Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Odontology ; 107(4): 473-481, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30924034

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to characterize the main features and the usage-induced degradation of the Genius file after four severely curved root canal instrumentations and to compare their properties to the Reciproc files. Brand new and ex vivo used files were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical metallography, and nano-indentation to disclose their morphological, chemical, mechanical, thermal, and phase composition features. Nano-indentation data were statistically analysed using the Student's t test for normal distribution or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for not-normal distributions. SEM analysis showed the presence of micro-cracks near the tip on both files after ex vivo usage test. EDS analysis confirmed that both files are manufactured from an almost equiatomic NiTi alloy. DSC analysis revealed that the transition temperature of the Genius is below 20 °C, while that of the Reciproc is above 20 °C. XRD analysis of Genius files identified cubic B2 austenite with minor peaks of residual monoclinic B19 martensite, while the contemporaneous presence of martensite, austenite and hexagonal R-phase was observed in the Reciproc files. Significant differences in nanohardness and modulus of elasticity (P < .05) were observed in both Genius and Reciproc files before and after use. The collected results showed that both instruments can be safely used as single-use files.


Assuntos
Níquel , Titânio , Ligas , Varredura Diferencial de Calorimetria , Ligas Dentárias , Instrumentos Odontológicos , Elasticidade , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Preparo de Canal Radicular , Propriedades de Superfície
2.
J Endod ; 32(11): 1091-3, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17055914

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to compare the surface tension of four common endodontic irrigants: Moltendo EDTA 17%, Cetrexidin, Smear Clear, Sodium hypochlorite 5.25%, with the surface tension of MTAD and Tetraclean. Freshly produced MilliQ water was used as a reference. All measurements were performed following the Wilhelmy plate technique, using a Cahn DCA-322 Dynamic Contact Angle Analyzer at the temperature of 22 degrees C. MilliQ water, sodium hypochlorite 5.25%, and EDTA 17% had the highest surface tension, whereas those of Cetrexedin and Tetraclean has shown the lowest surface tension value. Both new irrigants, MTAD and Tetraclean, are capable of removing the smear layer. Thanks to their low surface tension, increasing the intimate contact of irrigant solutions with the dentinal walls, they may permit deeper penetration.


Assuntos
Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/química , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/química , Cetrimônio , Compostos de Cetrimônio/química , Quelantes/química , Clorexidina/química , Ácido Cítrico/química , Doxiciclina/química , Ácido Edético/química , Vidro/química , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Polissorbatos/química , Hipoclorito de Sódio/química , Tensão Superficial , Tensoativos/química , Temperatura , Água/química , Molhabilidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA