Perioperative Fluid Management in Surgical Patients: A Review.

Intravenous (IV) fluids are one of the most widely prescribed medications. Despite their frequent usage, IV fluids are often not used appropriately. High-quality evidence to guide the surgeon in the perioperative period is sparse. A plethora of choices for IV fluids exists with limited evidence to help guide the surgeon in specific patient populations and situations. To address this, the authors have set out to provide a critical review of commonly used IV fluids to treat surgical patients. Gaps in the existing literature for the surgical population will also be discussed as potential target areas for future research.

Impact of Increased Enoxaparin Dosing on Anti-Xa Levels for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) contributes to significant morbidity in trauma patients while increasing hospital costs and length of stay. Standard trauma prophylaxis dosing with enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily may be inadequate to prevent VTEs. The objective of this study was to compare standard dosing of enoxaparin to an increased dose of enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily for trauma patients. We hypothesized that increasing thromboprophylaxis dosing leads to an increase in therapeutic anti-Xa levels and reduced VTE rates. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed from January 2020 to June 2021 at a Level I trauma center, following implementation of an increased enoxaparin dosing strategy. Patients with increased enoxaparin dosing were compared with those who received standard dosing. The primary outcome evaluated was the incidence of subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels. Secondary outcomes evaluated VTE rates and clinically significant bleed. RESULTS: A total of 204 trauma patients were identified. Ninety-one patients received an increased enoxaparin dose compared to 113 who received standard dosing. The baseline demographics of both groups were similar (P > .05). Subtherapeutic levels were higher with standard dosing compared to the increased dose (50 vs 22%, P = .003). Higher VTE rates were observed with standard dosing compared to higher dosing (6.2 vs 3.3%) but with a lower incidence of major bleed (1.8 vs 4.4%). Overall annual VTE rates decreased from 1.6 to 1.3% after implementation of the increased dosing regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that an increased dosing strategy decreased rates of subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels and trended toward lower overall VTE rates in trauma.

The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recommended that all silicone breast implant recipients undergo serial screening to detect implant rupture with magnetic resonance imaging. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of study design biases on the estimation of magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic accuracy measures. METHODS: Studies were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases. Two reviewers independently screened potential studies for inclusion and extracted data. Study design biases were assessed using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool and the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist. Meta-analyses estimated the influence of biases on diagnostic odds ratios. RESULTS: Among 1175 identified articles, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies using magnetic resonance imaging (10 of 16) and ultrasound (10 of 13) examined symptomatic subjects. Magnetic resonance imaging studies evaluating symptomatic subjects had 14-fold higher diagnostic accuracy estimates compared with studies using an asymptomatic sample (relative diagnostic odds ratio, 13.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.83 to 104.6) and 2-fold higher diagnostic accuracy estimates compared with studies using a screening sample (relative diagnostic odds ratio, 1.89; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 75.7). CONCLUSIONS: Many of the published studies using magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound to detect silicone breast implant rupture are flawed with methodologic biases. These methodologic shortcomings may result in overestimated magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic accuracy measures and should be interpreted with caution when applying the data to a screening population.

A systematic review of outcomes of toe-to-thumb transfers for isolated traumatic thumb amputation.

BACKGROUND: Toe-to-thumb transfer is an established procedure for reconstruction of traumatic thumb amputations. The four types of toe-to-thumb transfers are the second toe, the great toe, the wrap-around great toe and the trimmed great toe transfers. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature to compare outcomes amongst different methods of toe-to-thumb transfers. METHODS: A literature search using 'toe-to-thumb transfer' combined with 'thumb injury' and 'thumb reconstruction' as keywords and limited to humans and the English language identified 633 studies. Studies were included in the review if they: (1) present primary data, (2) report three or more toe-to-thumb transfers for isolated complete traumatic thumb amputation between the metacarpophalangeal joint and the interphalangeal joint (both excluded) and (3) present functional outcome data. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies representing 450 toe-to-thumb transfers met the inclusion criteria. They included 101 second toe transfers, 196 great toe transfers, 122 wrap-around transfers and 31 trimmed toe transfers. The mean survival rate was 96.4%. No statistically significant differences could be detected between the four transfers with regards to survival, arc of motion, total active motion, grip and pinch strength and static two-point discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: All four types of toe transfer procedures have predictably high survival rates and good patient satisfaction scores. The current data are inadequate to make any comments with regards to donor site morbidity. Till such data are available, an evidence-based recommendation for the superiority of a specific type of toe-to-thumb transfer cannot be made.

A systematic review of ethical principles in the plastic surgery literature.

BACKGROUND: This purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to identify articles that discuss ethical issues relating to the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery and to evaluate whether ethical issues are underrepresented in the plastic surgery literature. METHODS: Four medical databases were selected to search through the medical literature with specific inclusion criteria to disqualify irrelevant articles from the study. Appropriate articles were extracted, and their quality and validity were assessed by multiple investigators to maximize reproducibility. The data were then synthesized and analyzed for associations among the ethical principles. RESULTS: Of a total library search of more than 100,000 plastic surgery-oriented articles, only 110 clearly focused on ethical principles. Autonomy (53 percent) was the most common major theme, whereas distributive justice (15 percent) represented the least frequently emphasized ethical principle. The proportions of each ethical principle were tested against each other for equality using Cochran's Q test; the Q test reached statistical significance (Q = 67.04, df = 3, p < 0.0001), indicating that the ethical principles were not discussed equally in plastic surgery literature, which was expected because autonomy represented 53 percent of the articles, whereas distributive justice represented only 15 percent of articles. When examining both major and minor themes, more than half of the articles (61 percent) addressed two or more ethical principles. Beneficence and nonmaleficence were strongly associated (Pearson's chi = 55.38, df = 1,p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Despite the extensive number of ethical issues that plastic surgeons face, a relatively small proportion of plastic surgery literature was dedicated to discussing ethical principles.