Proposal for a new cut-off point for waist-to-hip ratio in women with severe obesity: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a chronic disease that increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), underestimated in this population. The high mortality related to CVD reveals the need for early screening. One of the training tools is the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). However, few studies evaluate its relationship with metabolic changes in severe obesity, making necessary a new cut-off point. METHOD: Cross-sectional study with 75 Brazilian women with severe obesity (mean age: 37,6 years; weight of 122 kg and body mass index (BMI) of 47,8 kg/m2). Height, weight, neck circumference (NC), hip (HC), waist (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were obtained. Blood samples were collected for lipid/glucose profile. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) was explored to define cut-off points for WHR based on SAH. Women were compared using the t-Student/Mann Whitney test. Pearson/Spearman correlations were performed, and the significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: The ROC curve indicated that WHR ≥0.92 best predicted SAH. The group with WHR ≥0.92 had higher Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (p = 0.037), insulin (p = 0.037), NC (p = 0.004), and Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) (p = 0.038). WHR correlated with NC (p = 0.002; r = 0.358), glucose (p = 0.026; r = 0.270); insulin (p = 0.05; r = 0.238); HOMA-IR (p = 0.01; r = 0.3238), triglycerides (p = 0.006; r = 329) and AIP (p = 0.02; r = 0.370). CONCLUSIONS: A new cut-off point for WHR related to SAH in severe obesity is suggested.

Endometriosis III and IV as a risk factor for tubal obstruction in infertile women.

OBJECTIVE: A previous study carried out among infertile women with tubal obstruction identified a relative risk of 2.5 for Chlamydia trachomatis seropositivity. However, endometriosis may also be associated with increased risk. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of tubal obstruction associated with endometriosis III/IV among women submitted to assisted reproductive procedures. METHODS: A case-control study was performed among 144 women with and without tubal obstruction. We calculated the odds ratio with 95% CI regarding the association of endometriosis III/IV and tubal obstruction. Calculations were performed using the SPSS v.17.0 package. RESULTS: The mean age was 33.7 years (4.76 SD), and the mean infertility duration time was 66.7 months (120.6 SD). The total prevalence of endometriosis was 20/144 (13%). Among 144 women, the risk group with tubal obstruction and endometriosis III/IV comprised 7out of 20 (35%), compared with the group without such risk, that comprised 22 out of 124 (17%). The X2 test was 3.19 with a p-value of 0.07. The odds ratio (OR) was 2.5 (95% CI: 0.647-9.639). CONCLUSION: Although the OR was 2.5, there was no significant difference between the groups with and without endometriosis III/IV. Further studies are needed to increase the sample size.