Cost-effectiveness of varenicline compared with nicotine patches for smoking cessation--results from four European countries.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness of varenicline with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smoking cessation in four European countries (Belgium, France, Sweden and the UK). METHODS: Markov simulations, using the Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Outcomes (BENESCO) model, were performed. We simulated the incidence of four smoking-related morbidities: lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease and stroke. The model computes quality-adjusted life-years gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated, adopting a lifetime perspective. Efficacy data were obtained from a randomized open-label trial: Week 52 continuous abstinence rates were 26.1% for varenicline and 20.3% for NRT. RESULTS: The analyses imply that for countries analysed, smoking cessation using varenicline versus NRT was associated with reduced smoking-related morbidity and mortality. The number of morbidities avoided, per 1000 smokers attempting to quit, ranged from 9.7 in Belgium to 6.5 in the UK. The number of quality-adjusted life-years gained, per 1000 smokers, was 23 (Belgium); 19.5 (France); 29.9 (Sweden); and 23.7 (UK). In all base-case simulations (except France), varenicline dominated (more effective and cost saving) NRT regarding costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained; for France the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 2803. CONCLUSION: This cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that since varenicline treatment was more effective, the result was increased healthcare cost savings in Belgium, Sweden and the UK. Our results suggest that funding varenicline as a smoking cessation aid is justifiable from a healthcare resource allocation perspective.

Real-world evidence effect of budesonide+formoterol Spiromax on patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Sweden.

Background and Objective: Despite improved asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, treatment remains inadequate in many patients. Understanding the impact of current treatment in settings outside of controlled trials would add important clinical decision-making information. This study evaluated costs and outcomes associated with budesonide+formoterol (BF) Spiromax® initiation among real-world Swedish patients with asthma and/or COPD. Methods:In this retrospective observational analysis of Swedish patients with asthma and/or COPD, data were collected from the National Patient Register, National Dispensed Drug Register, and Cause of Death Register 1 year before and after initiating BF Spiromax (index date). Outcomes included exacerbation occurrence, treatment patterns, inpatient care, and healthcare costs. Results: The study included 576 patients (asthma: 51.6%; COPD: 32.8%; and asthma and COPD: 15.6%). Following BF Spiromax initiation in asthma patients, there were significant decreases in exacerbations (41.1% to 30.0%; P < 0.001), mean comorbidity-related inpatient visits (0.5 to 0.2; P < 0.001), and inpatient days (1.9 to 0.6; P = 0.006), and a trend toward fewer asthma-related inpatient visits (mean, 0.2 to 0.1; P = 0.056) and asthma-related inpatient days (mean, 0.7 to 0.3; P = 0.060). Increased inpatient utilization was observed in patients with COPD or both diagnoses. All-cause and asthma-/COPD-related medication costs decreased in all groups. Conclusions: After switching to BF Spiromax, asthma patients had fewer exacerbations and hospital visits versus the prior year and COPD patients showed an increase in all-cause and COPD-related healthcare resource utilization. All-cause and asthma-/COPD-related medication costs decreased in all groups after switching to BF Spiromax.

Association between visual acuity and medical and non-medical costs in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration in France, Germany and Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Exudative ('wet') age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the major cause of blindness in Western developed countries. Treatments aimed at preserving vision are already available and new compounds are under development. Micro-economics information will be pivotal to justifying forthcoming investment. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate the costs of exudative ARMD in patients who were actively treated at ophthalmology referral centres in three European countries: France, Germany and Italy. METHOD: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in France, Germany and Italy in 2004. The following data were collected: ARMD description, visual acuity (VA), and the medical and non-medical resources used for ARMD in the preceding year. The economic perspective was that of society. ANOVA for cost variables estimated the impact of ARMD per eye, adjusted for sex and age. Both hospital and ambulatory eye centres were included. Patients with exudative ARMD were stratified into four levels of severity using VA thresholds of 20/200 for the worst eye (WE) and 20/40 for the best eye (BE). The main outcome measure was medical and non-medical costs. RESULTS: 360 patients were included (females 60%; mean age 77 years; mean interval since diagnosis 2.3 years). The two groups with the greatest difference in severity of VA loss consisted of BE >or= 20/40, WE >or= 20/200 (27.2% of patients) and BE <20/40, WE <20/200 (25.5% of patients). Total cost was two-thirds medical and one-third non-medical. Total costs increased with ARMD severity and were 1.1-2 times greater for severe disease compared with less severe disease. Average medical costs (2004 values) in France were euro 3714, compared with euro 1810 in Germany and euro 2020 in Italy, and showed slight increases with ARMD severity. Non-medical costs were significantly higher for patients with severe disease and highest in Germany. CONCLUSION: The impact of ARMD on costs was considerable and a positive correlation was found between total costs and ARMD severity. Differences among countries were partly explained by differences in customary care delivery.

Real-world effectiveness evaluation of budesonide/formoterol Spiromax for the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: Budesonide/formoterol (BF) Spiromax ® is an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist fixed-dose combination (FDC) inhaler, designed to minimise common inhaler errors and provide reliable and consistent dose delivery in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated non-inferiority of BF Spiromax after changing from another FDC inhaler, compared with continuing the original inhaler. METHODS: Patients with asthma and/or COPD who switched to BF Spiromax were matched (1:3) with non-switchers. Data were obtained from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the UK. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving disease control (using the risk domain control (RDC) algorithm); secondary end points were: exacerbation rate, short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) use and treatment stability (achieved RDC; no maintenance treatment change). Non-inferiority was defined as having 95% CI lower bound above -10%, using conditional logistic regression and adjusted for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Comparing 385 matched patients (asthma 253; COPD 132) who switched to BF Spiromax with 1091 (asthma 743; COPD 348) non-switchers, non-inferiority of BF Spiromax in RDC was demonstrated (adjusted difference: +6.6%; 95% CI -0.3 to 13.5). Among patients with asthma, switchers to BF Spiromax versus BF Turbuhaler® reported fewer exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio (RR) 0.76;95% CI 0.60 to 0.99; p=0.044); were less likely to use high daily doses of SABA (adjusted OR 0.71;95% CI 0.52 to 0.98; p=0.034); used fewer SABA inhalers (adjusted RR 0.92;95% CI 0.86 to 0.99; p=0.019); and were more likely to achieve treatment stability (adjusted OR 1.44;95% CI 1.02 to 2.04; p=0.037). No significant differences in these end points were seen among patients with COPD. CONCLUSIONS: Among UK patients with asthma and COPD, real-world use of BF Spiromax was non-inferior to BF Turbuhaler in terms of disease control. Among patients with asthma, switching to BF Spiromax was associated with reduced exacerbations, reduced SABA use and improved treatment stability versus continuing on BF Turbuhaler.

Vitamin K antagonist treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and time in therapeutic range in four European countries.

PURPOSE: Patients with atrial fibrillation are at increased risk for stroke and thus require anticoagulant prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists. However, many such patients fail to achieve target coagulation status. The objective of this study was to evaluate time in the therapeutic range and its relationship to clinical outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation prescribed a vitamin K antagonist in everyday clinical practice in 4 European countries (France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom). METHODS: Data were extracted from the European electronic primary care database, the Longitudinal Patient Database. Included in the analysis were 6250 adult patients for whom data on monitoring of coagulation time and international normalized ratio were available. The time within the therapeutic range was estimated by using the Rosendaal method. Patients spending >70% of time within the therapeutic range were considered to have well-controlled treatment. Data on stroke and bleeding events occurring during the study period were taken from patient records. Stroke risk was calculated by using the CHA2DS2-VASc score (i.e. 2 points for a history of stroke or TIA and age >75 years, and 1 point for age between 65 and 74 years, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, a recent cardiac failure, vascular disease and female sex). FINDINGS: The proportion of patients with poorly controlled treatment varied from 34.6% in the United Kingdom to 55.8% in Germany. The incidence of stroke was 0.5/100 person-years in well-controlled patients, compared with 1.0/100 in poorly controlled patients. After adjustment for stroke risk factors, the odds ratio was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.93-2.06; P = 0.110). The incidence of hemorrhage was 1.1 and 1.3 events/100 person-years, respectively (odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.72-1.16]). IMPLICATIONS: Many patients receiving prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists in everyday community care have poorly controlled anticoagulation treatment with vitamin K antagonists. Their international normalized ratio is frequently outside the therapeutic range, and they are thus exposed to an unnecessary risk of stroke or bleeding complications.