Characteristics and patient impact of boarding in the pediatric emergency department, 2018-2022.

OBJECTIVES: Boarding admitted patients in the emergency department is an important cause of throughput delays and safety risks in adults, though has been less studied in children. We assessed changes in boarding in a pediatric ED (PED) from 2018 to 2022 and modeled associations between boarding and select quality metrics. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of PED patients admitted to non-psychiatric services, broken into four periods: pre-COVID-19 (Period I, 01/2018-02/2020), early pandemic (II, 03/2020-06/2021), COVID-19 variants (III, 07/2021-06/2022), and non-COVID respiratory viruses (IV, 07/2022-12/2022). Patients were classified as critical (intensive care units (ICU)) or acute care (non-ICU inpatient services) based on their initial bed request. We compared median boarding times with Kruskal-Wallis tests. We assessed the relationship between boarding time and hospital length-of-stay (LOS) through hazard regression models, and the association between boarding time and PED return visit, readmission, and patient safety events through adjusted logistic regressions. RESULTS: Median PED boarding time significantly increased from Period I (acute: 2.4 h; critical: 3.0 h) to Period II (acute: 3.0 h, critical: 4.0 h) to Period III (acute: 4.4 h, critical: 6.6 h) to Period IV (acute: 6.2 h; critical: 9.5 h). On survival analysis, as boarding time increased, hospital LOS increased for acute admissions and decreased for critical admissions. Increased acute care boarding time was associated with higher odds of a filed safety report. CONCLUSIONS: Since July 2021, PED boarding time increased for admitted children across acute and critical admissions. The relationship between acute care boarding and longer hospital LOS suggests a resource-inefficient, self-perpetuating cycle that demands multi-disciplinary solutions.

Delays in treatment and disposition attributable to undertriage of pediatric emergency medicine patients.

BACKGROUND: Triage, the initial assessment and sorting of patients in the Emergency Department (ED), determines priority of evaluation and treatment. Little is known about the impact of undertriage, the underestimation of disease severity at triage, on clinical care in pediatric ED patients. We evaluate the impact of undertriage on time to disposition and treatment decisions in pediatric ED patients. METHODS: This was a case control study of ED visits for patients <22 years of age, with an assigned Emergency Severity Index (ESI) score of 4 or 5, and associated hospital admission, nebulized treatment, supplemental oxygen, and/or intravenous (IV) line placement, between January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022. Controls were sampled from a pool of patient visits with an ESI score of 3, matched by intervention, disposition, and date and hour of arrival. Primary outcome measures were time to order of intervention (nebulized treatment, oxygen administration, or IV placement) and time to disposition decision. A secondary outcome measure was return visits requiring admission or emergency intervention within 14 days of the index visit. Continuous variables (time to orders) were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test and dichotomous outcomes (return visits) were compared using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Analysis was performed with Python v3.10. RESULTS: The final analysis included 7245 undertriaged patients. Undertriaged patients had longer times to orders for nebulized treatments, (p < 0.001) IV placement, (p < 0.001) and admission (p < 0.001) when compared to controls. There were no significant differences in time to supplemental oxygen delivery and time to discharge compared to controls. Undertriaged patients were more likely to experience a return visit requiring admission or emergency intervention (OR 3.74, 95% CI 3.32,4.22). CONCLUSIONS: Undertriage in the pediatric ED is associated with delays in care and disposition decisions and increases likelihood of return visits.

Paired analysis of ED efficiency for low-acuity children treated by PAs and pediatricians.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there was a clinically important difference (15 minutes or more) in length of stay (LOS) for low-acuity pediatric ED patients treated by PAs compared with those treated by pediatricians. METHODS: Between July 2017 and February 2020, shifts were identified that had shared PA and pediatrician staffing in the low-acuity care area for a large, urban ED. LOS was collected for every patient during the 6 hours of overlap for each shift. Using a paired analysis, we calculated the difference in mean LOS for these shifts. RESULTS: Mean shift LOS for children seen by PAs (160.1 minutes, SD: 48.6) was 10.1 minutes longer (95% CI: 6.1, 14.1) than mean shift LOS for children seen by pediatricians (150 minutes, SD: 47.3). CONCLUSIONS: No clinically important difference in LOS was found for low-acuity children treated by PAs compared with those treated by pediatricians in a large, urban ED.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prescription Filling After Discharge From an Urban Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure racial/ethnic differences in prescription filling among children prescribed with outpatient antibiotics from the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort study of ED visits among children (0-21 years) from January 1 to March 31, 2018, during which oral antibiotics were prescribed. We measured the proportion of filled prescriptions in aggregate and by patient race/ethnicity. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify patient and visit-level factors associated with prescription filling. Secondarily, we measured differences in ED revisits by prescription filling. RESULTS: A total of 2881 participants were enrolled. A total of 66.3% (95% confidence interval, 64.5-68.0) of prescriptions were filled. Prescription filling varied by race/ethnicity; these are as follows: 77.3% non-Hispanic (NH) white, 73.5% NH black, 51.5% Hispanic, and 51.3% others (P < 0.0001). After adjustment for patient and visit-level characteristics, Hispanic children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.5 [0.3-0.9]) and children of other racial/ethnic groups (aOR, 0.5 [0.3-0.8]) had lower odds of prescription filling in comparison to NH white children. Interpreter use (aOR, 0.5 [0.4-0.6]) and uninsured status (aOR, 0.4 [0.3-0.5]) were additional independent risk factors associated with lower odds of prescription filling. There were no differences in the 72-hour revisit rates between those who filled their prescriptions and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: A third of antibiotic prescriptions for bacterial infections in the ED are unfilled. Hispanic children and children of other racial/ethnic groups have lower rates of prescription filling compared with NH white children. Interpreter use and uninsured status also have lower rates of prescription filling. Barriers to prescription filling should be explored further to help reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the provision of health care.

Patient and Visit Characteristics of Pediatric Patients With High-frequency Low-acuity Emergency Department Visits.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients account for a disproportionate number of low-acuity emergency department (ED) visits. The aim of this study is to describe pediatric patient and visit characteristics for high-frequency users for low-acuity visits. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children presenting to a tertiary care pediatric ED and an affiliated community ED, over a 2-year period, with at least 10 low-acuity visits. Twenty patients with the highest number of visits were classified as "superusers." We analyzed patient data from the larger sample of high-frequency users and visit specific data from superuser visits. IBM SPSS Statistics 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to perform descriptive statistics and to summarize demographic and visit specific variables. RESULTS: We identified 181 high-frequency users with a mean number of visits of 14.3 ± 4.3 and a subpopulation of 20 superusers accounting for 434 visits. The majority of high-frequency users (89%) identified as African American and had public insurance (96.1%). Many patients received primary care affiliated with the home institution. In the first year of the study, 50.3% of high-frequency users were infants younger than 1 year at the index visit and 47.4% of superusers were infants at the index visit.Superuser visits were evenly distributed among seasons and the majority of visits occurred during the weekdays (70.7%). The majority of visits were for medical complaints (86.6%) and almost half (47.6%) resulted in some testing (24.9%) or treatment (30.6%); however, only 1.4% resulted in hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, most high-frequency low-acuity ED patients were infants, African American and have public insurance. Many are seen during clinic hours and are paneled at affiliated clinics. Among superusers, the majority of the visits did not require any testing, intervention, or treatment.

Practice Pattern Variation in Test Ordering for Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Department Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Rising costs in healthcare have focused attention on interventions to optimize efficiency of patient care, including decreasing unnecessary diagnostic testing. The primary objective of this study was to determine the variability of laboratory and radiology testing among licensed independent providers (LIPs) with different training backgrounds treating low-acuity patients in a pediatric emergency department (PED). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic health records of all encounters with patients 21 years or younger, triaged as low-acuity, visiting 2 urban, academic PEDs from January 2012 to December 2013. We calculated frequency of orders for specific tests, including complete blood counts, aerobic blood cultures, urine cultures, and chest radiographs. Bivariable analyses were used to measure associations of test ordering between these LIP dyad groups: physician versus nurse practitioner (NP); physicians with pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training (PEM) versus physicians without PEM training and physicians with at least 5 years since residency graduation versus less than 5 years. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, including ED location, trainee co-management, and patient characteristics. We also performed sensitivity analyses by location. RESULTS: There were 148,570 total encounters treated by 12 NPs and 144 physicians, of whom 60 were PEM physicians. Seventy-three physicians had 5 or more years of experience. Testing rates per patient encounter ranged from 0% to 40% for individual providers. In bivariable analyses, testing was more likely when the LIP was a physician (odds ratio [OR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-1.2) or PEM trained (OR = 1.3, 1.2-1.3). In multivariable analyses, testing was more likely for encounters with PEM providers (adjusted OR [AdjOR] = 1.2, 1.1-1.3). A sensitivity analysis on a subset of encounters seen exclusively at our PED-based urgent care revealed that testing was also more likely for encounters seen by PEM physicians (AdjOR = 1.5, 1.4-1.7) and with NPs (AdjOR = 1.2, 1.1-1.4) compared with physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified substantial variation in test ordering patterns for LIPs treating low-acuity patients. There were significant differences in ordering practices between providers from different training backgrounds, most significantly when comparing PEM with non-PEM providers. Further research should examine interventions to standardize practice across disciplines.

Implementing Paper Documentation During an Influenza Surge in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a paper documentation and discharge bundle can expedite patient care during an influenza-related surge. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of low-acuity patients younger than 21 years surging into a pediatric emergency department between January and March 2018 with influenza-like illness. Patient visits documented using a paper bundle were compared with those documented in the electronic medical record on the same date of visit. The primary outcome of interest was time from physician evaluation to discharge for patient visits documented using the paper bundle compared with those documented in the electronic medical record. Secondary outcome was difference in return visits within 72 hours. We identified patient and visit level factors associated with emergency department length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 1591 patient visits were included, 1187 documented in the electronic health record and 404 documented using the paper bundle. Patient visits documented using the paper bundle had a 21% shortened median time from physician evaluation to discharge (41 minutes; interquartile range, 27-62.8 minutes) as compared with patient visits documented in the electronic health record (52 minutes; interquartile range, 35-61 minutes; P < 0.001). There was no difference in return visits (odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.2, 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of paper charting during an influenza-related surge was associated with shorter physician to discharge times when compared with patient visits documented in the electronic health record. A paper bundle may improve patient throughput and decrease emergency department overcrowding during influenza or coronavirus disease-related surge.

Pediatric outpatient utilization by differing Medicaid payment models in the United States.

BACKGROUND: In the United States (US), Medicaid capitated managed care costs are controlled by optimizing patients' healthcare utilization. Adults in capitated plans utilize primary care providers (PCP) more than emergency departments (ED), compared to fee-for-service (FFS). Pediatric data are lacking. We aim to determine the association between US capitated and FFS Medicaid payment models and children's outpatient utilization. METHODS: This retrospective cohort compared outpatient utilization between two payment models of US Medicaid enrollees aged 1-18 years using Truven's 2014 Marketscan Medicaid database. Children enrolled > 11 months were included, and were excluded for eligibility due to disability/complex chronic condition, lack of outpatient utilization, or provider capitation penetration rate < 5% or > 95%. Negative binomial and logistic regression assessed relationships between payment model and number of visits or odds of utilization, respectively. RESULTS: Of 711,008 children, 66,980(9.4%) had FFS and 644,028(90.6%) had capitated plans. Children in capitated plans had greater odds of visits to urgent care, PCP-acute, and PCP-well-child care (aOR 1.21[95%CI 1.15-1.26]; aOR 2.07[95%CI 2.03-2.13]; aOR 1.86 [95%CI 1.82-1.91], respectively), and had lower odds of visits to EDs and specialty care (aOR 0.82 [95%CI 0.8-0.83]; aOR 0.61 [95%CI 0.59-0.62], respectively), compared to FFS. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of children in this US Medicaid population had capitated plans associated with higher utilization of acute care, but increased proportion of lower-cost sites, such as PCP-acute visits and UC. Health insurance programs that encourage capitated payment models and care through the PCP may improve access to timely acute care in lower-cost settings for children with non-complex chronic conditions.

Pediatric urgent care education: a survey-based needs assessment.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing number of pediatric urgent care centers that are largely staffed by pediatric residency graduates. It is unclear if pediatric residency adequately prepares a physician to fully and successfully provide care in an urgent care setting. The goal of this study is to conduct an assessment of urgent care directors' perceptions of recent pediatric residency graduates' preparedness to successfully provide pediatric urgent care after graduation. METHODS: This is a 2018 cross-sectional survey of all pediatric emergency medicine division chiefs in the United States and all pediatric urgent care directors who are members of the Society for Pediatric Urgent Care. An electronic survey was distributed consisting of eight multiple choice questions regarding perceived preparedness and knowledge gaps of recent pediatric residency graduates for independent practice in urgent care. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results and qualitative data were analyzed via an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Forty-two percent (65/154) of surveys were completed. No respondents believed that a recent pediatric residency graduate would be adequately prepared to independently practice in a pediatric urgent care and 81% of respondents recommended some additional training. Most respondents described this training as important (46%) or very important (35%). Most respondents recommended between 6 months and 1 year as the appropriate amount of time to achieve competency. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing number pediatric residency graduates staffing pediatric urgent care centers, the majority of surveyed pediatric emergency medicine division chiefs and pediatric urgent care directors do not think that pediatric residency adequately prepares graduates to successfully provide urgent care to pediatric patients. We recommend further exploration of gaps in knowledge of recent pediatric residency graduates as a next step towards developing systems for further training for pediatric residency graduates to gain competency in urgent care management.

Improving Wait Times for Children with Caregivers with Limited English Proficiency in the Emergency Department.

Introduction: In our pediatric emergency department (ED), children triaged as low acuity who presented with Spanish-speaking caregivers with limited English proficiency (SSLEP) experienced disparately longer wait times than similarly triaged children with English-proficient caretakers. Although inequities in ED care based on language preference exist, little is known about effective interventions to eliminate the disparity. This quality improvement study aimed to eliminate the disparity in wait times and share effective interventions. Methods: A multidisciplinary team incorporating clinicians, professional interpreters, and data analysts utilized quality improvement methodology to introduce early identification of SSLEP children, standardize physician workflow, and optimize the interpreter process. The primary outcome was the length of stay. The secondary outcome was time to the provider. The balancing measures were revisits and non-LEP length of stay and time to the provider. Secondary analyses distinguished between the effect of our QI intervention and secular trends. Results: The mean length of stay for SSLEP children decreased from a mean of 178 to 142 minutes, a 36-minute (20%) decrease. Mean time to provider for SSLEP decreased from 92.8 to 55.5 minutes, a 37-minute improvement (40%). The 72-hour-revisit rates did not increase for SSLEP children throughout the project. Conclusions: We identified feasible interventions to improve wait times for children with SSLEP. Future directions include addressing components of the entire ED visit to decrease the length of stay discrepancies between populations. We hope to extend our findings to benefit all LEP communities.

Practice patterns and perceptions of influenza testing amongst pediatric urgent care providers.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a sensitivity of 50% to 70% the rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) continues to play an important role in clinical decision-making due to its quick turn-around time, high specificity, relative simplicity of use, and low cost. METHODS: A quantitative study using a web-based survey was distributed to 110 members of the Society of Pediatric Urgent Care aimed to assess RIDT use for diagnosis and management of influenza in outpatient pediatric patients. RESULTS: Responses from 61 providers were received. Forty-two percent (95% CI 29.5-54.5%) of respondents report higher confidence in their diagnosis of influenza with the aid of a positive RIDT. 28% of respondents (95% CI 16.6-39.4%) report a higher likelihood of prescribing antiviral medications to low-risk patients if an RIDT is positive than without laboratory confirmation. CONCLUSION: Most pediatric urgent care respondents reported higher confidence in their diagnosis and higher likelihood of prescribing antivirals with a positive RIDT rather than by clinical symptoms alone.

Undertriage for Children With Caregivers Preferring Languages Other Than English.

OBJECTIVES: Undertriage, the underestimation of acuity, can result in delayed care and potential morbidity in the emergency department (ED). Although inequities in ED care based on language preference have been noted, little is known about its association with undertriage. We evaluated for differences in undertriage based on caregiver language preference. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients aged younger than 21 years, triaged as Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level 4 or 5 (nonurgent), to the pediatric ED from January 1, 2019, through January 31, 2021. Indicators of undertriage were defined as hospital admission, significant ED resource use, or return visits with admission. We used logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to measure the association of preferred language with undertriage. RESULTS: Of 114 266 ED visits included in the study, 22 525 (19.8%) represented patients with caregivers preferring languages other than English. These children were more likely to experience undertriage compared with those with caregivers preferring English (3.7% [English] versus 4.6% [Spanish] versus 5.9% [other languages]; Spanish versus English: odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.4] and other languages versus English: OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2). Differences remained after adjusting for sex, insurance, mode of arrival, and clustering by triage nurse (Spanish versus English: adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5) and other languages versus English: adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Children accompanied by caregivers preferring languages other than English are more likely to be undertriaged in the pediatric ED. Efforts to improve the triage process are needed to promote equitable care for this population.

Improving Adherence to Evidence-based Practice for Uncomplicated UTI in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Introduction: Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) are among the more common pediatric bacterial infections. Despite their prevalence, significant variability exists in the treatment duration and antibiotic selection for uUTI. Our first aim was to improve adherence to a three-day course of antibiotic treatment for uUTI in children over 24 months old. Our second aim was to increase the selection of cephalexin in this population. Methods: We conducted a single-center quality improvement study from March 2021 to March 2022. One thousand four hundred thirty-five patients were included across our baseline and intervention periods. We created an order set with embedded discharge prescriptions and followed this with education and provider feedback. The outcome measures for this study were percent of children receiving 3 days of antibiotic treatment and percent of children prescribed cephalexin. In addition, we tracked order set use as a process measure, and 7-day emergency department revisit as a balancing measure. Results: Rates of 3-day prescriptions for uUTI demonstrated special cause variation with an increase from 3% to 44%. Prescription rates of cephalexin for uUTI demonstrated special cause variation with an increase from 49% to 74%. The process measure of order set use improved from 0% to 49% after implementation. No change occurred in 7-day emergency department revisits. Conclusion: We demonstrated improved use of shorter course therapy for uUTI with a first-generation cephalosporin throughout this project without adverse events. We leveraged an order set with embedded discharge prescriptions to achieve our goals.

COVID-19 Result Follow-Up Process in the Pediatric Emergency Department Setting.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic upended the world. As emergency departments and hospitals across the nation and world braced themselves for the surge of this new disease, the emergency department (ED) at Children's National Hospital (CNH) quickly created a process to address surges in patient visits and follow-ups for coronavirus testing. Within 2 wk of the first reported pediatric patient diagnosed with COVID-19 in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area, CNH ED implemented a new comprehensive follow-up process. This article describes the novel process that ensured timely notification of testing results, enabled patients to speak remotely with ED providers, increased patient and staff safety by reducing unnecessary exposures, and suggested a good patient experience. With over 1900 patients discharged pending their COVID-19 results, the program is successful. We anticipate expansion into antibody testing and notification as the pandemic progresses.

Improving Care at Emergency Department Discharge for Pediatric Patients with Anaphylaxis Using a Quality Improvement Framework.

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal systemic reaction that requires prompt recognition and targeted treatment. Despite international consensus and national guidelines, there is often incomplete care for pediatric patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Our institution experienced wide variability in discharge planning for patients with anaphylaxis. The goal of our study was to improve care at ED discharge for pediatric patients with anaphylaxis using a quality improvement framework. The specific aims were to increase the frequency of patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis who receive an anaphylaxis action plan at ED discharge from 0% to 60% and to increase referrals to an allergy clinic from a baseline of 61%-80% between October 2020 and April 2021. Methods: Targeted interventions included revisions to the electronic health record system, forging interdisciplinary partnerships and emphasizing provider education. Outcome measures were the proportion of patients receiving an anaphylaxis action plan and an allergy clinic follow-up. The balancing measure was the ED length of stay. Results: The study showed an increase in anaphylaxis action plans from 0% to 34%. Allergy clinic referral rates improved from 61% to 82% within the same period. The average length of stay of 347 minutes remained unchanged. Conclusions: Revising the discharge instructions to include an anaphylaxis action plan and reinforcing provider behaviors with educational interventions led to an overall improvement in discharge care for patients with anaphylaxis. Future work will focus on electronic health record changes to continue progress in additional clinical settings.

Under-triage: A New Trigger to Drive Quality Improvement in the Emergency Department.

The emergency department (ED) is a care setting with a high risk for medical error. In collaboration with our nursing colleagues, we identified a new trigger, under-triage, and demonstrated how its implementation could detect and reduce medical errors in the ED. Methods: We defined under-triage as patient visits with an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) score of 4 or 5 (ie, low acuity), and the patient was admitted to the hospital during the same visit. We defined mistriage, or medical error, when nurse-physician dyad reviewers determined that a different ESI level should have been assigned based on the information available at triage. A multidisciplinary team used nominal group technique to build consensus on key drivers and outcome metrics for this new trigger. We randomly selected 267 charts for review utilizing the under-triage trigger. Results: Of the 125,457 patients triaged as level 4 or 5 in 2019 and 2020, 1.1% (n = 1,423) were under-triaged. Of the 267 charts reviewed, 127 were categorized as mistriage, making the under-triage's positive predictive value trigger 48%. Reviews took 2-10 minutes per chart. We identified 10 categories of under-triage. Nine themes emerged, with four specific and measurable action items mapped to process and outcome metrics. Conclusions: We identify a new, feasible ED trigger, under-triage, that identifies medical error with a high positive predictive value. We identify process and outcome metrics and interventions to improve triage for future patients.

Reducing Pediatric ED Length of Stay by Reducing Diagnostic Testing: A Discrete Event Simulation Model.

Quality improvement efforts can require significant investment before the system impact of those efforts can be evaluated. We used discrete event simulation (DES) modeling to test the theoretical impact of a proposed initiative to reduce diagnostic testing for low-acuity pediatric emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: We modified an existing DES model, built at another large, urban, academic pediatric ED, to forecast the impact of reducing diagnostic testing rates on mean ED length of stay (LOS). The modified model included local testing rates for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 4 and 5 patients and additional processes defined by local experts. Validation was performed by comparing model output predictions of mean LOS and wait times to actual site-specific data. We determined the goal reduction in diagnostic testing rates using the Achievable Benchmark of Care methodology. Model output mean LOS and wait times, with testing set at benchmark rates, were compared to outputs with testing set at current levels. RESULTS: During validation testing, model output metrics approximated actual clinical data with no statistically significant differences. Compared to model outputs with current testing rates, the mean LOS with testing set at an achievable benchmark was significantly shorter for ESI 4 (difference 19.1 mins [95% confidence interval 12.2, 26.0]) patients. CONCLUSION: A DES model predicted a statistically significant decrease in mean LOS for ESI 4 pediatric ED patients if diagnostic testing is performed at an achievable benchmark rate compared to current rates. DES shows promise as a tool to evaluate the impact of a QI initiative before implementation.

A Multimodal Quality Improvement Curriculum for Pediatric GME Program Directors.

The 2016 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Clinical Learning Environment Review report identified knowledge gaps for quality in the clinical environment. It suggested quality improvement (QI) training is necessary to develop skills to improve health care quality. However, at the authors' institution, there is limited department-level QI mentorship and engagement, thus limiting QI experiences for residents and fellows. The authors developed pediatric graduate medical education program director (PD) proficiency in QI through a fellowship-focused QI project. PDs underwent an 18-month QI curriculum consisting of focused online QI education, a half-day workshop, additional QI didactic sessions, project presentations, and individual QI coaching. QI knowledge in 9 domains and participants' confidence were assessed. Participants' self-perceived confidence and skills increased by at least 20% in most domains. Overall, PDs felt prepared to help with their fellows' future QI projects. Fellowship-focused QI projects and individual coaching were key to course engagement.