Aprepitant for the control of delayed nausea and vomiting associated with the use of high-dose melphalan for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplants in patients with multiple myeloma: a phase II study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of aprepitant as part of the antiemetic regimen for high-dose melphalan conditioning in multiple myeloma patients. DESIGN: This is a prospective, single-arm study. SETTING: The study was conducted at an Academic Medical Facility. SUBJECTS: Twenty-six patients receiving high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support were included in this study. INTERVENTION: Eligible patients were >18 years with a diagnosis of MM undergoing high-dose melphalan followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). All patients had serum aminotransferases and total bilirubin less than 2× upper limit of normal. Treatment consisted of aprepitant 125 mg orally on day 1, followed by 80 mg orally 24 and 48 h after the initial dose; ondansetron 16 mg orally day 1; dexamethasone 12 mg orally day 1, and 8 mg orally days 2-4 with breakthrough medications as needed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated for the frequency of emetic episodes, the need for breakthrough antiemetic medication, and the mean nausea score in 24-h increments beginning 24 h after chemotherapy and continuing until 120 h. Nausea score was determined using a linear analog scale (0-10). Complete response (CR) was defined as no more than one (1) emetic episode during the evaluation period. A total of 26 patients (17 male, 9 female) were enrolled in the study. Of these, 25 (96 %) were complete responders and 24 (92 %) had no documented emetic episodes during the study period. One patient (4 %) had 1 emetic episode and one patient (4 %) had 2 emetic episodes. Some degree of nausea was reported by 23/26 patients, and the mean nausea score for the entire group over the study period was 0.7 (range 0-10). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetics resulted in low rates of delayed nausea/vomiting associated with high-dose melphalan and PBSCT, and has now become standard practice in this patient population at our institution.

Improved nonrelapse mortality and infection rate with lower dose of antithymocyte globulin in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

We sought to reduce the risk of infectious complications and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) associated with the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) without compromising control of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplantation. As part of an ongoing quality improvement effort, we lowered the dose of rabbit ATG from 7.5 mg/kg of ATG (R-ATG) (n = 39) to 6.0 mg/kg of ATG (r-ATG) (n = 33) in association with fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (BU) RIC transplantation and then monitored patients for adverse events, relapse, and survival. Of the 72 mostly high risk (82%) patients studied, 89% received unrelated donor allografts, 25% of which were HLA-mismatched. No differences in posttransplantation full donor-cell chimerism rates were observed between the 2 ATG-dose groups (P > .05). When R-ATG versus r-ATG patients were compared, we observed no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD (32% versus 27%; P = .73) or grade III-IV aGVHD (23% versus 11%; P = .28). However, the r-ATG group had significantly less cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (64% versus 30%; P = .005) and bacterial infections (56% versus 18%; P = .001), a better 1-year cumulative incidence of NRM (18% versus 3%; P = .03), and a trend for better 1-year overall survival (OS) (64% versus 84%; P = .07) compared to R-ATG patients. A seemingly modest reduction in the dose of rabbit ATG did not compromise control of aGVHD or achievement of donor chimerism, but led to a significant decrease in the risk of serious infections and NRM in high-risk RIC allograft recipients.

Dose modification protocol using intravenous busulfan (Busulfex) and cyclophosphamide followed by autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies.

We evaluated the safety and toxicity through a 5-cohort dose-modification model of once-daily administration of IV busulfan (Bu) in combination with high-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy) as preparative therapy for stem cell transplantation. Twenty-one adult patients with hematologic malignancies were evaluated. Eleven patients underwent autologous and 10 patients underwent HLA-matched sibling allogeneic transplantation. Patients were sequentially enrolled into 5 cohorts. Cohort 1 received intravenous (IV) Bu 1.6 mg/kg every 12 hours for 2 doses and then 0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours for 12 doses; cohort 2 received IV Bu 1.6 mg/kg every 12 hours for 4 doses and then 0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours for 8 doses; cohort 3 received IV Bu 3.2 mg/kg for 1 dose and then 1.6 mg/kg every 12 hours for 2 doses and 0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours for 8 doses; cohort 4 received IV Bu 3.2 mg/kg every 24 hours for 2 doses and then 0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours for 8 doses; and cohort 5 received IV Bu 3.2 mg/kg every 24 hours for 4 doses. In all groups, Bu was administered on day -7 through day -4 and was followed at least 6 hours after the last Bu dose by Cy 60 mg/kg daily for 2 doses on days -3 and -2. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis on the first and last day of IV Bu administration. All patients were alive and had engrafted at day 30. Five patients developed grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Four patients developed hepatic abnormalities, and 3 exhibited evidence of veno-occlusive disease. Two of 3 patients in cohort 5 with a Bu area under the curve >6000 micromol/min developed autopsy-confirmed veno-occlusive disease. Interpatient variability in AUCs was observed in patients within and between cohorts, but no statistically significant interpatient differences were observed in Bu half-life, volume of distribution, clearance, or dose-adjusted area under the curve. Further, minimal variability in Bu pharmacokinetics was observed between the 2 evaluations performed in each patient, thus reflecting the stability of Bu disposition within individual patients. On the basis of the dosing guidelines and schedule outlined in this study, our data suggest that administration of IV Bu 3.2 mg/kg IV every 24 hours for 4 doses in combination with Cy may result in excessive toxicity.