Mental health impact among hospital staff in the aftermath of the Nice 2016 terror attack: the ECHOS de Nice study.

BACKGROUND: The Nice terror attack of July 14, 2016 resulted in 84 deaths and 434 injured, with many hospital staff exposed to the attack, either as bystanders on site at the time of the attack ('bystander exposure') who may or may not have provided care to attack victims subsequently, or as care providers to victims only ('professional exposure only'). The objective of this study is to describe the impact on mental health among hospital staff by category of exposure with a particular focus on those with 'professional exposure only', and to assess their use of psychological support resources. METHOD: An observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study conducted from 06/20/2017 to 10/31/2017 among all staff of two healthcare institutions in Nice, using a web questionnaire. Collected data included social, demographic and professional characteristics; trauma exposure category ('bystanders to the attack'; 'professional exposure only'; 'unexposed'); indicators of psychological impact (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale); PTSD (PCL-5) level; support sought. Responders could enter open comments in each section of the questionnaire, which were processed by inductive analysis. RESULTS: 804 staff members' questionnaires were analysed. Among responding staff, 488 were exposed (61%): 203 were 'bystanders to the attack', 285 had 'professional exposure only'. The staff with 'professional exposure only' reported anxiety (13.2%), depression (4.6%), suicidal thoughts (5.5%); rates of full PTSD was 9.4% and of partial PTSD, 17.7%. Multivariate analysis in the 'professional exposure only' category showed that the following characteristics were associated with full or partial PTSD: female gender (OR = 2.79; 95% CI = 1.19-6.56, p = 0.019); social isolation (OR = 3.80; 95% CI = 1.30-11.16, p = 0.015); having been confronted with an unfamiliar task (OR = 3.04; 95% CI = 1.18-7.85; p = 0.022). Lastly, 70.6% of the staff with 'professional exposure only' with full PTSD did not seek psychological support. CONCLUSION: Despite a significant impact on mental health, few staff with 'professional exposure only' sought psychological support. Robust prevention and follow-up programs must be developed for hospital staff, in order to manage the health hazards they face when exposed to exceptional health-related events such as mass terror attacks. STUDY REGISTRATION: Ethical approval for the trial was obtained from the National Ethics Committee for Human Research (RCBID N° 2017-A00812-51).

Health outcomes of the July 14, 2016 Nice terror attack among hospital-based professionals and students: the « ECHOS de Nice ¼ health survey protocol.

BACKGROUND: The terror attack of July 14, 2016, in Nice, France, resulted in 86 deaths, including children, and several hundred wounded, with a major psychological impact on the population. Hospital staff had to cope with exceptional circumstances which made them vulnerable to detrimental effects on their own health. This paper describes the method that was selected for the survey entitled "ECHOS de Nice 14 Juillet" which aimed to assess the impact of the attack on the psychological, psycho-traumatic and somatic health condition of the Nice University and Lenval hospital staff who were directly or indirectly exposed to the attack, and also to describe the support and care facilities they were offered. METHOD: ECHOS de Nice 14 juillet is an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study focusing on all the hospital staff and students of both institutions, i.e. 10,100 persons in June 2017. A web-based questionnaire based on the model developed by Santé Publique France (IMPACTS and ESPA 13 novembre 2015) was adapted to the contexts of the healthcare professionals and students employed in these healthcare institutions in Nice and published on line from June 21 to October 30, 2017. The paper describes the tools that were used to meet the aims of the study, i.e. identification of exposure categories ('civilian' exposure for those present during the attack and/or 'professional' exposure); indicators of psychological impact (anxiety, depression, burnout, compassion fatigue, suicidal states, tobacco and alcohol use, self-medications), psycho-traumatic and somatic impact; professional and social impact. Lastly, awareness of availability and use of psychological support and care-follow-up facilities by professionals were investigated. Respondents could include extensive qualitative comments on the various themes explored in the questionnaire, with text analysis complementing that of quantitative data. DISCUSSION: The benefits and limitations of the selected methodology are discussed, in view of contributing useful information to help anticipate and manage health issues among hospital staff who have been victims of traumatic events.

[Promoting primary care screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection]. / Promotion du dépistage d'infection à Chlamydia trachomatis en soins primaires.

Background: Lower urogenital tract Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) infection is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection in Europe, especially among young people with multiple partners. Often asymptomatic, its spread and severity are due to delayed diagnosis, highlighting the need for early detection.Objective: Implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention targeting GPs in the Alpes-Maritimes (06) promoting opportunistic screening of Ct infection in young patients.Method: Academic detailing visits provided 105 randomized GPs with tools and patient self-testing kits to include 10 patients over a 6-month period followed by a quantitative (prescribed screenings / reimbursed screenings among visited GPs and all GPs in the Alpes-Maritimes compared to the previous year) and a qualitative assessment (post-interventional interviews with GPs and trainers).Results: In the context of a global increase in screening between the 2013 and 2014 seasons (+15%), the intervention resulted in a significantly higher rate (73%), p = 0.02. Screening was performed in 73 (48%) patients and 12 were PCR-positive. Qualitative analysis of post-interventional interviews with GPs and a focus group of AD visitors highlighted facilitating factors and obstacles to screening. Conclusion: Our intervention, appreciated by the visited GPs, demonstrates its potential impact and feasibility in primary care. GPs used facilitating factors to overcome the identified obstacles. To sustain this intervention, evaluated tools will be available on line to help GPs promote Ct screening as well as for sexual health training targeting GPs.

Efficacy of an educational and counseling intervention on adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: French prospective controlled study.

PURPOSE: The objective was to evaluate the impact of an intervention for improving adherence to antiretroviral therapies (HAART) in HIV-infected patients. METHOD: We designed a prospective, controlled, randomized trial to assess the impact of an educational and counseling intervention in addition to standard of care. At M0, the study enrolled 244 HAART-treated patients who attended a medical consultation between September and December 1999 who were not included in another protocol. Patients in the intervention group (IG) were offered three individual sessions by trained nurses. The proportions of adherent patients at 6 months followup (M6) and the change in HIV RNA between M0 and M6 were measured. RESULTS: Between M0 and M6, HIV RNA significantly decreased in the 123 patients of the IG (mean difference = -0.22 log [+/-0.86], p =.013), while it increased (+0.12 log [+/-0.90], p =.14) in the 121 patients of the control group. However, the proportion of patients with HIV RNA <40 copies/mL remained similar in both groups. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the only significant predictor of 100% adherence at M6 was the intervention group (p =.05) after adjustment for baseline adherence (p =.001). Among the 202 patients with available data on adherence, the proportion of adherent patients was similar in both groups at M0 (58% vs. 63%, p =.59) but became higher in the IG at M6 (75% vs. 61%, p =.04). CONCLUSION: The educational and counseling intervention was efficient for increasing adherence to HAART and could be implemented in most clinical settings.