[Examining in General Practice: Licensure Examinations in a General Practice Setting]. / Prüfen in der Allgemeinmedizin ­ Staatsexamina im ambulanten hausärztlichen Setting.

General practitioners play a major role in the health care of the population. Only a small proportion of patients receives care from specialised consultants, in a hospital or in a university hospital. Most of the patients consult a general practitioner. The strengthening of general practice that is called for in the Master Plan for Medical Studies 2020 in new state examination formats, for instance, means that this central position in patient care will be reflected in studies and examinations in the future. The general medical setting is subject to a specific background with unselected patients and a hermeneutic understanding of cases. The format of the new final examination promotes general medical and interdisciplinary competencies in medical interviewing, physical examination, dealing with diseases that can be treated on an outpatient basis, prevention, and the application of general medical guidelines of ethics and law. The standardised oral-practical examination has newly been designed by the Institute for Medical and Pharmaceutical Examination Questions (IMPP). It includes real patients in an outpatient setting. In eight steps, it integrates communicative and technical examination aspects. Two trained examiners will observe and assess the performance of graduates using standardised evaluation forms. The new examination format was developed in 2019 by the IMPP and faculty from various medical schools, was tested in five general medical teaching practices, revised, and then piloted in fourteen examinations. Standardised specifications for the examination process, spatial equipment, and examiner training were developed by IMPP. With approximately 10,000 examinees per year and two students per examination day, a total of 5,000 examination days will be required in general practices. The expertise of the German College of General Practicioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM), the Society of University Teachers of General Medicine (GHA), and the university locations, together with the great potential as the largest specialist group in Germany suggest that the goal of recruiting and motivation of practices appears achievable. With regard to funding, political decisions are necessary. In an increasingly complex care system, the redesign of the oral-practical examination in the outpatient setting contributes to strengthening interdisciplinary and multi-professional cooperation.

[SaxoForN-a transregional primary care research network in Dresden and Frankfurt am Main : Design of a practice-based research infrastructure]. / SaxoForN ­ Transregionales allgemeinmedizinisches Forschungspraxennetz Dresden und Frankfurt am Main : Konzept einer innovativen Forschungspraxeninfrastruktur.

Establishing primary care research networks (PCRNs) makes it easier to conduct clinical trials and health services research in a general-practice setting. Since February 2020, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) has sponsored the development of six PCRNs and a coordination unit throughout Germany, with the aim of setting up a sustainable outpatient research infrastructure to raise the quantity and quality of primary care.The present article describes the design of a PCRN in Dresden and Frankfurt am Main - SaxoForN - and explains its structure and how it operates. The network is a transregional alliance between the two regional PCRNs named "SaxoN" (Dresden/Saxony) and "ForN" (Frankfurt am Main/Hesse), both of which run transregional and local research projects. For this purpose, joint standards and harmonized structures, for example with respect to the data infrastructure, qualifications, participation, and accreditation, were agreed upon and implemented at both sites.A critical success factor will be whether and to what extent the standards and structures, as well as resource planning, can be designed sustainably enough to permit the PCRNs to carry out high-quality research over the long term. To achieve this, the PCRNs will have to attract new practices and build up lasting relationships with them, qualify the research practices in order to standardize processes as far as possible, and regularly document their basic information and healthcare data.

[Regional Influences on Home Visits - Is Care in Rural Areas Secured in the Long Term?] / Regionale Einflüsse auf die Hausbesuchstätigkeit ­ Ist die ländliche Versorgung auf Dauer gesichert?

BACKGROUND: Demographic change and urbanisation are proceeding at a rapid pace in Germany. Although the need for care is increasing due to a growing older and multimorbid generation, the number of home visits by general practitioners has been declining since years. Previous studies have shown that the workload for general practitioners is increasing, especially in rural areas. Research question What kind of structural practice characteristics are associated with the frequency of GP home visits? What influence do regional characteristics of GP practices have? METHODS: In a study of family doctors̓ practices in Saxony, 4286 home visits were documented by questionnaires from 303 participating practices over a period of one year. Each practice surveyed the home visits within a randomly assigned week. In addition to the characteristics of the home visits, information about the practice, such as regional location, home visit organization and patient numbers was also collected. The frequency of home visits was based on information provided by the doctors surveyed. Subsequently, the data based on the postal code were supplemented with structural information from the State Statistical Office and data from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung-KV). The data were first analysed regarding bivariate associations. Significantly associated variables were finally tested in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: According to their own statements, the interviewed general practitioners carried out an average of 14.5 (SD 9.5) home visits per week, which included the care of 32.0 (SD 30.0) nursing home patients. The number of home visits correlated significantly negatively with the number of inhabitants and significantly positively with the average age of the region. In the multivariate analysis, the age of the doctor was found to be the largest predictor of the number of home visits per week, with younger doctors making significantly fewer home visits. CONCLUSION: The number of home visits per week continues to decline compared to preliminary studies. In the regression model, the great influence of the doctor̓s age on the number of home visits is striking. While regional-structural characteristics fade into the background, a changed attitude towards home visits must be assumed, with telemedicine and delegation coming to the fore.

Health-related quality of life in elderly, multimorbid individuals with and without depression and/or mild cognitive impairment using a telemonitoring application.

PURPOSE: Multimorbidity leads to decreasing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Telemedicine may help to improve HRQoL. The present study was conducted to show (I) differences in HRQoL and changes in HRQoL over time in elderly, multimorbid individuals with and without depression and/or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using a telemonitoring application (TMA) and (II) associations between engagement with measurements by study participants using a TMA and changes in their HRQoL. METHODS: The present feasibility study was part of a longitudinal intervention study. Recruited general practitioners (GPs) enrolled individuals and assigned them to risk groups according to absence/presence of depression and/or MCI. Depression was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), MCI using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and HRQoL using the SF-12. The TMA consisted of tablets, software, and measuring devices. Measured vital data were transferred to a care and case manager for monitoring and possible intervention. RESULTS: Nine GPs recruited 177 individuals, 97 of whom were included in the HRQoL analysis. Significantly lower physical and mental component summary (PCS/MCS) scores were revealed in study participants with depression, and with both depression and MCI, compared to participants with no mental disorders. PCS scores did not differ between study dates, but MCS scores had significantly increased over time. Participants' engagement with measurements was significantly associated with an increased MCS score, but not with the PCS score. DISCUSSION: Depression and/or MCI are negatively associated with the HRQoL of elderly, multimorbid people using a TMA. Engagement of individuals with vital data measurements via a TMA may increase their mental HRQoL. Mentally impaired people should be closely involved as co-designers and experts in development processes of TMAs to benefit from tailored solutions. An individual's increased mental HRQoL can be a decisive factor in their engagement with a GP treatment regimen and telemonitoring processes.

Need-based care of multi-morbid patients - supporting general practitioners with algorithm-generated recommendations of healthcare services (telemedicine-project ATMoSPHÄRE).

BACKGROUND: The patient-oriented and need-based care of multi-morbid patients with healthcare services and assistive products can be a highly complex task for the general practitioners (GPs). An algorithm-based digital recommendation system (DRS) for healthcare services was developed within the context of the telemedicine research project ATMoSPHÄRE. The plausibility of the DRS was tested and the results used to examine if, and to what degree, the DRS provides useful assistance to GPs. METHODS: The plausibility of the recommendations of the DRS were tested with the Delphi procedure (n = 8) and Interviews (n = 4) in collaboration with the GPs. They proposed services and assistive products they considered appropriate for two multi-morbid patients. Furthermore, GPs had to report whether, and to what degree they deemed the algorithm-generated recommendations appropriate. Significant quantitative differences between the GPs', and the algorithm-generated, recommendations were evaluated with paired-samples-Wilcoxon-test. RESULTS: The first Delphi round revealed a high variability regarding the amount and character of services recommended by the physicians (1 to 10 recommendations, mean = 5.6, sd = 2.8). These professional recommendations converged after consideration of the algorithm-generated recommendations. The number of algorithm-generated recommendations which were judged as appropriate ranged between 7 and 17 of a total of 20 (mean = 11.9, sd = 2.5). The interviews revealed that the additional algorithm-generated recommendations which were judged appropriate contained mainly social care services. CONLUSION: The DRS provides GPs with additional appropriate recommendations for the need-based care of patients, which may not have been previously considered. It can therefore be assessed as a helpful complement in the primary care of multi-morbid patients.

[Delegation of Home Visits and Qualification of Health Care Assistants in Family Practices in Saxony, Germany - Results of the Cross-Sectional Study SESAM-5]. / Delegation von Hausbesuchen und Qualifikation nicht-ärztlicher Mitarbeiter in sächsischen Hausarztpraxen ­ Ergebnisse der Querschnittstudie SESAM-5.

BACKGROUND: In the context of demographic changes and the shortage of family physicians in the primary care sector in Germany, the delegability of home visits to health care assistants is discussed. There is little information on the extent of home visits delegated. The aim of this article is to examine differences in the socio-demographic and organizational profile of delegating vs. non-delegating family doctors in Saxony and to describe the level of qualification of health care assistants. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study is part of a series of epidemiological studies in the federal state of Saxony, Germany. All family doctors in Saxony were contacted in 2014 (n=2677), of whom 11,2% participated. In a period of 12 months, family practices documented home visits within a randomly assigned week. Socio-demographic characteristics of the family practice and the level of qualification of health care assistants were surveyed. RESULTS: A total of 274 family practices participated; 52,9% of all participating family doctors declared their willingness to delegate home visits, but only 8,5% of home visits were made by health care assistants. There were non-significant trends between the willingness to delegate and self-employment vs. being employed (92,4 vs. 84,6%, p=0,06), establishment in a single vs. shared practice (35,2 vs. 31,4%, p=0,09) and higher patient numbers per 3 months (x̄+= 1183,08 vs. 1092,16, p=0,07). The 224 health care assistants that participated in the study were mostly trained in nursing (39,7%) or as medical assistants (50,8%). The vast majority of the health care assistants (82,5%) had no further training or additional qualification; 19,6% completed further training that qualified them to have home visits formally delegated to them. CONCLUSION: Among family doctors in Saxony there is a reported high willingness to delegate, which is not implemented sufficiently in practice. Delegation is based on personal confidence in health care assistants without formal qualification. Qualified delegation ensures high standards in patient care and this potential is not used in Saxony, particularly in rural areas with imminent shortages of medical care. More education about the opportunities of qualified delegation seems necessary.

[Assessment of care in patients with dementia in house calls by general practitioners]. / Beurteilung der Betreuung dementer Patienten im allgemeinärztlichen Hausbesuch.

BACKGROUND: Patients with dementia (PD) are a special challenge for the healthcare system. They are responsible for 5% of the expenditure in the German healthcare service. The disease-related deficits and the associated need for care leads to the fact that patients are not able to live in their own residence and rely on the care of nursing homes (NH). OBJECTIVE: How is the overall care in PD assessed in house calls (HC)? Does the regional situation influence the living conditions of PD? MATERIAL AND METHODS: As part of the SESAM­5 study 303 participating general practices in Saxony were asked to document their HC within a period of 1 year whereby 4286 HC were documented through questionnaires and analyzed for content and structural data. RESULTS: The prevalence of dementia in HC patients was 27.5% and 72.6% of PD lived in a NH or assisted living home. The medical staff assessed the overall care of PD in the NH to be significantly better than in their own residence. This discrepancy was greater in rural compared to urban regions although in urban regions significantly more patients live in NHs (27% vs. 51%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall care of PD in HC was assessed predominantly as good by medical personnel, whereby PD in NH were assessed comparatively better than those in their own residence. This could be explained by the high need of care in PD. The difference between rural and urban regions is explainable through differences in the infrastructure and also in the organization in rural areas, where relatives participate in care significantly more frequently. In the future more focus could be placed on alternative types of housing because in PD cognitive deficits are in the foreground.

Pertussis vaccination status and vaccine acceptance among medical students: multicenter study in Germany and Hungary.

BACKGROUND: Medical students are at risk of contracting and transmitting infectious diseases such as pertussis. Complete vaccination status is important to protect own, patient and public health. Knowing own vaccination status is elementary for following current vaccination recommendations, including boosters. We aimed to assess pertussis vaccination status and vaccination acceptance among medical students of different nationalities. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter health survey at German and Hungarian universities enclosed international medical students in the 1st, 3rd and 5th year of study. Self-reported data from 2655 students regarding pertussis vaccination status were analyzed. Subgroup analysis enclosed data of German (n = 1217), Hungarian (n = 960) and other nationality (n = 478) students ("other"). RESULTS: More Hungarians reported basic immunization (39.0% vs 15.8% Germans vs 24.3% others, p ≤ 0.05). Booster vaccination was reported more by Germans (60.5% vs 43.6% Hungarians vs 36.0% others, p ≤ 0.05). Germans were more likely to report being unvaccinated (3.7% vs 0.9% Hungarians, p ≤ 0.05). More medical students of other nationalities were unaware of their pertussis vaccination status (37.4% vs 20.0% Germans/ 16.5% Hungarians, p ≤ 0.05). 75.2% (n = 1931) rated pertussis vaccinations as absolutely necessary (86.2% Hungarians vs 69.8% Germans/ 66.1% others, p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Positive attitudes towards vaccinations were reported but a large group reported insufficient vaccination status and being not aware of their status, especially among international students. Hungarians possibly have a better vaccination status than reported, based on mandatory vaccinations in childhood. The low awareness of vaccination status has implications for future booster vaccinations. All students should be informed about current recommendations and receive vaccination offers in frames of low-threshold medical services.

The workload for home visits by German family practitioners: an analysis of regional variation in a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, home visits account for a considerable workload for many family practitioners, substantial rural-urban disparities are assumable with regards to home visit frequency and duration. Considering the ongoing demographic change and a rural-urban migration a significant regional difference in the provision of care is assumable. There is a lack of reliable data on the current provision of home visits and how their organisational procedures can be ensured in the future. The aim of this study was to describe and assess the average workload of family practitioners during home visits and compare their rural-urban variations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study over a period of 12 months was conducted in Saxony as part of the fifth project of the Saxon Epidemiologic Studies in General Practice (SESAM-5). Over a 1-week period, family practitioners documented every home visit and answered questionnaires about sociodemographic, organisational and clinical characteristics. According to common categorizations in empirical studies four regional groups (rural, semi-rural, semi-urban, urban) were analysed and compared by non-parametric tests: Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's, Jonckheere-Terpstra and Mann-Whitney-U. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were carried out using a collection of plausible predictors to assess influences for a high frequency and a long duration of home visits. RESULTS: The sample included 3673 home visits conducted by 253 family practitioners. On average, 14.5 home visits were carried out per week with an average duration of almost 28 min. After comparing regional areas, the number and total duration per home visit showed significant differences between the regions: 8.2 h (rural), 7 h (semi-rural), 6.6 h (semi-urban) and 5 h (urban). The regression analyses found that a high frequency of home visits was most likely accomplished in rural regions and a long duration was most likely performed in private homes. CONCLUSIONS: Workload of home visits is strongly associated with the regional location of the practice, leading to rural-urban disparities. Strategies to reduce regional disparities to ensure the future provision of care in the German and comparable health care systems should be discussed, e.g. by financial incentives (short-term), exploiting the potential of delegation (medium-term) and discussing the implementation of substitution (long-term).

[Interface Problems Between Inpatient, GP and Outpatient Specialist Care: Viewpoint of General Practitioners in Dresden]. / "Da kann man sich ja totklingeln, geht ja keiner ran" ­ Schnittstellenprobleme zwischen stationärer, hausärztlicher und ambulant-fachspezialisierter Patientenversorgung aus Sicht Dresdner Hausärzte.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to identify interface problems between inpatient, GP and outpatient specialist care from the perspective of general practitioners in Dresden, especially in older multimorbid patients. METHODS: The data were collected in the context of the pilot study "Multimedication and its Consequences for the Primary Care of Patients in Saxony" and included guided interviews with 7 general practitioners. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to the inductive content analysis of Mayring. RESULTS: At the interface of inpatient to outpatient care, several problems regarding discharge management, intersectoral communication and cooperation as well as in the management of medication were found. Concerning the interface between general practitioners and outpatient specialist care, problems were particularly marked with regard to free choice of doctors, appointment management, medical decision-making process, medication management as well as the use of the electronic health card. Regardless of the interfaces, the lack of communication could be worked out as a central challenge. CONCLUSION: There are several problems with all adjacent interfaces. What is striking here is the lack of communication and cooperation between all parties involved. Possible causes were the often very different working methods and framework conditions, human and material resources and therapeutic intentions and approaches between the different interfaces. One possible approach to improve the situation may be the law regarding secure digital communications and healthcare applications, which exists since 2016. Among other things, it promises a secure and rapid inter- and intrasectoral exchange of patient data. The overall goal of healthcare in Germany should be an optimized and process-oriented interface management in order to ensure a secure and seamless sectoral transition to patients.

Cigarette, waterpipe and e-cigarette use among an international sample of medical students. Cross-sectional multicenter study in Germany and Hungary.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death worldwide. Besides cigarette smoking, waterpipe and e-cigarettes are gaining popularity among young adults. Medical students' smoking behavior is of particular interest because of their impending role in health promotion as future physicians. Aim of our study is to examine the prevalence and predictors of cigarette, waterpipe and e-cigarette use and the association of tobacco use with self-reported health status in an international sample of medical students. METHODS: In a multicenter cross-sectional study data on different aspects of health behavior were collected from medical students of 65 nationalities using a self-administered questionnaire in Germany (Dresden, Munich) and Hungary (Budapest, Pécs). The survey was conducted among 1st, 3rd and 5th year students. To explore associations between smoking behavior and socio-cultural factors Pearson's chi2-tests and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The largest subpopulations were formed by German (n = 1289), Hungarian (n = 1055) and Norwegian (n = 147) students. Mean age was 22.5 ± 3.3 years. Females represented 61.6% of the sample. In the whole sample prevalence of cigarette smoking was 18.0% (95% CI 16.6-19.4%), prevalence of waterpipe use was 4.8% (95% CI 4.0-5.7%), that of e-cigarette 0.9% (95% CI 0.5-1.2%). More males (22.0%) than females (15.5%) reported cigarette smoking. The lowest prevalence of cigarette smoking was found among Norwegian students (6.2%). Cigarette smokers were older, waterpipe users were younger than non-users. E-cigarette use was not associated with age of the students. Religious involvement was protective only against cigarette smoking. Financial situation showed no association with any kind of tobacco consumption. Cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users were less likely to report very good or excellent health status. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking is still the most popular way of consuming tobacco, although alternative tobacco use is also prevalent among medical students. To further health consciousness, medical schools should pay more attention to students' health behavior, especially their smoking habits. Tobacco prevention and cessation programs for medical students should consider not only the health risks of cigarette smoking but the need to discourage other forms of tobacco use, such as waterpipe.

[Simple guideline-oriented supportive tools in primary care: Effects on adherence to the S3/NV guideline unipolar depression]. / Niederschwellige leitlinienorientierte supportive Materialien (NILS) in der primärärztlichen Versorgung: Effekte auf die Orientierung an der S3/NV-Leitlinie Unipolare Depression.

Simple guideline-oriented supportive tools in primary care: Effects on adherence to the S3/NV guideline unipolar depression Objectives: Does the provision of supportive tools improve guideline-oriented recognition and treatment of patients with depression in primary care? METHODS: In a nested intervention study, as part of a larger epidemiological study program in German primary care, 46 randomly drawn practices received tools to facilitate identification and treatment decisions.Pre-post effects were compared to 42 matched control practices without intervention. RESULTS: The proportion of correctly identified depression cases was similar in the intervention (47.2%) and the control group (42.3%, p = 0.537). Compared to controls, practitioners in the intervention group rated their competence in case identification and treatment at post-intervention more positively (p = 0.016). No effects were observed regarding the usage of the tools, practitioners' attitudes towards national depression guidelines, and depression treatment procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Since provision of guideline-oriented tools did not improve recognition and quality of treatment, delineation of alternative strategies for enhanced guideline adherence in primary care for depression is warranted.

[How frequently are depressive disorders recognized in primary care patients? : A cross-sectional epidemiological study in Germany]. / Wie häufig werden Patienten mit depressiven Störungen in der hausärztlichen Praxis erkannt? : Eine epidemiologische Querschnittsstudie.

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a crucial role for guideline-oriented intervention in patients with depression. OBJECTIVES: Based on a diagnostic screening questionnaire, this study investigates the sensitivity of PCPs to recognize patients with depression as well as the factors facilitating recognition and concordant diagnostic decisions. METHOD: In a cross-sectional epidemiological study in six regions of Germany, 3563 unselected patients filled in questionnaires on mental and physical complaints and were diagnostically evaluated by their PCP (N = 253). The patient reports on an established Depression-Screening-Questionnaire (DSQ), which allows the approximate derivation of an ICD-10 depression diagnosis, were compared with the physician diagnosis (N = 3211). In a subsample of discordant cases a comprehensive standardized clinical-diagnostic interview (DIA-X/CIDI) was applied. RESULTS: On the study day, the prevalence of ICD-10 depression was 14.3% according to the DSQ and 10.7% according to the physician diagnosis. Half of the patients identified by DSQ were diagnosed with depression by their physician and two thirds were recognized as mental disorder cases. More severe depression symptomatology and the persistent presence of main depression symptoms were related to better recognition and concordant diagnostic decisions. Diagnostic validation interviews confirmed the DSQ diagnosis in the majority of the false-negative cases. Indications for at least a previous history of depression were found in up to 70% of false-positive cases. CONCLUSION: Given the high prevalence of depression in primary care patients, there is continued need to improve the recognition and diagnosis of these patients to assure guideline-oriented treatment.

[Interprofessional multistation practical training in the auditorium : Implementation of the national competence-based catalog of learning objectives for undergraduate medical education in the cross-sectorial area medicine of aging and the aged at the TU Dresden]. / Interprofessionelles Multistationen-Hörsaalpraktikum : Umsetzung des Nationalen Kompetenzbasierten Lernzielkatalogs Medizin im Querschnittsbereich Medizin des Alterns und des alten Menschen an der TU Dresden.

BACKGROUND: The German national competence-based catalogue of learning objectives for undergraduate medical education (NKLM) newly introduced in 2015, provides a variety of learning objectives, competences, as well as practical skills for the cross-sectorial area 7 "Medication of Aging and the Aged" (QB7). Against this background an interdisciplinary teaching concept to mediate all required teaching contents should be developed. OBJECTIVE: Can an interdisciplinary multistation practical course in the auditorium, in which different tasks and skills are trained at each station meet the requirements of the NKLM? MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evaluation by questionnaire and rating of answers on a 6-stage Likert scale. Analysis of the qualitative and quantitative evaluation results of 235 participating students and 13 lecturers in 2016. RESULTS: The interdisciplinary multistation practical course in the auditorium is fully compliant with the NKLM. All theoretical and practical contents and competences could be depicted. The subjective learning effect was assessed by students as good (mean = 2.66; SD = 0.94; N = 230). The available teaching time was rated as being too short in qualitative statements. The lecturers attested a high degree of interest by the students (mean = 2.15; SD = 0.86; N = 13), but criticized that the noise level was too loud. DISCUSSION: Compact, hands-on and interdisciplinary teaching concepts in the QB7 help to make the best use of human and spatial resources and convey all theoretical and practical teaching contents and competences from the NKLM; however, the planning, organization and implementation are very time-consuming.

Do socio-cultural factors influence medical students' health status and health-promoting behaviors? A cross-sectional multicenter study in Germany and Hungary.

BACKGROUND: Physical and mental health is important for coping with the high requirements of medical studies that are associated with a higher risk for severe stress, insomnia, smoking, harmful alcohol consumption and easier access to drugs. Health behaviors of medical students influence not just their own health but also the health of their future patients. We examined whether socio-cultural factors can explain differences in students' health status and health-promoting behaviors. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Germany (Dresden, Munich) and Hungary (Budapest, Pécs) enclosed international medical students in their 1st, 3rd and 5th academic years. The students were invited to voluntarily and anonymously complete a questionnaire on different aspects of health behavior during obligatory seminars and lectures in 2014. The response rate of the total sample was 56.2 % (n = 2935); the subgroup analysis enclosed data of German (n = 1289), Hungarian (n = 1057) and Norwegian (n = 148) students. RESULTS: A high number of Norwegian students (84.5 %) assessed their health status as very good/excellent. In comparison, only 60.3 % of the Hungarian and 70.7 % of the German participants reported a very good/excellent health status. The distributions were comparable between the study sites. Although gender, financial situation and nationality were significant health status predictors, they could explain only 8.2 % of the total variance of health status in the multivariable model. A comparably high number of Hungarian students (95.3 % vs. 67.4 % German and 56.7 % Norwegian) reported that they can currently do a lot/very much for their health. In contrast, a significant number of Norwegians (73.0 % vs. 63.7 % Hungarian and 51.5 % German) reported that they currently do a lot/very much for their health (chi(2)-test, p ≤ 0.001). Financial situation, study site and study year were the strongest predictors for health promotion activities (Nagelkerkes R(2) = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, gender and study year played only a minor role in the health status and health promotion beliefs and activities of medical students. Structural (study site) and somewhat socio-cultural factors (nationality, financial situation) mainly explained the differences regarding health promoting behaviors. Obligatory, free-of-charge courses for health promotion (activity and relaxation) should be included in study curriculums.

Why do family doctors prescribe potentially inappropriate medication to elderly patients?

BACKGROUND: Based on changes in pharmacokinetics and -dynamics in elderly patients, there are potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) that should be avoided in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Current studies showed prescription rates of PIM between 22.5 and 28.4 % in the primary care setting. The evidence concerning reasons for PIM prescription by FPs is limited. METHODS: This mixed method study consisted of three research parts: 1) semi-standardized content analysis of patients' records, 2) qualitative interviews with FPs using a) open questions and b) selected patient-specific case vignettes and 3) qualitative interviews with FPs' medical assistants. The integration of qualitative interviews was used to explain the quantitative results (triangulation design). PIM were identified according to the German PRISCUS list. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analysis was done using SPSS 22.0. Qualitative content analysis of interviews was used to classify the content of the interviews for indicating pertinent categories. All data were pseudonymously recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Content analysis of 1846 patients' records and interviews with 7 related FPs were conducted. Elderly patients [n = 1241, mean age: 76, females: 56.6 %] were characterized in average by 8.3 documented chronic diagnosis. 23.9 % of elderly patients received at least one PIM prescription. Sedatives/hypnotics were the most frequent prescribed PIM-drugs (13.7 %). Mental disorders, gender and number of long-term medication were detected as predictors for the probability of a PIM prescription. Common reported reasons for PIM prescription by FPs concerned limited knowledge regarding PIM, limited applicability of PIM lists in daily practice, lack of time, having no alternatives in medication, stronger patient-related factors than age that influence prescription, own bad experiences regarding changes of medication or refusal of following prescriptions of sedative/hypnotics. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to see FPs in a complex decision making situation with several influencing factors on their prescribing, including: patient-oriented prioritization, FPs' experiences in daily practice, FPs' knowledge regarding existing recommendations and their trust in it and organizational characteristics of FPs' daily medical practice. These pros and cons of PIM prescription in elderly patients should be considered in FPs' advanced training.

Vaccination status among nurses in hospitals. Results of a cross sectional study at Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben Quedlinburg / Impfstatus bei Pflegepersonal. Ergebnisse einer Querschnittstudie am Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben Quedlinburg

Background: Health care workers can be multiplicators for infectious diseases due to their patient contacts. Vaccinations are not mandatory in Germany but there are recommendations for people at higher risk such as health care workers. There is no representative data regarding vaccination status of health care workers in Germany. Aim: We examined vaccination status among nurses regarding diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis A (HA) and hepatitis B (HB) as well as correlations between age, professional years, vaccination status and acceptance. Methods: An anonymous cross sectional survey concerning health burden and health behavior including vaccination was conducted among health care workers. Statistical analysis using SPSS included descriptive analysis, subgroup specific differences of distribution were tested by chi2-tests. Results: Regardless of age or professional years, 99 % of the nurses evaluated that vaccinations are at least "partly necessary". Sufficient vaccination status was reported more often concerning tetanus (82 %) and HB (70 %) but less often regarding diphtheria (52 %), poliomyelitis (49 %), HA (43 %) and pertussis (42 %). With respect to some vaccinations, proportion of nurses not knowing their vaccination status was higher than 20 %. Conclusions: Despite the high vaccination acceptance, vaccination status among participating nurses was not sufficient. Implementation of vaccination measures targeting health care workers should be strengthened to reach higher vaccination coverages to prevent vaccination preventable infectious diseases among health care workers and patients in hospitals.

Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs' care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs' home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible. METHODS: We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study. RESULTS: Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.

Saxon Epidemiological Study in General Practice-6 (SESAM-6): protocol of a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners (GPs) are mostly the first point of contact for patients with health problems in Germany. There is only a limited epidemiological overview data that describe the GP consultation hours based on other than billing data. Therefore, the aim of Saxon Epidemiological Study in General Practice-6 (SESAM-6) is to examine the frequency of reasons for encounter, prevalence of long-term diagnosed diseases and diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in general practice. This knowledge is fundamental to identify the healthcare needs and to develop strategies to improve the GP care. The results of the study will be incorporated into the undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education for GP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional study SESAM-6 is conducted in general practices in the state of Saxony, Germany. The study design is based on previous SESAM studies. Participating physicians are assigned to 1 week per quarter (over a survey period of 12 months) in which every fifth doctor-patient contact is recorded for one-half of the day (morning or afternoon). To facilitate valid statements, a minimum of 50 GP is required to document a total of at least 2500 doctor-patient contacts. Univariable, multivariable and subgroup analyses as well as comparisons to the previous SESAM data sets will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Technical University of Dresden in March 2023 (SR-EK-7502023). Participation in the study is voluntary and will not be remunerated. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, preferably with open access. They will also be disseminated at scientific and public symposia, congresses and conferences. A final report will be published to summarise the central results and provided to all study participants and the public.

General practitioners' views on polypharmacy and its consequences for patient health care.

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is defined as suffering from coexistent chronic conditions. Multimorbid patients demand highly complex patient-centered care which often includes polypharmacy, taking an average of six different drugs per day. Adverse drug reactions, adverse drug events and medication errors are all potential consequences of polypharmacy. Our study aims to detect the status quo of the health care situation in Saxony's general practices for multimorbid patients receiving multiple medications. We will identify the most common clinical profiles as well as documented adverse drug events and reactions that occur during the treatment of patients receiving multiple medications. We will focus on exploring the motives of general practitioners for the prescription of selected drugs in individual cases where there is evidence of potential drug-drug-interactions and potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients. Furthermore, the study will explore general practitioners' opinions on delegation of skills to other health professions to support medical care and monitoring of patients receiving multiple medications. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a retrospective cross sectional study using mixed methods. Socio-demographic data as well as diagnoses, medication regimens and clinically important events will be analyzed retrospectively using general practitioners documentation in patients' records. Based on these data, short vignettes will be generated and discussed by general practitioners in qualitative telephone interviews. DISCUSSION: To be able to improve outpatient health care management for patients receiving multiple medications, the current status quo of care, risk factors for deficient treatment and characteristics of concerned patients must be investigated. Furthermore, it is necessary to understand the physicians' decision making process regarding treatment.