Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Australas Psychiatry ; 28(4): 394-400, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484738

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients admitted to mental health services may exhibit behaviours of concern (BOCs) such as aggression, self-harm, absconding and sexual harm. BOCs can lead to restrictive interventions, which have adverse effects on patients, carers and staff. This paper aims to explore the nature and outcome of BOCs within an adult inpatient mental health setting. METHODS: A retrospective audit was conducted at a metropolitan inpatient service between 1 August 2016 and 31 July 2017. The frequency, nature and outcomes of BOC episodes were described and thematic analysis was used to summarise BOC antecedents. RESULTS: A BOC was documented for 179 (18.2%) patients who also showed high rates of drug abuse, homelessness and longer admission. Most self-harm and sexual harm events occurred outside of normal business hours. Medications and verbal de-escalation were commonly used interventions. Episodes of deliberate self-harm were likely to result in patient and staff injury or mechanical restraint, whereas aggression was associated with seclusion. Mental state, care engagement, physiological stress and situational stressor were identified as BOC antecedents. CONCLUSION: Multiple forms of BOCs were experienced with mental state, physical and interpersonal contributors identified. Improving multidisciplinary input into early assessment and treatment of BOC causes is needed to improve safety.


Assuntos
Agressão , Reação de Fuga , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo , Comportamento Sexual , Adulto , Austrália , Auditoria Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 1642, 2023 01 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36717643

RESUMO

Hearing loss has been associated with individual cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and, to a lesser extent, CVD risk metrics. However, these relationships are understudied in clinical populations. We conducted a retrospective study of electronic health records to evaluate the relationship between hearing loss and CVD risk burden. Hearing loss was defined as puretone average (PTA0.5,1,2,4) > 20 dB hearing level (HL). Optimal CVD risk was defined as nondiabetic, nonsmoking, systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 120 and diastolic (D)BP < 80 mm Hg, and total cholesterol < 180 mg/dL. Major CVD risk factors were diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL or statin use. We identified 6332 patients (mean age = 62.96 years; 45.5% male); 64.0% had hearing loss. Sex-stratified logistic regression adjusted for age, noise exposure, hearing aid use, and body mass index examined associations between hearing loss and CVD risk. For males, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and ≥ 2 major CVD risk factors were associated with hearing loss. For females, diabetes, smoking, and ≥ 2 major CVD risk factors were significant risk factors. Compared to those with no CVD risk factors, there is a higher likelihood of hearing loss in patients with ≥ 2 major CVD risk factors. Future research to better understand sex dependence in the hearing loss-hypertension relationship is indicated.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Surdez , Diabetes Mellitus , Perda Auditiva , Hipertensão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Perda Auditiva/complicações , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Pressão Sanguínea , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Surdez/complicações , Colesterol
4.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 32(9): 576-587, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35176801

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Numerous cardiometabolic factors may underlie risk of hearing loss. Modifiable risk factors such as non-optimal blood pressure (BP) are of interest. PURPOSE: To investigate early auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in persons with nonoptimal BP. RESEARCH DESIGN: A cross-sectional nonexperimental study was performed. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifty-two adults (18-55 years) served as subjects. Individuals were classified as having optimal (systolic [S] BP < 120 and diastolic [D] BP < 80 mm Hg, n = 25) or non-optimal BP (SBP ≥=120 or DBP ≥=80 mm Hg or antihypertensive use, n = 27). Thirteen subjects had hypertension (HTN) (SBP ≥130 or DBP ≥80 mm Hg or use of antihypertensives). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Behavioral thresholds from 0.25 to 16 kHz were collected. Threshold auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) were recorded using rarefaction clicks (17.7/second) from 80 dB nHL to wave V threshold. Electrocochleograms were obtained with 90 dB nHL 7.1/second alternating clicks and assessed for summating and compound action potentials (APs). Outcomes were compared via independent samples t tests. Linear mixed effects models for behavioral thresholds and ABR wave latencies were constructed to account for potential confounders. RESULTS: Wave I and III latencies were comparable between optimal and non-optimal BP groups. Wave I was prolonged in hypertensive versus optimal BP subjects at stimulus level 70 dB nHL (p = 0.016). ABR wave V latencies were prolonged in non-optimal BP at stimulus level 80 dB nHL (p = 0.048) and in HTN at levels of 80, 50, and 30 dB nHL (all p < 0.050). DBP was significantly correlated with wave V latency (r = 0.295; p = 0.039). No differences in ABR amplitudes were observed between optimal and non-optimal BP subjects. Electrocochleographic study showed statistically comparable action and summating potential amplitudes between optimal and non-optimal BP subjects. AP latencies were also similar between the groups. Analysis using a set baseline amplitude of 0 µV showed that hypertensive subjects had higher summating (p = 0.038) and AP (p = 0.047) amplitudes versus optimal BP subjects; AP latencies were comparable. CONCLUSION: Elevated BP and more specifically, HTN was associated with subtle AEP abnormalities. This study provides preliminary evidence that nonoptimal BP, and more specifically HTN, may be related to auditory neural dysfunction; larger confirmatory studies are warranted.


Assuntos
Audiometria de Resposta Evocada , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico , Estimulação Acústica , Adulto , Limiar Auditivo/fisiologia , Pressão Sanguínea , Estudos Transversais , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico/fisiologia , Humanos
5.
J Endocrinol ; 251(1): 111-123, 2021 09 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34370682

RESUMO

Supplementation with precursors of NAD has been shown to prevent and reverse insulin resistance, mitochondrial dysfunction, and liver damage in mouse models of diet-induced obesity. We asked whether the beneficial effects of supplementation with the NAD precursor nicotinamide riboside (NR) are dependent on mouse strain. We compared the effects of NR supplementation on whole-body energy metabolism and mitochondrial function in mildly obese C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice, two commonly used strains to investigate metabolism. Male C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or standard chow with or without NR supplementation for 8 weeks. Body and organ weights, glucose tolerance, and metabolic parameters as well as mitochondrial O2 flux in liver and muscle fibers were assessed. We found that NR supplementation had no influence on body or organ weight, glucose metabolism or hepatic lipid accumulation, energy expenditure, or metabolic flexibility but increased mitochondrial respiration in soleus muscle in both mouse strains. Strain-dependent differences were detected for body and fat depot weight, fasting blood glucose, hepatic lipid accumulation, and energy expenditure. We conclude that, in mild obesity, NR supplementation does not alter metabolic phenotype in two commonly used laboratory mouse strains.


Assuntos
Metabolismo Energético/efeitos dos fármacos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Piridínio/uso terapêutico , Animais , Respiração Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Dieta Hiperlipídica , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Intolerância à Glucose/prevenção & controle , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos/efeitos dos fármacos , Fígado/metabolismo , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Niacinamida/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/metabolismo
6.
Am J Audiol ; 29(3): 303-317, 2020 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510971

RESUMO

Purpose Cannabis is widely used for medicinal and recreational purposes. Studies have evaluated its health benefits and consequences, although there is limited work on its effects on the auditory system. In this exploratory study, we evaluate the effects of cannabis smoking on early auditory evoked potentials. Method We investigated auditory brainstem response (ABR) and electrocochleography waveforms in 18 cannabis smokers (44% women, 54% men; M age = 23.06 years, range: 21-28 years) and 19 nonsmoker controls (63% women, 37% men; M age = 23.74 years, range: 21-33 years). Threshold ABRs were recorded using rarefaction clicks at a rate of 17.7/s from 80 dB nHL to Wave V threshold. Resulting amplitudes and latencies for Waves I, III, and V were compared via independent-samples t tests. Electrocochleograms obtained with 90 dB nHL (7.1/s) alternating clicks were assessed for summating and compound action potentials, which were compared between groups using independent-samples t tests. Results ABR Wave I amplitudes were significantly lower in smokers (M = 0.14 µV, SD = 0.11) compared to nonsmokers (M = 0.21 µV, SD = 0.10, p = .039) at 80 dB nHL. Wave V latencies were significantly delayed in smokers at 80 dB nHL. Wave I and III latencies did not differ significantly between the two groups. Summating potential/compound action potential ratios were significantly elevated in smokers (M = 0.30, SD = 0.04) versus nonsmokers (M = 0.21, SD = 0.05, p = .042). Conclusion We identified significant differences in electrophysiological outcomes between cannabis smokers and nonsmokers. Cannabis smoking may have a subtle neurotoxic effect on the auditory system. Larger confirmatory studies are warranted.


Assuntos
Audiometria de Resposta Evocada , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico/fisiologia , Fumar Maconha/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA