the young NH group, median SRT in condition S0N0 improved by 11 dB due to gap listening; in the older NH group, SRTs improved by only 3.1 dB. In the HA and bimodal CI groups there was no gap listening effect and SRTs in Fastl-noise were even worse than in Ol-noise. CONCLUSION: With increasing hearing loss, speech perception in modulated noise is even more impaired than in continuous noise.

Evaluation of a Transimpedance Matrix Algorithm to Detect Anomalous Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.

INTRODUCTION: Transimpedance measurements from cochlear implant electrodes have the potential to identify anomalous electrode array placement, such as tip fold-over (TFO) or fold-back, basal electrode kinking, or buckling. Analysing transimpedance may thus replace intraoperative or post-operative radiological imaging to detect any potential misplacements. A transimpedance algorithm was previously developed to detect deviations from a normal electrode position with the aim of intraoperatively detecting TFO. The algorithm had been calibrated on 35 forced, tip folded electrode arrays in six temporal bones to determine the threshold criterion required to achieve a sensitivity of 100%. Our primary objective here was to estimate the specificity of this TFO algorithm in patients, in a prospective study, for a series of electrode arrays shown to be normally inserted by post-operative imaging. METHODS: Intracochlear voltages were intraoperatively recorded for 157 ears, using Cochlear's Custom Sound™ EP 5 electrophysiological software (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia), for both Nucleus® CI512 and CI532 electrode arrays. The algorithm analysed the recorded 22 × 22 transimpedance matrix (TIM) and results were displayed as a heatmap intraoperatively, only visible to the technician in the operating theatre. After all clinical data were collected, the algorithm was evaluated on the bench. The algorithm measures the transimpedance gradients and corresponding phase angles (θ) throughout the TIM and calculates the gradient phase range. If this was greater than the predetermined threshold, the algorithm classified the electrode array insertion as having a TFO. RESULTS: Five ears had no intraoperative TIM and four anomalous matrices were identified from heatmaps and removed from the specificity analysis. Using the 148 remaining data sets (n = 103 CI532 and n = 45 CI512), the algorithm had an average specificity of 98.6% (95.80%-99.75%). CONCLUSION: The algorithm was found to be an effective screening tool for the identification of TFOs. Its specificity was within acceptable levels and resulted in a positive predictive value of 76%, with an estimated incidence of fold-over of 4% in perimodiolar arrays. This would mean 3 out of 4 cases flagged as a fold-over would be correctly identified by the algorithm, with the other being a false positive. The measurements were applied easily in theatre allowing it to be used as a routine clinical tool for confirming correct electrode placement.

Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients.

PURPOSE: Even in older patients, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant has become an established method for deafened or severely hearing-impaired patients. In addition to the hearing improvement, numerous other effects of CI treatment can be observed in clinical routine. In the literature, there is multiple evidence for a rapid and significant improvement in quality of life with CI treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of hearing rehabilitation using CI on the quality of life in older patients (≥ 65 years). METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study examined 84 patients between the age of 65 and 101 years who received unilateral CI treatment for the first time between one and 10 years ago. The World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-Old (WHOQL-OLD) was used to determine the quality of life. The study cohort was divided into three groups to compare the quality of life over time: group I (1-3 years after CI treatment), group II (4-6 years after CI treatment), and group III (7-10 years after CI treatment). In addition, the data from this study were compared with the results of our previous study (Issing et al. 2020) in which we focused on the first 6 months after CI treatment. RESULTS: In all three groups, there was a significant improvement in monosyllabic discrimination within 1 year after CI fitting (p > 0.001). No significant differences were found between the three groups. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the WHOQOL-OLD total score (p = 0.487) or any of the other six facets. Moreover, no significant differences were found compared to the study group of our previous study 6 months after CI treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the long-term stability of the improved quality of life following unilateral CI treatment in patients aged 65 years or older.

[Has the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic improved teaching?-Virtual education in otorhinolaryngology from the students' perspective]. / Hat die SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie die Lehre verbessert? ­ Virtueller Unterricht im Fach HNO-Heilkunde aus Sicht der Studierenden.

BACKGROUND: The Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV­2) pandemic has significantly changed the education of medical students. Due to the contact restrictions and the associated requirement for distance learning, digital teaching formats had to be implemented within a short period of time. The aim of our work was to analyze student evaluation data for virtual teaching in otorhinolaryngology (ORL) during the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic and to compare the data with previously obtained evaluation data under face-to-face conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation data for the block practical courses in winter semester 2020/21 and summer semester 2021, which were carried out in a virtual format with a short face-to-face phase as well as those for the block practical courses from summer semester 2018 to winter semester 2019/20, which had been performed completely in a conventional face-to-face format, were analyzed. The anonymous survey of the students focused on various aspects of the courses such as organization, didactics and learning atmosphere. RESULTS: Of 16 surveyed categories, 14 (87.5%) showed significantly better evaluation results for the virtual courses compared to the courses carried out previously under face-to-face conditions. This very positive assessment of the digital teaching offer showed no significant change during the course of the pandemic over the period of two semesters. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a high acceptance of digital teaching in ORL for students. Even though essential components of the medical education such as teaching on the patient and clinical-practical skills can still only be realized in a face-to-face format, our data suggest that digital elements could also play a role in medical education after the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation.

BACKGROUND: The cochlear implant (CI) is a standard procedure for the treatment of patients with severe to profound hearing loss. In the past, a standard healing period of 3-6 weeks occurred after CI surgery before the sound processor was initially activated. Advancements of surgical techniques and instruments allow an earlier initial activation of the processor within 14 days after surgery. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the early CI device activation after CI surgery within 14 days, comparison to the first activation after 4-6 weeks, and assessment of the feasibility and safety of the early fitting over a 12 month observation period were the objectives of this study. METHOD: In a prospective study, 127 patients scheduled for CI surgery were divided into early fitting group (EF, n = 67) and control group (CG, n = 60). Individual questionnaires were used to evaluate medical and technical outcomes of the EF. Medical side effects, speech recognition, and follow-up effort were compared with the CG within the first year after CI surgery. RESULTS: The early fitting was feasible in 97% of the EF patients. In the EF, the processor was activated 25 days earlier than in the CG. No major complications were observed in either group. At the follow-up appointments, side effects such as pain and balance problems occurred with comparable frequency in both groups. At initial fitting, the EF showed a significantly higher incidence of medical minor complications (p < 0.05). When developing speech recognition within the first year of CI use, no difference was observed. Furthermore, the follow-up effort within the first year after CI surgery was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early fitting of the sound processor is a feasible and safe procedure with comparable follow-up effort. Although more early minor complications were observed in the EF, there were no long-term wound healing problems caused by the early fitting. Regular inspection of the magnet strength is recommended as part of the CI follow-up since postoperative wound swelling must be expected. The early fitting procedure enabled a clear reduction in the waiting time between CI surgery and initial sound processor activation.

Band-Limited Chirp-Evoked Compound Action Potential in Guinea Pig: Comprehensive Neural Measure for Cochlear Implantation Monitoring.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with severely impaired high-frequency hearing and sufficient residual low-frequency hearing can be provided with a cochlear implant (CI), thereby facilitating ipsilateral electric and acoustic stimulation with established advantages over electric stimulation alone. However, partial or complete hearing loss often occurred after implantation due to, inter alia, acute mechanical trauma to cochlear structures during electrode insertion. Possibilities of intraoperative monitoring using electrocochleography (ECochG) have recently been studied in CI patients, primarily using the ongoing response to low-frequency tone bursts consisting of the cochlear microphonic (CM) and the auditory nerve neurophonic. By contrast, the transient neural response to tone bursts, that is, compound action potential (CAP), was generally less detectable or less sensitive as a monitoring measure, thus falling short of providing useful contribution to electrocochleography analysis. In this study, we investigate using chirps to evoke more robust CAP responses in a limited frequency band by synchronizing neural firing, and thereby improving CAP sensitivity to mechanical trauma in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation. DESIGN: Stimuli were band-limited between 100 Hz and 10 kHz to investigate their frequency range selectivity as a preliminary model for low-frequency hearing. They were constructed by adding a harmonic series either with zero phase delay (click) or by adjusting the phase delay at a rate that is inversely related to a traveling wave delay model (chirp), with three different parameters to examine level-dependent delay compression. The amplitude spectrum was thus identical between stimuli with differences only in phase. In Experiment 1, we compared input-output functions recorded at the round window in normal-hearing guinea pigs and implemented a high-pass noise masking paradigm to infer neural contribution to the CAP. In Experiment 2, guinea pigs were implanted with a custom-built CI electrode using a motorized micromanipulator. Acute mechanical trauma was simulated during the electrode insertion. At each insertion step, CAP and CM responses were measured at the round window for the following stimuli: broad-band click, band-limited click, and band-limited chirps (3 parameters), and tone bursts at frequencies 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz. RESULTS: Chirps compared with the equal-band click showed significantly lower thresholds and steeper slopes of sigmoid-fitted input-output functions. The shorter chirp evoked significantly larger amplitudes than click when compared at equal sensation level. However, the click evoked larger amplitudes than chirps at higher levels and correspondingly achieved larger saturation amplitudes. The results of the high-pass noise masking paradigm suggest that chirps could efficiently synchronize neural firing in their targeted frequency band, while the click recruited more basal fibers outside its limited band. Finally, monitoring sensitivity during electrode insertion, defined as relative amplitude change per unit distance, was higher for chirp-evoked CAP and tone burst-evoked CM, but smaller for CAP responses evoked by clicks or tone bursts. CONCLUSION: The chirp was shown to be an efficient stimulus in synchronizing neural firing for a limited frequency band in the guinea pig model. This study provides a proof of principle for using chirp-evoked CAP as a comprehensive neural measure in CI patients with residual hearing.

[Hearing rehabilitation using a cochlear implant - a way of reducing tinnitus in the elderly]. / Die Hörrehabilitation mittels Cochlea-Implantat ­ Eine Möglichkeit der Tinnitus-Reduktion im Alter.

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is a common symptom of severe hearing loss or deafness especially in older people. Hearing rehabilitation for these patients is usually only possible with a cochlear implant (CI). In recent years, an increasing number of old and very old patients have been treated with a CI. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of hearing rehabilitation with a CI on the tinnitus of older people. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study 34 patients between the age of 65 and 86 were included, who were unilaterally treated with a CI for the first time. 16 patients (47.1 %) had tinnitus preoperatively. At three time points (preoperative, on initial fitting and six months postoperatively), tinnitus severity was assessed in addition to speech discrimination in patients with tinnitus using the mini-tinnitus questionnaire (Mini-TF12). RESULTS: Six month postoperatively we found a highly significant improvement of speech discrimination (preoperatively 11.5 ±â€Š17.4, six-month visit 54.4 ±â€Š28.1 %, p = 0.001) that was accompanied by a highly significant reduction in tinnitus severity according to Mini-TF12 scores (preoperatively 6.9 ±â€Š6.5, six-month visit 4.3 ±â€Š3.3, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hearing rehabilitation by means of CI leads to a highly significant reduction of tinnitus severity of pre-operatively existing tinnitus in the elderly.

Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.

PURPOSE: Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels. CONCLUSIONS: In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.

[Speech perception and cognitive abilities in seniors without subjective hearing loss]. / Sprachverstehen und kognitive Leistungen bei Senioren ohne subjektive Hörminderung.

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of elderly test subjects without self-reported hearing loss to perceive, hear and comprehend speech in quiet and noise. Furthermore, the effects of age and cognitive performance on hearing were also investigated.The study included 40 subjects aged over 60 years (average age: 69.3 ±â€…7.1 years). The subjects were screened for dementia (DemTect test) to test for any signs of cognitive deficiencies. Average hearing loss (PTA_4) and average high-frequency hearing loss (PTA_HT) were determined. Speech perception in quiet was tested by means of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test and in noise by means of the Oldenburg sentence test with two different types of noise (temporally continuous and amplitude modulated). While the results of the DemTect test were age-appropriate for 65 % of the subjects, the remaining 35 % showed signs of mild cognitive impairments. The parameters of cognitive performance decreased significantly with age. The hearing loss (PTA_4 and PTA_HT) of the subjects correlated significantly with both age and DemTect score. Speech perception in both quiet and noise decreased significantly with age as well as within the parameters to assess cognitive performance.Seniors should undergo routine hearing screenings in order to detect hearing disorders as soon as possible so that hearing aids can be prescribed at an early stage. This would also allow, patients to get accustomed to their hearing aids early on and to achieve better hearing, thereby improving their quality of life.

Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.

There is currently no standardized method for reporting audiological, surgical and subjective outcome measures in clinical trials with active middle ear implants (AMEIs). It is often difficult to compare studies due to data incompatibility and to perform meta-analyses across different centres is almost impossible. A committee of ENT and audiological experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland decided to address this issue by developing new minimal standards for reporting the outcomes of AMEI clinical trials. The consensus presented here aims to provide a recommendation to enable better inter-study comparability.

A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: A psychoacoustic procedure designed for the precise assessment of perceptional threshold (T-level) in cochlear implant (CI) users is presented. The impact of this procedure on speech perception was investigated. DESIGN: Individual T-level measurements were obtained with the proposed procedure and three different speech processor fitting conditions were applied: (1) fitting familiar to the subject, T-levels unchanged, (2) T-level set to thresholds determined with the new procedure, (3) T-level set to thresholds determined with the new procedure, but T-level is decreased by 10 clinical units (CU). The impact of the different fitting conditions was measured by means of categorical loudness scaling (CLS) and speech perception tests in quiet and noise. STUDY SAMPLE: A prospective study at a tertiary referral university hospital. 18 experienced postlingually deafened cochlear implanted adult subjects. RESULTS: Average sound-field thresholds obtained by CLS were lowest in condition using the new procedure yielding a larger dynamic range with significantly higher speech scores in quiet compared to those with a subject's commonly used programme, and significantly improved in noise even after reducing T-levels by 10 CU. CONCLUSION: The precise determination of T-levels by means of the proposed procedure improved performance in several speech recognition tasks. Compared to the default behavioural setting, T-level increased on median by 9 CU. Average speech reception threshold in noise for soft speech levels (50 dB sound pressure level) decreased by 1 dB.

[Impact of microphone position on sound localization in cochlear implant users]. / Einfluss der Mikrofonposition auf die akustische Lokalisation bei Cochlea-Implantat-Nutzern.

OBJECTIVE: The delivery of directional cues of a hearing device microphone are highly dependent on the position of the microphones. The aim of this work was the evaluation of different microphone positions with regard to the transmission of interaural time and level differences as well as the spectral characteristics and its impact on the localization abilities. METHODS: Head-related transfer functions of 30 subjects were measured with three different omnidirectional microphones at different positions: in the pinna (ITP), behind the ear (BTE), at the entrance of the ear canal (EEC). Sound localization abilities of 12 bilateral CI users was assessed for the microphone positions ITP and BTE. RESULTS: Only the microphone positions in the ear (ITP, EEC) could sample the spectral cues of the pinna. However, the positioning of the microphone inside of the pinna did not significantly improve sound localization abilities compared to BTE microphones. For sound incidence from rear significantly less front-back confusions were achieved with the microphone inside of the pinna. CONCLUSION: The microphone position in the pinna showed only a slight improvement in sound localization compared with BTE microphones in CI users. A precondition for better sound localization abilities is the improvement of the delivery of temporal and spectral fine structure cues in CI systems.