RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the risk of relapse in patients with bipolar disorder is higher after discontinuation and restart of lithium treatment as compared to continuous lithium treatment in these same patients. METHODS: We conducted literature searches in the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycINFO databases with cross-reference checks. Relevant data were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Five relevant studies were included for review, of which three studies qualified for the meta-analysis and included a total of 212 analyzed cases. Two studies found lithium to be less effective after discontinuation and reintroduction and three studies found no decreased effectiveness. The pooled odds ratio for the occurrence of one or more relapses after interruption of lithium treatment compared to continuous treatment was 1.40 (95% confidence interval: 0.85-2.31; p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Although studies are scarce, review and meta-analysis of the available literature does not provide convincing evidence that lithium is less effective when treatment is discontinued and restarted, compared to uninterrupted treatment.
Assuntos
Antimaníacos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Cloreto de Lítio/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , RecidivaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: (a) To establish whether disease-related, child-related, and physician-related factors are independently associated with specialist referral in young children with recurrent RTI, and (b) to evaluate whether general practitioners (GPs) follow current guidelines regarding these referrals. METHODS: Electronic GP records of children under 24 month of age, born 2002-2008, were reviewed for RTI episodes using ICPC codes. Child-related factors were extracted from the prospective WHISTLER birth-cohort in which a considerable part of children had been enrolled. To evaluate guideline adherence, referral data were compared to national guideline recommendations. RESULTS: Consultations for 2532 RTI episodes (1041 children) were assessed. Seventy-eight children were referred for recurrent RTI (3.1% of RTI episodes; 7.5% of children). Disease factors were the main determinants of referral: number (OR 1.7 [CI 1.7-1.7]) and severity of previous RTI episodes (OR 2.2 [CI 1.6-2.8]), and duration of RTI episode (OR 1.7 [CI 1.7-1.8]). The non-disease factors daycare attendance (OR 1.3 [CI 1.0-1.7]) and 5-10 years working experience as a GP compared with <5 years (OR 0.37 [CI 0.27-0.50]) were also associated. Fifty-seven percent of referrals for recurrent RTI were made in accordance with national guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Referral of children for recurrent RTI was primarily determined by frequency, severity, and duration of RTIs; the influence of non-disease factors was limited. Just over half of referrals were made in accordance with guidelines.