Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 274(4): 646-653, 2021 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34506320

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess whether vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) increases the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophagitis and Barrett esophagus (BE) relative to patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients with and without preoperative GERD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Concerns for potentiation of GERD, supported by multiple high-quality retrospective studies, have hindered greater adoption of the VSG. METHODS: From the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, VSG and RYGB patients with ≥2 years enrollment were identified and matched by follow-up time. GERD [reflux esophagitis, prescription for acid reducing medication (Rx) and/or diagnosis of BE], upper endoscopy (UE), and re-admissions were evaluated beyond 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 8362 patients undergoing VSG were matched 1:1 to patients undergoing RYGB, on the basis of post-operative follow-up interval. Age, sex, and follow-up time were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Among all patients, postoperative GERD was more frequently observed in VSG patients relative to RYGB patients (60.2% vs 55.6%, respectively; P < 0.001), whereas BE was more prevalent in RYGB patients (0.7% vs 1.1%; P = 0.007). Postoperatively, de novo esophageal reflux symptomatology was more common in VSG patients (39.3% vs 35.3%; P < 0.001), although there was no difference in development of the histologic diagnoses reflux esophagitis and BE. Furthermore, postoperative re-admission was higher in the RYGB cohort (38.9% vs 28.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to RYGB, VSG may not have inferior long-term GERD outcomes, while also leading to fewer re-hospitalizations. These data challenge the prevailing opinion that patients with GERD should undergo RYGB instead of VSG.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Esôfago de Barrett/epidemiologia , Esofagite/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Surg Res ; 266: 44-53, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33984730

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preoperative optimization is increasingly emphasized for high-risk surgical patients. One critical component of this includes preoperative advanced care planning to promote goal-concordant care. We aimed to define a subset of patients that might benefit from preoperative palliative care consult for advanced care planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined adult patients admitted from January 2016 to December 2018 to a university health system for elective surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with death within 1 y, and presence of palliative care consults preoperatively. Chi-square analysis evaluated the impact of a palliative care consult on advanced care planning variables. RESULTS: Of the 29,132 inpatient elective procedures performed, there was a 2.0% mortality rate at 6 mo and 3.5% at 1 y. Those who died were more likely to be older, male, underweight (BMI <18), or have undergone an otolaryngology, neurosurgery or thoracic procedure type (all P-values < 0.05). At the time of admission, 29% had an advance directive, 90% had a documented code status, and 0.3% had a preoperative palliative care consult. Patients were more likely to have an advanced directive, a power of attorney, a documented code status, and have a do not resuscitate order if they had a palliative care consult (all P-values <0.05). The mortality rates and preoperative palliative care rates per procedure type did not follow similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative palliative care consultation before elective admissions for surgery had a significant impact on advanced care planning.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/mortalidade , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Ann Surg ; 272(1): 32-39, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32224733

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare trends in the development of cirrhosis between patients with NAFLD who underwent bariatric surgery and a well-matched group of nonsurgical controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with NAFLD who undergo bariatric surgery generally have improvements in liver histology. However, the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on clinically relevant liver outcomes has not been investigated. METHODS: From a large insurance database, patients with a new NAFLD diagnosis and at least 2 years of continuous enrollment before and after diagnosis were identified. Patients with traditional contraindications to bariatric surgery were excluded. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were identified and matched 1:2 with patients who did not undergo bariatric surgery based on age, sex, and comorbid conditions. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate differences in progression from NAFLD to cirrhosis. RESULTS: A total of 2942 NAFLD patients who underwent bariatric surgery were identified and matched with 5884 NAFLD patients who did not undergo surgery. Cox proportional hazards modeling found that bariatric surgery was independently associated with a decreased risk of developing cirrhosis (hazard ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.52). Male gender was associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis (hazard ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.31-3.27). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NAFLD who undergo bariatric surgery are at a decreased risk for progression to cirrhosis compared to well-matched controls. Bariatric surgery should be considered as a treatment strategy for otherwise eligible patients with NAFLD. Future bariatric surgery guidelines should include NAFLD as a comorbid indication when determining eligibility.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/prevenção & controle , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco
5.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 19(12): 1415-1420, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925321

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients taking beta-blockers (BBs) commonly experience weight gain. There is limited research exploring how BBs impact weight loss after bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: We examined how BBs impact 12-month weight loss in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). SETTING: Large midwest health system. METHODS: We reviewed health records of SG and RYGB patients (2011-2022) and categorized them by BB usage (none, pre-, post-, or pre- and postoperative). Multivariable linear regression models examined the relation between BB use, percent total body weight loss (%TBWL), and percent excess body mass index lost (%EBMIL). RESULTS: A total of 889 individuals (SG, n = 485; RYGB, n = 404) had complete data. RYGB led to greater %TBWL compared to SG (31% versus 26%, P < .01) and greater %EBMIL (79% versus 64%, P < .01). BB status did not significantly affect 12-month %TBWL or %EBMIL. CONCLUSIONS: BB use may not significantly affect weight loss 12 months after bariatric surgery. This finding could enable physicians to prescribe BBs for improved blood pressure control in bariatric surgery patients with less concern of blunting weight loss. Longer term follow-up with a larger sample size would be an important next step to better characterize the relationship between BB usage and bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gastrectomia , Redução de Peso
6.
Pancreas ; 50(5): 751-755, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016896

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in patients with pancreatitis requiring hospitalization and its impact on outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients admitted from 2011 to 2018 for pancreatitis were identified. Every admission for pancreatitis in the first year after diagnosis was evaluated for a VTE (pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or mesenteric vessel thrombosis) within 30 days of discharge. Characteristics of patients who developed a thromboembolic event were compared with those who did not. RESULTS: There were 4613 patients with pancreatitis identified, 301 of whom developed a VTE (6.5%). Patients who developed a VTE were more likely to be male (P < 0.01), older (P = 0.03), and have an underlying coagulopathy (P < 0.01). Those with VTEs were more likely to die (27% vs 13%, P < 0.01), have more readmissions for pancreatitis (1.7 vs 1.3, P < 0.01), longer length of stay (16 vs 5.5 days, P < 0.01), and be discharged to acute or long-term rehabilitation rather than home (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Acute pancreatitis requiring hospitalization is associated with high risk of VTE in the first year after diagnosis. Thromboembolic disease is associated with worse morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/mortalidade , Pancreatite/terapia , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidade , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2029411, 2020 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33315113

RESUMO

Importance: Genotype-guided prescribing in pediatrics could prevent adverse drug reactions and improve therapeutic response. Clinical pharmacogenetic implementation guidelines are available for many medications commonly prescribed to children. Frequencies of medication prescription and actionable genotypes (genotypes where a prescribing change may be indicated) inform the potential value of pharmacogenetic implementation. Objective: To assess potential opportunities for genotype-guided prescribing in pediatric populations among multiple health systems by examining the prevalence of prescriptions for each drug with the highest level of evidence (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium level A) and estimating the prevalence of potential actionable prescribing decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This serial cross-sectional study of prescribing prevalences in 16 health systems included electronic health records data from pediatric inpatient and outpatient encounters from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017. The health systems included academic medical centers with free-standing children's hospitals and community hospitals that were part of an adult health care system. Participants included approximately 2.9 million patients younger than 21 years observed per year. Data were analyzed from June 5, 2018, to April 14, 2020. Exposures: Prescription of 38 level A medications based on electronic health records. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual prevalence of level A medication prescribing and estimated actionable exposures, calculated by combining estimated site-year prevalences across sites with each site weighted equally. Results: Data from approximately 2.9 million pediatric patients (median age, 8 [interquartile range, 2-16] years; 50.7% female, 62.3% White) were analyzed for a typical calendar year. The annual prescribing prevalence of at least 1 level A drug ranged from 7987 to 10 629 per 100 000 patients with increasing trends from 2011 to 2014. The most prescribed level A drug was the antiemetic ondansetron (annual prevalence of exposure, 8107 [95% CI, 8077-8137] per 100 000 children). Among commonly prescribed opioids, annual prevalence per 100 000 patients was 295 (95% CI, 273-317) for tramadol, 571 (95% CI, 557-586) for codeine, and 2116 (95% CI, 2097-2135) for oxycodone. The antidepressants citalopram, escitalopram, and amitriptyline were also commonly prescribed (annual prevalence, approximately 250 per 100 000 patients for each). Estimated prevalences of actionable exposures were highest for oxycodone and ondansetron (>300 per 100 000 patients annually). CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 substrates were more frequently prescribed than medications influenced by other genes. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that opportunities for pharmacogenetic implementation among pediatric patients in the US are abundant. As expected, the greatest opportunity exists with implementing CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic guidance for commonly prescribed antiemetics, analgesics, and antidepressants.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde da Criança , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Testes Farmacogenômicos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/normas , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/genética , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Perfil Genético , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatria/métodos , Pediatria/normas , Testes Farmacogenômicos/métodos , Testes Farmacogenômicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/classificação , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA