Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Esp Urol ; 67(8): 714-7, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25306992

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is a rare and aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma with low cancer-specific survival. We reviewed our series of collecting duct tumours retrospectively. METHODS/RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the collecting duct carcinomas of the kidney treated in our unit between January 2007 and December 2012. The variables analysed were: age, gender, reason for consultation, side affected, ASA score according to anaesthetic risk, surgical treatment, tumour size, Fuhrman grade, lymphovascular invasion, TNM staging (2009 classification), adjuvant treatment and survival time. Four collecting duct carcinomas were identified. Mean patient age was 61 years. Constitutional syndrome and lower back pain were the most frequent reasons for consultation (75%), followed by hematuria. The surgical treatment was laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100% of the cases, with lymphadenectomy in 2 patients due to lymph node disease detected on imaging studies. The 4 patients were initially treated with temsirolimus as adjuvant therapy with no response. Two patients were given second-line treatment with sunitinib without any response. All 4 patients died from their disease with a mean survival of 9.5 months (rang: 4-15 months). CONCLUSIONS: Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is a rare and aggressive renal parenchymal tumour. Long-term survival rate is low, because the only potentially curative treatment seems to be surgery if it is performed in patients with localised tumours.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Túbulos Renais Coletores , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nefrectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Front Genet ; 10: 1237, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31921291

RESUMO

Bladder cancer (BC), the most frequent malignancy of the urinary system, is ranked the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide. Of all newly diagnosed patients with BC, 70-75% will present disease confined to the mucosa or submucosa, the non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) subtype. Of those, approximately 70% will recur after transurethral resection (TUR). Due to high rate of recurrence, patients are submitted to an intensive follow-up program maintained throughout many years, or even throughout life, resulting in an expensive follow-up, with cystoscopy being the most cost-effective procedure for NMIBC screening. Currently, the gold standard procedure for detection and follow-up of NMIBC is based on the association of cystoscopy and urine cytology. As cystoscopy is a very invasive approach, over the years, many different noninvasive assays (both based in serum and urine samples) have been developed in order to search genetic and protein alterations related to the development, progression, and recurrence of BC. TERT promoter mutations and FGFR3 hotspot mutations are the most frequent somatic alterations in BC and constitute the most reliable biomarkers for BC. Based on these, we developed an ultra-sensitive, urine-based assay called Uromonitor®, capable of detecting trace amounts of TERT promoter (c.1-124C > T and c.1-146C > T) and FGFR3 (p.R248C and p.S249C) hotspot mutations, in tumor cells exfoliated to urine samples. Cells present in urine were concentrated by the filtration of urine through filters where tumor cells are trapped and stored until analysis, presenting long-term stability. Detection of the alterations was achieved through a custom-made, robust, and highly sensitive multiplex competitive allele-specific discrimination PCR allowing clear interpretation of results. In this study, we validate a test for NMIBC recurrence detection, using for technical validation a total of 331 urine samples and 41 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of the primary tumor and recurrence lesions from a large cluster of urology centers. In the clinical validation, we used 185 samples to assess sensitivity/specificity in the detection of NMIBC recurrence vs. cystoscopy/cytology and in a smaller cohort its potential as a primary diagnostic tool for NMIBC. Our results show this test to be highly sensitive (73.5%) and specific (93.2%) in detecting recurrence of BC in patients under surveillance of NMIBC.

3.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 8(5-6): E366-70, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24940468

RESUMO

We report 2 patients with ureteral injury after a simple total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine myoma with a complete resection of the distal ureter. One patient had unilateral injury and the other 2 patients had bilateral injury. The surgical laparoscopic repair procedure was carried out 3 to 5 days after the injury. Surgery involved intramural dissection of the distal ureteral stump to expose at least 1 cm of the ureter, percutaneous ureteral stent placement, elimination of tension between the proximal ureter and the dissected distal stump, end-to-end anastomosis, and reinsertion of the distal ureter into the bladder muscle layer, which was previously dissected for the anastomosis.

4.
Urolithiasis ; 41(6): 517-22, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23913111

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The lithiasic size is a determining factor in selecting the most suitable treatment, surgical or medical. However, the method for obtaining a reliable lithiasic size is not standardized. Our objetives are to determine the differences between the estimated lithiasic sizes shown by plain radiography test and by computerized axial tomography (CT) scan (using different techniques) in relation to the actual size, and to establish which is the ideal type of imaging for this purpose. We present an in vitro model with lithiasis obtained in cooperation with four centers. INCLUSION CRITERIA: lithiasis >0.5 cm, intact, and visible via simple radiography. A sample of 245 lithiases was obtained, with 87 rejected as they did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. Initially the three main actual diameters of each lithiasis were measured with a calibrator, then a plain X-ray and a CT scan were taken of the samples to determine the surface size in cm(2) for simple radiography; surface size and volume in cm(3) for CT scan, in bone window and soft tissue (Toshiba Aquillion 64, sections of 0.5 mm, 120 Kv, 250 mA). The tomographic area was calculated by employing the formula recommended by the European Association of Urology and scanner software. The actual, radiographic and tomographic measurements were taken by three different researchers who were unaware of the results obtained by the each other. The statistics program IBM SPSS Statistics(®) 19 was used. Differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon sign test. The bone window CT scan slightly overestimated the actual lithiasic size (0.12 vs. 0.17 cm(3)), while in soft tissue window the actual volume was practically doubled (0.12 vs. 0.21 cm(3)) (p < 0.05). We did not find statistically significant differences in the comparison between actual surface size (0.39 cm(2)) and bone window CT scan size when using the EAU formula or scanner software (0.36/0.37 cm(2)). Resulting measurements in soft tissue window tended to significantly overestimate the surface size, although only slightly (0.42/0.44 cm(2)), whilst the plain radiography underestimated it slightly but significantly (0.37 cm(2)). CT scan, using the bone window, is the technical methodology with which the greatest in vitro accuracy in which actual lithiasis measurements can be estimated, although the craniocaudal diameter measurement will be overestimated. Using soft tissue window gives an overestimated size.


Assuntos
Litíase/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Padrões de Referência , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA