RESUMO
Measurement of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) may be done on a morning urinary sample or on a 24 hours-urine sample. Values defining microalbuminuria are: 24 hour-urine sample: 30-300 mg/24 hours; morning urine sample: 20-200 mg/ml or 30-300 mg/g creatinine or 2.5-25 mg/mmol creatinine (men) or 3.5-35 mg/mol (women). Timed urine sample: 20-200 microg/min. The optimal use of semi-quantitative urine test-strip is not clearly defined. It is generally believed that microalbuminuria reflects a generalized impairment of the endothelium; however, no definite proof has been shown in humans. IN DIABETIC SUBJECTS: Microalbuminuria is a marker of increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) and renal morbidity and mortality in type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects. The increase in UAE during follow-up is also a marker of CV and renal risk in type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects; its decrease during follow-up is associated with lower risks. IN NO DIABETIC SUBJECTS: Microalbuminuria is a marker of increased risk for diabetes mellitus, deterioration of the renal function, CV morbidity and all-cause mortality. It is a marker of increased risk for the development of hypertension in normotensive subjects, and is associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with cancer and lymphoma. Persistence or elevation of UAE overtime is associated with deleterious outcome in some hypertensive subjects. Measurement of UAE may be recommended in hypertensive subjects with one or two CV risk factors in whom CV risk remains difficult to assess, and in those with refractory hypertension: microalbuminuria indicates a high CV risk and must lead to strict control of arterial pressure. Studies focused on microalbuminuria in non-diabetic non-hypertensive subjects are limited; most of them suggest that microalbuminuria predicts CV complications and deleterious outcome as it is in diabetic or hypertensive subjects. Subjects with a history of CV or cerebrovascular disease have an even greater CV risk if microalbuminuria is present than if it is not; however, in all cases, therapeutic intervention must be aggressive regardless of whether microalbuminuria is present or not. It is not recommended to measure UAE in non-diabetic non-hypertensive subjects in the absence of history of renal disease. Monitoring of renal function (UAE, serum creatinine and estimation of GFR) is annually recommended in all subjects with microalbuminuria. MANAGEMENT: In patients with microalbuminuria, weight reduction, sodium restriction (<6 g/day), smoking cessation, strict glucose control in diabetic subjects, strict arterial pressure control are necessary; in diabetic subjects: use of maximal doses of ACEI or ARB are recommended; ACEI/ARB and thiazides have synergistic actions on arterial pressure and reduction of UAE; in non diabetic subjects, any of the five classes of antihypertensive medications (ACEI, ARB, thiazides, calcium channel blockers or betablockers) can be used.
Assuntos
Albuminúria/diagnóstico , Albuminúria/etiologia , Albuminúria/urina , Nefropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , Nefelometria e Turbidimetria , RadioimunoensaioRESUMO
Menopause coincides with an increase in the incidence of hypertension in women. A direct role of estrogen deprivation in this increased blood pressure remains a topic of debate. Menopause probably accelerates the arterial changes related to aging. Hormone replacement therapy does not influence blood pressure significantly and is not contraindicated in hypertensive women. The effect of hormone replacement treatment on cardiovascular risk was recently the object of controversy. It does not increase risk except in cases of late treatment in older women who already have atherosclerosis. Hypertension management in women is otherwise similar to management in men.
Assuntos
Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Menopausa/fisiologia , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
The phenomenon of implantation anchors the embryo into the uterine wall and produces a hemochorial placenta that maintains the pregnancy and fetal growth. Implantation and placentation are intimately linked and cannot be dissociated either in time or in space. Preeclampsia is characterized by hypertension and proteinuria. It is secondary to an anomaly of the invasion of the uterine spiral arteries by extra-villous cytotrophoblast cells, associated with local disruptions of vascular tone, of immunological balance and inflammatory status, and sometimes with genetic predispositions. Preeclampsia is a disease of early pregnancy, a form of incomplete spontaneous abortion, but is expressed late in pregnancy. Aspirin may play a favorable role in implantation which is related to the genesis of preeclampsia and some cases of intra-uterine growth restriction. The most important points in obtaining a preventive effect from low-dose aspirin during the pregnancy are early treatment (before 13 weeks of gestation) and the prescription of a sufficient dose (more than 100 mg per day).
Assuntos
Implantação do Embrião/imunologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/imunologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/fisiopatologia , Trofoblastos/imunologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Implantação do Embrião/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Trofoblastos/fisiologiaRESUMO
Hypertension is the most common medical complication of pregnancy. Isolated and moderate hypertensions most often have an uneventful course. On the contrary, preeclampsia is a severe condition, that threatens the fetal survival, and even maternal prognosis. Recent knowledge demonstrates that preeclampsia is related to a very early defect in placentation, with late maternal systemic effects. This has important practical counterparts. Any manifestation of placental dysfunction should be detected as early as possible. Antihypertensive treatment should be used with great caution, to preserve an appropriate blood flow through a placenta whose hemodynamic resistance is high. Finally, the most appropriate therapeutic way is a preventive one. Cardiovascular risk of those young women should be later monitored.
Assuntos
Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/classificação , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/terapia , Incidência , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/terapia , Gravidez , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/classificação , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Cardiovascular risk factor management by French vs US primary care physicians was studied. A survey was conducted that found that French physicians spend >20 minutes while US physicians spend five to 10 minutes (P<.001) addressing cardiovascular risk with patients. Fifty-three percent of French (vs 33% of US) physicians focus more on lifestyle modification and less on medication management (P<.0001). Sixty-nine percent of French physicians spend 0% to 20% of their time on administration while 65% of US physicians spend 10% to 30% (P=.0028). Fifty-one percent of French physicians see patients in one to three months for follow-up, while 51% of US physicians see patients in three to six months (P<.0001). Eighty-seven percent of French (vs 39% of US) physicians have guidelines available in the examination room either frequently or very frequently. US physicians report disparities in care more frequently than do French physicians (P<.0001). Forty-nine percent of French (vs 10% of US) physicians believe that they have relative freedom to practice medicine (P<.001). US physicians report greater administrative efforts, frustration, and disparities in their practice. French physicians focus more of their efforts on lifestyle management and see their patients more frequently and for a longer visit time.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , França/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Hypertension occurs in 6-8% of pregnancies, preeclampsia in 2%, found to be "severe" in 0.6%. Preeclampsia remains a major cause of foetal, and even maternal, mortality. Two different aspects are described: "maternal" preeclampsia is related to pre-existent vascular lesions in the mother, "placental" preeclampsia is due to a primary defect in early placentation. The earliest disorder seems to be a "materno-foetal immune maladaptation", characterized by a defective cooperation between uterine NK cells and foetal HLA-C. Defective angiogenesis is also involved, which has been accounted for by an abnormal production of soluble receptors for angiogenic factors and TGF-beta. The resulting placental ischemia is responsible for an increased shedding of trophoblastic debris in the maternal circulation, an inflammatory syndrome, and finally generalized endothelial dysfunction, which is the clue to maternal symptoms. Clinical presentations range from benign isolated hypertension to life-threatening severe preeclampsia, which entails a major risk of maternal complications and foetal death. Antihypertensive treatment does not improve the foetal or maternal prognosis, in spite of blood pressure lowering. Very early preventive treatments have been developed, which seem largely more promising. Research is very active in this field. Finally, women who had preeclampsia are more prone to future hypertension, type 2 diabetes, or coronary disease.