Myeloid expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl1 is required in anti-myeloperoxidase vasculitis but myeloperoxidase inhibition is not protective.

Antibodies to neutrophil and monocyte myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3 are a feature of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis, a disease with significant morbidity for which new treatments are needed. Mice with a myeloid-specific deletion of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl1 have reduced numbers of circulating neutrophils. Here, we assessed if myeloid-specific Mcl1 was required in murine anti-myeloperoxidase vasculitis and whether inhibition of myeloperoxidase was protective. In a murine model of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis, induced by anti-myeloperoxidase antibody, mice with a myeloid-specific deletion of Mcl1 were protected from disease. They had fewer crescents, neutrophils, and macrophages in the glomeruli, lower serum creatinine levels and reduced albuminuria compared with controls. At baseline and day six after disease induction they had fewer circulating neutrophils than controls. At day six there were also fewer circulating monocytes. Myeloperoxidase inhibition with AZD5904 had no effect on histological or biochemical parameters of disease, and there was also no reduction in albuminuria at day one, two, five or seven after disease induction. These findings persisted when disease was induced without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, which increases disease severity. A second myeloperoxidase inhibitor, AZM198, also showed no evidence of an effect, although both AZD5904 and AZM198 inhibited human neutrophil extracellular trap formation in vitro. Thus, our results show that while myeloid-specific Mcl1 is required in this model of anti-myeloperoxidase vasculitis, myeloperoxidase inhibition is not protective.

Antimyeloperoxidase antibodies modulate inflammatory responses and activate profibrotic pathways in human monocytes.

Antimyeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) and antiproteinase 3 (anti-PR3) antibodies are found in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). We investigated the effect of both anti-MPO and anti-PR3 IgG on human monocytes. Peripheral blood monocytes were cultured under a range of conditions that included TLR agonists, anti-MPO IgG and anti-PR3 IgG with appropriate controls. Experiments included whole transcriptome profiling and an assessment of the role of Fc receptors. When monocytes were stimulated with LPS or R848, anti-MPO but not anti-PR3 IgG, caused a reduction in IL-10 secretion and had a profound effect on cell-surface marker expression. Anti-MPO but not anti-PR3 IgG enhanced monocyte survival in the absence of TLR stimulation. These effects depended on the Fc receptor CD32a. With TLR stimulation, the effect of anti-MPO but not anti-PR3 IgG on the transcriptional response at 6 h was variable, but we identified a core set of transcripts likely to be important. Without TLR stimulation, there was a robust effect of anti-MPO but not anti-PR3 IgG on the transcriptional response at 24 h, and there was a highly significant enrichment of genes encoding extracellular matrix and extracellular matrix-associated proteins. Analysis with nCounter confirmed many of the differentially expressed transcripts and supported a role for CD32a. These data show that anti-MPO, but not anti-PR3 IgG, from patients with AAV has wide-ranging effects on monocytes which depend on CD32a. The activation of a profibrotic transcriptional response by anti-MPO but not anti-PR3 IgG may give insights into the differences in disease phenotype.

VISTA deficiency protects from immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis by inhibiting neutrophil activation.

V-type immunoglobulin domain-containing suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA) is a negative checkpoint regulator of T cells. We assessed VISTA deficient mice in the murine nephrotoxic nephritis models of acute and chronic immune-complex mediated glomerulonephritis. We show that VISTA deficiency protects from crescentic glomerulonephritis, with no effect on the nephritogenic adaptive immune response. The early neutrophil influx was unaffected but proteinuria was reduced suggesting a reduction in neutrophil activation. In vivo, there was reduced neutrophil degranulation in VISTA deficienct mice and, in vitro, VISTA-deficient neutrophils had an impaired response to immune complexes but not to fMLP or PMA. Mice with a genetic deficiency of neutrophils due to myeloid-specific deletion of myeloid cell leukemia 1 (Mcl-1) were also protected from crescentic glomerulonephritis, indicating an essential role for neutrophils. Therefore, VISTA deficiency inhibits neutrophil activation by immune complexes and neutrophil-dependent crescentic glomerulonephritis. This suggests that VISTA is a therapeutic target for inflammatory disease. However, this would need to be balanced against a potential enhancing effect on autoimmunity.

Eosinophils are important for protection, immunoregulation and pathology during infection with nematode microfilariae.

Eosinophil responses typify both allergic and parasitic helminth disease. In helminthic disease, the role of eosinophils can be both protective in immune responses and destructive in pathological responses. To investigate whether eosinophils are involved in both protection and pathology during filarial nematode infection, we explored the role of eosinophils and their granule proteins, eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and major basic protein-1 (MBP-1), during infection with Brugia malayi microfilariae. Using eosinophil-deficient mice (PHIL), we further clarify the role of eosinophils in clearance of microfilariae during primary, but not challenge infection in vivo. Deletion of EPO or MBP-1 alone was insufficient to abrogate parasite clearance suggesting that either these molecules are redundant or eosinophils act indirectly in parasite clearance via augmentation of other protective responses. Absence of eosinophils increased mast cell recruitment, but not other cell types, into the broncho-alveolar lavage fluid during challenge infection. In addition absence of eosinophils or EPO alone, augmented parasite-induced IgE responses, as measured by ELISA, demonstrating that eosinophils are involved in regulation of IgE. Whole body plethysmography indicated that nematode-induced changes in airway physiology were reduced in challenge infection in the absence of eosinophils and also during primary infection in the absence of EPO alone. However lack of eosinophils or MBP-1 actually increased goblet cell mucus production. We did not find any major differences in cytokine responses in the absence of eosinophils, EPO or MBP-1. These results reveal that eosinophils actively participate in regulation of IgE and goblet cell mucus production via granule secretion during nematode-induced pathology and highlight their importance both as effector cells, as damage-inducing cells and as supervisory cells that shape both innate and adaptive immunity.