Exploring data reduction strategies in the analysis of continuous pressure imaging technology.

BACKGROUND: Science is becoming increasingly data intensive as digital innovations bring new capacity for continuous data generation and storage. This progress also brings challenges, as many scientific initiatives are challenged by the shear volumes of data produced. Here we present a case study of a data intensive randomized clinical trial assessing the utility of continuous pressure imaging (CPI) for reducing pressure injuries. OBJECTIVE: To explore an approach to reducing the amount of CPI data required for analyses to a manageable size without loss of critical information using a nested subset of pressure data. METHODS: Data from four enrolled study participants excluded from the analytical phase of the study were used to develop an approach to data reduction. A two-step data strategy was used. First, raw data were sampled at different frequencies (5, 30, 60, 120, and 240 s) to identify optimal measurement frequency. Second, similarity between adjacent frames was evaluated using correlation coefficients to identify position changes of enrolled study participants. Data strategy performance was evaluated through visual inspection using heat maps and time series plots. RESULTS: A sampling frequency of every 60 s provided reasonable representation of changes in interface pressure over time. This approach translated to using only 1.7% of the collected data in analyses. In the second step it was found that 160 frames within 24 h represented the pressure states of study participants. In total, only 480 frames from the 72 h of collected data would be needed for analyses without loss of information. Only ~ 0.2% of the raw data collected would be required for assessment of the primary trial outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Data reduction is an important component of big data analytics. Our two-step strategy markedly reduced the amount of data required for analyses without loss of information. This data reduction strategy, if validated, could be used in other CPI and other settings where large amounts of both temporal and spatial data must be analysed.

Healthcare provider and patient/family perceptions of continuous pressure imaging technology for prevention of pressure injuries: A secondary analysis of patients enrolled in a randomized control trial.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of various pressure injury (PI) prevention strategies (e.g., risk identification, use of pressure re-distribution surfaces, frequent repositioning), they persist as a significant issue for healthcare systems worldwide. Continuous pressure imaging (CPI) is a novel technology that could be integrated within a comprehensive approach to the prevention of PIs. We studied the perceptions of healthcare providers and patients/families to identify facilitators and barriers to the use of this technology. METHODS: Hospitalized patients/family members from a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of CPI in preventing PIs completed a survey after 72 hours (or upon discharge from hospital) of CPI monitoring. They were asked questions about prior and current experience with CPI technology. For healthcare providers, perceptions on the use of the device and its impact on care were explored through a survey distributed by email or hard copies. RESULTS: A total of 125 healthcare providers and 525 patients/family members completed the surveys. Of the healthcare providers, 95% either agreed/strongly agreed that the CPI technology was easy to use and 65% stated that the device improved how they provided pressure relief for patients. Identified issues with the device were cost, the fitting of the mattress cover, and the fixation of the patients/families on the device. Over a quarter of the patient/family respondents agreed/strongly agreed that the device influenced how pressure relief was provided. This response was statistically associated with whether the monitor was turned on (intervention arm; 52.7%) or off (control arm; 4.2%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: CPI technology was positively perceived by healthcare providers. Most patients/families felt it influenced care when the CPI monitor was turned on. Concerns raised around cost and the ease of use of these devices by healthcare providers may affect the decisions of healthcare system administrators to adopt and implement this technology.

Patient satisfaction: evaluating the success of hospital ward redesign.

Patients who were moved from a traditional medical ward to a new state-of-the-art medical ward were surveyed regarding their perceptions of quality during their hospitalization. Respondents rated the environment of the state-of-the-art facility, as well as the overall quality of their hospital stay, more positively. However, fewer differences in perceptions of the quality of the broader hospital environment and little difference in the perceived quality of staff-patient interactions were found. Findings indicated that enhancing the facilities of the patient care environment improved patients' overall perceptions of the quality of their hospital stay.

Ototoxicity induced by gentamicin and furosemide.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case of ototoxicity induced by furosemide and once-daily gentamicin therapy. CASE SUMMARY: A 60-year-old white woman presented to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia and urinary tract infection. The antibiotic regimen included gentamicin and, after 5 doses, the patient reported profound bilateral hearing loss. A Pure Tone Audiogram suggested moderate to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally. The only risk factors present included her age, elevated temperature, and the use of furosemide. DISCUSSION: Several risk factors may predispose a patient to developing aminoglycoside ototoxicity: the 1555 chromosomal mutation, preexisting disorders of hearing and balance, hypovolemia, bacteremia, liver and renal dysfunction, and the simultaneous administration of other ototoxic medications. The cumulative dose and duration of aminoglycoside therapy are more important than serum concentrations. Administration of an aminoglycoside followed by furosemide may increase the risk of ototoxicity. The aminoglycoside interacts with the cell membranes in the inner ear, increasing their permeability. This theoretically allows the loop diuretic to penetrate into the cells in higher concentrations, causing more severe damage. CONCLUSIONS: Auditory toxicity occurred after only 5 days of gentamicin therapy and 1 dose of furosemide. An aminoglycoside followed by furosemide may increase the risk for ototoxicity. Clinicians need to be aware of the synergistic potential of ototoxic medications.