Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of open versus closed wedge osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) has become increasingly popular as an alternative to lateral closing wedge osteotomy for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. The present systematic review was conducted to provide an objective analysis of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes following previous knee osteotomy (medial opening wedge vs. lateral closing wedge). METHODS: A literature search of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library database) was made, in addition to manual search of major orthopaedic journals. The methodological quality of each of the studies was assessed on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Effective Practice and Organization of Care. A total of ten studies were included in the review. There were eight studies with Level IV and two studies with Level III evidence. RESULTS: Eight studies reported clinical and radiologic scores. Comparative studies between TKA following medial opening and lateral closing wedge HTO did not demonstrate statistically significant clinical and radiologic differences. The revision rates were similar. However, more technical issues during TKA surgery after lateral closing wedge HTO were mentioned than the medial open wedge group. The quadriceps snip, tibial tubercle osteotomy, and lateral soft tissue release were more frequently needed in the lateral closing wedge HTO group. In addition, because of loss of proximal tibia bone geometry in the lateral closing wedge HTO group, concerns such as tibia stem impingement in the lateral tibial cortex was noted. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review suggests that TKA after medial opening and lateral closing wedge HTO showed similar performance. Clinical and radiologic outcome including revision rates did not statistically differ from included studies. However, there are more surgical technical concerns in TKA conversion from lateral closing wedge HTO than from the medial opening wedge HTO group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Clinical Outcome of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Remnant Preservation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical outcomes in patients who underwent posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with and without remnant preservation. METHODS: A search of the literature was performed with the established medical databases Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register. Two authors screened the selected articles for title, abstract, and full text in accordance with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language articles on isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury; clinical trials with a clear description of surgical technique; outcome evaluation using a well-defined knee score, arthrometry, and posterior stress radiography; follow-up longer than 2 years; and a Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) of 65 points or greater. The methodologic quality of all articles was assessed by 2 authors according to the CMS. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included, with a mean CMS of 78.9 points (SD, 5.37 points). There was no direct comparative study between remnant-preserving PCLR and standard PCLR. At final follow-up, the knees of 72% to 100% of patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR and 41% to 95% of patients who underwent standard PCLR were rated as normal or nearly normal on the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee assessment. Patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR showed an increase of 16.4 to 47 points in Lysholm scores, and patients who underwent standard PCLR showed an increase of 22 to 29 points. The ranges of mean postoperative side-to-side differences on KT-1000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) testing were 0.7 to 2.8 mm in patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR and 1 to 3.5 mm in patients who underwent standard PCLR. The ranges of mean postoperative side-to-side differences on stress radiography were 2.2 to 5 mm in patients who underwent remnant-preserving PCLR and 4.7 to 6 mm in patients who underwent standard PCLR. CONCLUSIONS: All studies on PCLR with remnant preservation showed satisfactory outcomes despite using numerous surgical techniques, graft types, intervals from injury to surgery, and follow-up periods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II through IV studies.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an autograft or allograft for patellar dislocation: a systematic review.

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to review the use of an allograft or autograft in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Various electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published from January 2000 to September 2017 that evaluated clinical outcomes of MPFL reconstruction using an autograft or allograft. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessments were performed based on Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. RESULTS: The study of 21 autografts and one allograft was included in this review. Although direct comparative studies were unavailable, the Kujala score and subjective results were reported in the majority of these studies. While the use of an autograft for MPFL reconstruction yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes with few perioperative complications, no new outcome has been drawn from the use of allografts. CONCLUSIONS: Although many studies have shown favorable clinical results for MPFL reconstruction using an autograft, the clinical results of MPFL reconstruction using an allograft have not yet been sufficient to achieve meaningful clinical results due to low levels of evidence. Direct comparisons were not conducted because there were very few studies on allografts; thus, further research in this area should be performed in the future.

Is Bone Grafting Necessary in Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy? A Meta-Analysis of Radiological Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Bone grafting in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the radiological outcomes of OWHTO with bone graft (autogenous, allogenous, and synthetic bone graft) and those without bone graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Register of Studies databases were searched using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria for radiological studies involving OWHTO with bone graft and without bone graft groups. All reported delayed union, nonunion and correction loss were analyzed. Data were searched from the time period of January 2000 through July 2014. In addition, a modified Coleman methodology score (CMS) system was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with a mean CMS value of 77 (range, 61 to 85 score) were included. In total, 1,841 patients underwent OWHTO using 4 different procedures for bone graft: autobone graft (n=352), allobone graft (n=547), synthetic bone graft (n=541) and no bone graft (n=401). There was a similar tendency for delayed union, nonunion and correction loss rate among the osteotomy space filling methods. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed there was a similar tendency for radiological union and correction maintenance among patients undergoing OWHTO regardless of the type of bone in all of the studies. However, the currently available evidence is not sufficient to strongly support the superiority of OWHTO with bone graft to OWHTO without bone graft.