National Stroke Registry Programme in India for Surveillance and Research: Design and Methodology.

The burden of stroke is increasing, and India lacks comparable long-term data on stroke incidence and mortality. Disease surveillance using a registry model can provide long-term data on stroke for linking with public health interventions in stroke prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation. The objectives of the National Stroke Registry Programme (NSRP), India, are to generate reliable data on the incidence of first-ever stroke events in defined populations through a population-based stroke registry (PBSR) and to describe the patterns of care and outcomes of patients with stroke in different treatment settings through a hospital-based stroke registry (HBSR). Continuous systematic collection on a standardized format of diagnostic, treatment, and outcome information on stroke events in persons of defined population (PBSR) and those who attend hospitals (HBSR) is conducted through active data abstraction from review of records from all health facilities and imaging centres that cater to stroke patients. Data are ICD coded, verified, and completed by obtaining survival status of registered patients. IT tools are used for data collection,management and analysis. The NSRP shall establish a standardized stroke surveillance system that would reliably measure stroke incidence, subtypes, treatment patterns, complications, disability, case fatality, and survival. This evidence shall inform health planning of stroke interventions and control activities. It would facilitate improvement in stroke services to improve quality of care and outcomes of stroke. A thrust for research on stroke would be encouraged based on evidence-based hypothesis generation.

Network meta-analysis to compare VenaSeal with other superficial venous therapies for chronic venous insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared different interventions for chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) management, but mixed comparison of these interventions is lacking. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare VenaSeal closure system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn) with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), mechanochemical ablation, sclerotherapy, and surgery for management of CVI to achieve anatomic success (complete closure of treated vein within 6 months after intervention) as the primary outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol-5 Dimension, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), pain scores, and adverse events as secondary outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of journal databases was undertaken, and RCTs between January 1996 and September 2018 comparing different treatment options were included. Risk of bias and quality of publications were assessed using the Cochrane bias tool; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for study selection and reporting. Twenty RCTs comprising 4570 patients were analyzed. Data for anatomic success, VCSS, HRQoL, pain score, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed using mixed treatment comparison in a network meta-analysis. A Bayesian fixed or random effects model was selected for analysis. Rank probability graphs were generated for various treatments and corresponding ranks obtained to estimate their probability of being best. Relative treatment effects were calculated in terms of log odds ratios for anatomic success and adverse events. Mean difference was calculated for VCSS, HRQoL, and pain score. RESULTS: For the primary outcome measure (anatomic success), VenaSeal system had the highest probability of being ranked first (P = .980); RFA was ranked second (P = .365), EVLA third (P = .397), surgery fourth (P = .290), mechanochemical ablation fifth (P = .695), and sclerotherapy sixth (P = .982). For secondary outcome measures, VenaSeal system ranked third for VCSS (P = .332), fifth for EuroQol-5 Dimension (P = .420), and third for Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (P = .300). Although, VenaSeal system was slightly inferior to some of the other interventions for HRQoL, the 95% credible interval of log odds ratio indicated insufficient evidence for any concrete conclusion to be drawn. VenaSeal system ranked first in reduction of postoperative pain score from baseline (P = .690) and was lowest in occurrence of adverse events (P = .650). Odds of occurrence of adverse events was 3.3 times in the sclerotherapy arm, 2.7 times in the EVLA arm, 1.6 times with surgery, and 1.1 times with RFA vs VenaSeal system arm. CONCLUSIONS: VenaSeal system is a promising therapeutic option for anatomic success at 6 months, with fewer occurrences of adverse events (wound and groin infection, pulmonary embolism) in CVI patients compared with other interventions in this study. Additional economic analysis including cost-effectiveness analysis would provide interesting perspectives on real-world insights to patients, payers, and providers.

Tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment practices in private sector: Implementation study in an Indian city.

SETTING: Implementation study in private health facilities in an Indian metropolis. OBJECTIVES: Improve Tuberculosis (TB) care by private practitioners (PPs). METHODS: PPs from a defined city area were imparted short training in TB care and linkages made with public facilities; subsequent practices were recorded. RESULTS: Of 364 presumptive TB patient records, 70 (19.3%) did not conform to its definition. Of the conforming, 174 (59.2%) had presumptive pulmonary TB (PTB), 53 (18%) presumptive extra-pulmonary (EPTB) and 67 (24%) had both. Of conforming presumptive PTB, most underwent Chest X-ray and sputum examination in private laboratories. Tissue based diagnostics were not advised for most presumptive EPTB patients. Of 101 cases diagnosed with TB, 82% were new, 23% known diabetic and 4.7% human immune deficiency virus (HIV) reactive out of 64 tested. Most were notified and initiated treatment within 15 days of diagnosis. One-fourth was prescribed standard treatment regimen and treatment was not directly observed for most. One third was initial defaulters or lost during treatment; 62% of PTB and 46% EPTB cases initiated on treatment in private were successfully treated. Of successfully treated PTB cases, 61% had undergone follow-up sputum examination. CONCLUSION: Much intensified support mechanisms are needed to improve TB care in private sector.

Knowledge of private practitioners of Bangalore city in diagnosis, treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis and compliance with case notification.

One hundred and twenty-nine qualified private practitioners (PPs) were assessed on their knowledge in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), treatment of a new drug sensitive PTB case and practices of case notification, using semi-structured questionnaire. About 20% had adequate knowledge of diagnosis, 29% of treatment regimen, 54% the need for Direct Observation Treatment and 57% about role of sputum smear examination in monitoring treatment response. Of 85 (68%) PPs who had diagnosed any TB case during last two years, 54 (64%) had practised notification. These findings suggest the need for upgrading knowledge of PPs in TB diagnosis, treatment and notification.