Examining the relationships between cognition and auditory hallucinations: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Auditory hallucinations (hearing voices) have been associated with a range of altered cognitive functions, pertaining to signal detection, source-monitoring, memory, inhibition and language processes. Yet, empirical results are inconsistent. Despite this, several theoretical models of auditory hallucinations persist, alongside increasing emphasis on the utility of a multidimensional framework. Thus, clarification of current evidence across the broad scope of proposed mechanisms is warranted. METHOD: A systematic search of the Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted. Records were screened to confirm the use of an objective behavioural cognitive task, and valid measurement of hallucinations specific to the auditory modality. RESULTS: Auditory hallucinations were primarily associated with difficulties in perceptual decision-making (i.e. reduced sensitivity/accuracy for signal-noise discrimination; liberal responding to ambiguity), source-monitoring (i.e. self-other and temporal context confusion), working memory and language function (i.e. reduced verbal fluency). Mixed or limited support was observed for perceptual feature discrimination, imagery vividness/illusion susceptibility, source-monitoring for stimulus form and spatial context, recognition and recall memory, executive functions (e.g. attention, inhibition), emotion processing and language comprehension/hemispheric organisation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings were considered within predictive coding and self-monitoring frameworks. Of concern was the portion of studies which - despite offering auditory-hallucination-specific aims and inferences - employed modality-general measures, and/or diagnostic-based contrasts with psychologically healthy individuals. This review highlights disparities within the literature between theoretical conceptualisations of auditory hallucinations and the body of rigorous empirical evidence supporting such inferences. Future cognitive investigations, beyond the schizophrenia-spectrum, which explicitly define and measure the timeframe and sensory modality of hallucinations, are recommended.

Efficacy of topical capsaicin for cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in a pediatric and adult emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a clinical diagnosis characterized by symptoms of recurrent nausea, vomiting, and severe abdominal pain in the setting of chronic cannabis use. Symptoms of CHS are frequently unresponsive to standard antiemetic therapy. Topical capsaicin applied to the abdomen has been cited as a potential effective agent for CHS however robust evidence is lacking. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy of topical capsaicin in pediatric and adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected or confirmed CHS. The primary outcome assessed was if utilization of capsaicin for CHS resulted in more patients achieving an "efficacious" result, defined as only requiring ≤1 rescue medication for symptom relief after receiving capsaicin or after administration of the first agent in patients who did not receive capsaicin during their ED course. Secondary outcomes included total ED length of stay, time to discharge after administration of the reference agent (RA), proportion of patients requiring admission, total number of medication doses given for symptom relief, change in pain score and episodes of emesis, and proportion of patients returning to the ED within 24 h for the same complaint. Additional analyses were also performed to explore patient characteristics that may be predictive of capsaicin efficacy. RESULTS: 201 patients were included in the final analysis of which 25 were <21 years old and seen in the pediatric ED. A greater proportion of patients in the capsaicin group achieved the primary outcome of efficacy as compared to patients who did not receive capsaicin (55% vs 21%, p < 0.001, unadjusted OR 1.44 [95% CI 0.586-0.820]). There were no differences in secondary outcomes except for time to discharge after administration of the RA which was shorter in the capsaicin group (3.72 vs 6.11 h, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Significantly more patients in the capsaicin group experienced efficacy compared to patients who did not. Time to discharge after administration of the reference agent was shorter for those who received capsaicin compared to patients who did not. Administration of capsaicin did not influence patients' total number of medications received or total ED length of stay. Future research is needed to determine capsaicin's efficacy when utilized earlier in therapy, ideally upon initial diagnosis of CHS, and before additional adjunct medications are administered.

Pharmacist monitoring of QTc interval-prolonging medications in critically ill medical patients: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: No data exist regarding the value of pharmacist monitoring of drugs associated with QTc interval prolongation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the capability, clinical impact, and economic impact of pharmacists monitoring for drug-induced QTc interval prolongation in critically ill medical adult patients. METHODS: In a prospective, parallel-group study, 149 consecutive medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients prescribed a QTc interval-prolonging drug at the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center were assigned on alternating days to an intervention group (clinical pharmacist on physician team monitored drugs using a standardized algorithm) or a standard care group (team without pharmacist using an algorithm). The monitoring algorithm used daily assessments of electrocardiograms and laboratory data to generate pharmacotherapeutic recommendations. The primary endpoint was the frequency of QTc interval prolongation (>500 msec at any time or an increase > or =60 msec over baseline). Secondary endpoints included QTc interval greater than 470 msec in women or greater than 450 msec in men, mean increase in QTc interval at 48 hours, recommendation acceptance rate, and cost of care. RESULTS: QTc interval prolongation occurred less frequently in the intervention group compared with the standard care group (19% vs 39%, respectively; p = 0.006). Incidence of QTc interval greater than 500 msec (13% vs 33%, respectively; p = 0.003) was also lower in the intervention group. Incidence of QTc interval increase of 60 msec or more over baseline (12% vs 21%, respectively; p = 0.12) and increase in QTc interval at 48 hours over baseline (mean +/- SD; 6.4 +/- 40.8 vs 18.2 +/- 42.3 msec, respectively; p = 0.097) were not significantly different between the groups. Algorithm-generated recommendations were accepted 70% of the time by the intervention group physician team. Total cost and cost per day were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, pharmacist monitoring of QTc interval-prolonging drugs using a simple algorithm was feasible and reduced the risk of QTc interval prolongation. Further studies that monitor other proarrhythmic medications are warranted.