Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Mycol Med ; 32(4): 101312, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914432

RESUMO

Gastro-intestinal mucormycosis (GIMM) is a highly lethal invasive fungal disease partly because of a challenging diagnosis. An allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipient experienced bowel obstruction caused by slowly-evolutive gastro-intestinal mucormycosis and was successfully treated with surgery and antifungal therapy. Pathological findings revealed a granuloma without angio-invasion, which is unusual in this fungal disease and has incomplete similarities with an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Mucorales-specific PCR in both serum and resected tissue was positive and helped assessing the diagnosis. GIMM should be considered in front of unexplained granulomatosis or bowel obstruction in immunocompromised patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Mucorales , Mucormicose , Humanos , Mucormicose/diagnóstico , Mucormicose/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido
2.
J Palliat Care ; : 8258597211063687, 2021 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34841971

RESUMO

Background: Comfort evaluation is one of the major challenges in the palliative care setting, particularly when it comes to non-communicative patients. For this specific population, validated tools for comfort evaluation are scarce and healthcare professionals have to rely on their clinical sense and experience. Objectives: To provide arguments for the use of Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI) monitoring in order to improve clinical comfort evaluation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of non-communicative patients at the end of their lives whose comfort was evaluated clinically and with ANI. We focused on the coherence or discordance of clinical and ANI evaluations and on pharmacological interventions driven by them. Results: 58 evaluations from 33 patients were analyzed. Clinical and demographic characteristics were highly variable. Simultaneous clinical and ANI evaluations were concordant in 45 measurements (77.58%), leading mostly to no treatment modification when indicating comfort and to increasing anxiolytic or pain-relief treatments when indicating discomfort. Thirteen (22.41%) evaluations were discordant, leading mostly to treatment incrementation. Conclusion: We suggest that the ANI monitor is a reliable tool in the palliative setting and may help provide patients with the best symptom relief and the most appropriate therapeutics.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA