RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the extent of resection in the management of Glioblastoma is a long-debated topic, recently widened by the 2022 RANO-Resect Classification, which advocates for the resection of the non-enhancing disease surrounding the main core of tumors (supramaximal resection, SUPR) to achieve additional survival benefits. We conducted a retrospective analysis to corroborate the role of SUPR by the RANO-Resect Classification in a single center, homogenous cohort of patients. METHODS: Records of patients operated for WHO-2021 Glioblastomas at our institution between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed; volumetric data of resected lesions were computed and classified by RANO-Resect criteria. Survival and correlation analyses were conducted excluding patients below near-total resection. RESULTS: 117 patients met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 45 near-total resections (NTR), 31 complete resections (CR), and 41 SUPR. Median progression-free and overall survival were 11 and 15 months for NTR, 13 and 17 months or CR, 20 and 24 months for SUPR, respectively (p < 0.001), with inverse correlation observed between survival and FLAIR residual volume (r -0.28). SUPR was not significantly associated with larger preoperative volumes or higher rates of postoperative deficits, although it was less associated with preoperative neurological deficits (OR 3.37, p = 0.003). The impact of SUPR on OS varied between MGMT unmethylated (HR 0.606, p = 0.044) and methylated (HR 0.273, p = 0.002) patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present study support the validity of supramaximal resection by the new RANO-Resect classification, also highlighting a possible surgical difference between tumors with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Isocitrato Desidrogenase , Humanos , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Glioblastoma/patologia , Glioblastoma/genética , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Idoso , Adulto , Isocitrato Desidrogenase/genética , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To improve the workflow of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) by enhancing the delineation of organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) using deep learning (DL) and atlas-based (AB) segmentation models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five TMLI plans optimized in our institute were analyzed. Two commercial DL software were tested for segmenting 18 OARs. An AB model for lymph node CTV (CTV_LN) delineation was built using 20 TMLI patients. The AB model was evaluated on 20 independent patients, and a semiautomatic approach was tested by correcting the automatic contours. The generated OARs and CTV_LN contours were compared to manual contours in terms of topological agreement, dose statistics, and time workload. A clinical decision tree was developed to define a specific contouring strategy for each OAR. RESULTS: The two DL models achieved a median [interquartile range] dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.84 [0.71;0.93] and 0.85 [0.70;0.93] across the OARs. The absolute median Dmean difference between manual and the two DL models was 2.0 [0.7;6.6]% and 2.4 [0.9;7.1]%. The AB model achieved a median DSC of 0.70 [0.66;0.74] for CTV_LN delineation, increasing to 0.94 [0.94;0.95] after manual revision, with minimal Dmean differences. Since September 2022, our institution has implemented DL and AB models for all TMLI patients, reducing from 5 to 2 h the time required to complete the entire segmentation process. CONCLUSION: DL models can streamline the TMLI contouring process of OARs. Manual revision is still necessary for lymph node delineation using AB models.
Assuntos
Aprendizado Profundo , Humanos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Medula Óssea/diagnóstico por imagem , Irradiação Linfática , Fluxo de Trabalho , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Aggressive pituitary adenomas (APAs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are challenging for their invasive nature, resistance to treatment and recurrences. Temozolomide (TMZ) is used with benefit and well-tolerated toxicity profile in APAs and PCs. In most studies patients received ≤ 12 cycles but the best length of treatment is debated since other options after discontinuation are scarce and a second course is mainly unsuccessful. METHODS: We report outcomes of 8 patients with APAs and PCs treated with TMZ for more than 12 continuous cycles with a literature review. Data were retrospectively collected from Padua and Milan University Hospitals. TMZ was used as a single agent (150-200 p.o. mg/m2 daily, 5/28 days) for 14 to 45 cycles. RESULTS: Eight patients (7 M), 7 APAs and 1 PC. Previous treatments included neurosurgery and radiotherapy in all cases except two giant masses (ACTH-silent APA and prolactinoma). No patient had progression disease (PD) during long-term treatment nor toxicities. No one had complete response (CR) but four had partial response (PR). Four ACTH+ tumors maintained stable disease (SD) but the secretion pattern improved in all. After drug withdrawal, three had delayed PD (2 after 18 and one after 29 months, all ACTH+); two are still in SD. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ may be useful and well-tolerated in APAs and PCs as a long-term therapy. PR appears within the first cycles with no escape throughout the treatment; most patients achieve SD. We suggest extended protocols particularly in responsive ACTH+ PAs and PCs, when further therapies may be unsuccessful.
Assuntos
Adenoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Duração da Terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico , Temozolomida/uso terapêutico , Adenoma Hipofisário Secretor de ACT/tratamento farmacológico , Adenoma Hipofisário Secretor de ACT/patologia , Adenoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Prolactinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Prolactinoma/patologia , Radiocirurgia , Radioterapia AdjuvanteRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has changed the way in which cancer is treated. Patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) are believed to be in a vulnerable category. The aim of this study was to describe the experience of a hub cancer center and the measures that were put in place for treatment of patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioma. METHODS: To prevent in-hospital contagion and preserve the safety of health professionals and patients, specific protocols and strict regulations were introduced. Physical distancing, use of surgical masks, and diligent hand hygiene were adopted. Each case was discussed in a multidisciplinary board meeting before treatment. All patient candidates for surgical procedures were tested for SARS-CoV-2 with a nasopharyngeal swab and a chest CT scan. Indications for surgery were the radiological suspicion of HGG in patients with a good performance status and/or the rapid and progressive occurrence of neurological deficits. Adjuvant treatments were performed only in cases of HGG. This therapy consisted of conventional fractional radiotherapy (RT; 60 Gy/30 fractions) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZCHT) in younger patients; in elderly patients, a short course of RT was employed (40.5 Gy/15 fractions). For recurrent HGG, treatments were assessed after a careful evaluation of the patient's general condition, neurological status, and risk of early impairment in neurological status if not treated. During simulation CT for the RT plan, each patient underwent a chest CT study. In cases in which an imaging study was suspicious for COVID-19 pneumonia, the patient was immediately isolated and rapidly underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing. RESULTS: Between March 1 and April 30, 2020, 23 HGGs were treated, and these cases are included in the present evaluation. Fifteen patients harboring newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) underwent resection followed by a regimen of chemotherapy and RT, and 3 patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma underwent surgery followed by adjuvant RT. Five patients were treated for recurrent GBM, and they received surgery plus adjuvant RT. One patient in whom the simulation CT study was suspicious for COVID pneumonia was tested with a nasopharyngeal swab, which proved positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. No patients contracted COVID-19 during hospitalization for surgery or during RT treatment. Corticosteroid therapy was administered to all patients beginning on the 1st day of RT. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience during the COVID-19 pandemic showed that patients with HGG can be treated in the most effective manner without a compromise in safety. Careful selection criteria and a multidisciplinary evaluation are pivotal to assessing the optimal therapeutic strategy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Glioma/cirurgia , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos NeurocirúrgicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is a highly vascularised tumour and there are few treatment options after disease recurrence. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal, and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: REGOMA is a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial done in ten centres in Italy. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed glioblastoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and documented disease progression after surgery followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based system, stratified by centre and surgery at recurrence (yes vs no), to receive regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle or lomustine 110 mg/m2 once every 6 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02926222, and is currently in follow-up. FINDINGS: Between Nov 27, 2015, and Feb 23, 2017, 124 patients were screened and 119 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive regorafenib (n=59) or lomustine (n=60). Median follow-up was 15·4 months (IQR 13·8-18·1). At the analysis cutoff date, 99 (83%) of 119 patients had died: 42 (71%) of 59 in the regorafenib group and 57 (95%) of 60 in the lomustine group. Overall survival was significantly improved in the regorafenib group compared with the lomustine group, with a median overall survival of 7·4 months (95% CI 5·8-12·0) in the regorafenib group and 5·6 months (4·7-7·3) in the lomustine group (hazard ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·33-0·75; log-rank p=0·0009). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33 (56%) of 59 patients treated with regorafenib and 24 (40%) of 60 with lomustine. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to regorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction, increased lipase, and blood bilirubin increased (in six [10%] of 59 patients each). In the lomustine group, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased platelet count (eight [13%] of 60 patients), decreased lymphocyte count (eight [13%]), and neutropenia (seven [12%]). No death was considered by the investigators to be drug related. INTERPRETATION: REGOMA showed an encouraging overall survival benefit of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma. This drug might be a new potential treatment for these patients and should be investigated in an adequately powered phase 3 study. FUNDING: Veneto Institute of Oncology and Bayer Italy.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Lomustina/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/patologia , Humanos , Lomustina/administração & dosagem , Lomustina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Aim: This multicenter, retrospective study evaluates the clinical benefit (CB) of bevacizumab, alone or in combination, in recurrent gliomas (RG). Patients & methods: The CB was measured as a reduction of corticosteroid dosage and an improvement ≥20 points in the Karnofsky Performance Status lasting ≥3 months. Results: We collected data of 197 RG patients. A CB was observed in 120, patients without significant differences between patients treated with bevacizumab alone or in combination. The rate of patients who achieved a CB and free from progression at 1 year was 21.5 versus 1.4% in patients who did not report CB. Conclusion: The majority of RG patients treated with bevacizumab reported CB. Moreover, patients with CB showed improved survival.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Glioma/diagnóstico , Glioma/mortalidade , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primitive brain tumor in adults. Temozolomide (TMZ) administered daily with radiation therapy, followed by adjuvant TMZ has become the standard treatment. Although TMZ treatment has been considered to have a low toxicity profile, studies have noted the development of a severe myelosuppression, especially during the concomitant treatment; this toxicity may in some cases be prolonged and consequently treatment must be definitively discontinued. We analyzed two cases treated at our oncological center who developed severe and prolonged hematological toxicity during concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment with TMZ. Hypothesizing that radiation therapy and daily TMZ could be the major causes of severe hematological toxicity during the concomitant phase, we decided to treat both patients with maintenance TMZ at the time of recovery of hematological values. Patients showed good tolerability without important myelosuppression. In conclusion, we suggest that glioblastoma patients with severe myelotoxicity during daily TMZ and radiation therapy be treated with maintenance TMZ at the time of blood value recovery.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Doenças Hematológicas/etiologia , Temozolomida/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Feminino , Glioblastoma/patologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Temozolomida/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The optimal treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) in elderly patients is unclear. Fotemustine (FTM) is a third-generation nitrosourea showing efficacy in gliomas and it has been used with different schedules in adult patients. We performed, for the first time anywhere, a mono-institutional retrospective study to analyze the clinical outcome of an alternative fotemustine schedule in elderly patients with recurrent GBM. Retrospectively, we analyzed all GBM patients 65 years or older previously treated with the combination of radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ), receiving an alternative FTM schedule as second-line treatment at our Oncological Center from October 2011 to October 2014 with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. FTM was administrated at 80 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks for five consecutive administrations (induction phase), and then every 4 weeks at 80 mg/m(2) as maintenance. We enrolled 44 patients, 33 males and 11 females; average age was 70 years. ECOG PS was 0-1 in 80 % of the patients. 38 patients relapsed during temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. MGMT methylation status was analyzed in 34 patients and MGMT was methylated in 53 % of the patients. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from FTM treatment was 4.1 months (95 % CI 3.1-5.2) and 7 months (95 % CI 5.2-8.4), respectively. Patients with MGMT methylated status and patients who relapsed after completing TMZ therapy had a longer PFS and OS from the beginning of FTM. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent grade 3-4 haematological toxicity (9 %). The alternative schedule of FTM may be an active and safe treatment for elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma, especially patients with methylated MGMT and who relapsed after completing temozolomide therapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Nitrosoureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organofosforados/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Metilação de DNA , Metilases de Modificação do DNA/genética , Enzimas Reparadoras do DNA/genética , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Dacarbazina/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Compostos de Nitrosoureia/efeitos adversos , Compostos Organofosforados/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Temozolomida , Resultado do Tratamento , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 enzymes can convert α-ketoglutarate into 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). The aim of the present study was to explore whether 2HG in plasma and urine could predict the presence of IDH1/2 mutations in patients with glioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients had histological confirmation of glioma and a recent brain magnetic resonance imaging scan showing the neoplastic lesion. Plasma and urine samples were taken from all patients, and the 2HG concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled: 38 with R132H-IDH1 mutated and 46 with wild type. Among the 38 patients with mutant IDH1, 21 had high-grade glioma and 17 had low-grade glioma. Among the 46 patients with IDH1 wild-type glioma, 35 and 11 had high- and low-grade glioma, respectively. In all patients, we analyzed the mean 2HG concentration in the plasma, urine, and plasma/urine ratio (Ratio_2HG). We found a significant difference in the Ratio_2HG between patients with and without an IDH1 mutation (22.2 ± 8.7 vs. 15.6 ± 6.8; p < .0001). The optimal cutoff value for Ratio_2HG to identify IDH1 mutation was 19 (sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 76%; accuracy, 70%). In the patients with high-grade glioma only, the optimal cutoff value was 20 (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 89%; accuracy, 84%; positive predictive value, 80%; negative predictive value, 86%). In 7 of 7 patients with high-grade glioma, we found a correlation between the Ratio_2HG value and the response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Ratio_2HG might be a predictor of the presence of IDH1 mutation. The measurement of 2HG could be useful for disease monitoring and also to assess the treatment effects in these patients.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Glioma , Glutaratos , Isocitrato Desidrogenase/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Biomarcadores Tumorais/urina , Feminino , Glioma/sangue , Glioma/genética , Glioma/urina , Glutaratos/sangue , Glutaratos/urina , Humanos , Isocitrato Desidrogenase/biossíntese , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
The efficacy of temozolomide (TMZ) plus radiation therapy (RT) in elderly patients with glioblastoma is unclear. We performed a large multicenter retrospective study to analyze prognostic factors and clinical outcome in these patients. Inclusion criteria were age ≥65 years, newly histologically confirmed glioblastoma, ECOG PS 0-2, adjuvant treatment with RT plus TMZ. We enrolled 237 patients; the average age was 71 and ECOG PS was 0-1 in 196 patients; gross total resection was performed in 174 cases. MGMT was analyzed in 151 persons and was methylated in 56 %. IDH1 was assessed in 100 patients and was mutated in 6 %. Seventy-one patients were treated with RT 40 Gy and 166 with RT 60 Gy. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 11.3 and 17.3 months, respectively. Overall survival was 19.4 vs 13.8 months for patients treated with RT 60 Gy and 40 Gy (p = 0.02); OS was 17.7 versus 16.1 months for patients treated with gross total resection vs partial surgery (p = 0.02); OS was 21.2 versus 13.6 months for methylated and unmethylated MGMT (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, gross total resection, RT 60 Gy, methylated MGMT and ECOG PS 0-1 were independent predictors of longer survival. Twenty-five patients (10 %) had grade 3-4 haematological toxicity during the concomitant treatment. We showed that, in elderly patients in good clinical condition treated with concomitant treatment, standard-course irradiation might be more effective than short-course irradiation. Methylated MGMT remains the most important prognostic factor.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Glioblastoma/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Terapia Combinada , Metilação de DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Metilação de DNA/efeitos da radiação , Dacarbazina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Glioblastoma/genética , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Humanos , Isocitrato Desidrogenase/genética , Itália , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Mutação/genética , O(6)-Metilguanina-DNA Metiltransferase/metabolismo , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , TemozolomidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Total marrow (lymphoid) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) is a radiotherapy treatment used to selectively target the bone marrow and lymph nodes in conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A complex field geometry is needed to cover the large planning target volume (PTV) of TMI/TMLI with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Five isocenters and ten overlapping fields are needed for the upper body, while, for patients with large anatomical conformation, two specific isocenters are placed on the arms. The creation of a field geometry is clinically challenging and is performed by a medical physicist (MP) specialized in TMI/TMLI. PURPOSE: To develop convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automatically generating the field geometry of TMI/TMLI. METHODS: The dataset comprised 117 patients treated with TMI/TMLI between 2011 and 2023 at our Institute. The CNN input image consisted of three channels, obtained by projecting along the sagittal plane: (1) average CT pixel intensity within the PTV; (2) PTV mask; (3) brain, lungs, liver, bowel, and bladder masks. This "averaged" frontal view combined the information analyzed by the MP when setting the field geometry in the treatment planning system (TPS). Two CNNs were trained to predict the isocenters coordinates and jaws apertures for patients with (CNN-1) and without (CNN-2) isocenters on the arms. Local optimization methods were used to refine the models output based on the anatomy of the patient. Model evaluation was performed on a test set of 15 patients in two ways: (1) by computing the root mean squared error (RMSE) between the CNN output and ground truth; (2) with a qualitative assessment of manual and generated field geometries-scale: 1 = not adequate, 4 = adequate-carried out in blind mode by three MPs with different expertise in TMI/TMLI. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the independence of the given scores between manual and generated configurations (p < 0.05 significant). RESULTS: The average and standard deviation values of RMSE for CNN-1 and CNN-2 before/after local optimization were 15 ± 2/13 ± 3 mm and 16 ± 2/18 ± 4 mm, respectively. The CNNs were integrated into a planning automation software for TMI/TMLI such that the MPs could analyze in detail the proposed field geometries directly in the TPS. The selection of the CNN model to create the field geometry was based on the PTV width to approximate the decision process of an experienced MP and provide a single option of field configuration. We found no significant differences between the manual and generated field geometries for any MP, with median values of 4 versus 4 (p = 0.92), 3 versus 3 (p = 0.78), 4 versus 3 (p = 0.48), respectively. Starting from October 2023, the generated field geometry has been introduced in our clinical practice for prospective patients. CONCLUSIONS: The generated field geometries were clinically acceptable and adequate, even for an MP with high level of expertise in TMI/TMLI. Incorporating the knowledge of the MPs into the development cycle was crucial for optimizing the models, especially in this scenario with limited data.
Assuntos
Medula Óssea , Aprendizado Profundo , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Humanos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Medula Óssea/efeitos da radiação , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
Anaplastic ependymomas are rare tumors in adult patients. Maximal safe resection and use of radiation therapy are standard treatment approaches in patients with anaplastic ependymoma. Recurrent anaplastic ependymomas are treated by reoperation when the tumors are surgically accessible, by radiotherapy if not previously administered and by salvage chemotherapy. However, the role of chemotherapy is still unclear. A few retrospective studies showed interesting results with platinum-based regimens, while the administration of temozolomide alone demonstrated conflicting results. We present, for the first time, the case of a patient with anaplastic ependymoma refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy and temozolomide only, but showing a prolonged reduction of the lesion after receiving combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and temozolomide. A brief review of the literature on the treatment of anaplastic ependymoma follows.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Ependimoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Dacarbazina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ependimoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Ependimoma/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Temozolomida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 80-90% of all kidney tumors and about 15-25% of patients will develop distant metastases. Systemic therapy represents the standard of care for metastatic patients, but stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) may play a relevant role in the oligoprogressive setting, defined as the progression of few metastases during an ongoing systemic therapy on a background of otherwise stable disease. Aim of the present study was to analyze the outcome of RCC patients treated with SABR on oligoprogressive metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this monocenter study, we analyzed patients affected by RCC treated with SABR on a maximum of 5 cranial or extracranial oligoprogressive sites of disease. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: We included 74 oligoprogressions (26 intracranial and 48 extracranial) and 57 SABR treatments in 44 patients. Most common concomitant treatments were sunitinib (28, 49.1%), pazopanib (12, 21.0%) and nivolumab (11, 19.3%). Median follow-up was 19.0 months, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 79.2% and 57.3%, respectively. Repeated SABR was a positive predictive factor for OS (p = 0.034). Median PFS was 9.8 months, with 1- and 2-year rates of 43.2% and 25.8%. At multivariable analysis, disease-free interval (p = 0.022) and number of treated metastases (p = 0.007) were significant for PFS. About 80% of patients continued the ongoing systemic therapy 1- and 2-years after SABR with no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: we confirmed the efficacy and safety of SABR for oligoprogression from RCC, with the potential to ablate resistant metastases and to prolong the ongoing systemic therapy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Sunitinibe/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results and prognostic factors in a cohort of patient with oligometastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients affected by 1-3 metastases treated with SRT from 2013 to 2021. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to polymetastatic dissemination (TTPD) and time to systemic therapy change/initiation (TTS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2021, 55 patients were treated with SRT on 80 oligometastatic sites. Median follow-up was 20 months. Nine patients had local progression. 1 and 3 years LC was respectively 92 and 78%. 41 patients experienced further distant disease progression, median PFS was 9.6 months, 1 and 3 years PFS was respectively 40 and 15%. 34 patients died, median OS was 26.6 months, 1 and 3 years OS was respectively 78 and 40%. During follow-up, 24 patients changed or initiated a new systemic therapy; median TTS time was 9 months. 27 patients experienced poliprogression, 44% after 1 year and 52% after 3 years. Median TTPD was 8 months. The best local response (LR), tyming of metastases and PS were related with prolonged PFS on multivariate analysis. LR was correlated with OS at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: SRT represents a valid treatment for oligometastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. CR correlated with PFS and OS, while metachronous metastasis and a good PS correlated with a better PFS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In selected gastroesopagheal oligometastatic patients, SRT can prolong OS Local response to SRT, metachronous timing of metastases and better PS improve PFS.Local response correlates with OS.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Comparative prospective data regarding different radiosurgery (SRS) modalities for treating brain metastases (BMs) from solid tumors are not available. To investigate with a single institute phase III randomized trial whether SRS executed with linac (Arm-B) is superior to a dedicated multi-source gamma-ray stereotactic platform (Arm-A). METHODS: Adults patients with 1-4 BMs from solid tumors up to 30 mm in maximum diameter were randomly assigned to arms A and B. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2-3) radionecrosis (CIRN). Secondary endpoints were local progression cumulative incidence (CILP), distant brain failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were randomly assigned to Arm-A (121) or Arm-B (130). The 1-year RN cumulative incidence was 6.7% in whole cohort, 3.8% (95% CI 1.9-7.4%) in Arm-B, and 9.3% (95% CI 6.2-13.8%) in the Arm-A (p = 0.43). CIRN was influenced by target volume irradiated only for the Arm-A (p << 0.001; HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.25-1.48]). Symptomatic RN occurred in 56 cases at a median time of 10.3 months (range 1.15-54.8 months), 27 in the Arm-B at a median time of 15.9 months (range 4.9-54.8 months), and 29 in the Arm-A at a median time of 6.9 months (1.2-32.3 months), without statistically significant differences between the two arms. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two arms in CILP, BDF, DFS or OS. The mean beam-on time to deliver SRS was 49.0 ± 36.2 min in Arm-A, and 3.1 ± 1.6 min in Arm-B. CONCLUSIONS: Given the technical differences between the treatment platforms investigated in this single-institution study, linac-based SRS (Arm-B) did not lead to significantly lower grade 2-3 RN rates versus the multi-source gamma-ray system (Arm-A) in a population of patients with limited brain metastases of small volume. No significant difference in local control was observed between both arms. For Arm-B, the treatment delivery time was significantly lower than for Arm-A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02355613.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Radiocirurgia , Adulto , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a large series of brain metastatic renal cell carcinoma (BMRCC) patients treated in three Italian centers. METHODS: A total of 120 BMRCC patients with a total of 176 lesions treated were evaluated. Patients received surgery plus postoperative HSRS, single-fraction SRS, or hypofractionated SRS (HSRS). Local control (LC), brain distant failure (BDF), overall survival (OS), toxicities, and prognostic factors were assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 77 months (range 16-235 months). Surgery plus HSRS was performed in 23 (19.2%) cases, along with SRS in 82 (68.3%) and HSRS in 15 (12.5%). Seventy-seven (64.2%) patients received systemic therapy. The main total dose and fractionation used were 20-24 Gy in single fraction or 32-30 Gy in 4-5 daily fractions. Median LC time and 6 month and 1, 2 and 3 year LC rates were nr, 100%, 95.7% ± 1.8%, 93.4% ± 2.4%, and 93.4% ± 2.4%. Median BDF time and 6 month and 1, 2 and 3 year BDF rates were n.r., 11.9% ± 3.1%, 25.1% ± 4.5%, 38.7% ± 5.5%, and 44.4% ± 6.3%, respectively. Median OS time and 6 month and 1, 2 and 3 year OS rates were 16 months (95% CI: 12-22), 80% ± 3.6%, 58.3% ± 4.5%, 30.9% ± 4.3%, and 16.9% ± 3.6, respectively. No severe neurological toxicities occurred. Patients with a favorable/intermediate IMDC score, a higher RCC-GPA score, an early occurrence of BMs from primary diagnosis, absence of EC metastases, and a combined local treatment (surgery plus adjuvant HSRS) had a better outcome. CONCLUSIONS: SRS/HSRS is proven to be an effective local treatment for BMRCC. A careful evaluation of prognostic factors is a valid step to manage the optimal therapeutic strategy for BMRCC patients.
RESUMO
Total marrow (lymph node) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) delivery requires more time than standard radiotherapy treatments. The patient's extremities, through the joints, can experience large movements. The reproducibility of TMI/TMLI patients' extremities was evaluated to find the best positioning and reduce unwanted movements. Eighty TMI/TMLI patients were selected (2013-2022). During treatment, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed for each isocenter to reposition the patient. CBCT-CT pairs were evaluated considering: (i) online vector shift (OVS) that matched the two series; (ii) residual vector shift (RVS) to reposition the patient's extremities; (iii) qualitative agreement (range 1-5). Patients were subdivided into (i) arms either leaning on the frame or above the body; (ii) with or without a personal cushion for foot positioning. The Mann-Whitney test was considered (p < 0.05 significant). Six-hundred-twenty-nine CBCTs were analyzed. The median OVS was 4.0 mm, with only 1.6% of cases ranked < 3, and 24% of RVS > 10 mm. Arms leaning on the frame had significantly smaller RVS than above the body (median: 8.0 mm/6.0 mm, p < 0.05). Using a personal cushion for the feet significantly improved the RVS than without cushions (median: 8.5 mm/1.8 mm, p < 0.01). The role and experience of the radiotherapy team are fundamental to optimizing the TMI/TMLI patient setup.
Assuntos
Medula Óssea , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Humanos , Medula Óssea/efeitos da radiação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , ExtremidadesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The total marrow and lymph node irradiation (TMLI) target includes the bones, spleen, and lymph node chains, with the latter being the most challenging structures to contour. We evaluated the impact of introducing internal contour guidelines to reduce the inter- and intraobserver lymph node delineation variability in TMLI treatments. METHODS: A total of 10 patients were randomly selected from our database of 104 TMLI patients so as to evaluate the guidelines' efficacy. The lymph node clinical target volume (CTV_LN) was recontoured according to the guidelines (CTV_LN_GL_RO1) and compared to the historical guidelines (CTV_LN_Old). Both topological (i.e., Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)) and dosimetric (i.e., V95 (the volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose) metrics were calculated for all paired contours. RESULTS: The mean DSCs were 0.82 ± 0.09, 0.97 ± 0.01, and 0.98 ± 0.02, respectively, for CTV_LN_Old vs. CTV_LN_GL_RO1, and between the inter- and intraobserver contours following the guidelines. Correspondingly, the mean CTV_LN-V95 dose differences were 4.8 ± 4.7%, 0.03 ± 0.5%, and 0.1 ± 0.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines reduced the CTV_LN contour variability. The high target coverage agreement revealed that historical CTV-to-planning-target-volume margins were safe, even if a relatively low DSC was observed.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Standard of care for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) is missing. Several treatment options have been investigated including re-irradiation (re-RT). Results are promising but provided by retrospective studies. We designed a single arm prospective phase II study aiming to evaluate efficacy, and toxicity of re-irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults patients with good performance status, HGG diagnosis reclassified according to the new 2021 fifth edition WHO CNS classification, an interval time (IT) from previous RT ≥ 6 months were included. Outcome was evaluated by MRI imaging at 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter. Toxicities were evaluated in terms of radionecrosis occurrence, and neurocognitive status. RESULTS: Ninety recurrent HGG patients were treated, 11 oligodendroglioma grade 3, 18 astrocytoma grade 3 and 4, and 61 glioblastoma grade 4. The median age was 54 years, and majority had KPS 90-100. The median IT between first-RT and re-RT was 24 months. Re-surgery has been performed in 56.6%, and chemotherapy in 53.3%. The median follow up time was 64 months; median overall survival (OS) time,1,2,3-year OS rates were 17 months (95%CI 14-19), 66.7%±4.9, 32.6%±5.0, and 22.2 ± 4.7. Prognostic factors impacting on survival were age (p = 0.0154), IT between first RT and re-RT (p = 0.0051), glioma grade (p = 0.0090), and IDH status (p = 0.0001). Radionecrosis grade 2-3 occurred in 9 (10%) patients; neurocognitive functions remained stable until disease progression. CONCLUSION: Re-RT proved to be a safe and feasible treatment option with low toxicity. Younger patients with grade 3 IDH mutated gliomas, and a longer IT had the better outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02567539.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Lesões por Radiação , Reirradiação , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Glioma/terapia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reirradiação/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The lung is the most frequent site of metastasis in patients with sarcoma. Pulmonary metastasectomy is the most common treatment performed. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has proven to be a potential alternative to resection. This prospective phase 2 study aimed to assess the role of SBRT for patients with lung metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult patients with up to 4 lung metastases (LMs) ≤5 cm in diameter and unsuitable for surgery were included. Dose prescription was based on site and size: 30 Gy/1 fraction for peripheral lesions ≤10 mm, 60 Gy/3 fractions for peripheral lesions 11 to 20 mm, 48 Gy/4 fractions for peripheral lesions >20 mm, and 60 Gy/8 fractions for central lesions. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated lesions free from progression at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Between March 2015 and December 2020, 44 patients with a total of 71 LMs were enrolled. Twelve-month local control was 98.5% ± 1.4%, reaching the primary aim; the median DFS time was 12 months (95% CI, 8-16 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year PFS rates were 50% ± 7.5%, 19.5% ± 6.6%, 11.7% ± 5.8%, 11.7% ± 5.8%, and 11.7% ± 5.8%, respectively. The median OS time was 49 months (95% CI, 24-49 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS rates were 88.6% ± 4.7%, 66.7 ± 7.6%, 56.8% ± 8.4%, 53.0% ± 8.6%, and 48.2% ± 9.1%, respectively. Prognostic factors recorded as significantly affecting survival were age, grade of primary sarcoma, interval time from diagnosis to occurrence of LMs, and number of LMs. No severe pulmonary toxicity (grade 3-4) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The study found a local control of LMs in almost all patients treated, with negligible toxicity. Survival was also highly satisfactory. Well-designed randomized trials comparing surgery with SBRT for patients with metastatic lung sarcoma are needed to confirm these preliminary data.