Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 29(6): 1968-1976, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32974801

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the deep lateral femoral notch sign (DLFNS) in identifying a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/anterolateral ligament (ALL) rupture and predicting the clinical outcomes following an anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that patients with a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture would have an increased DLFNS compared to patients without a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture. METHODS: The lateral preoperative radiographs and MRI images of 100 patients with an ACL rupture and 100 control subjects were evaluated for the presence of a DLFNS and ACL/ALL rupture, respectively. The patients were evaluated clinically preoperatively and at a minimum 1 year following the ACL reconstruction. A receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed to define the optimal cut-off value of the DLFNS for identifying a concomitant ACL/ALL injury. The relative risk (RR) was also calculated to determine whether the presence of the DLFNS was a risk factor for residual instability or ACL graft rupture following an ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: The prevalence of DLFNS was 52% in the ACL-ruptured patients and 15% in the control group. At a minimum 1-year follow-up, 35% (6/17) of the patients with DLFNS > 1.8 mm complained of persistent instability, and an MRI evaluation demonstrated a graft re-rupture rate of 12% (2/17). In patients with a DLFNS < 1.8 mm, 8% (7/83) reported a residual instability, and the graft rupture rate was 2.4% (2/83). A DLFNS > 1.8 mm demonstrated a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 95%, a negative predictive value of 98%, and a positive predictive value of 89% in identifying a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture. Patients with a DLFNS > 1.8 mm had 4.2 times increased risk for residual instability and graft rupture compared to patients with a DLFNS ≤ 1.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A DLFNS > 1.8 mm could be a clinically relevant diagnostic tool for identifying a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture with high sensitivity and PPV. Patients with a DLFNS > 1.8 mm should be carefully evaluated for clinical and radiological signs of a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture and treated when needed with a combined intra-articular ACL reconstruction and extra-articular tenodesis to avoid a residual rotational instability and ACL graft rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/patologia , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fêmur/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Feminino , Fêmur/cirurgia , Humanos , Ligamentos/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Radiografia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ruptura/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura/cirurgia , Tenodese , Adulto Jovem
2.
Knee ; 30: 141-147, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33930701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to (1) investigate the variability of the femoral ACL center in ACL-ruptured patients, (2) identify whether the currently available over-the-top femoral ACL guides could allow for anatomical reconstruction of the native ACL footprint. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance images of 95 knees with an ACL rupture were used to create three-dimensional models of the femur. The femoral ACL footprint area was outlined on each model, and the location of the femoral ACL center was reported using an anatomical coordinate system. The distance of the femoral ACL center from the over-the-top position was measured. RESULTS: The femoral ACL center demonstrated a high intersubject variability ranging from 1.8 mm (9%) to 12.3 mm (60%) posterior and from 7.7 mm (37%) distal to 4.8 mm (23%) proximal using the posterior condyle circle reference. The average distance of the femoral ACL center from the over-the-top position was 1.9 ± 1.5 mm posterior and 13.8 ± 2.7 mm distal, respectively. The contemporary over-the-top femoral ACL aimers could restore the femoral ACL center in only 6.5% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The femoral ACL center demonstrated a high variation on its location, which resulted in a high intersubject variability from the over-the-top position. The contemporary over-the-top femoral tunnel guides do not provide sufficient offset to allow for an anatomical ACL reconstruction. Anteromedial-portal specific femoral ACL guides with a femoral offset ranging from 10 to 18 mm in the proximal/distal direction are required to restore the native ACL footprint.


Assuntos
Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/anatomia & histologia , Fêmur/anatomia & histologia , Articulação do Joelho/anatomia & histologia , Tíbia/anatomia & histologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento Tridimensional , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA