Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 2024 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777390

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmic quality of life (OQoL) has been investigated in selected parts of general populations and in patients with ocular disease, but OQoL in unselected general populations has not been studied in detail. The present study reports OQoL obtained from a representative sample of the adult Danish population 2020-2022. METHODS: The FORSYN study invited 10 350 citizen representatives for the adult Danish population for a non-mydriatic eye examination and answer the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire with 39 items in the validated Danish translation. The results from the 3384 (32.7%) persons who participated in the study were weighted on the basis of relevant socio-economic factors, and data were projected to represent the total population. Binocular visual acuity was below 0.1 corresponding to legal blindness in 0.22% of this population. RESULTS: OQoL was positively correlated with binocular visual acuity up to better than 93 ETDRS letters, negatively correlated with age for persons younger than 60 years of age and again positively correlated with age for persons older than 60 years. OQoL was negatively correlated with increasing ametropia and refractive error above 1 dioptre and encompassed more OQoL parameters for hyperopic than for myopic persons. CONCLUSIONS: The study underlines the benefits of improving visual acuity even within the normal range and of adjusting uncorrected refraction errors in the general population. OQoL is positively correlated with age in older persons independently of visual acuity, sex, refractive power and previous cataract surgery.

2.
Acad Emerg Med ; 2024 Jul 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39014886

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common complaint among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), yet pain treatment is frequently suboptimal. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of low-dose ketamine (LDK) as an adjunct to morphine versus morphine alone for treatment of acute pain among ED patients with and without current opioid use. METHODS: Adult patients presenting with acute pain of ≥5 on a numeric rating scale (0-10) who were deemed by their treating ED physician to require intravenous opioids were randomized to receive either 0.1 mg/kg ketamine (treatment group) or isotonic saline (placebo) as an adjunct to morphine. Patients with and without current opioid use were randomized separately. Pain was measured at baseline (T0) and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after randomization. The primary outcome was pain reduction from T0 to T10. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity over 120 min, need of rescue opioids, side effects, and patient and provider satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included from May 2022 to August 2023. Median (IQR) age was 51 (36.5-67) years; 58% were male and 36% had current opioid use. Pain reduction from T0 to T10 was greater in the LDK group (4 [IQR 3-6]) compared to the placebo group (1 [IQR 0-2]; p = 0.001). Pain intensity was lower in the LDK group at T10, T20, and T30, compared to the placebo group. There was a higher risk of nausea, vomiting, and dissociation in the LDK group during the first 10 min. CONCLUSIONS: LDK may be effective as an adjunct analgesic to morphine for short-term pain relief in treatment of acute pain in the ED for both patients with and without current opioid use.

3.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 31, 2024 01 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care testing may reduce diagnostic uncertainty in case of suspicion of bacterial infection, thereby contributing to prudent antibiotic prescribing. We aimed to study variations in the use of point-of-care tests (C-reactive protein test, rapid streptococcal antigen detection test, and urine dipstick) among general practitioners (GPs) and the potential association between point-of-care testing and antibiotic prescribing in out-of-hours general practice. METHODS: We conducted a population-based observational register-based study, based on patient contacts with out-of-hours general practice in the Central Denmark Region in 2014-2017. The tendency of GPs to use point-of-care testing was calculated, and the association between the use of point-of-care testing and antibiotic prescribing was evaluated with the use of binomial regression. RESULTS: Out-of-hours general practice conducted 794,220 clinic consultations from 2014 to 2017, of which 16.1% resulted in an antibiotic prescription. The GP variation in the use of point-of-care testing was largest for C-reactive protein tests, with an observed variation (p90/p10 ratio) of 3.0; this means that the GPs in the 90th percentile used C-reactive protein tests three times as often as the GPs in the 10th percentile. The observed variation was 2.1 for rapid streptococcal antigen detection tests and 1.9 for urine dipsticks. The GPs who tended to use more point-of-care tests prescribed significantly more antibiotics than the GPs who tended to use fewer point-of-care tests. The GPs in the upper quintile of the tendency to use C-reactive protein test prescribed 22% more antibiotics than the GPs in the lowest quintile (21% for rapid streptococcal antigen detection tests and 8% for urine dipsticks). Up through the quintiles, this effect exhibited a positive linear dose-response correlation. CONCLUSION: The GPs varied in use of point-of-care testing. The GPs who tended to perform more point-of-care testing prescribed more antibiotics compared with the GPs who tended to perform fewer of these tests.


Assuntos
Plantão Médico , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Proteína C-Reativa , Antibacterianos , Testes Imediatos , Dinamarca
4.
Reprod Toxicol ; : 108689, 2024 Aug 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39159852

RESUMO

It has been proposed that poor semen quality may have its origins from fetal programming due to environmental factors. We investigated whether maternal coffee consumption during early pregnancy was associated with biomarkers of reproductive health in adult sons in the Fetal Programming of Semen Quality (FEPOS) cohort. In 2017-2019, 1,058 young men provided a semen and blood sample and self-measured their testis volume. Daily maternal coffee consumption was reported by the mothers around gestational week 17. We estimated relative percentage differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for semen quality measures, testis volume, and reproductive hormone levels according to maternal coffee consumption during pregnancy. Maternal coffee consumption (yes/no (reference)) was associated with lower semen volume (-7.0% (95% CI:-12.9;-0.7)), lower proportion of morphologically normal spermatozoa (-8.3% (95% CI:-16.5;0.8)), higher proportion of non-progressive and immotile spermatozoa (4.3% (95% CI:-1.5;10.3)), and lower testis volume (-4.8% (95% CI:-9.0;-0.4)). No indication of a dose-response association or threshold effects was observed in the categorized and continuous analyses. No associations with reproductive hormone levels were observed in any of the analyses. Overall, the study does not provide obvious indications that maternal coffee consumption in early pregnancy deteriorates male offspring fecundity. While some minor changes were observed, most estimates were small with confidence intervals overlapping the null. Future studies, preferably with greater exposure contrast, are warranted before a conclusion can be drawn as to whether maternal coffee consumption during pregnancy constitutes a risk for reproductive health in adult sons.

5.
J Neurol Sci ; 463: 123136, 2024 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39024744

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite high COVID-19 vaccination rates in many populations, concerns persist about potential adverse events, including concerns about involuntary movements. While case studies have shown occurrences of involuntary movements following COVID-19 vaccination, no systematic studies have explored this association. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and involuntary movements. METHODS: This study employs a longitudinal panel design. The study population consists of 165,834 responses from a total of 97,537 unique individuals sourced from the BiCoVac cohort, which is a randomly sampled cohort of Danish individuals aged 16 to 65. Data were collected through a combination of questionnaires and national registers, and analyses were conducted using mixed effects logistic regression. RESULTS: Vaccinated individuals had lower odds of reporting involuntary movements compared to non-vaccinated individuals. Although adjustments attenuated the results, a consistent pattern of lower odds was observed among the vaccinated individuals. The strongest association for the first dose was observed in individuals who received the vaccine within the last 4 weeks before reporting symptoms (OR = 0.72 (0.60; 0.85)). For the second dose, the strongest association was found in individuals who received the second vaccine dose more than 4 weeks before reporting symptoms (OR = 0.77 (0.65; 0.91)). CONCLUSION: The results of the study do not indicate involuntary movements as an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine. These findings support the safety profile of the COVID-19 vaccine concerning involuntary movements and contribute to enhancing public trust in vaccination programs.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Longitudinais , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Discinesias/etiologia , Discinesias/epidemiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA