The Epidemiology and Costs of Disease Intervention Specialist Retention.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the environment in which disease intervention specialists (DISs) operate, as their skills were in demand beyond sexually transmitted disease (STD) control programs. Workforce conditions generally have changed in the last 2 years, imposing additional challenges. Retaining STD DIS has become more difficult in the changed environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a landscape scan and obtained data from literature and personal observations to characterize current DIS workforce issues. We used published employment data to characterize current labor market conditions and described how cost-effectiveness analysis could be used to assess potential DIS retention interventions. An example illustrating cost-effectiveness concepts was developed. RESULTS: Many STD control programs faced difficulties in retaining STD DIS, because competing positions often could be done without field work. Economic and crime issues posed additional challenges. General workforce turnover has increased 33% since 2016. Turnover varies by age, sex, and education. Cost-effectiveness analysis can be used to assess DIS retention interventions, but data on costs and outcomes are needed on an ongoing basis. Changes in the workforce environment could impact both retention and the effectiveness of retention interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Workforce changes have impacted employee retention. Increased federal funding makes expansion of the DIS workforce possible, but the labor market environment will continue to pose challenges to recruitment and retention.

A randomized trial of extended telephone-based continuing care for alcohol dependence: within-treatment substance use outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The study tested whether adding up to 18 months of telephone continuing care, either as monitoring and feedback (TM) or longer contacts that included counseling (TMC), to intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) improved outcomes for alcohol-dependent patients. METHOD: Participants (N = 252) who completed 3 weeks of IOP were randomized to up to 36 sessions of TM (M = 11.5 sessions), TMC (M = 9.1 sessions), or IOP only (treatment as usual [TAU]). Quarterly assessment of alcohol use (79.9% assessed at 18 months) was corroborated with available collateral reports (N = 63 at 12 months). Participants with cocaine dependence (N = 199) also provided urine samples. RESULTS: Main effects favored TMC over TAU on any alcohol use (odds ratio [OR] = 1.88, CI [1.13, 3.14]) and any heavy alcohol use (OR = 1.74, CI [1.03, 2.94]). TMC produced fewer days of alcohol use during Months 10-18 and heavy alcohol use during Months 13-18 than TAU (ds = 0.46-0.65). TMC also produced fewer days of any alcohol use and heavy alcohol use than TM during Months 4-6 (ds = 0.39 and 0.43). TM produced lower percent days alcohol use than TAU during Months 10-12 and 13-15 (ds = 0.41 and 0.39). There were no treatment effects on rates of cocaine-positive urines. CONCLUSIONS: Adding telephone continuing care to IOP improved alcohol use outcomes relative to IOP alone. Conversely, shorter calls that provided monitoring and feedback but no counseling generally did not improve outcomes over IOP.

Gap length: an important factor in sexually transmitted disease transmission.

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted disease (STD) transmission may occur if the time between dissolution and formation of sex partnerships, the gap, is shorter than mean duration of infectivity of STDs. GOAL: The goal was to examine gaps reported by a nationally representative sample of reproductive-age women. STUDY DESIGN: Data on women's sex partnership dynamics were collected from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Gap was defined as the time between first sex with current/most recent partner and last sex with previous partner. RESULTS: One third of women reported negative gaps (concurrent partnerships). Among the women who reported positive gaps (serial monogamy), more than half switched partners in time periods shorter than the mean infectivity periods of some bacterial STDs. Adolescents and women with past STD diagnoses reported shorter gaps than any other group. CONCLUSION: Given that many STDs are often asymptomatic, short gaps may present a problem if women and their partners are not routinely screened for STDs.

Cost-effectiveness of universal screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in US jails.

Universal screening for the sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) of chlamydia and gonorrhea on intake in jails has been proposed as the most effective strategy to decrease morbidity in inmates and to reduce transmission risk in communities after release. Most inmates come from a population that is at elevated risk for STDs and has limited access to health care. However, limited resources and competing priorities force decision makers to consider the cost of screening programs in comparison to other needs. The costs and cost-effectiveness of universal screening in correctional settings have not been documented. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness of universal urine-based screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea among inmates on intake in US jails compared to the commonly used practice of presumptive treatment of symptomatic inmates without laboratory testing. Decision analysis models were developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of screening alternatives and were applied to hypothetical cohorts of male and female inmates. For women, universal screening for chlamydia only was cost-saving to the health care system, averting more health care costs than were incurred in screening and treatment. However, for men universal chlamydia screening cost $4,856 more per case treated than presumptive treatment. Universal screening for both chlamydia and gonorrhea infection cost the health care system $3,690 more per case of pelvic inflammatory disease averted for women and $650 more per case of infection treated for men compared to universal screening for chlamydia only. Jails with a high prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea represent an operationally feasible and cost-effective setting to universally test and treat women at high risk for STDs and with limited access to care elsewhere.